I was recently on a bit of a Jake Gyllenhaal binge and watched The Guilty. It was okay but it didn't stack up to Brokeback Mountain. Anyway, it got me thinking about call centre operators and that job. One thing lead to another and I'm looking at the job listing for Triple Zero Call-Takers.
I was absolutely astounded to see that after completing their training a Triple Zero call taker makes an astounding $54,088. Over the next two years, their salary caps out at a paltry $64,595. Now you might think they are shift workers, so they get various loadings and such. This is addressed in the information pack "Factoring shift penalties and overtime a full-time ear 1 call-taker averages annual earnings of $75,900, a year 2 Call-taker earns on average $81,200 (based on analysis of earnings undertaken)".
I don't mean to come across as condescending towards those of less means, but it seems to me that this is an astonishingly low salary for a job with some major downsides (shift work, high stress, traumatising). It puts them significantly below the median full-time salary of $88,400. Now obviously we can't pay everybody a million bucks but I would have expected they deserve another $20,000 or so, given the nature of the work. So I wonder why do people take this job on if the salary is so low? Is it out of compassion and a desire to help others? Or is that just the reality of having no formal qualifications in Australia?
Obligatory cheers to the Triple 0 Call Takers, you're doing God's work.
as posters above mentioned, the relatively low salary is due to low barrier to entry - when anyone can do the job with training, however important, the salary will be capped due to supply and demand. not saying it's right, but that's the reality
the lower end of the salary would be for basic call taker "police fire or ambulance, what state and town" and forward, that's it. as you become subspecialised the pay rises accordingly, even then it's very protocol driven, there is no clinical decision to make