Red Vans Authentic Shoes - $45 + Shipping

Related Stores

Kaeho

• 

  poedgirl on 09/04/2013 - 19:05

  +1

  Motor vehicle? The what now?

  • 

    porleng on 09/04/2013 - 19:06

    +1

    They are the cars of the future.

• ifonlyiwasyounger on 09/04/2013 - 19:10 Comment score below threshold.
  • 

    ifonlyiwasyounger on 09/04/2013 - 19:34

    -3

    WTF? Why was I negged for what is an innocent observation?

    • 

      frostee on 09/04/2013 - 19:55

      Because it is not at all helpful to the "Gen Y-ers" that may wish to purchase these shoes. Pretty obvious I think.

      • 

        ifonlyiwasyounger on 09/04/2013 - 20:35

        -6

        Thanks frostee - I had not realised that you are a precious Gen Y-er.

      • 

        frostee on 09/04/2013 - 20:51

        +3

        Firstly I am not a Gen Y-er and secondly do you think it would be fair to neg a good deal on a pair of golf shoes because you don't play golf? Because that's pretty much what you are saying.

      • 

        ifonlyiwasyounger on 09/04/2013 - 21:44

        -4

        You are mistaken - I did NOT neg this deal, I merely made a light-hearted comment, as did the OP.

• 

  hluu0111 on 09/04/2013 - 19:19

  I clicked the link and saw $84.95?

  • 

    frostee on 09/04/2013 - 19:21

    Same here.

    EDIT: Nevermind there was a voucher code required. Are we sure these are genuine Vans? They are faked a lot these days.

    • 

      danielz on 09/04/2013 - 19:35

      kaeho are owned by rushfaster.com.au. they've been around for a while, i'd say they're pretty legit.

• 

  spychiatrist on 09/04/2013 - 21:10

  Got a vans bali (brand, not made in bali) for ladies…size 6 (actually 6-1/2 as written but small size so 6), shoot me a pm if interested. Sorry for the hijack op

• 

  c64 on 09/04/2013 - 21:48

  they look like something louie spence would wear …

• 

  young_dazza on 09/04/2013 - 22:44

  +1

  What makes "vans" better than your kmart sandshow for $10 that looks almost the same? It might be worth paying an extra $10 if it were better quality I suppose. But $90 for sandshoes?

  I know its the brand name that youre paing top dollar for - but snap out of the spell youre under and see them for what they really are - a pair of basic sandshoes!

• 

  jackspratt on 09/04/2013 - 23:08

  Besides the vibrant, exciting, seductive, stand-out red colour, can anyone explain why these are better than $20 (on special) Dunlop Volleys?

  • 

    frostee on 09/04/2013 - 23:22

    I would say Vans are much more comfortable than a pair of Volleys but the quality is only marginally better. In regards to the post above similar situation, in my experience Vans are pretty good quality and a steal at this price, much better value than Kmart ones. That is if you fancy red ones (quite fashionable currently I think you will find). I have mates who wear Vans to music festivals/raves where as you would expect they would get trashed but they seem to hold up pretty well for a basic looking shoe.

• 

  willdog123 on 10/04/2013 - 10:22

  $2 more and get man more colours from urban outfitters
  http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/category.jsp?id…
  Free shipping to aus for orders over $50

  • 

    frostee on 10/04/2013 - 14:02

    Nice find, I checked out the traditional black Vans and they were preorder for 21/6/13 (in my size) damn that is a long time!