Qatar Airways: Adelaide Return to Rome $1383, Milan $1401, Paris $1419, Barcelona $1475 + More (2x 23kg Bags) @ Google Flights

470

Go to Deal

AssociatedCheapFlightHunter @ Cheap Flight Hunter on 25/08/2026 - 20:14 google.com (1493 clicks)
Last edited 25/08/2026 - 20:26 by 1 other user

Finally some decent prices from Adelaide, on the world's best airline, Qatar. All routes are return, have one stop (Doha) and include 2 x 23kg checked bags. Dates are October & November 2026 and then January to May 2027.
I have linked the first search below, just change the arrival city to your preferred choice and click around on the calendar to find dates.

Adelaide to Rome $1383
Adelaide to Barcelona (BCN) - $1475
Adelaide to Copenhagen (CPH) - $1541
Adelaide to Dublin (DUB) - $1515
Adelaide to London (LHR/LGW) - $1501
Adelaide to Manchester (MAN) - $1499
Adelaide to Milan (MXP) - $1401
Adelaide to Paris (CDG) - $1419

*note that flights to London fly into and out of both Heathrow (LHR) and Gatwick (LGW).

Found by Cheap Flight Hunter. Sign up (free!) to get deals like this sent straight to your inbox.

Related Stores

Google

Cheap Flight Hunter

Third-Party

Qatar Airways

• freshofftheplane on 25/08/2026 - 21:26 Comment score below threshold.
  • 

    Lord Fart Bucket on 25/08/2026 - 21:30

    Wonder what plane you’re fresh off

    • 1
• 

  Scobar on 25/08/2026 - 21:50

  Just remember that Qatar is on the “reconsider your travel” list in Australia at the moment because of the war in the Middle East.

  • 15
  • 

    StingyMan on 25/08/2026 - 21:55

    Nothing like a good gamble to get a good bargain

    • 6
  • 

    gorge on 26/08/2026 - 11:46

    qatar doesnt even have prossies like dubai and dbu dhabi does it?

    • -1
• 

  EatThinkDrinkPremium on 25/08/2026 - 22:33

  I flew in Dec 2002 at $1480 Adelaide to London one way booked well in advance. Wish I had 20/20 vision to take my gap year at 40 when I could really afford it

  • 0
  • 

    odysseus on 25/08/2026 - 23:16

    The London you saw in 2002 is a fair bit different from the London of now.

    And you potentially were able to enjoy it in a different way to what you would be now…

    • 8
    • 

      DingoBlue on 25/08/2026 - 23:19

      Please continue (genuinely)

      • 0
      • 

        JohnSy on 26/08/2026 - 10:15

        If you are genuinely interested, I suspect one answer to "And you potentially were able to enjoy it in a different way to what you would be now…" can be found inside the book "Die with Zero" by Bill Perkins.

        He's what AI said when constrained:

        In Die with Zero, that line captures Bill Perkins’s core idea that the same dollar can buy more life-enjoyment when spent earlier, because many experiences are either physically harder, less meaningful, or simply different once you’re older.

        What the sentence means in context
        Perkins argues that people often defer big experiences to “later” (retirement, once the kids are grown, once there’s “enough” saved), but by then:

        Your health, energy, and risk tolerance may have declined.

        The people you’d share it with may no longer be around or able to participate.

        The psychological payoff of the experience can be lower because you’re in a different life stage.

        So when he says:

        “And you potentially were able to enjoy it in a different way to what you would be now…”

        he’s pointing out that an experience you had earlier in life isn’t just “the same thing, but sooner.” It’s qualitatively different:

        Skydiving at 35 vs 75 isn’t just “the same jump later”; your body, fear profile, recovery, and even who you’d tell about it afterward are different.

        A backpacking trip with friends in your 20s–30s creates a different kind of memory dividend than doing a milder version in your 70s, because of the shared life stage, intensity, and future stories you build on it.

        Some activities (long hikes, certain sports, high-adventure travel) may be physically impossible or far less enjoyable later, so the “enjoyment function” of that dollar has changed.

        In Perkins’s framework, this supports his rule: invest in experiences early, because:

        You get more years of “memory dividends” (replaying the experience in your mind, telling stories, looking at photos).

        You avoid the regret of having money but no capacity or context to enjoy certain things the way you once could.

        …..
        Food for thought

        • 3
        • 

          the swear jar on 26/08/2026 - 10:41

          @JohnSy: A good (personal) experience: having visited Angkor Wat in Cambodia many years ago in it's more authentic state before they put in wood stairs and handrailing all over the place. I understand it was crucial for preservation and to avoid further damage, but don't think I could go back there now and enjoy it as much. This applies to a lot of places I've visited that have now changed due to over-tourism - so glad I got to see these places earlier in life.

          • 2
          • 

            DingoBlue on 26/08/2026 - 13:47

            @the swear jar: I think they were alluding to something that could be misinterpreted as racism - or something like that. I believe that crime is quite high at the moment.

            I just want to genuinely understand the real situation without dancing around it.

            • 0
        • 

          AUBRX on 27/08/2026 - 01:12

          @JohnSy: Can't agree more with the message presented there.. Health especially is a roll of the dice. Things can change in an instant.

          • 0
  • 

    Be careful on 26/08/2026 - 00:18

    It’s gone downhill since then.

    • 2
• 

  Be careful on 26/08/2026 - 00:19

  The Middle East is a war zone atm. It’s a risk having a stopover in Qatar.

  • 2
  • 

    DingoBlue on 26/08/2026 - 13:48

    Oman

    • 1
• 

  SometimesStingy on 26/08/2026 - 16:17

  It’s important to check travel insurance eligibility, as if I recall flights via Middle Eastern airports void transit legs.

  • 0