This is slightly better and has HDR10 support than the other one posted recently. Reset is the same I believe.
Surcharges: 0% Afterpay & ZipMoney, 1% card & PayPal payments.
AOC Q27G11E 27" 180Hz QHD Fast IPS Gaming Monitor $209 + Delivery ($0 VIC/NSW/QLD C&C / in-Store/ $250 Metro Order) @ Scorptec
360
budgetbuddy on 12/08/2025 - 08:33 scorptec.com.au (1754 clicks)
Last edited 12/08/2025 - 10:57 by 2 other users
Last edited 12/08/2025 - 10:57 by 2 other users
Related Stores
Comments
You can also just get an adjustable VESA arm for your desk to solve that problem.
I vesa everything now. Monitor stands are almost universally dogshit.
No more yellow pages, and reflex paper seems rare these days. Can't be a scrub propping it up with wink paper… I dunno, I don't think it can be done.
Is this a joke or are you actually this ignorant?
lol, he is serious I think. Thinking this is a TV.
@kungfuman: You need high end graphics cards to drive 4K with nice detail settings and have decent frame rates.
As in, 5090 high end. So $2000plus or whatever it is now.
QHD can be driven with high detail settings by cheaper cards with high frame rates and it still looks bloody nice.
@kungfuman: Brother I have a 6750XT and can hardly get 100fps on warzone on low to medium settings on a 1440p monitor.
4k with reasonable fps is not an easy to achieve task.
@boirganz: I currently game at a QHD resolution using an AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT graphics card. This setup delivers excellent frame rates and provides a pixel density that ensures crisp and detailed visuals without overwhelming system resources.
@boirganz: This is the biggest myth going…
I got a 6900XT and, provided you don't turn ray tracing/path tracing on, 4K is easily obtainable at 100fps+ in 90% of games.
I thought about it alot and 4K is the future cause of TAA and textures…they are all made for 4K. TAA and unreal engine looks blurry at 2K and below
@kungfuman: For singleplayer games sure. But the priority for multiplayer games is high refresh rate, which you aren't gonna get at 4K.
1440p is the sweet spot for good resolution and high refresh rate gaming.
54% of gamers play at 1080, 25% at 1440 and just 4.6% at 2160: Steam Hardware Survey (July 2025)
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Softw…
This one does have HDR10, but it has a slightly lower max brightness and doesn't have G-Sync. Still has Adaptive-sync so its fine. For HDR10 games and movies, this is the better monitor.
With 300cd/m2 brightness, 1000:1 contrast ratio and no local dimming this monitor will not deliver a HDR experience, even if it, technically "supports" it.
Not sure if better than the Q27g4 posted earlier. this has 90% dci-p3 colour gamut, lower brightness, lower contrast ratio and no gsync.
ALTHOUGH, still very good for the price imo!
How does it compare to this for $169??
https://www.centrecom.com.au/msi-mag-275f-27-rapid-ips-fhd-1…That's 1080p and this is 1440p
Didn't even notice that, thanks!
hey guys, besides height adjustment is this better technically then this model that sold out yesterday? (Q27G4) TIA
I did wonder. From AOC's website, the Q27G4 is brighter (350cd/m2 vs 300cd/m2), has a better contrast ratio (1200:1 vs 1000:1), has better colour gamut (sRGB 127% CIE1931 vs sRGB 99% CIE1931), better colour range (1.07billion vs 16.7 million), uses less power (29w vs 42w), has height/swivel/pivot/tilt vs tilt only, and is g-sync compatible certified vs adaptive sync (I don't think this last one matters too much?).
Specs wise it seems the Q27G4 is better, but hard to find reviews on either model. My understanding was the Q27G11E was the budget option, but it does have an external power supply which is handy from a repair point of view.
Edit- the Google ai comparison is based on the wrong models, same with some of the other AI models. Easier to compare from AOC website
Well said. I agree the q27g4 seems better.. lack of reviews is annoying
Thanks for the link to the deal on this monitor at Scorptec. Centre com has it for the same price, but shipping is cheaper, so I went with them instead.
No height adjustment. And the labelled height (46cm) is pretty low compared to what I'm used to (50-51cm). I guess if your desk is higher it might be ok. Or just put something under the stand.