[1-Day] Guylian Solitaire Chocolates 3 Pk ($15.99)

Go to Deal

Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 15:24 1-day.com.au (354 clicks)
Last edited 30/05/2010 - 00:11 by 1 other user

Recommended Retail Price: $24
Sale Price: $10 | P&H: $6 ¹

Expires: 5th July (2010)

Delivery: 5-6 business days.

You can treat yourself or a loved one to an extremely delicious treat with a box of these chocolates. The BEST Cocoa has come from Asia, South America and Africa and put into these scrummy little squares to be admired and enjoyed by chocolate connoisseurs across the land.

Each 3 x pack of Guylian Solitaire Origin Chocolates is sold separately.

A selection of the best cocoa beans from Asia, South America and Africa
Delicious dark chocolate squares

A must for plain dark chocolate connoisseurs everywhere
30 chocolates: Asian Dark, Aztec Gold and African Ebony

……………………………………………………………………………………..

![image](http://www.guylian.be/images/solitaire-asian-dark.jpg "Delicious Asian Dark 56% Cocoa")

* Asian Dark (56% cocoa)

A balanced mix of Asian beans from the Forastero and Criollo cocoa trees
These trees have adapted to the local climate and produce a mild cocoa aroma with a hint of herbs

![image](http://www.guylian.be/images/solitaire-aztec-gold.jpg "Delicious Aztec Gold 65% Cocoa")

* Aztec Gold (65% cocoa)

Blend of South American and Caribbean beans from Ecuador (Arriba), Colombia (Trinitario) and Santo Domingo (Criollo) in a balanced mixture with African beans
A strong and bitter dark chocolate

![image](http://www.guylian.be/images/solitaire-african-ebony.jpg "Delicious African Ebony 70% Cocoa")

* African Ebony (70% cocoa)

Harmonious mix of Ivory Coast, Ghana and Nigerian beans with a touch of Sao Tomé
A full powerful chocolate gives the strength and flavour of the West African jungle

……………………………………………………………………………………..

Guylian has selected only the best cocoa beans from Asia, South America and Africa to create these delicious dark chocolate squares. The unique blend of the highest quality of origin chocolate makes Solitaire a must have for plain dark chocolate connoisseurs everywhere.

![image](http://imgur.com/NEDHv.jpg "Luxury chocolates that will make everyone happy!")

In theory: $5.00 ea [30pcs] + 99c shipping = $16.00 total [90pcs] ↩

Groceries Chocolate Confectionery Guylian

30 May 2010

Related Stores

1-Day, One Day Three Deals

closed Comments

Horizon on 28/05/2010 - 15:38

+1

Is the ability to drop some images into the description a new option or am I simply off the boil?

eg

<p><img src="http://imgur.com/NEDHv.jpg" alt="image" title="Luxury chocolates that will make everyone happy!" /></p>
- massari on 28/05/2010 - 15:42
  
  +1
  
  I was going to say.. this is new?? hahaha looks weird :|
- anthony on 28/05/2010 - 18:48
  
  +1
  
  It is nothing new
  http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#img
mawinmawin on 28/05/2010 - 15:45

+1

This one freaks me out !
Mikinoz on 28/05/2010 - 15:50

+2

Takes up half the bloody page lol
[Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 15:52

Only save $8 and expires this July? Not that good of a bargain
- Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 15:59
  
  -4
  
  shipping wasn't included in the RRP.
  eg. would be $30
  - [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 16:10
    
    +1
    
    So you're telling me you NEVER pass by the supermarket to buy some groceries? Do you magically make food appear on your plate? Wow, I want to know how to do that, please teach me now!
    - sash213 on 28/05/2010 - 16:27
      
      lol, shipping wasn't included… now thats funny… how much for extended warranty?
      - Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:29
        
        @sash213: … please read the bargain and associated posts carefully
        
        sash213 on 28/05/2010 - 16:37
        
        +1
        
        @Cripto: Carefully read…. you are kidding yourself.
        1. The price is $16 because pickup is not an option
        2. The product weighs next to nothing and is available widely (hence benefits of shipping are slim to none)
        3. The saving is $8 on RRP
        4. I and probably most OzBargains don't pay RRP especially on an unnecessary item like this as chocolates go on special every week or so
        5. Your saving is negligible
        6. You have product close to use-by date (probably has that white stuff on it)
        7. I do like how you flipped things and added $6 to the RRP to compare apples with delivered apples
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:53
        
        @sash213: It is pointless for you to insult the product, again you either like it or not. We've confirmed the price is $16, shipping is static by 1-Day as previously mentioned, the sale price is up to marketing. You can't say the price is $16 because pickup is not an option (hence it can't be $10 without shipping) when you claim it's 'readily available' at the shops. It still has a month to go, It won't get white stuff on it until much later (experience), all your claims are based on the availability, although unfortunately you can't prove this hence voiding your irrelevant claims. Remember this is OzBargain not just SydneyBargain, you can't get this type of chocolate here, and people who like dark chocolate love this type of chocolate. Bad example with apples; as it is irrelevant to packaged chocolate that weighs "next to nothing".
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 17:45
        
        @Cripto: You can get 80% cocoa chocolate from Aldi.
        
        And what happens if the price is $1 with $15 shipping, is it now $1?
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 17:58
        
        @[Deactivated]: What's this 80% cocoa you speak of? A name would be good, and is Aldi available in western states? can you order online etc.? more details please because I've never heard of it. And maybe you want to elaborate on your insult, it's not getting very far in this context.
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 18:08
        
        @Cripto: Couldn't find the picture for the 80% one but here is the 70%
        
        http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/415xebvOKoL.AA280.jpg
        
        Stop trying to find excuses, its a bargain because there isn't Aldi on Fraser island, if there aren't any shops at a place and you can ship something to there, everything is a bargain then.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 18:16
        
        @[Deactivated]: It's a bargain because I cannot ship this very good chocolate (that I prefer) to my state, I'm not just implying because it can't get here, that it's a definite bargain, the price is great; as mentioned, probably cheaper than your place (IF it were available here) once again price is fundamental.
        
        And can you please tell me how to order this "Moser-Roff" or whatever choclate to WA? If you can show a cheaper product which can be shipped to WA, than please do so rather than making irrelevant claims.
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 18:19
        
        @Cripto: I guess you can't get it. Oh well.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 18:23
        
        @[Deactivated]: How are you determining if it's a bargain for you? Please refer to the voting guidelines and read all sections that reflect the act of negative voting. I see you've gone back to insulting the chocolate, I'm sure "Moser-Roff" chocolate you were trying to present to me is much better quality (even though you failed to give a price, or shipping throughout Australia), and it's just you neg'ing so far, as the others realized they will be revoked if they neg without abiding to the guidelines.
        
        edit: wow nice edit, what happened to the rest of your statements? time to un-neg me now? thankgod for guidelines
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 18:29
        
        @Cripto: Takes a plane to Moscow.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 18:39
        
        @[Deactivated]: Have fun eating "Moser-Roth", it sure looks 'tasty'… you should even make your own bargain for it, I'm sure it will get alot of positive commentary.
    - Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:28
      
      it's $16 with delivery, without delivery according to your implication, it would be $10 alone for the product (given that you're picking it up from the supermarket) thus saving $14.00
      
      make sure you think the situation over carefully before posting.
      - sash213 on 28/05/2010 - 16:30
        
        @Cripto: I think you should think the situation over before posting
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:41
        
        -2
        
        @sash213: That post wasn't referring to you, see the branch order.
        
        To clear things up, it's $16 total (no hidden shipping fees)
        $10 for the 3 pack of chocolate, and $6 shipping (1-day static shipping charge)
        
        RRP (Recommended Retail Price) is $24, jared444 is determining how much he can save by using irrational math, eg. $8 (24-16)
        
        Traditionally shipping costs are not included with the RRP as stated on 1-Day, hence it would be $24 + $6 shipping if you were to buy the product at full retail price with shipping from 1-Day given that these 3-Packs of chocolate is unavailable at the supermarket.
        
        Therefore you save $14, not $8 ($30-$16 shipping included), in the unlikely event that you do see this at the shop and purchase it, the sale product without shipping on 1-Day would be $10 (-$6), and thus you're comparing $24 (RRP wo/ delivery) with $10, which is the same result. Not $8.
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 18:10
        
        +2
        
        @Cripto: Irrational maths? I think you're the one that needs to be rational. Learn some economics and you'll find from the basics that only the absolute value should be considered in terms of price.
      - WaywardOne on 28/05/2010 - 16:40
        
        +2
        
        @Cripto: If pick-up is not an option, shipping must be factored in. Only save $8 or 33% off for excess stock or soon to be expired.
        
        Most importantly, what is the weight? Is it 150 g x 3? For $16? That is $3.56/100g. Woolworths sell Guylian for $4.60/100g without any special. Hence this deal is less than 25% off.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:46
        
        -2
        
        @WaywardOne: If pickup isn't an option, the RRP holds a price of $30 not $24, quoting $8 is incorrect. It is also highly dependent on what state you're from, eastern states are generally cheaper when it comes to those chocolates, unless you can prove me wrong.
        
        Also I doubt you'll be able to purchase Solitaire, maybe another Guylian brand, not to say this is better than other types of Guylian chocolate, but it's to say it's a specific type. And you can either like this type of chocolate or not, can't compare it by weight, it's like comparing a brand with one superior best-selling type of chocolate by how much grams you get to determine which one you desire most or what's best for you.
        
        lazed on 28/05/2010 - 17:07
        
        +1
        
        @Cripto: You're kidding right? Who the hell factors in shipping costs for a bar of chocolate when comparing prices to a supermarket? NO ONE. Also please explain who gets their chocolate delivered to their post office instead of stopping at the supermarket and buying it? Your logic makes no sense at all. Please stop arguing your point, I'm embarassed for you.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 17:11
        
        -1
        
        @lazed: Who stops at the supermarket and buys it when it's not available in the supermarket? Unless you can prove this product goes on sale (or is even available at RRP price) in states other than your own, your argument doesn't hold up. Read carefully
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 17:55
        
        @Cripto: Whether its a bargain isn't determined by whether its available or how much it is discounted by, it's determined by how people value it and if people's reservation prices match the pricing. From all the comments that have been made, many don't value it, hence it isn't a bargain for them. Improve your logic.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 18:12
        
        -1
        
        @[Deactivated]: Wow did I upset you? There's no need to neg for no good reason, please read the voting guidelines. You neg'd me based on other people's votes and no legitimate reason. Please keep in mind, most the people who don't appreciate the deal have different preferences for the type of product which is being promoted, also they assume this product is available in ALL states at the given prices.
        
        You're entitled to your own opinion and may post your opinion, although please refer to the improved voting guidelines, there's too many points listed in the guidelines that you're negative vote does not adhere to.
        
        [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 18:22
        
        @Cripto: Yep, I've negged it because I find other chocolate better at a better price, that's not a good reason, the chocolate has to food poison me for it to be negged, I forgot.
        
        Oh, I'm very offended about chocolate, I worship Aldi chocolate in my basement and provide it fruits as a signal of respect every night.
        
        Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 18:29
        
        @[Deactivated]: You still fail to provide any chocolate at a better price? That's like saying a brand which is only available in WA and cannot be shipped elsewhere, which is better and is a better bargain than this, thus I will neg you because I have chocolate available only to my city and you're not getting any. I think you're the one who needs to improve your knowledge, I guess by your post edit, you realized your argument can't hold up and you choose to insult me instead.
- greenzeto on 28/05/2010 - 19:33
  
  that is like more than 1 month… do u think those 3 packs will last more than 1 month in winter season? geezz ++++
melmac77 on 28/05/2010 - 16:07

+1

Big pic now I'm craving Chocolate :(
chansthename on 28/05/2010 - 16:15

+1

the Picture needs to go from the front page, it takes up too much space and ruins the look of Ozbargain.
Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 16:30

Big picture that made people hungry and freak out has been moved to the bottom of the post :D
systmworks on 28/05/2010 - 17:34

I almost negged cos I cannot play Solitaire with this chocolate…
- Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 17:38
  
  rofl
  - [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 17:55
    
    ROFLcopter
Quick Ink on 28/05/2010 - 20:05

+1

This deal sucks….nuff said.
- [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 20:15
  
  +1
  
  agreed
- Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 22:56
  
  -1
  
  thanks mr. i sell the worlds best ink and like to put down others trying to spread the word about unique quality chocolate.
  
  since you live in perth can you tell me where dark chocolate fans can get Guylian Solitaires? and I don't even care if it's heaps more expensive… or if I have to travel to the other side of perth
  
  anyway thanks for the neg comment, guidelines have changed over past year because of people like you, not encouraging at all, I can't wait until your next 'bargain' for Quick Ink :)
  - [Deactivated] on 28/05/2010 - 23:07
    
    I revoked, are you my best friend now?
    - Cripto on 28/05/2010 - 23:11
      
      -1
      
      That's too bad, I reported you earlier today, you were going to get revoked anyway.
      
      Let me guess you actually took time to read the guidelines now? Some people with even the most simple statements have been revoked, but it's evident from everything you've said that you have violated pretty much all the sections containing negative voting rules in the guideline :)
      
      Don't be upset the rules are so strict, it's only for the best of the OzBargain future and so new people like me and Mr. Quick Ink have a chance at promoting products and opportunities that we want to share with others.
      - miq on 28/05/2010 - 23:21
        
        @Cripto: settle down mate lol
        
        Cripto on 29/05/2010 - 00:31
        
        -1
        
        @miq: I write these comments quite calmly actually, I like to keep the spirit of good faith at oB, it's funny though when these guys who have negative words can't handle the pressure and make all sorts of claims.
        
        [Deactivated] on 29/05/2010 - 01:23
        
        @Cripto: hahaha are you serious? How old are you?
        
        I don't have time to read an endless amount of conditions.
        
        I couldn't give a rats ass about you reporting me, it was worth the fun seeing you treat this matter seriously.
  - anthony on 29/05/2010 - 00:36
    
    since you live in perth can you tell me where dark chocolate fans can get Guylian Solitaires?
    
    Coles.
    
    I have purchased the same 3 chocolate pack from them, it is just in a box not a packet.
    
    Or try some Whittakers Dark
    - Cripto on 29/05/2010 - 00:48
      
      is this for perth? and how much did you pay?
so_fetch on 28/05/2010 - 23:42

These are avail at discount stores in my area for $5
Quick Ink on 28/05/2010 - 23:53

Cripto, while my overwhelming feeling is to return your personal attack you launched on me…I would like to think we are both above that. But it appears you are happy to flame anyone that doesn't like your deal for chocolate.

My comment was on the deal not the poster. Your reply was an attack on the poster which is when you cross the line.

Now the facts are I didn't neg your deal but you need to understand when you post an offer the bargainers will judge it on face value for them. For me this deal doesn't float my boat because with shipping the deal isn't cheap particularly because the chocolate will expire shortly - and while it won't kill you it tends to get that white stuff on it. Am I not able to post my point of view?

My comment simply concurred with other members who ,while were not as blunt as me, basically said the same thing.

Re you comment about worlds best ink….nah your not worth the keystrokes.

All the best
- Cripto on 29/05/2010 - 00:24
  
  Please read what you wrote initially, it would have been good if you started off with what you have just written now rather than very harsh words, the reply was no personal attack on the poster, it's unfortunate you see it that way, it was based on your past deals.
  
  For the record, if you post something good i'll +1 you, but i didn't feel like replying to last years post to tell you how…, wait i'll save those words.
  
  Anyone is entitled to their own opinion, not what came from you though (refer to your initial post :). I'm glad you took the time to rephrase what you meant though, that's a proper contribution to oB
  Keep up your submissions, All the best
Wampus on 29/05/2010 - 00:14

+1

DIABEETUS!

This was posted 13 years 10 months 29 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.