• expired

Viture Pro XR/AR Glasses $599 (RRP $749) Delivered @ Viture US via Amazon AU

50
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

$30 cheaper than previous deal
https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/905841

ATL according to Camel

VITURE Pro XR/AR Glasses — 135" 120Hz Full HD UltraClarity Display, Harman Audio, Myopia Adjustments, Electrochromic Film, Smart Glasses for iPhone 16/15/Android/Mac/PC/Steam Deck/Gaming Consoles

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
VITURE US
VITURE US

closed Comments

  • +3

    You get this for free with the deal. Also, itll be $599 delivered as price is over the free delivery threshold.

    https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0D47HVMBN

  • Brands be like, these tech companies are so stupid putting bullshit like XR/AR etc
    All we need to do is slap a brand label on it and it becomes $750 easy.

  • +1

    So no prescription is needed, it has all that adjustments builtin. I like it

    • only if you have spherical errors, any astigmatism and you will still need a prescription insert.

      • Damn, but still it is good they r implementing it. Probably in future, they find a way out for astigmatism, cylindrical, axis etc etc

    • If you have greater than 1.00DC of astigmatism then you might not see very clearly, but you can try using your spherical equivalent which is add 0.25DS for every 0.50DC astigmatism. It's common practice in ophthalmics because more than 50% of the population has some degree of astigmatism, and most people are under 0.75DC.
      Eg: You have -3.00 sphere with -0.50 astigmatism at 180 degrees or (-3.00/-0.50 x 180), your spherical equivalent is -3.25.

      • U r genius
        .. r u doctor, so much knowledge

    • Only up to +5.0. Anything more requires supplementary lens

  • Don’t they use these in Ted Talks?

  • Is there anywhere i can try these on/test these?

    • Amazon

      • Is that meant to be humour?

        • Nope im dead serious read the comments on amazon.

          • @McMaferMur: Reading reviews is very different to testing something yourself dude lol

            • @Dvbargain: Well if i wait for someone from.ozb to test, usually the item would be sold out by that time….

              • @McMaferMur: Well thats why I was asking whether I could test it myself anywhere, lol

                • +1

                  @Dvbargain: I mean , you can order it from Amazon and if you don't like it, just return it. Amazon does have a really stress free return policy, speaking from experience as I had returned TCL glasess 2 days later becuz edges were very blurry.

                  • @V003: I'd be likely to get busy and not get time to go post office and be stuck with it haha

  • -1

    No way they project 130".
    Hmm tempted to try and return if not good…

    • +3

      its comparable to looking at my 65inch screen from 3m or looking at my 16 inch laptop from 50cm.

      • Actually its a virtual 135 inch screen as viewed from 4m.

        • the point is a comparison, not many people have a 135 inch screen, what's the point of saying 135inch screen at 4m, you have no reference, saying comparible to a 65inch at 2-3m you have a point of reference as it is pretty standard to have a 65inch in a living room.

          • @azukay: Thanks my tv is 65. So you say it can get bigger if we sit at 4m away?

            • +1

              @McMaferMur: I think you should read again. Nothing is getting bigger or smaller. All it matters is the fov.

    • you're right, they don't project 130". it's misleading marketing like chinese lumens on flashlights. it's the FOV that really matters, and that's still stuck at 46 deg.

      • Yeah so probably it can be returned as not matching description.

        • I mean it's amazon lol, they'll let you return as long as it's not heavily damaged.

      • For reference, the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers recommends 40 degrees for a cinematic experience. THX certifies cinemas at 45 degrees.

        So the experience is slightly more expansive than what you'd get in a cinema setting. Anything wider becomes tiring for human vision unless you're leveraging fisheye optics (such as in VR headsets).

        • I'm sure those bodies have not been motivated/lobbied by cinemas to certify whatever happens to be affordably implementable at the time.

          I didn't get tired at all using ultrawides (about 67 deg FoV at 60cm away) for the past ~8 years, and I'm sure the vast majority of ultrawide users don't either, because it's literally never ever been brought up in any discussions or reviews. It's generally described as "immersive" instead.

          And just because a headset CAN output at, say, 90 deg FOV, doesn't mean you HAVE to use it at 90 deg FOV. You're free to shrink it down if you get tired.

          You can track how well sales of 46 deg goggles go in the future when higher FOVs become available affordably and tell me I'm wrong.

          Sorry but your comment really unironically sounds like "human eyes can't see above 30/60 fps" all over again.

          • @xrailgun: "I didn't get tired at all using ultrawides (about 67 deg FoV at 60cm away)"

            Which is fine but 99% of people don't use ultrawides. It's great that 67deg works for you but you're pushing a substantial proportion of your screen into peripheral vision. Again you may enjoy that, but much of the picture is now outside of your central cone of vision where only broad shapes are perceivable, requiring the viewer to move their head from side to side.

            This is generally considered immersion breaking and rarely conducive to an enjoyable viewing experience, especially for longer sittings.

            "Sorry but your comment really unironically sounds like "human eyes can't see above 30/60 fps" all over again."

            It's dependent upon the projection point which is a scientific thing and is measurable.

  • +6

    Bought these last year for $698, Used mine roughly 20 times and the proprietary cable went faulty. Returned mine and got a refund from Amazon

    The SpaceWalker app on Android was pretty average and hasn't been updated in ages……., you have to use it if you want to adjust the display from small/full screen and placement of screen (Centre/4 corners). The app only has a built in web browser and you couldn't your own personal apps to use.

    Only time I got proper use was when hooking up to my Steam Deck with a custom application which allowed me to adjust screen size and placement.

    There's supposed to be an app for the PC as well but I didnt bother.

    Im sure other people might have better experiences but this product probably wasn't for me.

    Virtue do offer a 30 day satisfaction on Amazon to try it out

    Just my 2 cents for those interested

    • the 2D to 3D conversion works surprisingly well on desktop, but it uses a lot of resources, it hits my laptop 3080 for around 40 to 60 percent utilisation.

    • +1

      The android app was updated a few days ago. It's still buggy but works a lot better and the 3d conversion is pretty cool.

      I use mine fairly regularly for both media consumption and productivity work while sitting outside with the dog.

      Just an fyi, they are releasing a new model of glasses in July. I recommend the glasses but I would personally hold off until the new model is released.

  • +9

    I paid 700 for these last year. I use them basically every day with my Steam Deck. It takes some work to get them to sit right, and sometimes the left side of the image is out of focus if I don't press the glasses firmly against my face.

    I have some custom prescription lenses that cost about $70. They're just a magnetic attachment. No hassles at all.

    I haven't managed to find a decent tablet with video out for watching series and movies, but the Steam Deck can do that in desktop mode.

    If you expect them to be like VR level immersion, you'll be disappointed. It feels like having a big screen in front of you. Your brain won't know whether it's a big screen far away or a small screen up close, so the whole 'how big is the screen' thing isn't as straightforward as you'd think. I sit on my lounge with them on, and the screen is much bigger than the 65" TV two metres away. I think that's pretty good considering I can use them in bed, on a plane, anywhere I like.

    They definitely feel like they're designed for smaller faces, but I'd buy another pair if something went wrong with mine.

    They're not suitable for replacing PC monitors for productivity. They're 1080p, not 4K. Text is readable, but you'll get a headache trying to code or read the news for hours on end. Incredible for watching a movie or playing a game though.

    Happy to answer any questions!

    • Where did you get the custom prescription lenses?

      • -1

        Thought I'd hijack this question with my thoughts. I haven't got these glasses but I've got the TCL ray neo 3s glasses and I got prescription lenses from honsvr. I've purchased lenses from them for all of my VR headsets and have never had an issue. Absolutely top notch customer service too. I gave them the wrong prescription for my last set and messaged them to get another set and they gave me the second set for basically nothing except for the shipping cost. Which was something I did not expect. Can't recommend them enough.

      • HonsVR. Great service.

    • 100% agree. It's not really a "VR" or "AR" unit.. There are some accessories (Smart neck band) that will "help" in getting more of this effect, but they are separate pricing and apparently still not up to scratch with it.

    • Sorry, I'm very new to this XR/AR glasses technology. But it doesn't have an internal processor, right?
      Does it only work as a video passthrough without the Pro Neckband? Or does it work as a second separate display? Can I connect it to my PC, MacBook, or iPhone via wired or wireless connection?
      How does it compare to, say, XReal One or One Pro in terms of functionality?
      Is it the same as the 'spacial computer' that INAIR is debuting?

      • I can't answer most of these. Head over to r/viture and see what they say.

        I can tell you that the glasses are just a monitor that attaches to your face. You plug the USB C cable into a device that's capable of sending video over USB C, and the glasses display it.

        They're powered over the same cable.

        There's no processor, software, or anything like that.

        They have a volume control, and a brightness control. That's all.

        No wireless. Only USB C.

        • So basically a big HD screen projected to your retina.
          Thanks for the answer, uncle!

          • @pariah: Exactly. Sorry I couldn't be more useful. It seems to be a pattern in my life!

  • Or you could make glasses like Zack Freedman?

    Yes i know they are different. :)

  • +1

    Heads up for everyone -

    They've just announced a new model will be coming out within the next few months. Potentially worth holding off. Likely new model will have higher res, better field of view, bigger virtual screen size ( i hope!)

    Ive got this model, love them, use them with steam deck and for watching stuff while taking my dog for a long walk! Though the sweet spot is very specific and it needs to sit in a very paritcular spot every time to not have blurry edges. Very cool tech overall, would buy the new model depending on the improvements.

    • Interesting.. how easy is it to go about your day and see the world around you whilst viewing something through these? I understand they have that dimming function but I’ve heard folks mention even without dimming activated the glasses are still quite dark?

Login or Join to leave a comment