• expired

Omen Transcend 31.5 Inch UHD 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitor - Omen Transcend 32 $1259.10 Delivered @ HP

130
Omen Transcend 31.5 Inch UHD 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitor - Omen Transcend 32 $1259.10 Delivered @ HP
Go to Deal
Cashback
MayhemVC on 11/11/2025 - 02:04 hp.com (295 clicks)
Last edited 11/11/2025 - 13:27 by 1 other user
FRENZY

I picked up one of these about a year ago as a dual purpose gaming and productivity monitor. Very good monitor.

Overview
Experience amazing visuals and ultrafast gameplay with the OMEN Transcend 32 OLED Gaming Monitor. Play and create like never before with a QD-OLED, 4K UHD, color accurate display that offers a 240 Hz refresh rate and .03ms response time. USB-C with 140W power delivery and OMEN Gear Switch enables you to seamlessly flow between gaming and working, making this a gamer's best friend and a boss's worst nightmare.

Unlock Peak Performance
Feel the power with a captivating QD-OLED, 4K UHD display that delivers an unreal 240 Hz refresh rate and .03ms response time so you can play to your potential.

Marvel at Hyperrealism
Replicate realism with a near infinite contrast ratio and VESA DisplayHDR™ True Black 400 giving you inkier blacks and vibrant colors.

Transcend Gaming and Creating
Easily switch between two devices with OMEN Gear Switch. One cable gives you 140W power delivery, data and video, and it has audio tuned by HyperX.

We're in this Together
It matters. With 100% recyclable packaging solutions, at least 80% recycled plastic content, and recycled materials on the various parts, we are in this together.

240 Hz Refresh Rate
Stunning QD-OLED, 4K UHD display delivering 240 Hz refresh rate and .03ms response time.
With VESA DisplayHDR™ True Black 400 replicate realism with inkier blacks and vibrant colors.
Easily switch between devices with OMEN Gear Switch with 140W power delivery and audio tuned by HyperX.

This is part of Click Frenzy deals for 2025
Computing 31.5inch Click Frenzy Computer Peripheral HP OLED Monitor UHD Monitor

Related Stores

HP Australia
HP Australia

Comments

Search through all the comments in this post.
  • GrumpyGandalf on 11/11/2025 - 02:17

    I don't understand how the RRP is justified when a similar product (although with slightly less offering) such as the alienware monitor exists for half the cost.

    • kanu666 on 11/11/2025 - 08:48

      hm, Alienware 4k 32" RRP is 1999 and it goes on same for about the same 1300ish

    • cozmo on 11/11/2025 - 08:49

      I agree, OLED's in general have dropped dramatically in the last 12 months, so I think the RRP of this screen has not yet reflected that move in the market.

    • Trip on 11/11/2025 - 11:53
      +2

      Where are you seeing a 32" 4k 240hz Oled monitor for $650?

      • heef on 11/11/2025 - 14:01

        Yeah 1440p 27 QD-OLED can be had for just under $600. 32" 4K is at least $1000

      • GrumpyGandalf on 11/11/2025 - 18:13

        I don't understand how the RRP is justified when a similar product (although with slightly less offering) such as the alienware monitor exists for half the cost (of the rrp, but adding this would be redundant you would only need to simply read as I had written).

        Actually had the Alienware 27 4K QD-OLED Gaming Monitor - AW2725Q (RRP is $950) in mind as I recently purchased it. Yes it is not the 32" but prices on the market seem pathetically arbitrary at the moment, which was more my point. The market doing it's supply demand scams and such, all of it is too much. And products like qd-oleds need to have a reasonable pricing points instead of it feeling like a kid with ADHD is randomly selecting pricing points. Too much bs going on (see ram inflation etc). None of it follows ACCC protocol and it's annoying to see no discussion about it in a forum where people are supposedly meant to have a handle on the market.

        • Big L on 11/11/2025 - 19:48

          You bought it anyway, so voted with your cash. Discussion is pointless.

          • GrumpyGandalf on 11/11/2025 - 20:04

            @Big L: Discussion is important because I refuse to allow my fellow humans to be ragdolled by predatory pricing trends. Just because you have no backbone doesn't mean I can't help you stand.

            • Big L on 11/11/2025 - 21:20

              @GrumpyGandalf: Buying it was the lack of backbone as you supported the supposed predatory pricing.

              • GrumpyGandalf on 11/11/2025 - 22:38

                @Big L: I know you have to be trolling but you're doing it in a really autistic way man. I bought the alienware.

        • MayhemVC on 11/11/2025 - 22:11

          I agree that the RRP is nonsense but having a quick look at 32" 4K 240Hz OLED monitors would indicate that the current price is competitive:
          https://www.umart.com.au/pc-parts/peripherals/monitors/oled-…

          • GrumpyGandalf on 11/11/2025 - 22:41

            @MayhemVC: Not claiming it isnt just saying the whole RRP inflation trend is getting tiring. It's predatory pricing for less informed buyers. RRP isn't supposed to be original retail price it's supposed to be the recommended retail price. It's made to give the consumer an idea of the actual shelf value.

            Since I've started a business I've grown tired of seeing such pathetic and immoral behaviours of major corps. I don't understand how we can be so irresponsible as humans. Any form of capitalism will never work if we don't keep things in check.

            • MayhemVC on 11/11/2025 - 23:41

              @GrumpyGandalf: I'm not sure I follow what you are saying. This item appears to have been advertised at the price of $2999 and is currently advertised at $2999 on the HP Official eBay store: https://ebay.us/m/egUX1k
              I don't understand what consumer law is being broken here.
              My understanding is that in an open (capitalist) market retailers are allowed to advertise a product for whatever price they like.
              Nintendo released the Nintendo Switch in 2017 for $469. Almost 9 years later it is still being sold for $469.
              https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/nintendo-switch-console-n…

              • GrumpyGandalf on 12/11/2025 - 01:00

                @MayhemVC: If you look at the current market and believe the standards have not seriously changed pre covid I am arguing with a wall friend. I have explained things too many times and you can go look at my past grumpy rants on the state of things if you'd like. The basic point I'm making is considering the technology, and value to consumer, do you think $3000 is a fair price? With 50inch+ qd-oled tvs on offer at the same price will you justify this price point by saying the higher refresh rate is such an incredible technology that it is worth paying this ticket cost for?

                I am simply seeing a trend of abuse with manufacturers conspiring with conglomerate retail groups to manipulate consumers interpretations of product value. It is not against and law to sell under RRP but under ACL it must reflect the current market price. The sale price is supposed to be temporary and the business is supposed to have originally sold the item at RRP. Now you just have literal scamming going on where every retailer lists something at inflated prices and uses this to try and bypass ACL. But the whole point of the ACL is to prevent misleading consumers. If you bring up technicalities it's hard to prove they aren't breaking existing guidelines but in principle they are doing exactly what the ACL was created to prevent.

                • GrumpyGandalf on 12/11/2025 - 01:08

                  @GrumpyGandalf: Forget laws, they are only bandages to problems within society. The problems are re-emerging due to consumer softness and corporate structures implementing internal directives to marginalise on their bottom line irregardless of insight on long term impact economically. Essentially they will all be eaten up by one another due to the corrosion of human values within their companies. It's all bad and I'm most disappointed by the lack of outrage by the public, followed by government bodies refusal to intercept and iterate on existing laws.

                • MayhemVC on 12/11/2025 - 07:52

                  @GrumpyGandalf: Oh OK. I didn't have a gaming PC until 12 months ago so I have no idea what pre-Covid prices were like. I gamed exclusively on consoles for 20 years prior to that.
                  I think $3k is a terrible price for that monitor, but I recently purchased a 77" OLED TV for just over $3k and this monitor has WAY more features than the TV so it's hard to say.
                  I understand your point of view but I also think that most people will compare prices before they make a $2-3k purchase and this monitor does not represent good value at $3k, so they will probably buy something else. Anyone buying this at $3k is probably not price sensitive (i.e. wealthy).

              • GrumpyGandalf on 12/11/2025 - 01:23

                @MayhemVC: Nintendo has always been a dark horse and technically it shouldn't offer old components at the same price. However they do have a proprietary hold over their product. And whilst they technically profit more from this strategy it is not as agregious as the example in this post. Like apple in the past, who used to annoy me when they offered products at higher prices in comparison to competitors. But there's something to be said for the genuine appeal of their products. People knew they are more expensive but at least they knew that they are buying. Call apple customers (current Samsung is no better, but I digress) stupid but at least they make what I would call an informed decision and know what they are buying is a product which will last and retain market value.

                If a product loses 50% of its perceived shelf value in 1-2 years and it's not just some niche startup, rather it's a fairly popular product with other manufacturers bidding for market share doesn't that set something off in your brain to say something is very wrong here?

                • MayhemVC on 12/11/2025 - 08:02

                  @GrumpyGandalf: A free market runs on supply and demand. Nintendo keeps the price of the Switch high because the demand is still there at that price.
                  I just had to update my laptop for work and ended up switching to Apple after discovering that their laptops are no longer twice the price of a PC equivalent. I would say that I made a considered purchase. I'm not an Apple fanboy but they seem to offer good value nowadays.
                  You provide valid arguements for why Nintendo and Apple can go against the fair pricing grain in an open market, but apparently HP is not allowed to do this?

                  • GrumpyGandalf on 12/11/2025 - 12:08

                    @MayhemVC: What they are doing is preventing the customer from perceiving an honest value proposition. They are deceiving their consumers and it should not be accepted practice. If they can do that I can deceive them too and say I’m going to pay but just steal their products instead. If it’s a free market and enough of us think hp isn’t worth anything that’s just supply and demand right?

  • AreYouAWiiizard on 11/11/2025 - 02:57
    +1

    Last 2 times it went down to $1199 and it's almost Black Friday, this doesn't really seem like a deal.

  • SpaceNinja on 11/11/2025 - 03:38

    it it preferable for for a 32 inch monitor to be curved? For gaming or productivity?

    • BargainMelbourne on 11/11/2025 - 08:04
      +3

      My personal preference is all 16x9 monitors to be flat. Regardless of size.

    • sethr0 on 11/11/2025 - 10:18
      +1

      Depends on what you do daily. For my line of work, I prefer flat and non-OLED (heavy usage of multiple software with static toolbars/elements.

      For gaming and media consumption, 32" OLED curved is great imo.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join