• long running

Tesla Model Y L - 6 Seater Vehicle from $78,171 Driveaway (NT) @ Tesla

14547
Tesla Model Y L - 6 Seater Vehicle from $78,171 Driveaway (NT) @ Tesla
Go to Deal
AssociatedGomo @ Ride4U on 13/03/2026 - 11:25 tesla.com (15499 clicks)
Last edited 13/03/2026 - 14:59 by 1 other user

This morning Tesla have launched the new variant Model Y L, the new 6 seater vehicle,

This will further open doors to those who originally figured a traditional 5 seater vehicle wouldn't suit their needs, Deliveries starting from May 2026

Drive away Pricing

QLD - $79,208
ACT - $80,173
NSW - $80,979
NT - $78,171
SA - $80,673
TAS - $80,432
VIC - $81,155
WA - $82,817

Model Y L
Long wheelbase with three rows, six seats and all the comfort.
3 Rows, 6 Seats
Expert Handling
A refined chassis with adaptive suspension and electronic damping shocks adjust to road condition to filter out vibrations and provide improved grip.
Designed to Do More
An extended base creates a more spacious, versatile interior that lets you decide whether to prioritise leg room or storage.
Integrated Efficiency
An extended roofline and refined exterior body design improve airflow around the vehicle for increased efficiency, giving you more range for your drive.
Enough Power to Share
Use your vehicle’s battery and the Tesla Outlet Adapter to power other devices and appliances including space heaters, e-bikes and power tools.

More Specifications

Range - 681 kilometres (WLTP)
0-100km/hr - 5.0 seconds
Supercharge - up to 288 kilometres (15minutes)
Speakers - 18 Speakers | 1 Subwoofer
Wheels - 19'' Machina 2.0 Wheels

Interior
Textile decor
16'' first-row ultra high-definition touchscreen
First-row seats with power recline, power tilt, heating, ventilation and thigh extension

Ride Comfort
Advanced multilink suspension with electronic continuously variable damping

Included With All Trims

Interior
Footwell and door pocket ambient lighting
Wrap-around ambient lighting
Aluminum detailing and premium textiles
8'' second-row touchscreen
Second-row seating with power two-way folding and heating

Cameras
8 exterior cameras
(includes a new front facing camera)

Connectivity
Second-generation hardware
Trunk
Hands-free power open on approach

Climate
Laminated safety glass on cabin windows and roof
Tinted safety glass with metallic infrared reflective coating across the roof
Power-actuated first- and second-row air vents

Basic Autopilot
Enables your car to steer, accelerate and brake automatically for other vehicles and pedestrians within its lane
Included With Every Tesla

Comfort
Heated seats, heated steering wheel and heated windshield, air filtration system, custom driver profiles with automatic easy-entry and exit, tinted glass roof and ultraviolet and infrared protection on all glass

Active Safety
Automatic Emergency Braking, Forward Collision Warning, Blind-Spot Collision Warning and Lane Departure Avoidance

Entertainment
Enjoy movies and shows on Netflix, YouTube, and other platforms through Tesla Theater, and dive into gaming with Arcade

App Remote Control
Lock, unlock, pre-heat and cool your vehicle
Auto Charge Planning
Auto-plan charging stops and enjoy refreshments at charging locations
Dashcam & Sentry Mode
Record notable events while driving or capture any suspicious behaviour near your parked and locked vehicle

Tesla Referrals

Referral: random (649)

Referee gets $350 off Model Y & 3 purchase.

Referrer gets $150 credit toward Supercharging, software upgrades, merchandise, service payments or a new vehicle. Limit of 10 referral benefits per calendar year.

Automotive Tesla Inc Electric Vehicle

Related Stores

Tesla
Tesla
Ride4U
Ride4U

Comments

Old
Search through all the comments in this post.
  • kungfuman on 13/03/2026 - 11:28
    +16

    this is temping on a novated lease Model Y L

    • eminemkh on 13/03/2026 - 11:29
      +2

      I was thinking the same…

      • kungfuman on 13/03/2026 - 11:31

        anyone ordered one to see what the wait time is on these?

        • AssociatedGomo @ Ride4U on 13/03/2026 - 11:45

          From May 2026 onwards

    • axlfan on 13/03/2026 - 11:51
      -1

      Same here but looks like a long waiting time!

      • kaleidoscope on 14/03/2026 - 00:20
        -1

        Its a long vehicle… so you know

    • whyisave on 13/03/2026 - 12:09
      +1

      Get in, while the benefits are still there, however, there is talk of the per-km charge that all EV drivers will need to pay.

      • kungfuman on 13/03/2026 - 12:19
        +3

        yeah thats not going to fly simply because there isn't that many people that own EV's if there was then maybe but they will make very little money if they did it now, and it would slow adoption as well of EV's so they shoot themselves in the foot too.

        • whyisave on 13/03/2026 - 12:28

          What are you replying / referring to ?

          The FBT exemption or the EV per-km "levy" ?

          • JsMIT on 13/03/2026 - 15:37
            +2

            @whyisave: They are looking at removing or reducing the FBT exemption for novated EV leases atm with any announcement for the next budget in May. Basically, if they remove the FBT exemption then there is absolutely no point having a novated lease for any vehicle. There is also talk about the EV per-km as well so its a double wammy.

            • whyisave on 13/03/2026 - 16:54

              @JsMIT: I already knew about the FBT exemption being scrutinised/removed.
              I said this, but I was seeking a clarification to my reply, ie.was that person replying to the FBT aspect or the per-km charge aspect?

            • ialam99 on 13/03/2026 - 20:22
              +1

              @JsMIT: Wow. I've been putting off replacing my old car but if the FBT exemption may end, I'm better off locking in something now before then. You would think they would continue with the EV exemption to reduce our exposure to imported petrol.

              • dan76n on 13/03/2026 - 22:02
                +1

                @ialam99: It won't end, maybe they will reduce the max price which is currently set at 91k but I highly doubt they will completely can the FBT exemption.

      • Veedub on 13/03/2026 - 17:29
        +4

        Too much push back for just EV per km road use charge. It’s all vehicles. Plus car registration is for payment of roads and maintenance. Petrol excise goes to general funding.

        • whyisave on 13/03/2026 - 17:44
          +1

          You are right.
          It's all vehicles.
          I didn't know this.

          https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/nsw-gov…

          A fair and sustainable road user charge

          A future distance-based road user charge will ensure all drivers are paying for their share of road use – regardless of the type of vehicle they drive.

          A road user charge will apply to eligible EVs from 1 July 2027 or when EVs make up 30 per cent of all new vehicle sales, whichever comes first.

          Plug-in hybrid EVs will be charged a fixed 80 per cent proportion of the full road user charge to reflect their vehicle type.

          The road user charge rate is indexed to consumer price index each financial year.

          The road user charge rate for the 2025-26 financial year will be:

          • 2.974 cents per kilometre for a battery EV or hydrogen fuel cell EV
          • 2.379 cents per kilometre for a plug-in hybrid EV
          • BusMan247 on 13/03/2026 - 21:01
            +7

            @whyisave: So if I drive to Melbourne from sydney I have to pay $30?? Wtf plus tolls plus rego plus insurance plus ctp mate just whack on another charge for breathing

            • Lt Frank Drebin on 14/03/2026 - 08:23
              +7

              @BusMan247: That's what we get for having to give endless handouts to everyone who doesn't lift a finger and useless politicians who piss our money away

              • whyisave on 14/03/2026 - 20:31
                +1

                @Lt Frank Drebin: It's what we get for voting harder and harder every election.
                Next election, we will need to vote our hardest.

            • 1st-Amendment on 14/03/2026 - 15:36

              @BusMan247:

              So if I drive to Melbourne from sydney I have to pay $30?

              If you were to do that in your ICE car you'd use about 60 litres of petrol which would incur about $30 in fuel excise. So it's about the same cost.

          • DPW on 14/03/2026 - 07:50
            +6

            @whyisave: Except the road user charge decision in Victoria was overruled by the High Court. It will need to be a federal scheme to go ahead.

            https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/cases/decided/…

          • 1st-Amendment on 14/03/2026 - 15:33
            +1

            @whyisave: This is out-of-date info. The High Court already ruled this unconstitutional after Victoria tried it as only the Federal gov an impose such a tax, not States (Petrol excise is federal tax).

            • whyisave on 14/03/2026 - 20:27

              @1st-Amendment: I was replying to someone else.

              However, at the bottom (ie. footnote) of that link which I posted, it does state the VIC case, so this was already known.

              It's just that I did not know the NSW State Government was trying to also impose this levy on non-EV cars.

              Keyword: trying.

        • unifex on 14/03/2026 - 17:08

          thats not true. Vast majority of car registration is third party body insurance. Most of The rest is cost of managing the registration system. Very little goes into roads and maintenance.

          Road tax (on fuel) is to contribute to the maintenance of the roads. Its decoupled from the line item by going into general revenue but its still going in there and road funding is coming out of the same general revenue.

        • valour on 17/03/2026 - 23:41

          But the odometer doesn't work in my FC Holden. How will they tell how far I have travelled?

    • Windows98 on 13/03/2026 - 16:46
      +4

      If anyone has access to a NL and is looking at buying a car and isn't buying an EV really needs to do some research

    • supersabroso on 13/03/2026 - 20:14
      +3

      It's not a bad middle ground but Tesla stuffed up. If they kept it as a 7 seater then this would fly out of the parking lots as it would be the most popular 7 seater EV there is given that it could have been the cheapest fully EV one on the market.

    • triks on 13/03/2026 - 21:26
      +1

      Consider electric vehicles tend to depreciate faster than many traditional cars. The problem ties back to the mismatch between the lease’s predefined residual value and the car’s actual market value at lease end.

    • Ti94 on 27/03/2026 - 16:45

      Can someone had done the novated lease for Tesla share your review? I got some quote for novated lease with this new model L but with the high interest rate they charge (about 10%!) and all the brokerage fee, it ended up quite high after the 5 years including the residual amount. I think after 5 years total cost is $117k for this model. Thanks.

      • Brianqpr on 10/04/2026 - 09:29

        I've just been quoted for the RWD model Y. Total net cost over 4 years including final payment works out about the same as paying in cash today, but also includes 4 years of rego and insurance. Great deal.

  • Ten on 13/03/2026 - 11:28
    +62

    Hmm, I wonder if I could setup a GoFundMe to afford one with donations. What are your thoughts @Gomo?

    • AshSet on 13/03/2026 - 11:42
      +1

      Ouch! :P

    • LHSolutions on 13/03/2026 - 11:42
      +1

      HaHa, You can give it a go and let us know how it goes

    • mandelbrot on 13/03/2026 - 11:47
      +19

      That's against forum rules and you'll get banned!
      (For everyone except @Gomo of course. Cos he's special)

      • seamonkey on 13/03/2026 - 12:05
        +1

        I missed this one…..seeking context. 🙂

          • seamonkey on 13/03/2026 - 12:21
            +6

            @mandelbrot: Cheers. Read above kind of like OP was the cyberbegger..🤣 Cheers for the context..Madness.

            • mandelbrot on 13/03/2026 - 12:23
              +10

              @seamonkey: If you said that on the facebook page, he would have banned you.

            • Ten on 13/03/2026 - 14:32
              +5

              @seamonkey: The OP of this deal is the guy from the article.

              • seamonkey on 13/03/2026 - 14:35
                +2

                @Ten: Ahhh.
                My first instinct was right then. And I can say what I like here but if I was to say it on Facebook, he'd ban me..Got it..🙂

        • Brick50 on 13/03/2026 - 12:22
          +41

          TLDR: he is admin of Tesla owners Australia Facebook group, his car breaks down, he then posts about 4 times about it being picked up by a tow truck,

          he then immediately creates a go fund me trying to raise $$$ for a new battery pack, after a week or so it’s determined it only needed a repair which was under $1000? Keep in mind this car is used for his RIDESHARE business

          If you commented on his post anything not positive then you got banned for 30 days (I did)

          Instead of refunding people’s money, he “donated” it to a charity

          People have speculated that he will use this donation and the car repair invoice as a tax deduction, since he uses the car for his business (ride share) effectively making him a tidy profit off the go fund me donations

          That’s my opinion of what happened

          • seamonkey on 13/03/2026 - 12:30
            +2

            @Brick50: That's wild. Hope he metaphorically gets hit some balancing karma.

          • mandelbrot on 13/03/2026 - 12:33
            +2

            @Brick50: Tbf - the 100k members of that facebook page aren't really members of a community facebook page. The 100k members are his personal followers, since he is a god influencer.

            • Brick50 on 13/03/2026 - 12:42
              +4

              @mandelbrot: Yes that’s true, all the members are there for him and his selfies and not for posts about Tesla cars 😂

              I think he does truly believe that the page followers are following it because of him unfortunately

              • maplesyrup on 13/03/2026 - 19:14

                @Brick50: Other influencers got a car to test drive under embargo conditions. I don’t believe the influencer in question did.

                • Heybargain on 13/03/2026 - 20:03
                  +1

                  @maplesyrup: He’s not an influencer. And no he had to go to a showroom in Brisbane to see it today. Then posted close to 20 posts about it on his Facebook group.

          • Brick Tamland on 13/03/2026 - 12:34
            +3

            @Brick50: He later admitted to banning like 100’s of people from the forum and deleting almost a thousand comments.

            • unco on 13/03/2026 - 12:48
              +6

              @Brick Tamland: And won't step down as admin even after all these wrongs and bringing bad news stories to the Tesla community.

              • mandelbrot on 13/03/2026 - 13:10
                -1

                @unco: Those aren't wrongs. Well, they are wrongs for everyone else. But not for him. Cos he's done so much for the Tesla community. And he's an influencer. So the GoFundMe was his reward.

                • Heybargain on 13/03/2026 - 13:13
                  +4

                  @mandelbrot: Oh wait, gofundme's are allowed now. But you need to have driven your car over 200,000km and fill out a form and get his approval.
                  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfWYQXoMETdrbKw_0vC…

                • Brick Tamland on 13/03/2026 - 14:37

                  @mandelbrot: He never said it was for his reward of being an influencer, he said it was for repairing his battery that could have costed a lot of money.

                  • mandelbrot on 13/03/2026 - 16:46
                    +2

                    @Brick Tamland: When people said he should take down the gofundme and it was against the rules of the fb page, he said he had given so much to the tesla community by starting and administrating the fb page, so he deserved it.

                    • Brick Tamland on 13/03/2026 - 16:59

                      @mandelbrot: Would people still have contributed if it was simply a reward for administration of a FB page?

              • Brick Tamland on 13/03/2026 - 13:19
                +3

                @unco: It was quite the train wreck.

          • Roulettethedumbcat on 14/03/2026 - 06:10

            @Brick50: He also only ended up donating to charity after the heap of criticism he received.

            Initially he intended very much to keep all the gofundme $$$ and doubled down on how people didn't have to donate but chose to (regardless of false pretense or not for costly repairs) therefore it was his right to retain funds lol

    • gezza90 on 13/03/2026 - 12:04

      Or take some photos of your feet, upload online and see where that takes you.

    • arcticmonkey on 13/03/2026 - 12:51
      +8

      Is that the Muppet that bans people for upsetting his/her fragile ego?

      • pwnd on 13/03/2026 - 15:37
        +2

        Yeah, but also for liking comments that upset his/her fragile ego

    • Mtbdirt on 13/03/2026 - 15:45

      Good one

    • mudguts on 13/03/2026 - 18:57

      Hahah Nathan and Mr Sparkles! Isn’t he active here as well?

      • Brick50 on 13/03/2026 - 19:33

        He is the one who posted this very deal!

      • Heybargain on 13/03/2026 - 20:05
        +1

        Who calls their car Mr Sparkles

    • PaperplaneXXX on 14/03/2026 - 00:03

      great! i will donate 10 aud

  • Imposter on 13/03/2026 - 11:37
    +17

    Is it a deal or just a new product?

    • juns on 13/03/2026 - 11:42
      +45

      Just a new product. This looks more like an advertisement than a deal.

    • BargainMe on 13/03/2026 - 11:43
      +13

      It's like when people post that Netflix has released a new movie, unfortunately OzBargain is a place for announcements rather than just deals now.

      • Save 50 Cent on 13/03/2026 - 13:09
        +1

        More controversial posts. More arguments in the replies. More clicks. More money. That is pretty much the internet nowadays.

    • rogaland on 13/03/2026 - 18:09
      +2

      Agree, this is not a bargain, just a promotion of a new product, not a special deal i thought this website was all about ( I actually have a Model Y)

  • krisspy on 13/03/2026 - 11:40

    It's already fun trying to fit in adults on pseudo 7 seat cars. This looks fun on a whole new level.

    I can imagine cyber truck trunk sensors fitted on these, but instead of breaking carrots and fingers, it's rear passenger heads.

    Probably sell alot of these though since it's the cheapest 6 seater on the market.

    Need china to flood the market with 7 seater bevs, not paying six figures just to get an extra 2 seats.

    • ATangk on 13/03/2026 - 13:54
      -5

      This one does not fit adults in the 3rd row at all. Sloped roofline + zero knee room = kids third row. Not really different to the original rear facing seats, not fit for purpose.

      • dwbr on 13/03/2026 - 14:46
        +2

        The head room is pretty decent in the 3rd row actually.

        • ATangk on 13/03/2026 - 17:23
          -5

          How to get skin cancer, put glass above the head. And this deal? Just standard pricing. OzRRP is it?

          • JimmyF on 14/03/2026 - 09:23

            @ATangk: LOL tell me you're a hater without telling me.

            • ATangk on 14/03/2026 - 11:55
              -1

              @JimmyF: Doesn’t change the fact this doesn’t meet deal guidelines.

              • JimmyF on 14/03/2026 - 14:57

                @ATangk: I'm not talking about the deal comments, I'm talking about the other rubbish being said.

                I do agree, it isn't a deal, its standard pricing.

                • ATangk on 14/03/2026 - 21:59
                  -2

                  @JimmyF: So a third row seat should have glass above their head? Good way to get a sunburnt scalp.

                  • JimmyF on 15/03/2026 - 10:25

                    @ATangk:

                    Good way to get a sunburnt scalp.

                    You really need to educate yourself on glass and UV before you start talking.

                    • ATangk on 15/03/2026 - 11:02
                      -2

                      @JimmyF: Rear and side windows don’t. Maybe you need to really educate yourself on glass and UV in automotive applications before you start talking and spreading dangerous and false information.

                      • JimmyF on 15/03/2026 - 13:42

                        @ATangk:

                        Maybe you need to really educate yourself on glass and UV in automotive applications

                        I have.

                        before you start talking and spreading dangerous and false information.

                        That would be you.

                        Go off and check, I'll wait.

                        • klaw81 on 15/03/2026 - 14:11
                          +1

                          @JimmyF: This little pissing match isn't much fun to specatate. Let's just cut to the chase:

                          From the Model Y owner's manual:

                          The roof, windshields, and windows in Model Y are excellent at protecting you from UV (ultraviolet) rays. The glass components score less than 2 on the UV Index scale. Review your region’s UV Index specifications for more information.

                          https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-B4E78C9…

                          There's plenty of evidence that appropriately tinted glass, particularly laminated glass as used in all current Tesla models, can remove 99% of UV from full sunlight - so this seems like a reasonable claim to make.

                          The Cancer Council recommends using sun protection when UV index is more than 2.
                          https://www.cancer.org.au/cancer-information/causes-and-prev…

                          Long story short: I'm with Jimmy on this one. And since I own a Tesla with a glass roof and have driven for hours during summer without sun protection, my own personal experience gels with Tesla's claim.

                          Having said that, we have an aftermarket roof liner for our Tesla's roof - not because of sunburn concerns, but because when the car is parked in the sun during summer, it gets crazy hot inside - the roof liner does a good job of reducing interior temperatures under those circumstances. It stays fitted for about 7 months of each year.

                          • JimmyF on 15/03/2026 - 14:32

                            @klaw81:

                            There's plenty of evidence that appropriately tinted glass, particularly laminated glass as used in all current Tesla models, can remove 99% of UV from full sunlight - so this seems like a reasonable claim to make.

                            You took all the fun out of it, its fun to watch the uneducated double down when they have done zero research.

                            And since I own a Tesla with a glass roof and have driven for hours during summer without sun protection, my own personal experience gels with Tesla's claim.

                            Same :)

                          • ATangk on 15/03/2026 - 16:53

                            @klaw81: https://www.drive.com.au/reviews/2026-tesla-model-y-l-review…

                            The big miss, however, is the apparent lack of any UV tinting on the rear glass, unlike the panes above the other two rows of seats. On a 40-degree Australian summer’s day, we anticipate passengers in the rear-most seats will need to wear a hat. It’s a surprising omission, given the rear glass is new for the Model Y L.

                            Guess the specific car we're talking about doesn't have it.

                        • ATangk on 15/03/2026 - 14:11
                          -2

                          @JimmyF: https://www.uow.edu.au/media/2025/can-you-get-sunburnt-or-uv….

                          Maybe if you stopped eating pencils you'd find the answer.

                          • JimmyF on 15/03/2026 - 14:30

                            @ATangk:

                            Maybe if you stopped eating pencils you'd find the answer.

                            That's cute, all that says it depends on the type of glass used. So what glass does Tesla use? Do they apply a UV/tint to the glass?

                            I mean pencil eaters like you should know the answer to this before you post wild claims saying otherwise.

    • The Wololo Wombat on 13/03/2026 - 12:17
      +35

      It's best to adjust the side mirrors to look towards the adjacent lanes, not your own reflection.

      • Dollar General on 13/03/2026 - 13:04

        Play the ball not the man

        • The Wololo Wombat on 13/03/2026 - 14:47
          +7

          Fair call, it was a cheap comment that sounded funny in my mind. Ad hominem.

          I just find it funny that people get so emotional about Tesla (Your language was highly emotive)… this comes across as both political and irrational to me. Subjectively, I think they some of the best looking cars on the road and I believe the company has have done really good things for the car industry.

          • Dollar General on 13/03/2026 - 15:09
            -2

            @The Wololo Wombat: All EV’s look plain and ugly to me. No brand specifically

            They are too minimalist with a large tablet plonked in the middle of the dash

            Probably my bias as I prefer ICE vehicles as I am a car enthusiast who grew up loving the sound of a roaring engine

            • klaw81 on 15/03/2026 - 10:54
              +1

              @Dollar General:

              All EV’s look plain and ugly to me. No brand specifically

              There are probably a bunch of EVs that you don't realise are EVs. Some of them have both EV and ICE versions of the same car that look virtually identical.

              But in terms of exterior differences, the main changes in appearance are usually made for aerodynamic reasons. The most obvious change is the lack of a large grille at the front - EVs don't need much cooling and an open grille is bad for aerodynamics, so it's usually eliminated. The other obvious change is the wheels - again, the brakes don't need ventilation as they are largely replaced by regenerative braking, and the openings are covered over for improved aerodynamic efficiency.

              They are too minimalist with a large tablet plonked in the middle of the dash

              Not all EVs are like this…and quite a few ICE vehicles are also heading this way to some extent. It's part trend, and part cost saving - a single screen is cheaper than lots of buttons and knobs.

              Personally, I really like the clean minimalist style, but it can be taken too far. A few knobs for convenient control of climate etc is good.

              I am a car enthusiast who grew up loving the sound of a roaring engine

              Me too, but it's more of a psychological thing. We have learned to associate those loud noises, smells and vibration with power and performance, and there's a certain drama to it. But EVs produce that power and performance without all the fuss and noise, and I can't say I miss it much. I will always love the burble of a V8, but not the fuel bill or the maintenance.

    • Nillionaire on 27/03/2026 - 22:37
      +1

      They don't? They look to beautiful to me as someone that likes minimalism..

  • purpleredmonkeychair on 13/03/2026 - 11:43
    +8

    The AU Falcon i had in 2009 had 6 seats in 2 rows and all the comfort. Nothing new here.

    • gezza90 on 13/03/2026 - 12:10
      +1

      The Falcon XC ('78) and the EB GLi (90s) wagons had third rows. Just enough for 2 kids facing the back. Similar to the Mercedes E class wagons.

    • johnno07 on 13/03/2026 - 14:06

      I had no idea there was a six-seater AU. Just a bench seat across the front? It's super hard to find any details on these.

      • purpleredmonkeychair on 13/03/2026 - 17:40
        +2

        It was a 2001 series 2 ex-taxi sedan with a folding 3rd centre seat in the front and column shift. Just ticked over 1mil km in 2009

    • 1st-Amendment on 14/03/2026 - 15:40

      I had an 1971 HQ Holden with bench seat that would easily fit 6 adults, 3 in the front, 3 in the back.
      I did have 64 Holden EH also with a bench seat, but being a narrower body it wasn't so comfortable stacking 3 adults wide.

      • MrZ on 24/03/2026 - 11:19

        The rear passenger space in the HQ was a joke. In particular the legroom.

  • capslock on 13/03/2026 - 11:46
    +3

    So, it's just like a 7 seater SUV but Tesla removed 1 seat to make it 6. Nice one Tesla.

    • krisspy on 13/03/2026 - 11:47

      Probably because it's the only way to get in the back lmao, unless they make the rear backrests fold 180 degrees and you enter from the trunk

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join