Was it fair that Andrew Tate got banned from all the major social media platform?
Fair Deplatforming Andrew Tate?
[Deactivated] on 10/09/2022 - 17:41
Last edited 10/09/2022 - 17:55
Last edited 10/09/2022 - 17:55
Poll Options
- 495Yes
- 201No
Comments
I think if you're not below the age of 30/on tiktok you're not going to have a clue who this guy is.
TBH yes i think his views on women are dated and regressive.
Admittedly he was creating a cult of disenfranchised teens & 20 somethings blaming women on their ability to not get any. By basically framing it as a you not me approach.
It did bring to light the toxic positivity culture around how some groups of women band together to justify their actions and skewed dating culture in terms of what's expected from each party, largely guys.
But also he was trying to absolve men of all their deficiencies by blaming womenI also don't have a huge problem with him, to me he was just another shock jock nutter like Kyle Sandilands out there to sell sh1t.
Oh and his "Husters University" BS training program.
Basically start a cult - enlist cult into your shame training scheme - profit.Considering you too don’t know much about him and hence haven’t watched him speak much.. this was a very balanced take..
But also he was trying to absolve men of all their deficiencies by blaming women
That’s not true I promise you.. I’d hate him too if he did that.
Just a quick example https://youtube.com/shorts/c8A5Svk3tVE?feature=share
Also, it’ll take me time but there’s segments where he’s said (I summarise)
“if a woman doesn’t date you, it’s your fault as a man, you need to be more competent and nicer to them. Woman have much more to risk than a man and hence are more choosy as they SHOULD be. The onus is and has always been on the men to improve themselves”Jordan Peterson also says the same things. These maliciously cropped out hit pieces don’t mention this. The hit piece videos on him don’t mention this. It doesn’t suit their narrative
So I can understand why so many of you here are soo misguided with your assumptions. Soo many people have even lied and slandered him in these comments, I presented them with video footage to prove otherwise and they still wouldn’t concede. It’s almost depressing to deal with people like that.Regardless, I have heard Tate blamed men soo many times. If you want more proof, tell me
I’ll send you some podcasts to listen to..Oh and his "Husters University" BS training program.
Basically start a cult - enlist cult into your shame training scheme - profit.I have watched enough general content on YT to kinda know what these courses are about.
It’s still a legal enterprise where people do make money.
Do you and I need it ? No Ofcos not.
Does a kid with extra cash who knows nothing can gain something from it ? Ofcos yes. They do
So many screenshots of kids making thousands of dollars from itBtw this is the free market… Apple sells a clump of plastic bits for $1500 when it only cost them like $150 to make. Never saw you complaining about it.
Nor should you, coz it’s predicated on a free will trade.That’s your response ?
I addressed almost everything you had to say..
And you are still wrong. But you don’t care about that do ya ?Anyways, they SHUT DOWN the affiliate referral program many months ago and their paying subscriber base has since doubled whilst retaining most of them too.. coz the subscribers are still making money.
Even though it’s not a referral programme anymore. Almost every business and enterprise has a referral programme attached to them. You never called them a scam ?
It's basically affiliate marketing that has been done forever on the internet
Why there’s been a few forums here about media influencers that I’d didn’t know about till it’s posted here? What are u dumb sheeps following retards in the first place??
The world is (profanity) massive dude, the sheer amount of people you don't know that have millions upon millions of followers is insane.
People have different interests/run in different circles.
i got called uneducated for not knowing some F1 driver. Am i supposed to know every famous person in this world?
Tate had 5m~ on ig and 3m~ on yt which is not a lot where Kylie Jenner has 360m on ig. There are tons of gaming channel who has 20m+ subs on yt. point is how is it fair when all the social medias decided to ban him at a same time as tos violation when its clear that he just had a different view on things. People say dumb and hurtful things intentionally all the time. They don't do anything.
What are u dumb sheeps
so if we are a dumb sheeps, what are you then? smart shepperd?
This guy is what happens when there is a vacuum of kind, decent men with normal relationships with everyone, women included, on social media (who no doubt have better things to do than make vaguely homicidal posts about not eating breakfast). How people cannot see that this chap has some quite extreme personal issues is beyond me - you can see it in the way and the content that he posts. And there are similarly vulnerable people out there who will eat this up, en masse. Hate begets hate.
He has not been deplatformed from every social media platform, just the ones he has been deemed in breach of. And like ANY forum, saying "which rule did he violate" isn't useful because it's always a judgment call at times - anyone who has moderated a forum will tell you this (although it seems pretty clear to me). The failures of the last few years are the result of hate and antagonism, and a total failure to negotiate. This guy is symptomatic of that. Claiming he is the only male role model should tell you all you need to know really. We need guys who unite people, not just disaffected groups crying out for a father figure…
(who no doubt have better things to do than make vaguely homicidal posts about not eating breakfast)
I don't recall him saying that, but I don't watch all his content in full. The good stuff is always in his youtube shorts under the motivation tag. This material still hasn't been banned because there is nothing wrong with it.
Is it possible that the homicidal posts are a joke he made up? I would like to watch this particular video, it seems absurd that he would say something like that. A lot of the third party comments about him are mostly misinformation.
Serious question, does he really state that. If so, Wowzers, mind blown!….
People just dont have sense of humour like do you get offended by this post https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lJv39qton5w?
Agreed, there is most likely a context behind those comments too. Although I'm still looking for that homicidal comment. I don't think that one you posted is that one.
It was on Instagram but it's been posted around, here is a picture.
https://twitter.com/NinokunrieTV/status/1561840543163891712This guy isn't well.
I don't read into it that way. He doesn't eat breakfast because he feels like it makes him lazy. He wants to work before he gets to eat. He states if you have food right in front of you, that you will become lazy. He is referring to how easy men have it these days. I know because he often quotes that the ancestors of ordinary men would be upset to see how lazy men are these days, he often quotes that his ancestors wrestled sabre tooth tigers.
That's all I can recall though. Men do really do have it too easy these days.
@[Deactivated]: It wasn't the bit about breakfast that was the problem and even so, if what you take from it is shaming men for being too lazy these days then that's a problem too. Men aren't lazy, they're pretty darn hardworking as a rule, and if they're not, it's because they've got something going on that they can't articulate. It bothers me that people can read that and think this guy is ok, he is really not. Happy and well adjusted people just don't do this.
Honestly, I'm probably on your side here. Anyone that has to say they're the only good role model around is unlikely to be so, but what exactly is homicidal in that post? He says he wants to strangle space-time, whatever that means, but not hurting anyone.
It just seems like ramblings from a 13 year old that thinks too much of himself and thinks he's being profound to me…
@NigelTufnel: Vaguely homicidal - his language is very aggressive and the way he puts his thoughts together is disordered. It bothers me that he has all these followers that aren't recognising the level of aggression he's putting out, and worse, normalising it.
@MessyG: That to me seems like you are setting a really low standard for men.
Most men should be out there innovating, improving the lives of people around them. Instead, most men work 9-5 jobs, go home and just sit there playing video games or watch netflix. That time you spent playing video games or watching porn could have been used to come up with the new inventions, look at how cool Japanese culture before someone spun it on its head and suddenly it became okay to be a hikikomori or neet.
In the past people literally went out there and tried to improve the lives of people around them with inventions that were actually useful. People would go to work and have fantastic input on how to improve the processes and how to make the workplace more efficient. People would spend hours in their shed, but these days people just spend hours on their computers clicking away at some gun which is continuously shooting at some random pixels on the screen. That's all it is. You gain nothing from that. It's stupid.
We went from a vibrant innovative society, Australia, and we have since moved to a society where it is alright to be soft. Now we don't have any good new innovations, the new iphone is just the old one with a small added satelitte feature that is useless because the bandwidth is too low.
In the past I spoke to a lot of low quality men and a lot of them want to make sure women go to work so they can sit at home and do nothing. They want the breadwinner to be the wife so they can stay at home playing video games, but there is something not right about that. They want feminism to succeed not because it improves the lives of women, but because it would improve the lives of men, this is the dirty truth.
These men want universal basic income not so they are able to free up time that could be allocated to improving society. Instead they want universal basic income because it allows them not to have to go to work, but to play video games all day. That's morally reprehensible.
There is a responsibility to be a good citizen, and that is what Tate is telling everyone. He adds a lot of other clown references that pisses people off along the way. A lot of people get angry because they watch porn, but most of us real men, we don't watch porn, we don't treat women like garbage, we don't pay for sexual services. When I saw what happened at Ruse, I was shocked at how terrible this porn culture has taken over young Australians. It has brainwashed them and Tate is trying to get people out of that mindset. Tate would smack those kids stupid for doing what they did. Instead the media states he would praise them, hell no he wouldn't.
Most men should be out there innovating, improving the lives of people around them. Instead, most men work 9-5 jobs, go home and just sit there playing video games or watch netflix.
Here's a redpill for you chief: the majority of men (and women) throughout human history weren't innovators or inventors either.
In the past people literally went out there and tried to improve the lives of people around them with inventions that were actually useful.
Survivor bias. You're only seeing the winners that history bothers to remember in the first place. The majority of humans ever haven't really contributed anything of significance beyond their personal monkeyspheres. Maybe if you were lucky you'd live long enough to procreate and not die to starvation/the elements/some pointless war.
In the past I spoke to a lot of low quality men
You have a very rose-coloured view of history. Those "low quality men" you're looking around at have been the norm for basically all of human existence, it's just that in contemporary times they haven't died in wars or to dysentery or to childbirth or to etc… so they're still around to consoom for way longer than anyone intended.
Sure, by all means aim to better yourself. But temper it with the understanding that most of the NPCs you see around you are never destined for great things. Expecting everyone to have a net positive contribution to the world is naive; in the overwhelming majority of cases, most will have to be content with just not leaving this world worse off than it was when they were born into it.
@[Deactivated]: "We went from a vibrant innovative society, Australia, and we have since moved to a society where it is alright to be soft. Now we don't have any good new innovations, the new iphone is just the old one with a small added satelitte feature that is useless because the bandwidth is too low."
"There's no innovation because there's no new consumer products for me to buy"
K..
Sounds like you want to date him.
But they gotta play hard to get.. They can’t help but move through drama.
People watch Tate's short videos, roughly 10 minutes long rather than spend 10 minutes jerking off to some random porno or waste even more time watching a 2 hour movie. No one should be wasting their time watching a tv series either, that's like a 24 hour movie for each series. People need to wake up.
Each person for themselves, but you cannot spend all your time entertaining yourself, not working on yourself and then complain that you are poor.
People who like him play Devils Advocate for a few minutes, google Andrew Tate quotes and see if you are ok with some of the things he has said. I did and he seems like a garbage human.
You can google quotes for literally anyone but there's no point if they remove context entirely. I'll bet you don't hold everyone to that same standard, or even yourself for that matter.
If I google context-free quotes from other people, I'm sure as shit not going to get what comes up if I go through the copypasta archives of this guy…
"poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids" - Resident nazi himself.
@Willy Beamish: It was his breakfast post on Instagram that did it for me. This guy is unwell. That people can't recognise this is what bothers me the most.
@Willy Beamish: Odd reply, we are not discussing any positive things he said, just the atrocious stuff.
Humans need heuristics or rules of thumb so we don't need to spend days finessing our evaluations of people. If someone says I won't have my children be nerds that's my heuristic.
Seems to be a thing now (Trump being the prima facie case) where because someone appears to be counter the mainstream view you can sweep any negatives under the carpet.
@samsonl: Seems like a you problem, you guys are so filled with hate all you do is try to bring people down. I don't even watch the guy, don't care what he has to say to be honest but all you people are malding over a guy you don't even watch for what reason? Just because you don't like someone that you don't watch. It's all a power thing with you people, you fake outrage to make yourselves feel superior.
Ask yourself the question, why do you care so much?
@Willy Beamish: Ahh ok…. Sorry I don't care enough to rebut your very good, very strongly made points. Sorry again. Take a screen shot and read back what you wrote in 5 years time…
@samsonl: You would have been better off not replying than replying saying you don't care enough.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt " ~Donald Trump.
@Willy Beamish: Does that apply to you as well? Does my reply to your reply make me 2x the fool in your eyes?
@Willy Beamish: We are not the ones filled with hate - we're the ones recognising it when many others aren't. The longer you've been on the Internet the longer you've seen the various flavours of this particular human come and go. Again, he isn't well. And it will all come out eventually, it always does.
@Willy Beamish: Wait who said that. That's pretty racist lol. Hope he get deplatformed. I'm referring to the poor kids can be as bright as white kids comment
@michaelTito: Whoever it was, it sounds like someone who definitely wouldn't have a history of similar racist remarks and actions peppered throughout a lifelong political career that all of a sudden magically stopped when the year ticked over to 2020 for some reason. No sir, surely not.
No one should be censored regardless of how inflammatory or terrible their speech may be.
Otherwise it’s just silencing dissidents and suppressing opposition, kind of like what the CCP does in the Chinese Empire.
Although Australians do sell their souls for Chinese goods, but pretend they dislike China
Moderation rules aren't censorship, he's free to go to a platform with different mod rules, or even start his own.
Cool so you'd be ok with pedophiles talking about diddling kids, radical jihadists trying to recruit people online, people encouraging school shootings?
It certainly appears that way.
Tiktok has its own platform 🐱🙊🍾💮💮
Happy they deplatformed him, but wish they would deplatform all influencers. World would be a better place.
He spoke the harsh truth which most people in this day and age can't handle.
Weird.
I see so many extreme feminists out there talking about how bad men are, or how useless they are.
Some have even gone on reddit to suggest if they ever get pregnant and it's a male, its abort.I mean misogyny is the same form of extremism as feminist movement, yet the latter is often sponsored. Both are not required.
Some have even gone on reddit to suggest if they ever get pregnant and it's a male, its abort.
yet the latter is often sponsored
I've never seen that extremism sponsored. POS people and people who have been hurt to the point where they have a blanket opinion exist on both sides. Some are just louder than others.
I see so many extreme feminists out there talking about how bad men are, or how useless they are.
I've seen similar on various mwtow and the like reddit threads. It's quite sad, because their attitude will probably put off any decent woman.
That stuff is supposedly everywhere. It's just like Tate is seemingly everywhere but I didn't see any of his content until he was banned. During the Roe v Wade incident all the skeletons came out of the closet and it went mainstream on CNN in the US. Notably these comments were censored in the Australian media, but it was right there on CNN.
Why can't men support the woman to have the freaking child in 90% of situations. That's the problem, it's men's fault that a woman gets an abortion. It's a man's fault if the woman gets pregnant. There are so many risks associated with abortion that you would be nuts to do it, but in reality, the man screwed up and we need to put the blame on the man for what happens. I mean you have the choice to have an abortion and you will do it anyway, but it's a really shitty choice to have to make as a woman especially since a man screwed up. It's always the man, even when you include the rape part too. That's the man's fault.
If we had good men, Tate wouldn't even have an audience. The fact we have poor quality men is why Tate is rising up. If you said you would take care of your girlfriend before you got her pregnant, you better do so, otherwise you are a scumbag. You need to be a sayer, otherwise you should feel like a idiot like what Tate says. I know he uses other colorful language but it is the same thing.
You want men to be the best they can be, and you want women to be the best they can be. This is Tate's message. Feminist and their male equivalent (which is not a misogynist) are the dream team. You have both wife and husband who are high performers.
TLDR: Tate is a response to poor quality men.
Feminists do not need to be scared as we all want the same outcomes. Women who say things should follow through with their goals. They can do the same stuff as a man can do, if you say that, you better do that. The world would be a better place if we could all achieve that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vskvaj7C8Ng
Tate provides that same uplifting message to women, which is why women watch him too, because frankly if you look at the content, it's the same as feminism.
I think there's good men and scummy men. Same with women. Some may be shit due to bad experiences in life, either the circumstances they grew up in, or had a bad relationship.
Tate says some things that make sense, but then says something else that's ridiculous/offensive. At the moment, he's not perceived as the best a man can be.
I have no idea who this guy is, and at this point I really don't give a shit.
No one asked you to comment..
There’s billions of people on this planet. No one expected you to know all off them.
Wasn't he just another snake oil merchant selling his petty $99 per month course through affiliate network using toxic, controversial videos?
$49 ***
Atleast get your BS right…
affiliate network
He shut that down months ago… but please keep going and tell us more..
The course is targeted at high performing men. That price is nothing compared to the $20k+ required to fly out and visit a conference with someone like Patrick Bet David in his Vault conference.
If you cannot afford $99 a month then there is something wrong with your life. Maybe you are spending too much time watching netflix, playing videos or watching porn, rather than working towards real useful hobbies. You need to cut the fat from your life.
If you want a better role model, there are plenty of other role models other than Tate, but none of them provide cheap access that he does.
"high performance men" don't need a toxic clown and his fanboys' discord server with his shallow content.
There is so much misinformation in your comments. You are focusing on his entertainment side.
I doubt the content appeals to anyone on the lower end anyway. It's a cheap laugh, but most people here can't even afford it. They don't even realise Tate is trying to curate a club of people with specific talents.
If you watched a pirated copy of the material maybe your views would change as your comments are misguided.
@[Deactivated]: < Ignore this @ Thing
Seriously, so you think his target audience are clowns that sit at home everyday, playing video games and watching netflix.
Who pays to have someone laugh at them all day. That's some S&M stuff right there.
It is not okay to be coming home after work to sit down and play video games, that's morally reprehensible. That time could be spent working with a charity. The world is a really screwed up place and Tate serves it out raw. You don't go complain because of the videos of homeless people on youtube that make you angry and sad. Why would you promote the censorship of this material?
The whole idea of anger and depression is to get you to get off your stupid ass and do stuff. If you cannot see that you will live a very lonely nihilistic life.
It is not okay to be coming home after work to sit down and play video games, that's morally reprehensible. That time could be spent working with a charity.
Out of interest, do you consider spending time arguing with strangers on an online bargains forum to be a particularly good use of time for a "high performance man"?
@NigelTufnel: Yeah it's a good use of time to improve the lives of other men. Note I'm not on here 24/7 and it is in a very limited capacity.
It's an hour here and there, but barely. It's better than playing video games and it improves my mental acuity. I'm sure it improves your mental acuity as well because you are challenging me to a discussion.
I am sure you can tell I type really fast and communicate my ideas with speed. It might look like I'm writing essays, but this is only taking me minutes at best. So, yes… lol.
We want to curate a club of good men.
Yeah it's a good use of time to improve the lives of other men.
It's sweet that you think that you're doing that.
It's better than playing video games and it improves my mental acuity.
I think that's debateable. There's lots of evidence that playing video games can actually improve mental acuity, I'm not sure there's the same evidence for arguing on an online forum. But I'd be interested in seeing that research…
We want to curate a club of good men.
Best of luck. I won't expect an invite. I quite enjoy the odd video game.
I'm not a fan of his, surprised to see a few very passionate followers on ozb for him though, his bit on YMH (hey fellow mommies) was amusing, I was really ready to just skip that ep but glad I watched it as you could see the act but he kept it together.
I voted no, most of the reasons against censorship have already been covered here by others.
But another year goes by and this account is fine. https://twitter.com/Zabehulah_M33 674k followers.
It's never about the rules, it's about if they want you on their platforms, again not a fan or follower but Alex Berenson, deplatformed at the request of the White house.
As always the rules won't apply if you're on the right team at the time.Yeah, people are forgetting Tate is an entertainer.
The media acted like he was some massive thing before they reported on him, when i feel like it was their hysteria about him that made him well known.
Also, the media was later putting out articles saying, "well he actually might not be that harmful" because people don't actually directly absorb what they are told by content creators (i.e. contradicting the bullet theory of media that the hysteria was premised upon).
Geez, you'd think the media of all people would understand how people (even young people) consume media through their own mental filtering in the first place.
But nah, they wanted to make a story out of very little in the first place. Like wow — there are controversial people online, incredible. Doesn't really warrant so many stories about it.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-02/how-to-talk-to-kids-a…
"The media acted like he was some massive thing before they reported on him, when i feel like it was their hysteria about him that made him well known."
Regardless of opinion on the guy, this was a generally true assertion, there was a huge escalation of interest well before the weeks leading up to his cancellation campaign. I'd imagine tiktok sized clips of his content probably started to greatly push his 'influence' over the last year.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=Andrew%20Tate,Don…
Private companies do have a right to run their business however they want. So long as the way they run their business complies with the law, they can choose their customers.
Don’t even know, nor care, who this person is.
The dude has opinions of someone who gets kicked in the head for a living.
He is now trying to say stupidly controversial talking points to make idiots pay for his hustle course.
Dude is a grifter.
Who?
Bro so original
😂😂😂
Literally never heard of the guy
Cares
Andrew Tate has some of the most weird, vile, and hateful views on people (especially women) that I have seen for a long time. He's basically a professional troll, trying to say the most outrageous things to attract clicks and subs from sycophants.
However, do I support him being removed from social media? No I don't. Where else am I going to get cheap laughs at the things he does?
For those crying 'free speech', note that he's half American, he doesn't live in the USA, and the US constitution only limits the power of congress to curtail people's freedom of speech. This is one area most get so wrong. There's nothing stopping Facebook, Twitter, Instragram, etc from kicking this professional clown off their platforms. They are private companies. They can deplatform anyone they want.
Another misinformed post where you can ignore the first paragraph…
Man try harder.
Why don't we have Fact Checks next to these comments about Tate?
It's hilarious.
He is a flog, so yes
Cool interview between Patrick Bet David and Andrew Tate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY6k6XuZ41E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv-C4CVGk28thats explained why there are clips of him every where again on the internet. yikes
He's definitely a "salesman". A whole lot of drivel without really saying much. It would be interesting to watch an interview where people aren't fawning over him. I actually think he'd do pretty well answering without really answering, he's not as oafish as Trump who begins incoherently rambling. They have the same target audience though.
In at least one section he does talk about women as though they're objects, says they can't be trusted, talks about lying to every woman he's ever been in a relationship with and refers to women as "p***y" or "hoes" sometimes. He talks about how women need to respect men, even though he clearly doesn't respect women. That was intentionally left for much later, even though it's what the ban seems to be about. They start easing in about 3 hours and 45 mins in. I suspect it's pretty toned down as well, this is his "I'm a reasonable guy" interview after all.
I skipped ahead a lot. But at the start he spends a lot of time on government is corrupt in every country, because he knows no one disputes that. He talks a lot about how Romania is better because there isn't much law and there's corruption everywhere. I think he's also trying to act like this is what his ban is really about. He knows that most people will stop listening well before he gets to his bit on women, except his die hard fans who eat it up.
I think he's probably actually pretty intelligent, but also a bit of a psychopath. It's hard to say how much of what he says he actually believes, but a lot of the stories will be made up or exaggerated. People like this are interesting to watch, from a psychological perspective, but I can't stand being in the same room as them.
I have done what I need to do. If you did not understand the message from Tate, then you cannot be helped. Ignorance is Bliss.
Game Over.
I just want him off my youtube shorts that's all.
He is extremely toxic and spreads a very bad message aimed directly at young, impressionable men as well as gullible and creepy men.
Just look at the rate of domestic violence perpetrated by men in Australia alone!
These idiots idolise this loser.
You are completely clueless about what he actually talks about
What’s remarkable is the certainty that you said all of that rubbish with. It’s almost like a skill..He's not going to sleep with you. Get over it.
I've seen his videos, the guy is a scum.
Someone challenges your viewpoints, you resort to passing insults.
Why am I not surprised ?You have typed two comments already and haven’t yet provided anything of substance to backup your BS.
Go on, using context prove everything you said in your initial comment.@Gervais fanboy: Cool story bro.
We get it, you're a misogynist.
It stands to reason that you get hot and bothered over that famous for nothing, reality TV clown.
Also, it was you that responded to me with put downs and now you're triggered because your feelings are hurt
Doesn't change the fact that I'm right and you're wrong.
you're a misogynist.
Based on what ?
you get hot and bothered over that famous for nothing,
My critiquing of your slanderous statements has got nothing to do with the person in question here.
I haven’t really defended him, I have only asked you to cite something to go along with what you are saying.that I'm right and you're wrong.
All you have done is share opinions and no facts.
You have shared opinions and talked a lot of $h1t. Good thing for you we are only online… allows you to say whatever you want.@Gervais fanboy: Let's put this into perspective.
YOU accused me of attacking you for having a different opinion, yet YOU'VE attacked everyone (including me) for having a different opinion of this idiot.
YOU immediately started with the put downs and all you've done on here is defended him as if you were his girlfriend (it's evident that you wish you were).
He's being banned for a reason whether it agrees with your fantasies and schoolboy crushes or not.
Andrew Tate is a misogynist and scum who is dangerous to kids and the feeble minded.
I never said you couldn't continue to get randy over him. That's your business.
attacking you for having a different opinion, yet YOU'VE attacked everyone (including me) for having a different opinion of this idiot.
You talk about putting things in perspective and then get your very first point wrong.
Slandering someone isn’t the same thing as having an ‘opinion’. You called me a misogynist, that’s not an ‘opinion’Trust me, given you standards of censorship about Tate. You too should have your account suspended immediately. Bloody hypocrite.
YOU immediately started with the put downs and all you've done on here is defended him as if you were his girlfriend
These are such juvenile insults btw, atleast be creative with it.
Anyways, to your point. If people have a right to express factually inaccurate points then I have right to critique them. I have done that in the past with other users, talking point etc. I have no special allegiance to Tate.
He's being banned for a reason
Firstly, they didn’t even give him a reason. None at all. But I’m sure @imurgod from Ozbargain knows more on this than Tate himself.
Secondly, this is your 4th comment and you still have only made accusations, no citations, no evidence whatsoever.Andrew Tate is a misogynist and scum who is dangerous to kids and the feeble minded.
Based on what ?
I never said you couldn't continue to get randy over him. That's your business.
My business, is it ?
And yet you can’t stop talking about it,
in your almost disparaging homophobic manner. Making suggestive sexual remarks.Shouldn’t that be a strike number 2 for you ?
If only I was a liberal cuck of a man, I would dislike and report all of your comments.@Gervais fanboy: You're still going but you're still massively wrong.
You don't seem to understand that despite your crush, you're absolutely, categorically incorrect in almost every point you make.
Call.it what it is, you are not successful with women or you hate them and now you've got an ex-reality TV star who shares your misguided point of view.
I expect that when you hear about footballers raping women, you cheer at least a little.
You can lie to me about who you are but you can't lie to yourself.
you're still massively wrong.
categorically incorrect in almost every point you make.Okay, five comments in and I am still waiting for you to deconstruct something/anything that I have said.
You are just accusing me and framing conclusions. No real arguments anywhere..you are not successful with women or you hate them and now you've got an ex-reality TV star who shares your misguided point of view.
Hahahaha, I mean I don’t care about correcting you… But just WOW..
imagine being a person that actually thinks and talks like that.I expect that when you hear about footballers raping women, you cheer at least a little.
That should be striker number 3 Surely…
Wouldn’t you agree ?
Given your cancel culture standards, that’s account termination right there isn’t it ?You can lie to me about who you are but you can't lie to yourself.
Lie about what ?
I haven’t told you anything about myself.
You just believe what you want to believe.
Its like a work of art.@Gervais fanboy: You're still going as if you've made a single valid point…. You haven't.
The fact still remains that Tate is a terrible human being who spreads hate and you cry and jerk it while you defend his indefensible hate speech.
You even spew out all the same Trump-cultist catch phrases. You're very one dimensional.
It must kill you that this isn't Fox news or Truth Social and nobody here is buying your crap.
Maybe read the room. Very few seem to share your deluded fantasies.
In case you haven't noticed yet, I don't find you interesting, I know you're disillusioned and misguided and I'm not really paying attention to your vitriol, so save your tiny fingers and don't bother constantly responding. You're wasting your time.
@imurgod: lol you are soo angry
Tate is a terrible human being who spreads hate
Like What ?
you jerk it
More inappropriate sexual suggestions ?
You even spew out all the same Trump-cultist catch phrases
Like what ?
It must kill you that this isn't Fox news or Truth Social
I actually quite like this website and the people here..
Maybe read the room. Very few seem to share your deluded fantasies.
Btw what fantasises ?
You mean something like demonising someone without a single shred of evidence ? That kind of a fantasy ?
I don't find you interesting
Awww
I'm not really paying attention to your vitriol
What vitriol ?
don't bother constantly responding. You're wasting your time.
Do you mean our** time.
Btw I thought we were getting along just fine…What happened ?@Gervais fanboy: Still crying i see….
You'd be wrong a lot. One would expect you to be used to it now.
I'll bet you head up the Taint fan club, huh?
Idolising a predatory toxic misogynist who's 15 minutes are only due to hate speech and reality tv is pretty pathetic, tiger.
I don't hate you. Far from it. I feel sorry for you for being as gullible as a 13 year old eshay kid.
Oh, extra points for taking my comments out of context but that's right out of the Trump cultists playbook. It's so passe.
I'll bet you head up the Taint fan club, huh?
What does that mean ? Didn’t get it
Idolising a predatory toxic misogynist who's 15 minutes are only due to hate speech
What hate speech ?
tiger
Ohh come on now, let’s not disclose our bedroom talk in the open like that…. My little pumpkin pie.
Good thing for you we are only online… allows you to say whatever you want.
I love this threat. Mate, I'll say whatever I want to your face.
I'm not scared of cowards.
You have just contributed to it too.. Twice.
It’s like the climate alarmists complaining about overpopulation whilst still choosing to live and breeding more kids.