for your ease of comparion:
https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=11039&idPhone…
prices are within $100 or so
what would you take
the S is a 2 gen older flagship ish unit vs a midranger
specs about lineball
Samsung A52 5G Vs. Samsung S20 FE 5G
tonyjzx on 10/03/2022 - 10:10
Last edited 10/03/2022 - 14:24
Last edited 10/03/2022 - 14:24
Comments
Yeah I made a mistake on mobile. I mean the s20.
I think the s21/22 is a fine thing if you're paying per month on a long plan but paying $1k cash on s21 seems a bit hefty to me.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G 8+128GB Dual Sim Cloud Navy
$655Samsung Galaxy A52 A5260 5G Dual Sim 8GB Ram 128GB Black
$493.99both kogan
$150 seems to be ok i guess?
S series.
I have an A series , and the software is slow.. I wished I bought an S series which I had previously
i would not think a Snapdragon 700 series would be that slow???
I have a Galaxy A71. I used to have an S9 , the S9 was zippier and you didn't have to unlock the phone after restarting it for it to come to ready.
A52S 5G is the one to consider , not A52 5G
A52S 5G has much better sd778 soc at similar price , some bought under $500 on sale , or now $549 at jb-hifi , but saw a few here bought under $500
if you want better camera , go for s20 fe 5g snapdragon (not exynos)
if you want longer OS / security support , get A52s 5g
Where is the S20 FE 5g for $655?
Sounds like Used pricing. Nothing new at that price, I've been keeping my eyes open.
Title says S21FE, the link goes to S20FE. You probably need to clarify which one you're referring to. I think the S21FE is a no brainer over any A model for a similar price. S20FE will be closer.
Overall, it depends what you do with your phone. If you're just browsing and doing basic things most of the time, an A series will do the job. If you're doing more intensive things like video conferencing, games etc, an S series would be a better choice.
It also depends which device you're coming from. If you're coming from a flagship, an A series will drive you nuts with it's slower performance and comparative lagginess since the main difference is obviously processing power and therefore overall performance.