FujiFilm X-T3 WW Body Black Compact System Camera $1,299 Shipped @ Camera House

120

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

LYahooChess on 08/07/2022 - 17:36 camerahouse.com.au (539 clicks)
Last edited 08/07/2022 - 17:40 by 1 other user

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Was looking for a Fujifilm X-S10 when came across this. The Fujifilm XT3 WW appears to just be missing a charger, but apart from that the same??

You are able to 2.8% cashback too through Shopback, which brings it down to $1262.63 with free shipping. There appears to be a free $200 free print voucher, VIP membership and an E-learning course in there too.

Related Stores

Camera House

• 

  Dlee13 on 08/07/2022 - 17:41

  The X-S10 doesn't actually come with a charger, you generally just charge it over USB-C. The dedicated charger you need to buy separately which is around $90.

  • 

    YahooChess on 08/07/2022 - 21:16

    The XT3 charges over USB C no? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems both the XT3 and X-s10 charge over USB-C, they just don't have the wall adapter.

    • 

      TheRealCJ on 09/07/2022 - 03:21

      Yep, charges the battery via USB-C.

• 

  cpeiqi on 08/07/2022 - 18:52

  X-S10 has IBIS.

  • 

    YahooChess on 08/07/2022 - 21:06

    Yeah but is currently more expensive than this XT3 by a couple of hundred dollars. I would want to use this for photography not videography, so I don't think this would be a big difference?

    • 

      Dlee13 on 08/07/2022 - 21:18

      +1

      IBIS is honestly just as useful for both. You can handhold at a much slower exposure, usually 3 or 4 stops lower than if you are using a body/lens combo without IBIS/IS so that means lower ISO and cleaner images.

      • 

        aragornelessar on 08/07/2022 - 22:11

        Agreed. I've done long exposure fireworks propped up against a car hood and dashboard. Not as ideal as a tripod, but it beat carrying around one during NYE crowds

        • 

          Dlee13 on 08/07/2022 - 22:33

          @aragornelessar: Even for normal day to day shooting they help if you aren’t as steady. I got so used to having IBIS on my FF bodies over the years so the X-S10 having was a big reason why I sold my M50 Mark II for it.

• 

  zombrex on 08/07/2022 - 19:31

  I really want to buy the X-S10 been holding out for a better Nikon body than the Z50 but seems it will never happen sadly.

  • 

    YahooChess on 08/07/2022 - 21:14

    +1

    yeah I had a look at the Z50, looks very good value for money, but I already have a Fujifilm XA3 with a 35mm f2, 50-230 and 16-50mm

• 

  snvl on 08/07/2022 - 20:48

  +1

  Cheaper from their eBay store with the 5% off

  • 

    YahooChess on 08/07/2022 - 21:07

    ooh yeah thanks. Would that make it invalid for the $200 worth of prints though?

    • 

      Buy2Much on 08/07/2022 - 22:16

      They'd include the voucher in the parcel, even for their eBay sales.

• 

  Nivlac on 08/07/2022 - 21:41

  Just got myself the X100V, but logged in to give this an upvote.
  Nice post OP

  • 

    S0041464 on 12/07/2022 - 15:37

    Nice where did you get it from?

    • 

      Nivlac on 12/07/2022 - 15:53

      Georges camera, its actually a pre-order.
      Currently advertised for $1784.
      Supply has been scarce.

      • 

        S0041464 on 12/07/2022 - 16:09

        Yes indeed. I would like before my holiday. Might have to wait

• 

  coconut1512 on 09/07/2022 - 00:54

  can anyone shed some lights on this vs Canon EOS RP? Used mainly for family/road trip

  • 

    TheRealCJ on 09/07/2022 - 03:49

    +1

    The EOS RP is cannon's entry level Full Frame mirrorless. Full Frame means that it can physically shoot higher resolution and has larger pixels, so performs much better in low light. A lot more lenses available for it via R to EF mount adapters, but the drawback is that because it's an entry level model, the UI and button layout is much more like a base model SLR like the EOS 3000D - Barely above a point and shoot. That said, simple UI means you can get great shots right out of the box with barely any tinkering, and canon's autofocus is still the best on the market (imo). Battery life unfortunately is terrible, rated for about 250 shots, which honestly is totally pants. The screen on the Canon isn't as good, but it is rotating instead of tilting, so you can use it for selfies and at practically any angle, compared to the Fuji which can only point in a few directions. It has one SD card slot that supports UHS-I and II, so you'll be able to use the fastest cards you can, but it only has one slot which limits your options. Ergonomics-wise, the Canon is more comfortable to hold with a more SLR-like body with a deep grip, so if you're planning on taking a lot of one-handed shots or just have larger hands, you may find the Canon way more comfortable to hold. The Fuji has a very "classic" design, which means a quite shallow grip, much less ergonomic.

    The X-T3 is a more professional camera, lens selection is less (but still decent). It has an APC-C sensor which is physically smaller than full frame, and so has less effective low-light performance, but Fujifilm has their X-Trans layout, which is a different sensor layout from most other digital cameras and produces really excellent colour performance. Smaller sensor also means that it creates smaller file sizes per image, which enables much higher high speed shooting - 20 frames per second (compare that to about 5 frames per second on the Canon) which if you're taking photos of kids can be absolutely essential if they're playing and not posing for you. The body and lenses also physically smaller than the Canon, which means for normal walking-around-the-place situations it's a lot less conspicuous, and depending on what lenses you have take up much less overall space, meaning you can have a smaller bag or just less to physically carry around. That said because of its better build quality it is about 100g heaver than the Canon, although the larger RF Lenses will weigh more than the X-Moint ones. Most importantly though it has a professional-level user interface, with physical dials for the three most important settings - ISO, Shutter Speed, and Exposure - as well as subdials for drive mode and exposure metering, a joystick for selecting focus points and navigation, and front and rear jog dials which can be user-modified to change various settings. It also has 2 UHS-I/II card slots, which means you can have two memory cards set to work in various ways: in sequence so you effective have twice as much storage space, mirrored, so you have a backup of every shot you take in case of card failure, you can set one card to save JPEGs and one to save RAW, or have one card save photographs and the other one video, etc.

    The X-t3 also has Fujifilm's legendary film simulations, which can basically recreate and save just about any film style you care to name, which for photographers looking for a very specific type of look is unbelievably valuable. In camera image processing is the best on the market. I'm serious when I say I've taken more jpeg shots with an Xt3 that needed almost zero touching up than I ever have with any other camera.

    Battery is rated for a little under 400 shots, which is still not great but better than the Canon. BUT, importantly, the battery will charge while it's in use, so you can theoretically plug in a USB-C power bank and use the camera while charging the battery at the same time - the Canon needs to be switched off to charge the battery, although it will work as though plugged into a mains via USB-C.

    Neither camera has a built in flash, but the Canon wins here simply because the Canon ecosystem is much, much more widely used, so there's a lot of low-cost third party lenses and flashes and accessories compared to Fujifilm, which has more of a smaller enthusiast demographic and so tends to result in more expensive but better quality accessories.

    Anyway, tldr: The Cannon has the Full Frame sensor and ecosystem going for it, while the Fujifilm has more professional-level controls and better (again, imo) colour science, as well as a much faster shooting speed, longer battery life (and the ability to charge and use the camera simultaneously).

    Honestly, if you're okay with the smaller sensor and higher overall cost of lenses and the ecosystem, and want a camera you can really get professional-style shots with, choose the Fujifilm. If you prefer a lower overall cost of lenses and accessories, and prefer a more automatic point-and-shoot system that doesn't require much tinkering, get the Canon.

    • 

      coconut1512 on 09/07/2022 - 11:56

      Thanks for the detailed write up, think I am leaning towards Fuji, will do more research before settling

  • 

    Buy2Much on 09/07/2022 - 10:15

    can anyone shed some lights on this vs Canon EOS RP? Used mainly for family/road trip

    I would compare the Fujifilm to the Canon APSC equivalent, Canon R10. The latter is a new release and more advanced with excellent autofocus. IMHO $1539 with kit lens is more bang for buck https://www.camera-warehouse.com.au/canon-eos-r10-mirrorless… . ATM you can claim from Canon a free second battery or EF Len adapter.
    Review here: https://m.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-r10-initial-review

• 

  shabaka on 12/07/2022 - 18:35

  +1

  for interested to buy this, today it's 10% with Ebay plus. comes down to $1169. I got one

  x-s10 is $1399 at Amazon, but no weather sealing on x-s10 seals it for me (no pun intended)

  also 16/2.8 is weather sealed and $513 on Amazon, along with a few other good sub $600 primes

  • 

    shabaka on 12/07/2022 - 20:40

    last one left. clueless people are still trying to sell their used ones for this much or more on eBay

• 

  S0041464 on 14/07/2022 - 14:49

  I think this is sold out

  • 

    YahooChess on 14/07/2022 - 15:01

    pretty sure you can still check out with it. I am picking mine up today

• 

  shabaka on 20/07/2022 - 17:46

  +1

  I think this show is over