• long running

[eBook] Free - Encyclopedia of Human Evolution/Making Sense of World History/Anthropologies of Revolution - Amazon AU/US


Three more interesting freebies for the start of the day - lots of knowledge to gain.

Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory: Second Edition: https://www.amazon.com.au/Encyclopedia-Human-Evolution-Prehi...

Making Sense of World History: https://www.amazon.com.au/Making-Sense-World-History-Szostak...

Anthropologies of Revolution: Forging Time, People, and Worlds: https://www.amazon.com.au/Anthropologies-Revolution-Forging-...

US Links:

Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory: Second Edition: https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Human-Evolution-Prehisto...

Making Sense of World History: https://www.amazon.com/Making-Sense-World-History-Szostak-eb...

Anthropologies of Revolution: Forging Time, People, and Worlds: https://www.amazon.com/Anthropologies-Revolution-Forging-Peo...


Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Amazon Cloud Reader
Amazon Cloud Reader


    • +4

      Is this really a 'left' thing though?

    • +4

      I sense you have no idea what you're talking about.

      • I sense you are a woke sjw

        • -1

          I think biological evolution is currently the best explanation for describing how we got to where we are now, that various humans have differing ancestors with many varying attributes, that intelligence is an abstract idea and not something concretely measurable by a test developed by Europeans, that everyone's genetic makeup is unique yet somewhat similar.

          So, tell me more about my political leanings.

          • @afoveht: If evolution is the best explanation I'd hate to see the worst explanation. Evolution doesn't even qualify as science. i.e. It cannot be observed or repeated. Therefore it a belief system, a faith or religion: not science. Nothing presented as 'evolution' actually demonstrates evolution. It's all smoke and mirrors in that they say, "We have all this evidence of evolution…" then they insert something which doesn't qualify. Even Darwin himself said his THEORY (people forget this part) depended upon finding certain hard evidence in the future to validate his postulations. We're still waiting.

            • @Faulty P xel:

              THEORY (people forget this part)

              You are the weakest link. Goodbye.

      • +1

        can't use something that never happened (macro)

  • +1

    In the immortal words of Chuck Heston:
    "Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"


  • These are awesome. Thanks OP.