• expired

SanDisk Ultra 128GB MicroSD $19.95 Delivered @ Shopping Square (via Mobile Site)

662

Free Delivery, Must use the mobile site to Checkout

Related Stores

Shopping Square
Shopping Square

closed Comments

  • +5

    Did I need it? Probably not

  • Plus 1.99 delivery cost

    • +2

      Delivery fee goes away at checkout for me, paid with PayPal.

      • +1

        I can confirm. Just paid with PayPal, no delivery fee! Thanks OP!

  • +1

    I purchased a 256GB SD card, paid through PayPal and the page tells me they don't deliver to my location (meteo Melbourne). I still got charged for it :S

  • Is this one good for nintendo switch?

    • Will work but can get better and faster

      • Which one will you recommend?
        Thanks

        • +8

          Samsung EVO + would be a good unit.
          They also have better IOPS and random performance than Sandisk.

          Also more reliable, but according to pitchfork crew below I'm not entitled to that opinion, even though it forms part of Oz Bargains rules.

    • -1

      Negging due to lack of reliability issues / mass failures with SanDisk SD, Micro SD and USB flash drives.

      • +3

        Negging for negging without a good reason…. we can all play this game.

        If I'm not entitled to my opinion as per the site rules then why should you be?

        :edit: Don't be a jackass and vote on the product yourself and not my fair and valid comment.
        :edit2: Really wanted to add, i never neg someone for an opinion on the product or deal as you just have, it's wrong to do.

    • +4

      It's true. Over the years, I've had regular SanDisk device failures. Never with Samsung!

      • +2

        Nagging should be related to deal, not the product.

        No product is flawless.

        • +8

          The sites rules specifically state that a product can be negged for issues with the product.
          I checked the FAQ to be sure.
          I am completely compliant with the sites rules and my neg perfectly matches the example in the FAQ.

        • +3

          @Miyagi - Your statement is completely incorrect. Please check the the site rules before provide false information within the community.

    • Yes you're right I actually have to agree. I bought one of their SSD's once. Failed less than 24 months. And I have had peculiar problems with their USB flash drives before. You wouldn't think anything could go wrong with a flash drive by well known name, but i discovered it can. I neverrrrr buy sandisk anymore.

      • -2

        Did you buy from a reputable retailer?

        The reason I ask is that Sandisk clones are EVERYWHERE.

        Stick with places like Amazon, and only buy when fulfilled by them. There's never a 100% guarantee, but it's a hell of lot better than some Ebay random seller. Even some of the bigger Ebayer's buy ripoffs- sometimes unintentionally. But a major retailer will nearly always have a more reliable supply chain.

        • Have bought from Amazon, Officeworks and Ted's cameras, as well as Shopping Express (the retailer in this very deal).

          Am well aware of counterfeits, plenty of good info too on how to capture them.

          I am confident none of my failed devices are counterfeit.

        • +5

          imagine that someone sharing their genuine problems and have another commenter telling them it's invalid. lol.

          should i share the case notes and transcripts i have on amazon that I have imitation SAMSUNG cards sent to me on 2 separate occasions and the same local/australian seller was swearing black and blue that they dont know what happened?

          this is precisely the reason i will no longer share my experiences online. what's the point getting shot down for warning people.

          • -1

            @slowmo: imagine reading your own narrative into a post and completely ignoring everything typed in front of you, to try and prove a useless point. lol.

            I never suggested disbelief or invalidity of the claim. I simply asked a question and suggested a possible solution.
            No shooting down, no paying out, no personal attacks. I was trying to be HELPFUL.

            I suggest you go back to not sharing your experiences online, or re-read posts before replying to them.

    • I've stuck with Samsung Evo for my microSD usage as I've found that they work better with my a7iii and my dashcam.

      My SanDisk SSD for PC have been rock solid tho.

  • This is ozbargain, and about better deal.
    I like the reviews here but negative marks is not necessary to person brings the deal

    • +1

      The negatives are not against the person, they are against the deal and/or the product.

  • +1

    Even if Sandisk products didn’t have issues who wants to wait 3 months to receive something from this mob.

    • This one seems to be AU stock and they have that in stock.
      Honestly, at this price, it'd better be AU stock.

      • I bought some Eneloops from them and they were AU stock. After 20 days, I am still waiting for their delivery.

        • I don’t think these guys actually have anything in stock in this country. I’m still waiting for a microsd card from early August.

          • @smartazz104: They stated the Eneloops would be shipping from Aus. I know they have extremely slow shipping. I don’t buy from them unless I can’t find anywhere cheaper.

  • Anyone had any experience using this type of card with a GoPro? Specifically the Hero4 or Hero Session, I'll be shooting at 1080p 60fps mostly. It's not on the recommended cards list so I'm hesitant with purchasing it incase my files all get corrupted.

    • It'll do but I'd go for something with a quicker write speed and more rewrite durable

    • +2

      Nah SanDisk are pretty bad in GoPros and dash cams.

  • +2

    Thanks OP, grabbed one for a Reolink security camera

    • Same here. Just bought two of these MicroSD card then realise my Reolink E1 Pro only support up to 64Gb :(

  • I'll risk one for my dashcam. Had several SanDisk cards over the years and only had one fail.

  • -1

    No issues ever with Samsung or SanDisk.
    The SD card is named after SanDisk after all.

    • +1

      SD stands for Secure Digital.
      Unfortunately the "secure" part of the specification is only accessible if you pay a lot of money and agree to an NDA, so it's basically meaningless and they're practically the same as any other type of dumb memory card.

      • the "secure" part of the specification is only accessible if you pay a lot of money and agree to an NDA

        It's not even that. The "secure" part was an idea they had, in the hope that movies and similar could be distributed on SD card, while not being copyable. It was touted as a feature, but never implemented, because nobody wanted that feature.

        • But… they charge money to access the full specification (vs. the freely available "simple" specification).

          • @ssquid: The full specification includes full details of how to communicate with the card - data rates, timing, signalling, DMA modes and such. I don't believe that is in the simple specification, or perhaps the 1-bit "SPI-like" communication method is described in the simple spec.

            • @Russ: I've read the simple spec. It includes full information about SDIO, SPI, 1/4 bit and UHS transfer modes. It also has sections about the secure features which are empty except for "not included in simple specification" statements.

              • @ssquid: It's been about a decade since I last looked, I recall the information in the simple spec was insufficient to develop a device using 4-bit mode. The company I was working with did a quick test of the SPI mode, and found it was too slow for their needs, and couldn't progress further without joining the association (=$$$), so they shelved that project. Perhaps they have upgraded the simple spec since then, to have the information that we couldn't get on 4-bit mode.

                Wikipedia has information on how the "secure" part failed, with references.

                "In 1999, SanDisk, Matsushita, and Toshiba agreed to develop and market the Secure Digital (SD) Memory Card.[5] The card was derived from the MultiMediaCard (MMC) and provided digital rights management based on the Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI) standard and for the time, a high memory density. It was designed to compete with the Memory Stick, a DRM product that Sony had released the year before. Developers predicted that DRM would induce wide use by music suppliers concerned about piracy.[6]"

                "On October 15, 1999, Eric Scheirer, later a digital music analyst for Forrester Research, wrote an editorial for MP3.com titled "The End of SDMI"[2] which declared that the group's true goal to fold the technology industry into an alliance that would guarantee the record industry's near monopoly over musical content had failed."

                "The SDMI has been inactive since May 18, 2001.[4]"

                "Unfortunately it turned out that none of the technologies submitted could satisfy the requirements set out at the beginning, e.g. of being unnoticeable by so-called "golden ears". SDMI has then decided to suspend its work and wait for progress in technology."

                From these two wiki pages:
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SD_card#1999%E2%80%932002:_Cre…
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital_Music_Initiativ…

  • Bought it today

  • -1

    Is this still available?

    • +1

      I just ordered one.

  • I ordered one a few days ago let's hope it doesn't take a month like some people are saying???

  • Haven’t received the order yet. Cant contact them either.

Login or Join to leave a comment