expired SAMSUNG 32" LCD TV - Series 4 - HD - $228.00 at Harvey Norman (Auburn & North Ryde)
This was posted 11 months 14 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal
Edited by pauly 11/06/2012 - 00:16
Mate just rang me to tell me he just purchased a Samsung 32" LCD TV for just $228 at Harvey Norman Auburn. He said its a Series 4 and is HD - not FULL HD. They have one left at Auburn and I have been told there is also one left at North Ryde - other stores may have them as well. Must be a clearance model.
Here is a pic from the North Ryde Store:
http://upload.ozbargain.com/2012/06/10/8638_image.jpg
Mod: edited title to include confirmed stores. Comments below seem to indicate that this deal is not Australia wide.
Comments (Closed)
+5 votesliveyourlife on 10/06/2012 - 15:39 ¶Ask him to send you* a scan/picture of the receipt.
*So that you can upload it here for us to see.
Was $298 at goodguys, if same model - http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/71020
illumination on 10/06/2012 - 19:34 ¶If only I read all this 2 years earlier… At least my LG has lasted that long.
+2 votesThere is no universe where LG even approaches Samsung quality and reliability much less is better. I would rather have no TV than pay "Lucky Goldstar" another penny. I've had it with their rubbish misrepresented products.
But hey don't take my word for it.
Their fridges straight from ACCC http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/947285
Their washing machines http://www.smartcompany.com.au/legal/20100917-accc-slams-lg-...
Not to mention their terrible rude product support staff.
Would you recommend this over the Sanyo Full HD LED at DSE (http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/71339)?
Whilst I don't have the specs of both in front of me, in a 32" size you'd probably only pick the Sanyo LED for energy efficiency. LED > LCD for efficiency generally. If power consumption doesn't worry you then get the cheaper Samsung. As others have pointed out full HD doesn't matter much on a 32" screen.
binaryactions on 11/06/2012 - 10:47 ¶the max res that you will get is 1366x768 - rather than 1920 x 1080 on full hd.
auna on 10/06/2012 - 20:12 Comment score below threshold (-11).
- +6 votes
Ahhh Gerry such a humanitarian
"You could go out and give a million dollars to a charity tomorrow to help the homeless. You could argue that it is just wasted. They are not putting anything back into the community,” said Harvey. …. "It might be a callous way of putting it but what are they doing? You are helping a whole heap of no-hopers to survive for no good reason. They are just a drag on the whole community.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/harvey-charity-not-so-sweet-2...
+1 voteGerry is obviously a dik. But he has a point.
You're either destroying (consuming) wealth, or you're creating (producing) wealth. Almost all charity is a form of net wealth destruction. It's unsustainable and relies on receiving more wealth from producers in the future. It's demeaning to those who receive charity to rely on someone else's wealth production. Government charity is the absolute worst.
Much better to invest that million in a profit seeking business. The business will be forced to hire people in order to be successful. So those people who might have received charity, could get jobs instead. A better deal for everyone.
TheShinySuitMan on 11/06/2012 - 10:39 ¶Just called HN Auburn. After 10mins of being on hold, I asked the guy what Samsung LCD's they had in stock around the $250 mark. He said they had a special 3 weeks ago but nothing around that price in Samsung now.
This deal = fail
here is the pic you wanted - this is from North Ryde
11
WOW - great buy!