This was posted 7 years 5 months 6 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Neos Flek 7 8GB 7" Tablet $47 (Was $67) & Neos Flek 10 16GB 10.1" Tablet $78 (Was $98) @ Harvey Norman

90
Neos Flek 7 8GB 7" Tablet $47 (Was $67) & Neos Flek 10 16GB 10.1" Tablet $78 (Was $98) @ Harvey Norman
Go to Deal
Lizard Spock on 04/12/2016 - 04:55 harveynorman.com.au (565 clicks)
Last edited 04/12/2016 - 08:32

Neos Flek 7 8GB 7" Tablet - Black:

Thanks to the Neos Flek 7 8GB 7" Tablet’s A33 quad core processor and 1GB RAM, you can enjoy a balanced performance with low power consumption.

Running on an Android 6.0 Marshmallow, the Neos Flek 7 8GB Tablet gives you added security, improved app permissions, easier access to information, and more, with smarter battery consumption.

With a built-in flash storage of 8GB, the Neos Flek 7 Tablet gives you ample room to save the files that matter to you.

Featuring a 7” IPS capacitive touch screen, this Neos Flek Tablet helps you stay connected online with just a touch.

Neos Flek 10 16GB 10.1" Tablet - Black:

The Neos Flek 10 16GB 10.1” Tablet features a quad-core processor and 1GB RAM.

Featuring 16GB internal storage, the Flek 10 tablet has plenty of space for various apps and games. Get additional space via its microSD card slot.

The Neos tablet’s 10.1” touchscreen display (1024x600 resolution) delivers sharp details and clear visuals whether you’re playing, watching, or browsing the web.

Computing Neos Flek Tablet

Related Stores

Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman

closed Comments

  • Merlict on 04/12/2016 - 05:09
    +2

    Cheap and nasty. 1gb ram, and 1024*600 is a smeary mess at 10 inches

    I'd take my chances with something from Gearbest etc before this.

    • [Deactivated] on 04/12/2016 - 06:34
      +3

      Agreed. I got a Chewi Vi8 off AliExpress for ~$100 ($90 after cashback) and it's amazing. Intel CPU, Windows + Android, 2GB RAM/32GB storage… No point getting a nasty outdated tablet for $47 when a legitimately good tablet is only $90… Even if it is local stock.

      Edit: usually is around ~$110-120 for a Vi8, but my point still stands - might as well spend extra and get something actually usable than spending less and getting junk.

      • Lizard Spock on 04/12/2016 - 07:43
        +5

        No complaints with the Lenovo tab 3 I got (with 1GB RAM) for the little one to play with. $47 for tablet that will keep the kids quiet is worth its weight in gold as far as I'm concerned.

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 08:57

          Lenovo products can't be compared to the rubbish quality of this one. It'll be as bad as the recent 10" one Aldi had for a similar price, terrible thing.

        • Lizard Spock on 04/12/2016 - 09:01
          +1

          @logon: ah, I see

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:04

          @logon: don't be too quick to praise Lenovo. I've owned the TAB 3. The first one, the battery didn't charge and had to return in after a couple week. The second one the charger port was loose. Going ok now with a different cable but the quality ain't there either. Sorry.

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:11

          @Gavman:
          I'm not saying the cheap Lenovo's are "good" but at least the screen and body on them are not as nasty as these random crappy ones.

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:15

          @logon: it's also double the price. Yeh I'm not sure the screen is any better really or if it's built any better. They are all cheap Chinese build tablets. One has a brand ppl tend to trust and the other most people would have heard of

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:17

          @Gavman:
          It will be a worse screen, much worse than the Lenovo, thus my first comment..

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:20
          +2

          @logon: I wouldn't but it for myself. I wouldn't touch the Lenovo either. I got young kids that bug me to buy them a tablet. To get a $47 one they think its just as good as a $1000 iPad and it's like the best day of their lives. They chuck them around the room and they smash up quick but still work which is good enuf for me and I don't care

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:24
          +1

          @Gavman:
          Your kids sound clever!
          I think most of us would chuck it around the room if we had to use one…. LOL

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:35

          @logon: just saying when ur 3 years old as long as it plays games and they can watch crap on it they love it.

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:38

          @Gavman:
          Sure…
          I had visions of them chucking the 10" one around, it'd be a scary thing to get hit by, the 7" would be far less lethal ;-)

        • bbtlovebbt on 04/12/2016 - 11:03

          @Gavman:
          With GPS?

        • [Deactivated] on 04/12/2016 - 11:30

          LS, where did you get it?

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 11:44

          @bbtlovebbt: Duno. Don't think so. Don't think it makes much difference in a cheap tablet for the kiddies

        • [Deactivated] on 04/12/2016 - 19:31

          As stated by others, Lenovo is a reputable brand - I'd rank it up with Asus and what-not.
          Edit: Despite a few negative cases mentioned above… But still - more reputable than neo.

          Also 1GB of RAM isn't problematic at all, rather it's the CPU. The CPU in the Lenovo tablet is 2-3x faster in benchmarks than the neo fleks CPU. The neos CPU is a chipset that costs $4.

          Overall, you've assumed a $47 device is good because a $150+ device is… :P

  • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:02

    1280 x 800 screen on $47 tablet with android 6.0. Can't complain especially for the kiddies. Just chuck on a SNES and download heaps of games. Hours and hours of entertainment

    Also when the thing gets smashed after a few weeks after they dropping it ull be glad u only spend $47 and not more.

    • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:13

      If it were a 1280x800 screen it wouldn't be so bad, but it's only 1024x600 which is evil on a 10" device!
      Edit: and almost as nasty on a 7" screen.

      • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:17

        The 7" is. Look at the specs. Not sure about the 10" didn't really check.

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:21

          HN always get their specs wrong, look at the cheap Lenovo 10" tabs they have on their website, they show 2GB ram but the devices only have 1GB. Same goes for the cheap Yoga tablet, shows wrong specs, typical of HN.

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:25

          @logon: http://www.pendo.com.au/pendopad-7-quad-core-black-neot60m7b… shows the same specs. Would be inclined to believe so

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:31

          @Gavman:
          My initial post above was about the 10" one, and the 1024*600 specs are correct.
          https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/4239877/redir
          I wasn't discussing the 7" one and had not checked it's details because no interest in it.
          Edit: the first two comments in this thread were also about the 10" one, which is what I was commenting on.

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 09:34

          @logon: fair Enuf. I agree the 10" wouldn't be a great screen and something for everyday use is spend more and get something better. But when ur wanting to spend the minimum on a tablet this 7" inch one is the best I've seen -for the price.

        • logon on 04/12/2016 - 09:35

          @Gavman:
          Yep, I do agree that the 7" one would be less painful than the 10" one…

  • mrfluffy on 04/12/2016 - 11:27
    +4

    Don't mean to be rude, but if i took the advice of all the computer knowledgeable : ) people on this forum i would not have bought the cheap celeron dual core laptop that we have been using, no real limitations, for what we, and i guess most people, would use their laptops for. Lots of snobs around here, imo. ; )

    • medium_tight on 04/12/2016 - 13:10

      Amen

    • [Deactivated] on 04/12/2016 - 15:40

      What a lot of people want is iPad specs for Ali Express prices.

  • surm on 04/12/2016 - 11:43

    Would anyone know the differences between these two Lenovo tabs?

    http://www.harveynorman.com.au/computers-tablets/ipads-surfa…

    http://www.harveynorman.com.au/computers-tablets/ipads-surfa…

    • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 11:52
      +2

      They are identical. Just one has more storage. 16gb v 8gb. U can get one for $77 from TGG ebay today. I've own one. Ok cheap tablet. Plastic cheap build

      • AlienC on 11/01/2017 - 02:30

        Warts the max YouTube quality and can you play vainglory and war robots on it?

  • Lionmaru-G on 04/12/2016 - 11:44
    -1

    These cheap and nasty tablets have horrible screens. If you dont want your little kids to go blind, best to avoid them.

    • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 11:50

      If u got kids ull understand after the first day the screen will be smashed. Even on a nice hd screen, a cracked screen looks just as shite only u just spent 10x more for it

      • Lionmaru-G on 04/12/2016 - 11:54

        i've got 3 little boys at home they know how to treat electronic items. Maybe it's just your kids that are clumsy?
        You dont even need to spend 10x more to get a cheap IPS tablet.
        i've learnt my lesson from cheap Pendopads last year. These Neos Flek ones seem to be in the same category.
        Never again!

        • Gavman on 04/12/2016 - 12:04

          my kids aren't clumsy. They just not training like dogs perhaps
          Like ur kids are to not chuck their toys around the house. $200 tablets have the same crappy screens reso and same plastic junk build quality. I'd rather spend $40. But I t's ur money, u can spend it how u wish.

  • dcep on 04/12/2016 - 13:37

    does the 2yrs statutory warranty applies to this ?

    • llama on 04/12/2016 - 14:10

      does the 2yrs statutory warranty applies to this ?

      No, definitely not.

      There is NO SUCH THING as a "2 year statutory warranty"

      (Oh, except for on Ozbargain, which is the only place I have ever seen it mentioned).

      • tunzafun001 on 07/12/2016 - 12:25

        2 yrs statutory warranty on all phones sold in Australia. Unless the tablet has phone support, probably not.

        • llama on 07/12/2016 - 17:22

          2 yrs statutory warranty on all phones sold in Australia

          LOL @ "2 year statutory warranty on all phones"

          Please show us the "law" or whatever you think confirms your statement.

          You know, something gazetted in State or Federal law would do. Or a publication from the ACCC, perhaps.

        • tunzafun001 on 07/12/2016 - 23:24

          @llama:

          Here you go:

          https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Warranties%20and%20refu…

          Also, the fine print in the booklet that came with my Sony and Huawei phones also state it. I got my Huawei replaced after 19 months no questions asked (and that was Coles). Apple in accordance with section 54 have also declared 2 years, but you would probably get 3+ if a $45 Huawei gets 2 years.

          But feel free to ignore everything and turf your phone if it breaks down in 13 months.

        • llama on 08/12/2016 - 03:03

          @tunzafun001:

          Here you go:

          https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Warranties%20and%20refu…

          LOL - Good one. Not.

          That document that you linked to DOES NOT contain anything whatsoever about your mythical "2 yrs statutory warranty on all phones sold in Australia".

          Come on - you made the statement, so PROVE IT.

  • tunzafun001 on 08/12/2016 - 10:58
    +1

    Oh dear…

    So obviously you can't grasp section 54 of the ACL. You are obviously also not happy with the physical evidence that I have physically returned a $45 phone well outside the generic 1 year global warranty terms without an issue.

    So… I'm not going to copy every phone manufacturers warranty terms, but they do understand S54. Lets go with Apple and Samsung.

    http://www.apple.com/au/legal/statutory-warranty/

    In case you just read the Apple global warranty (1 year) and not the AUSTRALIAN column.

    "Without limiting consumers’ rights, Apple will provide its own remedies equivalent to those remedies in the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law at any time within 24 months of the date of purchase. For the avoidance of doubt, Apple acknowledges that the Australian Consumer Law may provide for remedies beyond 24 months for a number of its products."

    What is the minimum that Apple are indicating here? _______ feel free to fill in the blank.

    http://www.samsung.com/au/support/html/warrantyinformation/w… (Phones AND tablets…… 2 years).

    But I'm guessing you are all still all cynical. Thinking this will never be enforced:

    https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/apple-australia-gives-…

    So as pointed out above, Apple are a MINIMUM of 24 months, with acknowledgement that beyond 24 months is possible.

    For the sake of fellow Ozbargainers, phones purchased in Australia have a minimum statutory warranty under the ACL of 2 years. Interestingly, the links above indicate that many tablets also have 2 years. At least I learnt something.

    Take it on the chin ya Muppet and move on!

    • thydzik on 09/01/2017 - 01:31

      you are quoting manufactures warranties.

      nothing about statutory warranties.

      only a court can decide on what a reasonable life of a product is.

      what Apple and Samsung are doing are providing 2 years as a blanket statement to hope they cover the majority of cases.

      But even they have said the ACL may extend past 2 years for their products, in which they will still comply.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join