Marketplace
CRACKA20
A good price for the new 55" LG OLED55C7 OLED. From the Ebay Videopro Store $2915 including shipping using the 20% off code.
55" LG OLED55C7 OLED (New 2017 Model) $2915 Shipped with 20% off Code at Videopro eBay
790
Related Stores
closed Comments
10 inches less on this model, I'm sure your wife will be more happy with the one you got…
x9300d is a fantastic TV. You shouldn't have regrets.
I don't suppose you please know if they still have that deal? :)
Hi mate, which costco is selling sony 65 inch X9300d for $2700 ?? i called uo north lakes in brisbane they told me it is for $3000
I bought mine from Docklands like a week ago - they had about 18 in stock but were the only ones in VIC who carried it still.
Heaps of bad reviews of the 9300d needing repairs unfortunately
OLED is the way to go.
There's a huge premium you have to pay for it though. And it's only available in 55" and 65".
Having bought one, I think it's worth it, especially if you watch a lot of bluray movies and have a home theatre setup. I find a lot of streams don't have true blacks encoded so they don't take advantage of the Oled nature.
The sizes for oled do go higher than 65, but you'd have to buy into the more expensive g series and w series. I do regret not paying an extra 2k for the 65 inch though.
once a 65 inch gets this low ill bite
thats what she said….
*deep
deep dickiee?
Yeah I'm hoping prices come down when Sony and Pana release theirs later this year.
Unlikely. Sony and Pana OLEDs are going to priced way above LG.
They are all LG panels, just rebranded so unlikely to be cheaper
Is this OLED model Dave Warner approved?
They haven't cut him a check yet for this series. I think it makes a big difference in his enjoyment.
@rickadlee. LoL
OLEDs have the best picture quality you can get. I've had a 1080p OLED since 2014 and it's great. Haven't had any issues. Also LGs WebOS is the best TV operating system in my opinion.
Just bear in mind OLEDs perform much better in a dimly lit or dark room. If you're going to stick your TV somewhere that is always brightly lit, save $$$ and buy an LCD. Otherwise get this. You won't regret it.
QLED is just Samsung's quantum dot LCD from last year that's been slightly improved and given a new name.
Negatory Jason
Ha ha, dude you realise 'QLED' is just an old LCD screen with an extra colour layer on top.. It's just Samsung playing catch up through marketing so they don't get left behind.
OLEDs perform much better in a dimly lit or dark room.
If you have such a dedicated home theatre room, you may as well go all the way and get a projector and 120-inch screen.
OLED is great tech, but size trumps all.
Yeah I wouldn't mind LGs 77" Wallpaper OLED but don't have the spare $40k..
Sell your eneloop collection?
55" OLED or 65" LCD, for a 6x4m lounge?
OLED
I'm trying to decide this also. Heard opinions both ways.. OLED has the best picture but at further viewing distances a decent 65" LCD might provide a better experience.
Big room, I'd go the bigger TV.
If its going to be your main TV for movies n stuff then get at least a 65". But if you can afford to spend $3k then go for a 75".
Size depends on how far you are going to sit. I have a 75" TV but don't get a fully immersive experience sitting ~4.5m from it.
2016 65" UHD and save $1,000 for something else.
I upgraded recently to a 65 thinking it was too big. Now I find 55 to be tiny. 60 is a good size but can be not worth it as 65 isn't much dearer generally.
But.. if your feeding it sd content 60 might be a good idea. Anything less than 720p the 65 does not give a great experience, depends on how far back your sitting of course.
Also worth considering when you watch on a cinematic aspect for a movie the 65 doesn't look so big. Whereas full screen tv shows etc make the screen look huge.
Depends on quality of TV, some brands can look crap when low res content where as better brands upscale better
Go for the hisense uled range if you have a room that big. They have 75inch uled tvs for less than most brands have their 65inch. Currently I own an oled55b6t and I find that the hisense uled range is the closest an lcd has come. Other option is go to a place like jb hifi, make them price match this in a larger size if possible (I could negotiate the oled65b6t to 5k from 7k last time I was there) and put it on a zero interest for 60 months plan.
Go for 75"….
They don't make OLED in 75.
First, sergum is not asking about oled. he was asking this 55" oled or 65" led. I suggested for 75" and of course it was for LED.
Also, not sure what you are talking about. There are oLED even bigger than 75"First, sergum is not asking about oled. he was asking this 55" oled or 65" led.
So he gives you A and B as his options, and you say C? He doesn't want 75 anyway otherwise he would have included it as his option. I'm guessing cost is the issue. 65 OLED would be out of his price range otherwise he'd take that over 55 OLED, so he had to settle for 65 LED instead. 75 might be either too big or too expensive.
There are oLED even bigger than 75"
Not available in this country. How much does LG charge to ship that thing from the US to Australia? They probably make something even bigger than 75 in OLED, but if it's not available here, it's irrelevant to the discussion. So for the purpose of this conversation, they don't make anything bigger than 65.
@lostn: First you never said about Aus and LG makes bigger OLED. Secondly, I never said get 75" OLED. So based on size of the room, I am suggesting user to go for 75"
Thirdly, your comments have added anything to the discussion which user asked…
very nice proce,…. 4k blurays would look awsome!!!!!!!
Does anybody know if the input lag is acceptable for gaming on this? Thanks. :)
It is the lowest for any OLED I believe at 21ms, so great for gaming, some do 30ms at 4k hdr, but then drop to almost 40-50 at 1080p for some reason, but this remains at roughly 21ms at all times, so yes it is.
Cheers, billybob. I have a 4yo 55" Sony that I love, but I need 4K for my reviewing work. I was going to go to a 65" LED, but this is tempting me to be less size queen and more future-proof. :D
Do it!
I managed to talk JB hi-fi down to $3200 on this. Still a major wad of cash but they've treated me well with warranty and are doing 2.5 years warranty for no extra charge. I have no idea about video pro's reputation in regards to service and warranty so am happy with the peace of mind
at that price you would get at least 3 years warranty just from your statutory rights anyway.
love it!
Why such a huge price differential between the 55" and the 65"?
40% more viewable area.
hope the prices will get low as soon as possible :)
I wish this was cheaper. Don't think it's really worth more than $2500.
The quality is always fantastic when you're watching through the OLED TV. The thing that stood out to me is the blacks in the OLED really shows and distinguishes those colours very very well. I love the OLED. One of the things I look forward to when I come home is actually being able to sit on the couch in front of my OLED TV.
Classic
The quality is always fantastic when you're watching <blank>. The thing that stood out to me is the <feature> really shows and distinguishes those <feature>s very very well. I love the <blank>. One of the things I look forward to when I come home is actually being able to sit on the couch in front of my <blank>.
I just read that with a lisp
Lovley cardoons
I'm buying one in 2.5 years time. So excited.
Me in 3… Super excited.
wallpaper OLED by then
I could of got this for $2250 through work, but decided to wait for next years model which hopefully will have hdmi 2.1 which will be better for gaming at 4k 120hz
which costco is selling sony X9300d for $2700 ?? i called uo north lakes in brisbane they told me it is for $3000
Here are my rambling thoughts. I recently succumbed to the power of Ozbargain and got a 55" Samsung HDR LED. It cost me less than a grand. There are plenty of times when I've been awestruck by the clarity and richness of the images I've been watching. Now, I'm sure if you put me in a room with my tv and this oled side-by-side showing the same source, the oled would be superior. Slightly but clearly would be my guess. That's side-by-side. How does that translate to enjoyment of the tv? Once you get past the self-congratulation that you've got the best tv out there, not much imo. Once you get to 'absolutely spectacular', 'a little more spectacular' doesn't really do much. Don't get me wrong. If I were single and had money to spend, this is the one I'd get. But do I lust after it at three times the price of what I've got? No.
Agreed, my kids would just cover this in fingerprints anyway, then every tv looks the same after that treatment…
I watch Netflix through my fingerprint covered phone.
I'm a degenerate. :(
The difference between OLED and LCD is actually pretty significant. Contrast is basically what makes a TV look good or shit. LCDs contrast ratio is about 1000-5000:1 whereas OLEDs is infinity:1..
In practice this means OLED picture in a dark room looks practically 3D. It really packs a punch far beyond most LCDs. It looks very natural and not washed out at all. The technology also doesn't have any of the drawbacks of LCD such as light bleed, narrow viewing angle, haloing, dirty screen effect, etc.
In the end like most products out there, some people are willing to pay more for high quality, while others are quite content with a cheapie from ALDI. As long as you're happy with your purchase, that's all that really matters.
why waste so much on a TV
Money you enjoyed wasting wasn't wasted.
thats the point you still wasted that money
A 1000$ TV would do the same quality
Stop being poor and it won't be a problem.
Anyone been able to price match similarly?
I got $3000 at my JB
LG OLED55C6 OLED Has 3D, this model does not! Please sign this to bring back 3D for the 2018 Model https://www.change.org/p/lg-please-revive-3d-on-a-2018-oled-…
Please let 3D TVs die …
They're already dead. The OLED55C6 is the discontinued 2016 model. No one makes 3D TVs anymore. Even Sony who pushed 3D with PS3 has abandoned it in PS4.
Please let 3D TVs live!
There are many features on my TV that I don't use, but I don't wish that they didn't exist. That's just silly.
3D would still exist if it didn't carry a price premium. Those who were indifferent to 3D would still have it in their TVs because it cost them no extra, and you'd have a wide install base of 3D capable TVs now, which would make 3D blurays and console games a lot more prevalent.
But they decided to charge extra for it and people didn't really need it or they couldn't justify shellout out extra for it, so as a result 3D is largely dead. Instead of throwing it in and making it a standard feature everyone would have, they let the market decide if they wanted it, and the market decided against it.
Though for some reason people are willing to pay an extra $4 or so (with glasses) to see a movie in 3D at the theaters.
HDR which is in the midst of a format war might be the next '3D'.
The cheap Nintendo 3DS Has 3D so hardly a "Premium" The awesome Monster Hunter series in 3d is so great
The 3DS has a TN screen.
Nintendo themselves have ditched 3D. The New 2DS and the Switch have no 3D. Going forward, Switch is going to replace both Wii U and 3DS lines. No more 3D. It's dead.
And we were talking about 3D TVs vs 2D TVs, not gaming devices. The 3DS carries a premium over the 2DS, so you're still wrong.
If you're old enough, 3D came and died about 5 times. Nobody ever really wanted it enough to pay extra.
The blue and red glasses 3D deserved to die.
3D without colored lenses had a shot. But no one saw the need to upgrade their TV just for it. It came too late. If 1080p TVs had 3D from the outset, everyone who owns a 1080p tV would have 3D. But 3D didn't come out till a few years later, and people who had a 1080p TV already saw no point getting a new one. TVs aren't things you replace every few years like a phone or tablet.
The ones who genuinely wanted a 3D TV faced expensive glasses costs, and needing to buy multiple glasses so the whole family could watch a movie. The TV set itself was more expensive, and the Blurays carried a significant premium over 2D Blurays.
The market decided it wasn't worth the money, and that was that.
Can't understand people downvoting a perfectly valid comment letting people know that the TV in question does not have 3D capability.
For anyone who likes 3D it's a legitimate concern when buying a new television.
If you personally don't like 3D, that's fine, but why shouldn't everyone else at least have the option of buying a 3D TV if they want to?
Anyone have any recommendations for a good 65" around 3k?
Out of stock - 36, worth over $100,000 sold!
hmm i bought a 65 inch x9300d from costco for $2700….did I make a mistake? Damn this is tempting.