• expired

FILA Classic Unisex Hoodie $15 (Rose Colour, Expired), Other Colours from $19 + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $39 Spend) @ Amazon AU

1040
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Brushed fleece for comfy warmth
Lined hood with drawcord for adjustable coverage
Rib cuffs and hem for a secure fit
Pre-shaped sleeves for range of motion

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

closed Comments

    • +11

      Pink used to be a boys colour actually and blue a girls colour. Makes sense when you consider pink is like manly red mixed with milk and baby blue is like girlish blue mixed with milk.

      • +6

        That would make perfect sense in another universe

      • +6

        please share the ozbargain deal on the drugs you are smoking. we want to have fun too.

      • +1

        Pink used to be a boys colour actually and blue a girls colour.

        And apparently all children used to be called girls - "knave girls" for males and "gay girls" for females.

        Who Was Traditionally Dressed In Pink And Called A Girl? | QI

        Makes sense when you consider pink is like manly red mixed with milk and baby blue is like girlish blue mixed with milk.

        Take your pick of theories from the 235 comments under that youtube video. Or add your own, as it appears that none of those comments have mentioned milk.

      • Ackchyually!

    • +17

      Because it’s… pink? I have plenty of pink clothes, it’s my favourite colour. But it’s got nothing to do with sexuality, I just really like the colour. You do you

      • +17

        We have chosen to link gender to colour
        Just like scents. It's all bs. Enjoy what you enjoy

        • -4

          Evidence?

          Pretty much all the empirical evidence and meta analyses might disagree with you.

          People keep trying to suggest that gender preferences are totally socially constructed but that's not the case. Perhaps partially, but almost all studies involving infants and toy preferences show very strong associations between "gendered" preferences

          • @KnifeEnthusiastBoi: Your evidence?

            • @Chocobros: Gender based toy preferences
              https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-01624-7

              colour preferences
              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311615/#:~:tex….

              In this systematic review you can find many links to research studies on work done in terms of gender preferences on colour

              Eynseck 1941
              https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13830144/
              Verified by Ling et.al in 2006 suggesting that even for 50+ years, it still remains the same

              In fairness yes there are cultural differences in value of colour and meaning, but the larger the sample size that includes some representation cross culturally, you will begin to minimise individual differences and solidify immutable, generalisable conclusions. The conclusion of these studies that look at many other studies, what they find is general associations of certain colours to different genders, such as the pinks, the blues, etc.

              • +1

                @KnifeEnthusiastBoi: But none of this is relevant. A certain gender can prefer a certain colour. Does not mean we must ascribe a colour to a gender e.g.pink for girls and blue for boys. That is society choosing to do so. It's still bs…

                As an aside infants like to put anything and everything in their mouth… Doesn't mean thats what the human race is built for. We could do studies and then someone could analyse them with a meta analysis and prove that yes infants do put everything in their mouth. We could do a meta analysis now and again in 50 years to prove just how much infants put things in their mouth. Still doesn't mean the human race is built to put everything in their mouth and that this has been true for 50 years.

                • -1

                  @Chocobros: It's only not relevant if you choose to think it's not so.

                  Society doesn't dictate tyranically that girls should like pink and boys should like blue. These are preferences that have evolved over centuries and are so engrained that cross culturally these preferences exist, which means although there is societal influence, it could suggest it's evolutionary or even biologically based.

                  If your thinking is because in toys and clothes, companies make blue ones for boys and pink ones for girls that it's societally doctrined, that's not true. The market just tailors to what the customers want, so it's not societally doctrined, it's just what generally people want.

                  If over centuries girls in ancient times appreciated the colour of pink flowers and found them generally more desirable than blue ones, you going to say that's societally decided?

                  We don't really know/can't quantify how much of it is societal and how much could be engrained/biological. I'm just saying that suggesting it is purely societal is a mistake. Some boys like pink, some girls like blue, but the majority funnel into the opposite. Not saying that that either have to like the other.

                  • @KnifeEnthusiastBoi: Nope. It's objectively not relevant to my point that we have chosen to link gender to colour. If a gender prefers a colour it doesn't mean that colour belongs to that gender. It's just something they prefer. You are drawing a conclusion that isn't there.

                    I'm not saying that you are wrong in saying girls may prefer pink and boys may prefer blue. But colour is not attributed to gender

                    • @Chocobros: Well I never said that any colour "belongs" to a gender either, I was merely saying exactly what you said that there may be colours that by and large certain genders prefer. It depends what you mean by attributed, maybe I'm saying that certain colours can be more associated to certain genders but we're probably arguing semantics.

                      In honesty we don't fully know (speaking as someone who is well versed in psychological research) how or why certain genders have innate/deep rooted "preferences". Some of it societal for sure, but some also biological. In terms of how those studies are not relevant to your point, I think they are and that's because we're talking about "preferences" as a whole. What one gender prefers over another is a highly researched topic. Psychologists have looked at preferences in colours, toys, jobs, etc. All to try to understand the relationship between sociology and biology in the contribution of preferences. When you do multivariate analysis and determine that gender accounts for a certain % of the predictability of one gender choosing one option over another accounting for other variables, you can start to understand if biology plays a part.

                      Social science research hasn't proven or debunked the theory that colour-gender associations are purely sociological, and until they can, it's always possible. How much contribution of societal vs biological would also be an interesting discovery

                      What you said about individual preferences is true, but when you do large scale research, you include large sample sizes to squash precisely that. The more people you include, the closer you get to a "generalisable" opinion. 1 out of 1000 guys who like pink doesn't mean guys must hate pink, it just means that the majority dont prefer it. That doesn't invalidate that the person doesnt like pink, but if your strategy was to make 50% of your product tailored to boys pink based on that finding, that would probably unwise as you'd have to deal with a lot more waste and depreciated product.

      • 🤔 at the very least you are sending a message.

      • Mellow rose*

    • +2

      Fun fact, Pride month started in ‘69.

  • +3

    $19 for other colours black/silver/white/red/navy

  • Rose colour appears as $26 for me, but all other colours $19.

  • +2

    Similar prices to BigW hoodies

  • +14

    FILA should pay me advertising fees every time I go out with one of they huge logos!

    • +7

      FILA is all about diversity and inclusion — this is scientifically the minimum-sized logo for old people to be able to read it

      • +3

        this is scientifically the minimum-sized logo for old people to be able to read it

        Scientifically? That sounds like a statement made by someone working at FILA sci-fi department.

        • +2

          They had to exclude the occasional dementia patient who said the logo looked like a monkey’s arse. Science is hard, sometimes

  • +2

    Is the quality any good?
    I wouldnt wear brands in public, just a around home kinda thing.

    • -1

      so you exclusively shop at kmart?

      • +2

        Sure, most clothing is branded in some way.
        But there is a big difference between something like this and something more reasonable like the jumper i have on now which is a sewn-on faux leather badge which is like 2 inches across at most.

    • actually checked the quality.
      it's perfect, until you wash it. lol. Febreeze for life.

  • +5

    Don't know why people are calling this pink when it's clearly salmon

    • +1

      salmon, are you colour blind.

      you obviously meant to say fuchsia

    • +2

      Fila a fish?

    • More watermelon…….

  • -2

    Fila has to pay me to wear their brand on a hoodie

  • +2

    I can't see 15$ !? All colors are 19$ except red which is 22.39$

    Anyone got 15$ price for any color or size?

    • Try the Australian website

      • +2

        Yeah still same.

  • +1

    I don't love the logo, but these are better quality than their price suggests. Warm too. Of course others may not agree.

    • They complete my "houso" look so no-one robs me.
      Thanks again OP.

      • I sympathise with your undesirable living situation.

  • -8

    This is for "Them"

  • Will it peel ?

    • Pill?

      • Yeah

  • -6

    You don't find these in the Mens department do you?

  • Nice find!

  • +13

    I'm so tough and straight that pink things make me uncomfortable and I need to say something about it being totally feminine and gay.

    • +3

      It’s probably time for your wrist exercises

  • +3

    The quality is not great. I got one a few weeks ago. A lot of white cotton balls fall from inside the hoodie.

    • +1

      We’ve gone from fast fashion to disposable fashion. Still, at these prices, it’s hard to complain

    • +3

      Agreed. It's quite poor quality. Even cheaper hoodies don't have lint like this.

      They look pretty good though.

  • So with cashback is moving to cart from saved items the same as adding to cart?

    • +1

      I've always emptied my cart after putting them in my Cashback wishlist and then added to cart via the cashback app of choice. Seems to work but I'd like an answer too

  • Bought 2 for the kids for this price a couple of weeks ago (Blue M, PInk S) and they love them, seems like a great price to me.

    • +1

      Same deal i bought 2 for my wife and I. We have been wearing them literally every night since lol. Very comfortable

  • How is the sizing I’m normally xl in most tops etc but the sizes on these seem small so not sure what to go for

    • it's TTS

      • What is tts?

  • +2

    Unfortunately due to my current waist line i would look like my avatar wearing this…

  • -2

    Landfill

    • +1

      Nnly if you place it there. I would recommend wearing the jumper instead.

  • Prices gone up nvm

Login or Join to leave a comment