144hz 1080p VA Panel Vs 60hz 1080p IPS Panel

Im torn between this choice,
Ive upgraded from TN to IPS panel this year and the difference is amazing and noticeable, I wont go back to TN panel ever.

I've looked around and it seems the VA is less than IPS but about TN, but im still not sure, need personal opinions for these.

Anyone have used both or anything close, need opinions, should I sacrifice panel type for refresh rate or keep what i have,
144hz 1080p VA or 60hz 1080p IPS

what i have now
http://www.msy.com.au/vic/mitcham/peripherals/17113-lg-ips-2…

what i wanna get
https://www.ple.com.au/Products/626955/AOC-AGON-G2770PF-27-F…

thx

Comments

  • 144hz mostly benefits gamers. You don't buy 144hz monitors for anything else, really.

    If you feel rich, you could consider 144hz IPS displays

    here is a list of all 144hz displays regardless of display type (Gizmodo article from last year, so it's outdated a little)

  • VA has much higher contrast and better blacks than IPS which has a massive effect on image quality. I would choose that over IPS before you even get to the increased refresh rate. VA has better colour reproduction than TN but it's not quite as good as IPS. IPS has a weakness displaying blacks and it's low contrast.

    Going from 60hz to 90Hz is a large increase in quality and responsiveness for all players.

  • If you game = 144hz. If you dont = stick to 60hz

    But after using 144hz for a couple of years now, I cant go back to a 60hz panel. Even the mouse movement on windows desktop feels laggy to me on a 60hz monitor.

  • I find that 144hz is overkill, especially since its difficult to get to those frame rates even on graphically-easy games.
    It requires you to dial the settings down to 1080p or 900p, on Medium or Low, with Minimal or No Anti-Aliasing.
    Even with a GTX 1070.

    I rather "suffer" with only 55-65fps, but have Very High Settings with some Anti-Aliasing, and supersample/checkerboard 1800p or 83% to 4K (or Faux-K).

    • the only reason i need to get a new monitor is to justify my 1080 ti purchase :P, im running witcher 3 all maxed @ 120+ fps

      • I would say if you're going high-end, forget about 144Hz… go for 120Hz.
        It's x5 of 24fps, x4 of 30fps, and x2 of 60fps.
        It's a very scaleable frame rate.

        Some people say it is smoother than 144Hz, others say it is almost as smooth as 144Hz.
        Either way, you're more likely to maintain that framerate, so it should be an upgrade over 144Hz as you will get less screen tearing or stuttering.
        And there's some nice 1440p/Ultrawide screens with 120Hz rate instead of 144Hz.

        Don't forget about G-sync.
        That's your thousand dollar justification right there.

      • I'm using a GTX 1060 with factory overclock, plays Overwatch fine at 1080p 144FPS.

        Witcher maybe 90~100FPS on medium but with a GTX 1080 you can crank those details right up and enjoy the game in super buttery smooth 144hz.

      • If you have a 1080 Ti I would say ignore 1080p entirely and look at 1440p panels. A 1080 Ti is wasted on 1080p.

        With a GTX 1080 I can comfortably play most games at 144fps on my 1440p 144hz monitor.

  • Depends what you play - if you play a lot of FPS I'd stick with 1080p however if you're playing a variety of games and want to really work out your GPU, jump up to a 1440p.

    The price will jump up a fair bit thought.

    This is my current monitor: https://www.pccasegear.com/products/32334/asus-mg279q-144hz-…

    I paid about $680 for it on special. It's hit and miss but generally monitors can last up to 10 years so why not spend the extra $$$. Or maybe just stick with the 1080p and jump up to a 4K in 1-2 years time when they are more affordable and GPUs are better.

Login or Join to leave a comment