This was posted 10 years 15 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Master Real Estate and Architecture Photography Online Course- $29 USD - Great Photography Course

10
Master Real Estate and Architecture Photography Online Course- $29 USD - Great Photography Course
Go to Deal
Associatedcharliebor on 10/04/2014 - 01:14 greatphotographycourses.net (131 clicks)
APRILSALE

There are plenty of opportunities for competent architecture photographers. They might be asked to photograph homes or commercial spaces for the builders, real estate companies, architects, or magazines. No matter the market, this photographic specialty requires a set of skills to professionally photograph a job. Architecture is one of the most challenging subjects to compose and light. There are ambient light issues, color balance issues, and lighting a scene to make it look natural. If you have an interest in architecture photography, we have created the perfect course for you. You will learn a step-by-step approach to making the jump from lighting novice to experienced lighting technician. You will learn lighting, composing using strobes lights and flash, Photoshop techniques, and the popular painting with light approach to interior photography.

Internet Architecture Lamp Photography Real Estate

Related Stores

greatphotographycourses.net
greatphotographycourses.net

closed Comments

  • jv on 10/04/2014 - 01:25
    +8

    Do you realise that some of the things you are teaching in your real estate photography are illegal here under the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002….

    http://greatphotographycourses.net/mastering-architecture-ph…

    http://greatphotographycourses.net/mastering-architecture-ph…

    • 5k on 10/04/2014 - 04:49

      May I ask what is illegal about this?

    • Rayve on 10/04/2014 - 05:29
      -3

      Actually, no. The photograph of the building represents the building and not, in this case, the environs. Were the publisher of said image to claim that there are features of the building that are not present that would be a misrepresentation under the law. In this case the surrounds of the building are not being offered for sale, nor are they under the control of the seller and no offense has occurred.

      • sk3iron on 10/04/2014 - 05:50
        +2

        The misrepresentation occurs where the buyer would presume that underground power had been put in, this is an attractive asset to some buyers as after the fact this is a costly exercise (at the new owners expense)

  • 5k on 10/04/2014 - 05:52
    -2

    so deleting powerlines in photoshop is illegal?

    • jv on 10/04/2014 - 06:56
      +5

      Using the altered photo to sell a house is…

      • 5k on 10/04/2014 - 23:19

        looks like I can't even ask a question without neg votes. geez like you guys know everything

    • sane on 10/04/2014 - 09:13
      -2

      Personally I'm not keen on when people downvote something because they don't like or approve of it.

      Question isn't if you approve, but if this is a bargain. Now I'd say there were quite a few free tutorials out there (eg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTPr9-8JbYg ), but there's also quite a few overpriced tutorials. This looks to be of reasonable quality, and a decent price in comparison. So it should be upvoted, not down.

  • jdr on 10/04/2014 - 08:08
    +3

    Even if the removal of the powerlines wasn't illegal, it's just deceitful.

  • Davros on 10/04/2014 - 08:17

    Should have seen the place I was interested in buying sight unseen a few weeks ago.
    REA pictures looked fantastic for the price asked, Real estate porn, but my property manager did an appraisal and reality was that it was a piece of shit with termite activity evident.
    It also had piles of junk lying around that were included free of charge in the price as it was a mortgagee in possession sale.
    None of this was in the pictures or mentioned in the ad.

  • SBOB on 10/04/2014 - 08:37

    so this is a course on how to over do HDR photography?

  • theguru1 on 10/04/2014 - 11:09
    +2

    Removal of powerlines and poles from the image could be deemed Misleading and Deceptive conduct. Big fines.
    http://theage.domain.com.au/real-estate-news/photoshopped--t…

  • Associatedcharliebor @ greatphotographycourses.net on 11/04/2014 - 01:35
    +1

    Hello Everybody-

    This is my course offered in this deal. The image in question showing the power lines being removed was photographed for the builder who requested the power lines removed. That builder wanted to showcase the buildings they have built as part of their portfolio. It was not photographed for a real estate sale. Most of the course shows similar properties and how they were photographed for architects, hotels, construction companies, and home builders. There is also some sections on shooting for real estate and those cover how to capture dynamic range, blend in better window exposures, light with flash, but nothing on how to mislead a property that is for sale. And NO overdone HDR either. The course teaches technique but how those techniques are applied ethically or not is up to the subscriber.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join