This was posted 2 years 5 months 10 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Canon PowerShot G9X Mark II Camera $196 in-Store at Officeworks

1300
Canon PowerShot G9X Mark II Camera $196 in-Store at Officeworks
View Image
rye on 02/01/2022 - 14:21 files.ozbargain.com.au (9082 clicks)
Last edited 02/01/2022 - 17:12

Saw this camera on clearance at the Windsor, QLD store while on the hunt for a new camera. They only had 1 in stock which I brought but other stores in Brisbane (Adelaide Street and Garden City) also have it in stock and on clearance for the same price. The staff member noted that cost price was $500. HN have these for $698.00.

I noticed that when the staff member couldn’t find the product on their system by keying in the product code - they could only find it by scanning the clearance ticket, so not sure how successful you would be by phoning a store, best to go in store.

Edit: Staff member said this was a national clearance.

Edit edit: thanks to Coops1 - stores with available stock can be found here: https://nrby.in/officeworks/cag9xiibk

Electrical & Electronics Camera Canon

Related Stores

Officeworks
Officeworks

closed Comments

  • UsernameChecksIn on 02/01/2022 - 14:27
    +2

    Great clearance find

  • adrianhughes1998 on 02/01/2022 - 14:35
    +2

    Decent price for this type of sensor. Had a g7x mk ii and it was ok for a while.

    Needed better for low light though so moved to Olympus mirrorless

  • BrewerHaHa on 02/01/2022 - 14:48
    +3

    Anyone know if any other OW has this?

  • Phoebus on 02/01/2022 - 14:49
    -8

    No HDR. No AVC. "1080P video"… no deal.

    • henno on 02/01/2022 - 14:58
      +21

      Got a locally-available alternative with those features for $196?

    • Jenny Death on 02/01/2022 - 15:00
      +3

      What's wrong with 1080p?
      Seems to take good photos for the price https://www.flickr.com/groups/3542179@N24/pool/

      • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 15:30
        +11

        1" CMOS. Superior hardware and phones simply cant compare. Pixel count can be meaningless beyond 12MP. In fact, not sure whether is it a good idea to cram so many pixels into a small sensor.

        I used to have a G1X 1.5" in additional to the 5D MKii. Great for travelling.

        A few things phones cant do
        - surperior low light shooting
        - long exposure
        - bokeh (not software generated 'blur')
        - RAW

        $200 is an absolute bargain.

        Downside of this camera
        - not wide enough being 28mm eqv
        - slow lens f2.0-4.9

        • Korban Dallas on 02/01/2022 - 22:18

          My phone can shoot raw as well as long exposure.

          Also dark mode is pretty frigging good.

          Most phones probably not.

          But size of CMOS sensor can't compare. Totally agree with you on that one.

      • plmko on 02/01/2022 - 15:41
        +7

        Haha there's always one of these numpties when a camera deal pops up.

      • tacos4brekkie on 02/01/2022 - 15:42
        +1

        Dude really thought he could get away with comparing a smartphone camera and a camera with a dedicator sensor, lens and optics, smh.

      • 9839002 on 02/01/2022 - 21:45
        +1

        Lens.
        Sensor physical size.

  • A female dog on 02/01/2022 - 14:55
    +1

    Managed to snag one. Thanks OP.

    Looks like a decent camera. We used to own the G7x mark 2. This seems… comparable?

    • adrianhughes1998 on 02/01/2022 - 15:03

      Bit worse actually. From memory the numbering scheme was backwards so g9 line was bottom, g7 up, g1 top etc.

      • wetwork on 02/01/2022 - 15:21

        I had a G2 in 2002. Then it went to G3 etc.
        After a while I couldn't keep track of their numbering system.

    • CyberMurning on 02/01/2022 - 15:04

      From where?

      • Muzeeb on 02/01/2022 - 15:47

        Officeworks is my guess

  • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 14:58
    +9

    Where did you bring it exactly?

    • THICKnSLOW on 02/01/2022 - 15:08
      +3

      Apparently brung it here

  • Jimothy Wongingtons on 02/01/2022 - 14:59

    Classic

  • Coops1 on 02/01/2022 - 15:05
    +34

    Stock in a few places. none in tassie :( https://nrby.in/officeworks/cag9xiibk

    • em0r33 on 02/01/2022 - 15:08
      +4

      Thanks for sharing that link! Never seen that site before

      • Coops1 on 02/01/2022 - 15:17
        +6

        Extremely handy for deals like this. Can’t remember who posted it originally, but it is a ripper

    • ganymede on 02/01/2022 - 16:22
      +1

      Thanks for sharing!

    • bobbified on 02/01/2022 - 18:02

      How often is that meant to update? I got one from a store (just over an hour ago) that showed had one and, right now, it still shows that there is one.

      • Coops1 on 02/01/2022 - 18:18
        +1

        There is a time at the bottom of the webpage. Last updated 4.30 AEDT

        • bobbified on 02/01/2022 - 18:33

          ah right - thanks!

    • TeddyBear on 02/01/2022 - 18:23

      Called most of the major stores in VIC less than an hour after the deal went up. Either had no stock or couldn't find the product even when searching the name on their system. Even Shepparton came up with nothing.

    • BluebirdV on 03/01/2022 - 06:17

      Says price is $246.

  • kampret on 02/01/2022 - 15:11

    Can this be used as a webcam using EOS Webcam Utility?

    • IceCreamBandit on 02/01/2022 - 15:33
      +1

      Apparently not

      • Save Medicare on 02/01/2022 - 16:06

        There's one near me, but I think I'll hold off since can't be used as webcam

    • Diji1 on 02/01/2022 - 16:48
      +1

      No but apparently it can do clean HDMI output. HDMI out to capture card is higher quality for the same camera than using EOS utility.

      However, I am not sure whether it can do continuous operation without overheating, so it still may not be suitable to use as a webcam.

  • MoleManMike on 02/01/2022 - 15:19

    Still worth buying at $246? Found a store with 1 in stock but they are refusing to match the $196 price

    • 333 on 02/01/2022 - 15:27
      +2

      Just for info, which store is that?

      • Muzeeb on 02/01/2022 - 15:48
        +1

        Officeworks

        • Josh1 on 02/01/2022 - 17:12

          Cannington WA has 2

          • banana365 on 02/01/2022 - 18:54

            @Josh1: No, apparently they sold 1 earlier today and that was the last one (I'm here now)

  • SS625 on 02/01/2022 - 15:42
    +1

    released in 2017. I reckon top phones take better photos

    • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 15:45
      +3

      Snapshot - possibly
      Photography - no

      • SS625 on 02/01/2022 - 15:52
        +2

        I wouldn't use this camera for photography

        • easternculture on 02/01/2022 - 16:08
          +5

          What would you use it for?
          A paper weight?

        • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 16:15
          +3

          Then a few lessons in photography might help. Such as basics of composition, and basic camera controls.

    • coxymla on 02/01/2022 - 15:51

      I agree, I bought a ~$400 point & shoot a while back and the photos look garbage compared to a phone.

      Cameras can only beat phones at low light and superzoom.

      • easternculture on 02/01/2022 - 16:07

        This is a $600+ camera so may not be too much garbage

      • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 16:13
        +2

        Point and shot, mostly garbage. This is one of Canon's renowned G serie with large sensor and full manual control.

        I had a 1.5" G1X alongside a 5Dii some year back. Excellent for climbing and able to do some pretty decent long exposure shots.

        Phones simply cant compare with superior hardware on proper cameras.

      • OrderedChaos on 02/01/2022 - 17:09
        +4

        Must agree. Bought two point and shoots in the last 12 months for the kids. One from Panasonic (TZ90) and Canon (Ixus 190). Both are horrible compared to the photos and videos from a Galaxy S9 not to mention the S21. I researched and couldn't find anything vaguely decent for the kids… so opted for those rather than having them walk around with cellphones.

        Regarding the two point and shoot cameras we own - they're not better for low light but are ok at zoom. Lowlight is horrific! Shutter speeds drop so badly that optical image stabilization doesn't help. My little one can't get a stable shot indoors. Arrrrrg. Outdoors are ok. Oh and white balance sucks eggs!!!

        Nuf said. Really disappointed with the state of point and shoot cameras. They've completely lagged cellphones.

        • nephilim on 02/01/2022 - 19:20

          I took my Ixus 220 to the birth of my child, doctor asked for my phone after being frustrated at the load times between photos, but the camera did great historically, lasted me 10 odd years.

          • OrderedChaos on 02/01/2022 - 21:23

            @nephilim: 😆… can see how that would be… come on… faster mate… 😂. Recall filming during my little one's cesarian delivery. Was given very specific do not do's 😂. Damn that was more stressful than the delivery 🤣.

      • supersabroso on 02/01/2022 - 21:13

        Yes, all cameras without 1" sensors are garbage. Gotta look out for that 1" image sensor (minimum). This one is a good one with a 1" sensor and is far superior to any phone camera. However, it does look like the 1" sensors might finally be coming out to the next generation smart phones, this could be a game changer and make a dedicated camera obsolete.

        • coxymla on 02/01/2022 - 21:30

          I'm sure the sensor is technically superior to a phone sensor, but my point is that the images are going to look worse.

          • ihfree on 02/01/2022 - 23:14
            +2

            @coxymla: … with an unskilled user. Your phone does post-processing automatically. An image from a camera has a lot more room for improvement.

            Depending on the types of photos you're taking, that may not matter to you. I take most photos on my phone and am happy with the results for their purpose.

      • frowny on 02/01/2022 - 21:55

        Ricoh GRI/II/III would absolutely roflstomp a phone

        • coxymla on 02/01/2022 - 22:37
          +1

          Ah yes, the GR3, where the famously celebrated camera company "Ricoh" tries to sell a point&shoot camera for $1300.

          The GR1/2 is 9 years old, I don't know why you bring them up.

          • frowny on 02/01/2022 - 23:58

            @coxymla: Even 9 years old it would absolutely ROFLSTOMP an iPhone, Pixel or Samsung.

            Source: Have GR II/III, and iPhone 12 Max and a 21 Ultra (work).

            If 'brands' excite you, then look away in shock horror that a Ricoh (owned by Pentax lmao) doesn't fit your definition of a good tool. If a 'good' photo is one that had sharpness and HDR cranked to the tits, with fake blurring that makes someone's hair look like a halo around them then that's fine too lmao.

            Just watch MKBHD's blind smartphone brackets and buy a Pocophone

      • ihfree on 02/01/2022 - 22:59

        Lol. A quality camera will beat a phone every time in every condition… with a skilled user… and post processing. A raw file captures more data and can be better processed beyond what comes out of a camera. Real bokeh beats fake bokeh.

        For the average user, phones now are more than good enough. Software that backs cameras in phones is amazing. Computational photography means photos look great without any work.

      • mrhatken on 03/01/2022 - 12:08
        +1

        Important to understand that modern phones have synthetic images - a lot of AI is (and simple algorithms are) used to make the image look better. Cameras are more natural, more real if you like, although, of course, there is no such thing as a real image.

    • 9839002 on 02/01/2022 - 21:46

      Keep using your phone then

  • Bluering48 on 02/01/2022 - 15:54

    I have the G1X Mark II, how superiour is the G9X Mark II?

    • Bluering48 on 02/01/2022 - 16:02
      +1

      Quick search find:
      Canon G9 X II: 20 MP | 1″ (13.2 x 8.8 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor
      Canon G1 X II: 13 MP | 1.5″ (18.7 x 14 mm) CMOS Sensor

      I guess my GIX MII sensor is wider, so it is still a keeper.

      • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 16:18

        G1X should have quicker lense too. G5X has larger aperture, but smaller sensor than G1X.

  • easternculture on 02/01/2022 - 16:02
    +3

    Thanks OP.
    Grabbed one at officeworks punchbowl

    They have one left

  • [Deactivated] on 02/01/2022 - 16:24

    Should pair with one of these 240$ brand new. Used ones should be well under 200

    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/232400227445

  • Miii on 02/01/2022 - 16:27

    any recommendations for where to purchase good value waterproof casings for these?

    • Miii on 02/01/2022 - 16:28

      they seem to be around $200….

    • PlasticSpaceman on 02/01/2022 - 16:51
      +1

      FWIW I'd consider getting something designed to be rugged and water resistant eg the Lumix FT30 can be found for under $200. Usually much easier to use under water, in snow, etc than something in a case. Image quality may suffer a little in comparison, although waterproof cases themselves can have issues with condensation etc impacting on the final image.

      • Miii on 02/01/2022 - 16:58

        thanks

        • belongsinforums on 02/01/2022 - 17:37
          +1

          I had an olympus tough camera. Dropped it in the ocean. washed up on the beach hours later and retrieved it. Still worked

          • PlasticSpaceman on 02/01/2022 - 17:59

            @belongsinforums: Yep - I have one of those somewhere…. it replaced an older Sony that was brilliant (frankly better images than the Olympus) but the kids broke the battery flap. Speaking of which, always make sure that all the doors/seals are clean of hairs or dirt etc - I've done a bit of underwater photography (I also have a Nikon AW1) and always prefer to err on the side of caution and - so far - have never lost a camera due to water damage. :-)

    • BusMan247 on 02/01/2022 - 18:37

      Just use your iPhone or Galaxy which is probably already waterproof

      • taki on 02/01/2022 - 21:41
        +1

        This <$200 camera has much lower financial when damaged with water than $2,000 of the phones you mentioned. They are not completely waterproof & no warranty if damaged by water. You cannot unlock iPhone underwater with the face. It takes time for the water to damage the phone. Don't film underwater without special case other than for experiment.
        https://youtu.be/Lv1kofMtpFs?t=560

      • Trishool on 03/01/2022 - 12:18

        Generally not waterproof from sea water. Read the fine print for your phone.

  • Ausperleo on 02/01/2022 - 16:29
    +1

    Thanks, OP, grabbed one from OW Joondalup, they have 4 left.

  • beezlebub9 on 02/01/2022 - 16:39
    +2

    Thanks, good deal

    2 left at east vic park WA. Just ask at the front counter

  • AliKay on 02/01/2022 - 17:07
    +1

    Thanks op… Bought one from Coburg for my son's birthday who specifically asked for a camera 🙂

    I think this was the last one available with them

    • OrderedChaos on 02/01/2022 - 17:13
      +1

      Lucky you. I called Kew East, who were showing stock. Apparently was caller 5 😆😆. None in stock.

      • AliKay on 02/01/2022 - 17:20
        +3

        They said I called 4 seconds before another caller and after checking logs who called first they reserved it for me

  • Hugh G Rection on 02/01/2022 - 17:11
    +1

    sweet, thank you. got this for my kid so she can learn with this camera before i step her up to a mirrorless or dslr later.

    • belongsinforums on 02/01/2022 - 17:35
      +3

      Lucky kid. I learned on a Gameboy camera and disposables

      • Hugh G Rection on 02/01/2022 - 18:44
        +2

        she earned it, pretty good kid. straight A student, listens, helps her siblings, etc…

        she makes me nervous when she uses my cameras, lol. i shoot a 5dm4 (portrait), 7dm2 (action), and a m6m2 (travel). so when she gets good, i will give my cameras to her so i have an excuse to get new cameras, lol. win win. probably going to get an eos r next.

  • omblygombly on 02/01/2022 - 18:15

    Just Googled the camera and found it's 5 years old. A complete noob to these cameras and just wondering how this holds up against something newer in the $600 ballpark ?

    • hypie on 02/01/2022 - 18:47

      This camera has a 1 inch cmos sensor. Although they have improved over time (sensitivity etc) this is still larger than most cameras in that ballpark. If you wanted a current model 1 inch cmos sensor. You would be looking at $600+.

      Compare it to a Sony Rx100 m3 etc. I still use this camera… (has to be 5+ years old now too).

      This is a bargain.

      You can learn how aperture, shutter speed etc relate adequately on a camera such as this.

    • belongsinforums on 02/01/2022 - 18:48
      -5

      Imo if you're half serious about learning photography, get a mirrorless camera. Google is your friend regarding recommendations within your budget

      • netjock on 02/01/2022 - 19:00
        +4

        Mirrorless isn't a guarantee of quality or skills boost.

        • belongsinforums on 02/01/2022 - 20:31
          -1

          I went from several p and s to an olympus mirrorless. Learned how to adjust aperture and shutter speed. Learned how to focus. I did say to Google for body recommendations for more up to date information

  • ChrisPro on 02/01/2022 - 19:44

    Hmm… no clean HDMI out from what I read.
    Can anyone confirm?

  • dec1an on 02/01/2022 - 21:38

    Bargain. Bona fide

  • oadvdotcom on 02/01/2022 - 22:51

    mobile phone camera compare to this. I got insta one r too and happy.

  • syousef on 02/01/2022 - 23:57
    +2

    Review sucks

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-powershot-g9-x-mark-i…

    "As you've probably gathered by now, the G9 X II is let down by its lens, JPEG processing and battery life that requires buying at least one spare. If you're set on a Canon, moving up to the PowerShot G7 X II is a smart idea, assuming that you have an extra $200 available. The Sony RX100 and RX100 II are also worth consideration, though we think that Canon offers a better user experience."

  • nson on 03/01/2022 - 13:05

    Worth noting that you can't use this as a live webcam either

    • rye on 03/01/2022 - 15:06

      Didn’t realise that this was a sought after feature with a point and shoot camera lol

      • Jenny Death on 03/01/2022 - 15:13
        +1

        Lot of people looking for a good WFH solution, streaming or starting an only bargains account. Points out how garbage most of the webcam sector is.

        • rye on 03/01/2022 - 19:54

          Yeah agree the webcam sector is overpriced crap

      • nson on 04/01/2022 - 14:47

        I don't buy single purpose appliances, unless they are really good at the one thing they do.

  • MeagerDollarBucks on 03/01/2022 - 16:11
    +2

    Thanks OP, picked up the Panasonic TZ80 for $131 from OW Windsor after seeing your photo.
    JB selling for $449 so it's an absolute steal in my eyes.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join