Seagate Barracuda Pro ST10000DM0004 10TB 7200RPM 3.5-Inch Internal Hard Drive €337.87 (~AU $508) Delivered @ Amazon Germany

120

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Gengar on 26/05/2017 - 01:33 amazon.de (140 clicks)

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Seagate Barracuda Pro ST10000DM0004 10TB

3.5" Form Factor
SATA III 6 Gb/s Interface
256MB Cache
7200 rpm
Up to 220 MB/s Data Transfer Rate

---

Amazon.de price shows as €378.93. After adding to cart, VAT is removed and total delivered cost comes to around €337.87 (~AU $508)

StaticIce shows the local prices for this drive start at $633

https://www.staticice.com.au/cgi-bin/search.cgi?q=ST10000DM0…

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon Germany

• 

  [Deactivated] on 26/05/2017 - 01:40

  +2

  Wow so much pr0n can be stored

  • 

    bargainsniper on 26/05/2017 - 01:50

    -1

    Too much masturbation is no good for you

  • 

    driverelli on 26/05/2017 - 02:03

    +5

    At least you'd never have to watch the same one twice

• 

  syousef on 26/05/2017 - 06:25

  -7

  Why let 3TB of data be destroyed when your Seagate dies when it could be 10TB?

  I'm sure others have a use for these and still trust Seagate but after my experience with 2 drives dying a couple of months ago and 6 or 7 over the last couple of years, I'll pass.

  Downvote away…

  • 

    justtoreply on 26/05/2017 - 08:19

    +1

    If you only have one hdd and everything is on it you're daft, and largely to blame. Thats what backups are for.

    Mix manufacturers or at least manufacture dates with backups.

    A better reason not to buy might be that it's still early to be an adopter of helium technology. But at least the drive isnt shingled.

    • 

      lostn on 26/05/2017 - 09:12

      Will it rise up if you don't tie it down?

      • 

        BillyG687 on 26/05/2017 - 09:59

        +1

        No, but shipping is cheaper ;)

    • 

      syousef on 26/05/2017 - 15:01

      I had backups. I restored. It was a time wasting pain in the arse. And restoring the data means going to the expense of purchasing another drive.

      • 

        justtoreply on 27/05/2017 - 22:09

        Yeah. But at least you still have your data. Thats much better than not having it. If you dont need to minimise the number of hdds in your pc, theres nothing wrong with smaller drives. But theres no more wrong with bigger drives either unless the technology in them is riskier (helium, shingled,…)

  • 

    Sage on 26/05/2017 - 08:37

    I agree. Never again with seagate after I've lost TBs of data.

• 

  mshanann on 26/05/2017 - 08:42

  +1

  Damn 10TB

  My first hard disk on an old XT was a 5 1/4" double-bay 10 megabyte disk like this one (and sounded identical) using MFM (pre IDE days)

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0tqSUv1O-c

  • 

    lostn on 26/05/2017 - 09:15

    I think mine was 32MB. The thing was huge supposedly. I had the 5.25" myself. "Double density", which was like 360KB or something. I'm not sure if they made a "single density".

    High Density disks, which had the "HD" logo on it were 1.2MB, and something to be proud of owning as opposed to those crappy DDs.

• 

  scuderiarmani on 26/05/2017 - 08:52

  -3

  WD Reds are popping up in 10TB, may wanna keep that in mind.

  • 

    scuderiarmani on 27/05/2017 - 15:07

    -1

    Wow Seagate fanboys are alive and well.

• 

  lostn on 26/05/2017 - 09:11

  Can it really do 220MB/s?

  • 

    coxymla on 26/05/2017 - 10:30

    +1

    The bigger the disk, the higher the max sequential transfer rate (assuming the same RPM.)

• 

  Most Wanted on 02/06/2017 - 03:47

  I wonder if this and my 10TB Ironwolf "Helium" are identical but they just slap a different sticker on them. maybe this goes 10mb faster, but Ironwolfs last a lot longer