• expired

LISEN 240W USB C to USB C Fast Charging Cable 2m 2-Pack $9.89 + Delivery ($0 with Prime/$59 Spend) @ LISEN Space via Amazon AU

1051
8K4N7FMB
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

To get this price, Click -
Coupon [ ] Apply 20% off coupon
Redeem Save 47% promo code: 8K4N7FMB

About this item

  • 240W SUPER FAST CHARGING This type c to type c fast charging cable supports PD 3.0 and QC 3.0 fast charging, it charges your macbook pro and new iPhone 15/15 Plus/iPhone 15 Pro Max as fast as Apple official 240W cable; Fast charging gives you a quick and convenient way to recharge your devices up to 80 percent in 30 minutes, and data transfer speeds up to 480Mbps (1200 songs synced per minute).

  • APPLE OFFICIAL E-MARKER SMART CHIP LISEN 240W super fast charging USB C cable is build in the original power delivery E-Mark chip, which supports USB PD fast charging and provides comprehensive protection to devices battery and adapters, keep you in light-speed charging and safe;

  • SUPER LONG CABLE 2m / 6.6 ft/2 Pack let you can charge and have fun in bedroom, sofa, library, office, even when you are on the backseat of the car; thanks to exceptional flexibility, remains tangle-free even when stuffed into a bag or pocket.

  • AMAZING DURABILITY Reinforced braided usb c cable, Lasts 30x longer than ordinary cables-proven in a laboratory environment to withstand 48,000 bends. It built-in laser welding technology, which ensure the metal part won't break. One of the toughest cables ever created, with tensile strength capable of withstanding 175 lbs

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
LISEN Space
LISEN Space

closed Comments

  • +1

    APPLE OFFICIAL E-MARKER SMART CHIP

    Love it how pseudo-companies blatantly lie out of China. Clearly no false advertising laws lol.

    • It does have an e marker chip if it really does 240w, maybe not “apple” though, but it might be made of apples who knows

    • you didnt test it but you presumed, you have rights to decide not to buy though,

      • +8

        Apple doesn't make "official emark chips". At best they could be the same vendor Apple uses, but that's unlikely, and still not "Apple official".

        So I didn't presume. It was just some incredibly complex deductive work that allowed me to reach my conclusion.

        • Apple licenses emarker chip usage to many vendors, which is most likely what this means.

          If that's the case and I'm not saying it is, by all metric this is then "Apple Official"

  • About the same as AliExpress then

  • I don't LISEN.

  • +3

    Was not aware 240W was possible, that’s got to be over 10A easily and as far as I know 20V is the limit for PD, so that’s more like 12A.

    • +2

      240w PD jacks the voltage up to 48V so the line losses don't become dumb.

    • We've moved to 28v 5A for 140w charging, and as it goes up we likely are going to be using higher voltages to minimize line loss.

      • Interesting to know!
        Will be useful to be able to power 24v devices.

    • -3

      Was not aware 240W was possible

      They meant 240V.

      Will try as soon as I receive mine and post back here…

  • +4

    The product specifications feels so inconsistent. It advertises 240W but supports PD3.0. 240W is EPR (extended power range) which requires PD3.1.

  • +19

    About 5 out of 781 reviews mentions a fire hazard/smoking, 2 reviews mentions shocking, not bad - I will try my chances!

    • So a Fire-sale then?

  • +3

    thanks these sometimes maybe good sometimes maybe shit

  • Thanks. Just need a PD charger capable of delivering 240w on a single port and a device that is capable of receiving 240w!

    Dear ozb gods, for my birthday, pretty please?

  • 240w through a USB-C cable, wow, technology elevates fast!

  • +2

    From the description, you can tell it wasn't written by someone who actually know the tech side of USB-C.

    240W is a USB-PD 3.1 standard, not 3.0. Given that this cable is USB 2.0 only, that means at best only the power delivery wires are better quality ones.

    You'd better hope this is a proper 240W cable, rather than 20V/5A cable with e-marking hacked to 48V. Apple, so far, only allows USB-PD 3.1 to operate on the new MagSafe power cable so if you really want to test 240W, you need to use a PC laptop supporting > 100W USB-C/PD charging.

    • They don't exist. There aren't chargers that are 240w capable to begin with.

      This is an issue to be worrying about in 2024 or 2025 when devices are slated to be releasing with it.

  • If you don't lisen you end up with schitec.

    There are too many inconsistencies in the product description for this to be a safe purchase.

  • why cant i see the 20% off coupon ?

  • Expired? Don't see a 20% off coupon.

  • Same here

  • 20% is gone

  • Strange, i got the promo code working but not the promo

  • It’s showing 15.89

  • +1

    Reminder to self. I purchased these. Come back in a several days when ozbargains best techheads who have also purchased, have received and given the things a once over, come back to this post and communicated their expert opinion BEFORE I actually plug anything in. 🙏

    • Youre fine to use these

      • If you know anything about these (not sure if you do) my fear is that I've been observing our chargers in the house, a Satechi 165W USB-C 4-Port PD GaN Charger ST-UC165GM and a BlitzWolf BW-S25 75W 6 Port USB-PD PPS Charger. The BlitzWolf particularly, every now and then I'll touch it and be pretty shocked at how much heat it's pumping out. Enough that I try and make sure I turn it off if I'm leaving home, when I remember. I recall throwing a floor fan on it a few times. Fear with the cables if I choose poorly, could exaggerate the problem. I'll go slowly slowly catchy monkey, but yeah, absolutely interested in hearing from anyone with a high degree of knowledge on the subject. Thank you. 🙂

        • +2

          Hi

          I do a lot of testing on chargers and banks on OzB so I'm probably qualified enough.

          I've tested the Satechi unit you have, and while it gets hot it's not a cause for concern.

          GaN chargers are designed to operate at hotter temperatures and be just fine with it. What you're experiencing is the heat actually being dissipated into the body of the unit so it can be cooled. In good quality chargers like the Satechi this is normal and a good thing, as usually what happens in cheaper units is the heat is held within a small area until the charger just dies from overheating.

          Safety wise there are protection systems in place to throttle and cut off if the temperatures get too hot.

          Manufacturers try not to use the chassis as part of their cooling system in order to not burn users or cause concerns as you do right now, but the reality of it is if you are pumping 100+ watts things will get toasty… It's nothing to worry about because decent chargers have safety systems in place where it's going to die in a unspectacular cessation of function rather than a flashy puff of fire or smoke.

          But if you're saying the blitz wolf is getting hot without you charging anything you need to dispose of the unit immediately.

          What cable you use shouldn't have any bearing on this at all - in fact if your cable is unable to pump the negotiated amount of power, it wouldn't be able to negotiate it to begin or would cut out before any safety issues arose.

          Since there aren't any 240w devices, you are going to be using these at 100w or at best 140w, which they are definitely more than capable of handling with no issue.

          • @SmoothCactus: Can't thank you enough. Such an awesome response and it's much appreciated. One further question please - the BlitzWolf isn't so much hot when not being used, I'd say it's really hot when it's working hard to charge several items, that's my observation, does that change your advice on binning it? It's enough for me to think woah…plastic encasing can get SO hot without melting 😲

            Thanks again!

            • +2

              @seamonkey: Not unusual. Hot when charging (especially with multiple items) is just because of losses when converting the 240V AC from the wall to the various DC output voltages.

              Blitzwolf is generally decent enough, but certainly on the cheaper end, and will tend to use less efficient components and designs.

              Likely when charging multiple items, the overall efficiency is quite low.

              EG, it might be outputting 50W, but starting with 70W+, and turning 20W+ into heat. That's enough for the exterior of the charger to feel quite hot, but shouldn't be an issue.

              In my experience, desktop chargers such as the BW-S25 tend to run hotter. Partly because the larger size makes it easier for the manufacturer to use less compact, less efficient electronics. I also find chargers that use an IEC-C7 cord also tend to run hotter in general because they don't have the additional heat sinking provided by the power pins running directly from the charger to the wall socket contacts, and into the relatively thick wall wiring.

              • +1

                @Prong: This is all such wonderful information, thank you. I knew nothing yesterday about this stuff, you guys are crazy knowledgeable. 🙂

  • Hey so what devices would use something like this? i don't mean the wall socket - like what kind of phone/table/laptop could use this much power with a cord like this?

    • A computer monitor maybe?

  • Just gotta wait for someone to have a device that has 3.1 PD support to review it on here

  • It's always baffled me the existence of these cables.
    240W PD Chargers don't exist yet nor do any devices using it. Theres never independent testing for compliance, and whether they meet the requirements or not.

    The standard was announced in 2021, and they usually take several years to pickup. The last I heard some devices were about to be releasing with in mid 2024.

    That however doesn't mean these are problematic or unsafe. They work just fine and are perfectly safe to what you could possibly use them for today. The question is ONLY whether they will be 240W compliant in 2-3 years from now. I have some of these cables and there are some Baseus cables that are identical to this that are also in circulation.

    They work just fine at 140w, so they'll be fine with anything below too.

    For a budget cable… It doesn't really matter either because cables that are truly compliant with thunderbolt and higher power are usually more expensive on a raw materials level, to the point it'd be unusual for them to be this cheap.

  • Can someone share an actual charger and device that can use this at 240w? Never heard of such thing

  • +1

    Lisen out for the fire truck on it's way to your burning down home.

  • 240w? LISEN through their teeth?

  • Received the cables and looked pretty Generic. No mention of power or protocol supported in the packaging. Will be returning back this afternoon.

Login or Join to leave a comment