• expired

Navie Polarized Pilots $19.99 Plus Free Shipping with Discount Code @ Makz Australia

04
DEC10OFF

Clearance deal on Navie Pilots, down to $19.99 from $59.99 with free delivery across Australia.
Simply enter "DEC10OFF" at checkout under discount codes before payment.

MAKZ Australia has a 50% off sale going on at the moment across its entire range of sunglasses.
Great prices for polarized sunglasses.

Please note the $10 off only works for the Polarized Navie Pilots. For all other items use "TENMORE" instead to receive a further 10% off already sale price.

Related Stores

MAKZ Australia
MAKZ Australia

closed Comments

  • +1

    I thought it says Nivea 😂😂😂

  • +1

    MAKZ Australia has a 50% off sale going on at the moment across its entire range of sunglasses.

    $10 off only works for the Polarized Navie Pilots

    Neg-ligible

    • -1

      Hi sky blu, For all other items you can use "TENMORE" for a further 10% off. This discount code only applies to this particular range as it is a clearance line.

      • +1

        Please read the description of your post. Pause. Ask someone to proofread.

        Also read @PJC's comments below. I'm not sure how serious you actually want to go into business.

        • Have updated the description. Thanks for pointing out the confusion.

  • +1

    It would be Naive to purchase Navie.

  • +2

    OP last week you were requested proof your sunglasses comply with Australian Standards.
    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236803/redir

    Therefore would you please upload copies of the relevant documents you possess?
    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236803/redir

    That would be somewhat reassuring, thank you.

    • +2

      This mob should be banned from posting until them provide relevant documents. -Ve from me OP.

    • +4

      Negging as well. Shoddy sunglasses will absolutely blind people.

    • As explained in the earlier post, these documents are not meant to be posted for the public. No retailer/wholesaler ever posts these documents online. One member attached a link to sunglass hut, but neither do sunglass hut post up these documentations for public viewing. All that is posted online is a guide, which explains the AS/NZS 1067:2003 standards.

      When it comes to reassurance, our team have discussed this issue and are happy to post out any required info in more depth. Please shoot us an email requesting the particular item you need more documentation for and our team will be more than happy to provide them to you by the next business day. But we cannot upload such info on a public domain, as it is not required to do so and neither do any other company do so.

      Please note, when you request for a particular item's documentation, the documentation sent out to you will be referenced according to SKU numbers, rather than item names, like for example "NAVIE", or "FIGHTER". This is done to allow flexibility on item name changes.

      Thank you.

      • +1

        Does your sunglass comply with - AS/NZS 1067: - Sunglasses and fashion spectacles? If yes, update your post/on your website and i will revoke my -ve.

        Any glasses that claim to be sunglasses or fashion spectacles and are sold for that purpose must comply with the Australian and New Zealand standard, AS/NZS 1067: - Sunglasses and fashion spectacles. This standard applies to uniformly tinted, polarising, photochromic and gradient tinted lenses. Copies of the sunglass standard are available from Standards Australia. The retailer, distributor or importer is responsible for ensuring that sunglasses comply with the standard.

        • Pyramid, we can update our website to include this information. In short, Australia follow the same regulations for eyewear as the EU, whenever an item is classified according to "Lens Category" it is automatically referring to the AS/NZS 1067. "Categories" on lenses simply means they comply with the standards. I apologize, as I personally was not aware this was what you have been requesting be changed on the website. We shall get our website designer to include this statement as soon as we can.
          Also just some extra info, all our documentation as explained in the earlier deal and as above, is not a physical certification from any certification body. AS/NZS 1067 is merely a standard that classifies lenses according to light transmission and UV protection. All our lenses were tested to determine the light transmission percentages and thereafter categorised according to appropriate categories. I hope this helped.

        • +1

          @hosh_mak: Ok, now let me tell you this AS 1067 it's not mere standard but it's requirement. And you can get your product certified for that standard by following procedures mentioned here http://www.arpansa.gov.au/radiationprotection/factsheets/is_…. And according to this website all sunglasses sold in Australia must be labeled according to standards. So standards are in place to follow and not just merely sitting on website.

        • @pyramid: You are still misunderstanding the Standard. Items have to be LABELLED as compliant to the standard, not CERTIFIED (This info is also in the FACT SHEET you have attached). And items can only be labelled between Category 0 to 4 based on where they fall on the AS1067 standards.
          Here's a famous example Hawkers .
          This conversation has only led us in circles, we have tried our best to make this matter as clear as possible. However, We appreciate your feedback and shall be taken into consideration for future webpage updates.

      • I sought a reply consistent with the transparency you claimed previously.
        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236870/redir
        Unfortunately you now resort to opacity. Your analogy regarding Sunglasses Hut is ineffective because we trust their stock and we continue seeking reason to trust yours.

        After a week to consider, are you yet able to explain those identical product photos?
        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236964/redir

        • -1

          Yet you cannot prove how Sunglass Hut has done anything different to prove their stock is more trustworthy than our company has?

        • +1

          @hosh_mak: Yet you have not proved here how your products are equally trustworthy. Have you? I need prove nothing regarding sunglasses because I don't intend selling any.

          Look at the bottom of this page. As I type, after Friday midnight, there are still 804 members and 3,171 guests here. Now look at the votes at the top after over 2 hours. And you continue refusing to satisfy courteous requests regarding the trustworthiness of your products.

          You haven't explained those identical photos. Did you think we wouldn't notice?

        • @PJC: And again we ask, what do you require us to do more than any other website to prove our stock is more trustworthy? You are requesting for something, but yet you do not know what exactly is it you want us to offer?

  • +1

    And your confusing statement on your website:
    We source our products from designers based in Italy, Japan, Malaysia and the US and shipped directly from their manufacturing plants.
    How does this work like sourcing from Designer but shipping from manufacturing plant (ie China)?

    • +1

      i.e. Genuine fakes designer replicas

    • Upto 70% of our sunglasses are manufactured in China but have been designed by an Italian company.
      Our yet to be launched grooming range is fully designed and manufactured in Japan.
      Canvas Bags and Travel accessories are designed by a US based company and manufactured in China.
      Ties & Cufflinks are from freelance designers based in US and manufactured in either Malaysia (Cotton/Polyester products) and China (Acrylic/Enamel products).

      How does this work? An example: Otterbox is a US based company, all products are designed in the US but manufactured in China and Mexico. Upon placing an order with them in Australia, the items are not shipped from the US, but shipped from their manufacturing plant in China.
      Another great example is Apple. The same applies.

      So when we refer to designers, we are referring to otterbox/apple, with whom we have actually struck deals with, these are then fullfilled at their plants.

      • +1

        Your statement should be 'designed in Italy Japan etc and manufactured in China Malaysia etc'. Or better is design sourced from Italy and manufactured in China.

        • Thank you, shall take your feedback into consideration during future website updates.

  • +1

    Negging because after a whole week plus additional courteous requests today, Associated OP provides no proof these products comply with Australian Standards despite assuring member 086 "We sure can." https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236803/redir

    Furthermore, OP informed member scatman00 "you should not compare our products to aliexpress products without any solid proof" https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4236793/redir but a week later avoids explaining identical product photos.

    OP's eponymous website is effectively a middleman for purchasing AliExpress wares and obfuscates this with spurious RRPs and pretentious names like Navie and later perhaps Armie and Ayrforce. Alternatively, I am mistaken and OP tired of receiving $59.99 per pair and provides fellow OzBargain members a discount out of the goodness of his heart.

    • Thank you, shall take your feedback into consideration during future website updates.

Login or Join to leave a comment