Which Car Should I Buy?

My fellow ozbargainers, I’ve been looking for a new car for a while, upgrading from a sedan to a compact SUV. After test driving 12 different SUVs and spending countless hours on internet, I’ve stopped on Subaru Forester XT Premium VS Mazda GT Diesel.

Both cars are available to me at the same price.

Subaru Forester XT Premium (I would get 2013 model with 0km to save money)

Positives:

• Best performance on highway in it’s class when running on 98 oct. petrol
• 5 year Subaru factory warranty
• Proven and reliable Subaru AWD and Turbo technology
• Large sunroof and emergency traffic stop technology
• Excellent amortisation over speed humps
• Additional small display for drive information
• Good space at the back seats
• Slightly better sound system then CX-5 GT

Negatives

• Fuel consumption and 6 months service intervals make it cost me $3800 more over 3 years then Mazda CX-5 diesel
• Awful GPS/central console unit
• Steering wheel leather feels like cheap plastic
• Leather seats are worse quality then Mazda CX-5 GT
• Exterior styling is not as good as Mazda
• Higher depreciation then Mazda Diesel

Mazda CX-5 GT Diesel (2014 model with 0km)

Positives:

• Best performance when driving around town or going on hills
• Extreme fuel economy for an SUV – contributes to $3800 saving over 3 years for me
• 3 years Mazda warranty + 3 years dealer mechanical warranty
• Less serving periods (every 9 months for me)
• Good cornering and handling ability for an SUV
• leather seats are better than in forester and steering wheel feels better
• Better exterior styling then forester
• Better design of the boot space
• Low depreciation

Negatives:

• Potential for mechanical/service problems with diesel such as oil dilution and very costly DPF replacement. (Supposedly has been fixed by Mazda in 2013) Please confirm.
I will be driving 12-15k per year, mostly long trips.
• Some internet articles suggest diesel exhaust linkage to a long term health problems, however I would like to hear more people opinions on this matter – modern small Diesel exhaust VS Petrol exhaust – what’s more damaging for your health?
• Automatic DPF burning cycles will reduce fuel efficiency – please confirm
• Awful GPS/central console unit
• Very stiff suspension makes the ride uncomfortable
• Small sunroof
• Lack of space at the back seats
• Diesel noise when idle
• Istop technology is using starter to restart the engine in diesel version – potential starter reliability issues in long term?

Comments

  • +2

    Most car reviewers give high praise to the Mazda CX5. It has a very reliable and efficient engine and is built to last. My family has a Mazda 3 and Mazda 2 and we have never had a problem. Subaru have slipped their standards a bit and the Forester is not as highly acclaimed as it used to be.

    It also depends on where you will be driving too. CX5 will be better around town and the commute to work whilst the Subaru will be better for off road adventures on the weekend. The $3800 fuel saving, the better exterior and the lower depreciation on the CX5 make it a no brainer though.

    • I mainly use it for travelling around town and commuting to work. My previous car was a Subaru, which is part of the reason I considered them in the first place.

      • +1

        I think the CX5 would be the safest bet. It will be cheaper over the long term whilst being a nicer car to drive. CX5 are very popular on the roads and there is a reason for this. Mazda build quality, affordable and well designed cars that are reliable and a nice drive. It is worth the switch from the Subaru I reckon and you will not regret it.

  • Can read up on the CX5 here… there are 6 parts to the forum topic.
    http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=2252991
    Heaps in there on the Forrester also.

    Not a fan of either. :-( Prefer a V6 for a vehicle of that size and weight.

  • +1

    +1 for CX-5. It was named Drive's best SUV under $40k in 2013. A facelifted model was released last week with an updated interior and larger screen, and should be coming to Australia early next year.

    However, if you're using the car for lots of off-road, the Subaru is definitely better since the Mazda's AWD is "on-demand" (only uses the rear wheels if the front wheels lose traction).

  • Can anyone comment on the cx-5 diesel potential negatives?

    • Had two Mazda diesels now: a Mazda3 diesel hatch and currently own a Mazda6 Diesel wagon.
      Both excellent cars with zero problems.
      DPF light has only ever come on once (we drive around town too) and all you need to do is get on highway quick and drive it fast and it burns off quickly.
      Dealer explained this to us when we purchased and doesn't worry us.
      Fuel consumption is great and power/torque is fantastic.
      Diesel doesn't fluctuate the same as petrol so sometimes petrol is cheaper and sometimes it's more. But we get 1000km to a tank of diesel which means less visits to the fuel station which is a bonus.
      Servicing costs are more for diesel but mazda has capped price services so you should know what you're in for.
      Any other questions please shout.

      • I drive 17km to work each way every day. Out of that 15 minutes is highway. Would it be enough for diesel?
        I make around 14000km each year.

    • -3

      Can anyone comment on the cx-5 diesel potential negatives?
      Not specifically, but make sure you prepare for wallet shock or get rid of it before the injectors need replacement (100K?). Around $1k each iirc - although you might get clones or reconditioned injectors for half that. A BIG disincentive. CRD systems are also susceptible to water-in-fuel damage. Rare but big repair bills if you can't get compensation from the fuel company or your insurance doesn't cover it.

      Also, google mazda dpf and diesel oil dilution.

      By the way the word is 'than', not 'then'.

      • -2

        Clueless anonymous neggers at work again. Tell me, which of the above doesn't meet your approval boys?

  • www.productreview.com.au is always worth a look but read between the lines with some posts.
    Might be of help for more on Mazda.. http://www.ozmazda.com/index.php/index.html

    Don't expect the longevity out of small diesel motors like you hear about with the larger diesels.

  • Damn thos small sunroofs. How will I ever transport a full grown bear in a standing position.

    Have you taken them for a drive. I've heard that the new forrestors engines aren't much chop. Not as reliable as they once were. I too Did a big diesel suv test drive of all the brands. Tiguan, asx, sportage, ix35, rav 4 and cx5 gt. Ended up with a 2012 cx 5 gt. Awesome car. Quick and agile. Great sound.
    Don't know what your issue with the sat nav unit is, its one of the best features on the car.

    Just took a brand new sportage diesel platinum for a drive last night. Seriously contemplating getting rid of the cx 5. Mainly cos of the $300 a year cap price servicing and 7 year warranty and road side assist that comes with the kia. And I was suprised how the kia drove. It was quicker then I expected. It was definitely more comfortable to drive then the mazda too and had some awesome features that the cx5 didn't have. Like locking the diff, side mirror fold in at a button push. Sat nav is awesome too. Dual sunroof if thats your thing. And a bigger boot. Heated front and rear seats.

    Def worth a look anyways.

    • Oh and you can turn istop off at the push of a button on the cx5 gt.

    • Challenge Accepted! ;-)

  • Flip a coin, When the coin is in the air you will truly know which car you want.

    But seriously I'd get the CX-5 mainly because about a year ago top gear tested over 15 different suvs and came to the conclusion that the CX-5 was the best all around suv for the time, also it's the car my mum was going to get.

  • you will only do 12k km per year and save $3800 in fuel. whats the fuel runnimg costs in the subaru, must be extreme to save that much.

Login or Join to leave a comment