Neighbour's Builder Damaged My House

Hi All,

We have a town-house, and so we share the common walls with our neighbours as we're in the middle. Recently, one neighbour (it's their investment property, I live in my home) decided to renovate and went through the appropriate process with council and engaged a licensed builder. A dilapidation report was completed prior to commencement. The builder initially damaged our property and then has caused subsequent damage during the renovation works.

  • A shared gutter pipe was cut, a temporary down pipe was placed on our property without our consultation/knowledge and overflowed, causing internal property water damage to wall, flooring, which will require replacement/repair/repainting - our home insurance has approved - however we will have to pay excess.
  • Minor damage across the common wall (e.g. minor cracking to paint work, visual cracks to timber (not structural).
  • Unfinished work - e.g. short gutter, unfinished roof.

I engaged a lawyer who interestingly advised that I should just suck it up as insurance have covered it (however I'm still out of pocket). I have evidence to back-up with before and after photos etc.

To add to the story (many more not mentioned), another pipe on our property happens to be accessible from their property only. Before the builder finished, he was at pains to advise my that any leak from that pipe onto his clients' property would be my liable.

My question is - if I pursue, who do I pursue - the owner or builder? My preference is to chase the owner, providing it's worth the effort as have already invested a significant amount of time and just want closure. I've written a letter of demand which they've ignored and we will be out about $10K, not including our time.

TL;DR - Our house was damaged by a builder who has now finished up. I have incurred a loss (both time/effort and money) and am deciding if I pursue it, and who I pursue (Owner or Builder) given our home insurance has covered us for some cost (3/4), however, we will be around $10K out (not including valuing time) due to lawyers, insurance excess, initial/outstanding repairs (covered at our cost), repairs associated with insurance.

Comments

  • +6

    a lawyer who interestingly advised that I should just suck it up as insurance have covered it

    This is good professional advice from a solicitor. Perhaps you should give it some thought.

    • Thanks - I have - I am thinking of taking it and moving on. But part of me just wants to do the final letter of demand as it's quick.

    • Could you get them to cover excess?

      Or can op claim through their builder insurance instead?

  • +2

    Small claims court against owner. I would be sending a few letters first, and then see what the owner says.

  • +3

    How are you out $10k if the insurance is covering the bulk? How much did you pay a lawyer?

    • +3

      PTSD, emotional toll and shear inconvenience

      • Not to mention hiring a media consultant to engage with a current affair.

      • shear inconvenience

        Ha!

        • -1

          If you shear the 'in' out of 'inconvenience'..

    • Insurance informs us they will only cover what was damaged as a result of the event.

      Emergency Repairs - Plumber (several visits inc. report requested by insurance not reimbursed) $2.5K
      Lawyer - $1.5K
      Building Report recommended by lawyer $0.9K
      Insurance Excess $0.8K
      Replacement of kitchen appliances (our cost for rangehood and microwave selected as builder is advising replacement)$1K
      Roof repair - (damaged by builder) $1K
      Additional enhancements in kitchen not covered by insurance $2.75K (at our choice)

      Further Plumbing Work required as a result - relocation of temporary plumbing and lining of our pipes (water was carried by neighbour previously). Probably another $1K-$3K.

    • +1

      ..

  • however, we will be around $10K out (not including valuing time) due to lawyers, insurance excess, initial/outstanding repairs (covered at our cost), repairs associated with insurance.

    Can't claim legal costs unless you sue them and win (and even then usually not all of it)
    Repairs covered at your own cost.. should've been covered by insurance surely?
    Repairs associated with insurance should definitely be covered by insurance.

    So you're really left with… the insurance excess. How much is that? I assume you told you lawyer how much that was and they told you to move on, and I'd personally take professional advice on that point.

    • Insurance informs us they will only cover what was damaged as a result of the event.

      Emergency Repairs - Plumber (several visits inc. report requested by insurance not reimbursed) $2.5K
      Lawyer - $1.5K
      Building Report recommended by lawyer $0.9K
      Insurance Excess $0.8K
      Replacement of kitchen appliances (our cost for rangehood and microwave selected as builder is advising replacement)$1K
      Roof repair - (damaged by builder) $1K
      Additional enhancements in kitchen not covered by insurance $2.75K (at our choice)

      Further Plumbing Work required as a result - relocation of temporary plumbing and lining of our pipes (water was carried by neighbour previously). Probably another $1K-$3K.

      • Insurance informs us they will only cover what was damaged as a result of the event

        That's also what the builder or neighbour would be liable for too.

  • Perhaps your own counsel has thought about your odds of success, even in small claims, and feels it's just not worth the aggravation, having experienced these sorts of matters on a professional basis themselves. Did you lawyer give you any sort of advice, specifically why you would be better not to pursue at all? Perhaps it's worth asking your lawyer if pursuing this matter yourself through small claims would be a potential option?

  • Pursue the owner as they engaged the builder

Login or Join to leave a comment