iPhone 16, 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max on clearance. Can possibly price match @ Officeworks if the clearance stock doesn't run out.
Mod - Examples:
iPhone 16 256GB $1597 $1299
iPhone 16 Pro 128GB $1797 $1599
iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB $2147 $1999
iPhone 16 Pro Max 1TB $2847 $2399
There's like 17 different models dude
Heads-up to anyone considering to buy iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Pro. Base model iPhone 17 is a better deal than iPhone 16 and 16 Pro any day and it’s cheaper.
Absolutely! I'm not an iPhone fan myself, but Apple did a great job this year with the base iPhone 17. The upgrades made and the previous strategy of withholding these features/upgrades from the base model to upsell people to the Pro models seems to have had a bit of give this year. The base iPhone 17 is one of the best value for money iPhones ever now IMO.
Whats best way to get i phone 17 base model? I cant remember but i thought i saw on ozb few months ago i phone for like 40% off or something? Or was i mistaken?
iPhone 17 base model launches tomorrow.
I doubt you've seen it promo'd for 40% off a few months back 😅
maybe the 16 model on plans?
Thanks to all our boycott Apple got some sense
Also completely agree. But the colour schemes of the 17 pro are a little questionable. The air received all the nice colours
I have been following the iPhone 16 and 16e prices for family. We decided to wait for the release and hope they drop further after the release of the new lineup.
The lowest about 4-6 weeks ago was
iPhone 16 - $1,147
iPhone 16e - $847
With how much better the iPhone 17 is looking for $1,399, they will hopefully drop the price further.
is that the same in the camera department? was considering the 16 pro and did the comparison on the apple store and it seems to be similar minus the extra camera
Bad deal. Also, iphone 17 benchmarks:
https://ibb.co/prsQgr20
https://ibb.co/XxB4qhFh
https://ibb.co/W4DBrTJS
https://ibb.co/mF90fKbM
https://ibb.co/kgPKwb7F
tl;dr: vastly improved reception and speed; vastly improved computing where base model outperforms previous pro
You can't just judge phones on benchmarks dude. The vast majority of people do not need anywhere near the power of the best chipsets/GPUs.
Pixel phones are behind benchmark wise every single year, but they're pretty great phones
True. I'm just providing benchmarks as an fyi for those interested.
Fair!
Agreed, I'm using a Pixel 7 Pro 12GB/512GB and it hasn't skipped a beat with gaming or any other tasks I've thrown at it.
Aren't users of pixels complaining about gaming performance?
Why are they comparing 5G to 4G in the Internet speed tests to compare models?
No, that's remoteness test. Same location, the 17 Pro Max is picking up 5g whereas the iPhone 16 Pro Max is only picking up 4g.
The biggest issue here is the speed cap of 150Mbps unless you have a postpaid plan without speed cap. I wouldn't be so concerned about that youTuber's worst case result. I am more interested in WiFi 7 result, which most, if not youTubers haven't done such test. Also, sustained performance on iPhone 17 still at a typical smartphone / iPhone level.
This deal is not good though. iPhone 16 128GB could be have for $650 (or $600 if you have a Telstra postpaid plan) back in April. $850 for the 256GB version. I don't think people who got those iPhone 16s back in April will be too concerned. I also doubt we will be able to get the same kind of deal for iPhone 17 in April 2026 (would be awesome if we will be able to).
Because wifi 7 is super rare in households. Also this is not about speed but about reception. It's showing vastly improved reception.
The thing is, that test was using iPhone 17 Pro Max, which has a new antenna design due to the new bump. For iPhone 17 series phones, iPhone 17 base model might be the best one to get for most people so one cannot just look at iPhone 17 Pro Max result and assume that applies to the base model as well.
There are a lot of cheap WiFi 7 routers. The WiFi 7 test is important because that could be one advantage of iPhone 17 over iPhone 16. You need at least 2.5Gbps LAN (preferably 10Gbps LAN) for iPhone 16 or better.
Also, people tend to get Apple too much credit, the 120Hz display is quite common for Android. WiFi 7 performance on Android is superior (hopefully, iPhone 17 will change that). It's annoying that iPhone 16 is not a good device to test WiFi 7.
@netsurfer: Yes I agree they should've tested for the base 17 as well but I'm guessing much improved reception over base 16 still.
Yes 120 Hz is common. But Apple just built different 😎
@marshmall0w2: Did you check reviews from other youTubers? They did indicate it is that new antenna design. I don't believe iPhone 17 has the antenna design change and based on the results from other youTubers, I wouldn't over-hype iPhone 17. The CPU is better, but sustained performance, the Pro series phones still have a clear advantage.
It's best not to read too much into these early reviews. I can see these youTubers still want to demonstrate the advantages of Pro and Pro Max series. Those ones have a re-design with vapor chamber. Apple's 120Hz doesn't allow always 120Hz and you can't adjust.
@netsurfer: Yes I'm aware. What I'm saying is that I also expect the 17 to attain better reception and speeds given factors like better CPU and changing from titanium to aluminium for heat dissipation. The actual hardware I'm not sure yet.
@marshmall0w2: iPhone 16 base model wasn't titanium, it was aluminium, same as iPhone 17. You need to stop talking iPhone 17 base model as if it is iPhone 17 Pro Max. For the early reviews, the youTubers are talking about iPhone 17 Pro Max, that's because that's where all the changes are. iPhone 17 is essentially iPhone 16 Pro with 1 less camera, new CPU so there is not much for the youTuber to talk about.
Using aluminium is still cost cutting. Sure, people will sugarcoat it with aluminium dissipate heat better, but high end Apple Watch Ultra uses titanium.
Some youTubers have tested iPhone 17's heat dissipation, the result is underwhelming (basically the same as iPhone 16).
@marshmall0w2: Basically, is it worthwhile to spend close to $1000 more for a better mobile reception in worst case scenario because this year's Pro model does have a new antenna design covering a much larger area, basically a larger antenna)? We are talking about Apple here so you really think Apple re-designed the iPhone 17 base model, rather than re-use last year's design?
WiFi 7 would be attractive for iPhone 17 because if Apple done it right this time, you could get close to 4Gbps using WiFi 7, that beats USB2 (and is close to USB 3.2 gen 1/5Gbps).
@netsurfer: I know some Wifi 7 routers are not expensive, but how many people upgrade this thing regularly in their houses? Most people use a router provided by the internet company until it breaks, that's it.
Even those who know tech may not upgrade to Wifi 7 if they are on Wifi 5/6.
So what we should care is just reception test. The speed test for newer wifi standard is quite useless for a majority.
@User531437: It's quite common for new builds (due to ethernet wiring is costing less nowadays). WiFi7 routers come with 2.5Gbps LAN ports minimum (if you get a WiFi 7 device, you will generally at least ALL 2.5Gbps LAN ports, with decent / proper ones have 10Gbps LAN port(s)).
The main reason I want to see the WiFi 7 result is because iPhone 16's WiFi 7 support is more like WiFi 6E. I just want to know whether it is now doing proper WiFi 7. Basically, Android phones with WiFi 7 provides significant speed advantage of iPhone 16.
The reception test was for mobile data and it was done on iPhone 17 Pro Max which has a new antenna design (using the large camera bump). iPhone 17's antenna design is the same as iPhone 16.
@User531437: If you are a current Apple iPhone owner, it is hard to be objective. Apple is really good at marketing and selling people iPhones.
The reception issue, the truth is, whichever provider Arun was using, didn't have enough base stations in the area. You don't get an iPhone 17 Pro Max so that you can use 15Mbps. Arun was demonstrating the advantage of having an antenna around the entire camera bump on 17 Pro Max. iPhone 17 doesn't have that antenna. If you want to numb your brain and think that extra antenna is completely useless (Apple put that on Pro Max just for fun), then go ahead (despite Arun indicates that plays a part).
iPhone 16 is dead last in WiFi 7 speed test for all smartphones which supports WiFi 7. Even if you don't use WiFi 7 right now, for the shinny new toy, iPhone 17, you want to know whether Apple fixed the issue.
@netsurfer: Okay, hope you do the same when Wifi 7E and later version come out 😂 best Wifi detective/investigator ever, certified! Kudos to you, legend!
@User531437: You still don't get it. Apple cheated in iPhone 16, claiming WiFi 7 support, despite its top speed is essentially WiFi 6E. Also, there is no WiFi 7E (WiFi 8 is next). If you don't know WiFi, then it's not objective to make claims on what technical people will do. If iPhone 17 does support WiFi 7 properly, it will further drive WiFi 7 sales. It was frustrating that to properly test WiFi 7, an Android phone had to be used (and clearly Apple could have done it had it elected not to cheap out last year).
The tech people I know embarked on WiFi 7 much earlier than I thought and they also have 10Gbps LAN setup, latest nVidia GPU (for AI work). How many tech people proud themselves using old tech? Anyone who can afford an iPhone 17 most certainly can afford WiFi 7. You can sell your old network gears. No need to fall in love with WiFi 5.
@netsurfer: We just got the details now. iPhone 17 base uses N1 chip. It improves Wifi and networking over previous iPhones.
This deal is not good though. iPhone 16 128GB could be have for $650 (or $600 if you have a Telstra postpaid plan) back in April. $850 for the 256GB version.
hey can you point me in the direction or link where you saw iPhone 16 outright for $650?? I searched all previous deals and could not find it even in the comments. https://www.ozbargain.com.au/product/iphone-16
I guess I'm missing something because going by title ATL seems to be $1009.
Worst deal in 2025
…or ever? for iPhones
Well, iPhone 16 128GB all time best deal (using all the info provided in OZB) was $650 (or $600 if you had an existing Telstra postpaid plan) back in April so this deal doesn't look good.
I'm surprised retailers not doing fire sale to clear their iPhone 16 stock.
The deal is so bad.
Man what a terrible deal… who is this even for? Surely if you can pay $1300 for a 256GB iPhone 16, you’d pay the extra $100 to get the iPhone 17.
Samsung Fold and Flip FTW!
Foldables are a whole different category
iPhone 16 256gb should be at $999 so that worth a look.
The 17 line makes 16 obsolete if 16 is not heavily discounted.
But not the 16 Plus….which is what I'm chasing. Last of that size 6.7"
Same. Please comment if you find a good deal on 16 Plus 512 gb.
iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB $2147 $1999
iPhone 17 Pro Max 256GB $2199
I would rather wait and get the 17 where the bargain sorry
Or just pay the extra $200 for the latest PM. Terrible deal.
Looking for any newer iPhone for my mum, upgrading from XR so no trade-in. Any okay offers around for iPhone 17, outright or good plan? I've been looking but so far don't see any difference with where to buy from? Open to other iPhones too.
ive yet to see any offers outright for any of the 17 series - best is MAYBE if you happen to have some kind of discounted giftcard at jb or apple. Or trade in and get the bonus some stores are offering.
my xr started glitching few days back, if you find new phone for your mum, can I have hers? 😉
p.s: i haven’t bought any phone since 2014 and have survived on other people’s upgrades 🤫
RIP titanium. That was a huge downgrade with the iPhone 17 and the only reason I refuse to upgrade.
They went back intentionally because the titanium was trapping heat
titanium sounds so premium though even when just throwing it into a conversation
but even if you dress up aluminum like - 'aircraft grade aluminium' or 'military spec aluminium' its usually crickets haha
(yes i am aware military spec generally means cheapest crap possible to pass the benchmark for the military)
Titanium is more premium and I prefer it. Just mentioning why apple decided to change back.. I think they could have found a way if they wanted to, but either it was a cost cutting measure or easier option just to go back
@maverickjohn: I never had my iPhone overheat as much as my 15 Pro does. I hadn't considered a connection with the heat dissipation in titanium until Apple suggested it last keynote.
Maybe they're full of shit and it is just cost saving, but given the profit margins they have and the fact they still use titanium in their cheaper Air phone (which benchmarks have shown performs far worse than the regular 17) I am inclined to believe them that they made the change for thermal reasons.
@stirlo: I meant it's cost cutting to resort to aluminium rather than keep titanium and find a way to exhaust the heat out. They have enough money to try and find a solution. But probably went for the easier route of just going back to aluminium.
So basically, people just want titanium for it's wank factor?
Sent from my iPhone 16 Pro Max 1TB Titanium.
I’d rather some extra heat than the extremely easily damaged and lower quality aluminium.
I don't particularly like the 17 pro design or choices, just mentioning the reason they stated for the change.
My wife loves her 16 pro max. Titanium and all.
The extra heat affects the phone significantly though. My 15 Pro consistently overheats when using the camera or when charging. This impacts my day to day use far more than what material the phone is made of (it's always in a case anyway).
FYI titanium can also get scratched, the blue colour of mine has multiple marks on it so it's not like it's a bulletproof way to have your phone stay pristine either.
Should I buy a new iPhone 17 Pro (12GB ram, 256GB storage), or a refurbished iPhone 6s (2GB ram, 32GB storage)?
does 6s come in ozbargain orange?
does iphone 17 pro come in ozbargain orange?
the answer is clear ;)
You should buy iPhone 17 Pro (12GB, 2TB). Make Tim Apple rich.
These aren't worthwile deals at all. The base 17 actually does offer a lot more value for the money this year so getting the 16 just to save $100 is a bad idea all round.
The pro's are dubious value, it comes down to how much you value the third camera and the titanium, but you're also trading off storage (128gb on the 16pro, 256gb on the base 17) plus the $200 extra. I think they're bad deals.
iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB $1999
bought from JB less than $1850 4 months ago.
I’m waiting for the 17e. I still can’t bring myself to pay over $1000 for a phone, even if I use it for 3-4 years. Currently on an iPhone SE3
Same. The most I've ever paid for a phone was $599.
Smart, not everyone is intelligent as you are.
it is a strange world to be living in where, people end up spending 2k for a disease like phone and then later go to doctors for anxiety and other sleep disturbing problem and spend another 2k+ for treatment..
A mate got that JB Hi-Fi deal posted on OZB back in April and basically got a brand new iPhone 16 128GB model for $600. JB refused to do a deal on iPhone 16e at the time though (so iPhone 16 was cheaper than 16e).
Why stop there? You can get Android smartphones for as cheap as $100!
True, if that solves purpose then absolutely.
It depends on how much the price of the phone represents in your budget. When a pint of beer is $18 and a Toyota Camry costs $45k spending $1-2k on a phone which you use for hours a day for 3-4 years is a bargain and provides outstanding value compared to other purchases…
Horrible price, just get the base 17
Even when you price match the Pro Max at OW to a lower $1899, still a bad deal 🤣
Officeworks do not price match clearance lines OP!!
Officeworks doesn't like money
My last iPhone was the 7 plus, I didn't realise how much there phones have gone up on price
People have become addicted and have forgotten the word “wise spending”.
Priced matched ow, they said they can only price match with shipping, ended up paying $2285 using 10% off gift card from ALDI, so out of pocket is $2056 for the 1TB 16 pro max, thanks op
Hi guys, any deal for iPhone 16 Pro 1tb? I’m looking for one and looks like JBHifi doesn’t have any stock…
Price in title.