This was posted 6 years 3 months 11 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Xiaomi 20,000mAh Power Bank 2C Quick Charge USD $28.27 (~AUD $37.05) Delivered @ GearBest

521
Xiaomi 20,000mAh Power Bank 2C Quick Charge USD $28.27 (~AUD $37.05) Delivered @ GearBest
Go to Deal
gentlecrack on 09/01/2018 - 05:26 gearbest.com (1818 clicks)
Last edited 09/01/2018 - 08:00 by 1 other user

USD $.01 cheaper than previous cheapest including shipping. 100+ units available at this price.

Previous deals here.

Main Features:

● Original Xiaomi 20000mAh super large capacity portable power bank
● Bi-directional QC 3.0 quick charge, saves more time
● High-density lithium polymer battery pack, safe and reliable
● Support charging two devices simultaneously
● Built-in multiple protections
● Round edges design, comfortable to hold
● Charging time: about 6.7h (9V / 2A charger), or about 10h (5V / 2A charger)

Other essential info
  • Product weight: 0.3280 kg
  • Product size (L x W x H): 14.95 x 6.96 x 2.39 cm / 5.89 x 2.74 x 0.94 inches
  • Package Contents: 1 x Power Bank, 1 x USB Cable, 1 x Chinese Manual
  • Charge an iPhone 7 7 times or an iPad mini 4 2.5 times
  • Safely charge low-power devices such as fitness bands or bluetooth headsets by double pressing.
  • What is the mode No of the Xiaomi power bank 2C?
  • Model No: PLM06ZM.
  • Max output current of two ports work simultaneously - 5.1V, 3.6A.
Electrical & Electronics 20000mAh Power Bank Xiaomi

Related Stores

GearBest
GearBest
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • iamkuza on 09/01/2018 - 07:49

    when added to cart, it says AU$5.61 shipping

    • garage sale on 09/01/2018 - 07:55

      says priority 6-10 business days ….. no free shipping option ….. $5.61 if you see it in 2 weeks is good ….. free shipping could be wait up to 45 days if,offered.

  • marantz on 09/01/2018 - 07:54

    i get AU$2.23 for shipping

    • marantz on 09/01/2018 - 07:57
      +1

      interesting… I ordered 2 and get cheaper shipping AU$2.23

      Available Shipping Methods Estimated Shipping Time Shipping Cost (weight:0.828 kg)
      Priority Line
      5 - 10 business days AU$2.23
      Australia Express 5 - 10 business daysAU$2.23

      Buying one you get charged AU$5.61 for priority shipping

  • anzacpaul on 09/01/2018 - 07:58

    Came to nearly 35 with shipping for me, bought anyway as I had some points to use

  • doweyy on 09/01/2018 - 08:00

    Shipping wasn’t included, I updated the price to include it as it’s a compulsory inclusion into the price.

  • Shpox on 09/01/2018 - 08:09
    +4

    Any deals on USB type C powerbanks?

    • jaybo on 09/01/2018 - 09:52
      +2

      yeah i'm keen for one of those ZMI ones, as are a couple of my mates :D

      • garage sale on 09/01/2018 - 10:06

        yeah the usb C ones look interesting as more phones are USB C and how many cables do I want in my bag, but I haven't seem any PD ones so you get high power to drive a laptop in an emergency…. they seem to make use of USB C as a better connector rather than adopt the extra standards.

        • jaybo on 09/01/2018 - 10:50
          +1

          yeah a lot of the USB-C power banks are just the new connector rather than actually supporting USB PD.

          i believe USB-C can support up to 5v @ 2A (10w) rather than the USB-A connector only doing 5v @ 1.5A (7.5w) so at a basic 5v level the USB-C -> USB-C cable can do a little more power than the USB-A -> USB-C cables can.

        • Shpox on 09/01/2018 - 20:46

          @jaybo:

          Benson Lee from google did a bunch of testing on cables for the Nexus 6P and pretty much echoes your points. I think I read they've argued the best charge would be from C-C versus A-C, even from the same power source or something.

          All I know is I get a quicker charge from the C than the A :)

        • jaybo on 10/01/2018 - 10:22
          +1

          @Shpox:

          yeah the USB-A socket on the charger itself can only deal with a certain amount of power, the USB-C socket can provide a few more watts :D

          the USB-C standard also should dictate certain gauge of wiring in cables to ensure it can handle the power, if you've ever tried to use really cheap micro USB cables in the past (or really long ones) you would've noticed how slowly things charge for this reason :)

    • BrainSand on 09/01/2018 - 09:54

      20100mah w/ a usb C port. $90.96

      Pricey, but I picked this one up as I needed it now. Plus local warranty.
      So far so good

      • bbtlovebbt on 09/01/2018 - 10:02

        Your one is QC 2.0 - out dated. This one is QC 3.0.

  • biggweilo on 09/01/2018 - 08:49
    -1

    Does the 1 cent saving come in the form of any currency? because I could certainly use a penny for the swear jar right about now.

  • BargainKen on 09/01/2018 - 08:49

    Thx OP. Got 2 for $45 with the cheaper shipping and a bunch of points I had.

  • bbtlovebbt on 09/01/2018 - 09:02
    +5

    This is not the best price.

    • crunch on 09/01/2018 - 10:42

      Yeah agreed

  • vjknight on 09/01/2018 - 09:39

    got 2 thanks OP

  • nissalive on 09/01/2018 - 09:41

    Thanks bought one

  • reaching on 09/01/2018 - 09:46

    Still haven't gotten mine from the last deal

    • Zenskas on 09/01/2018 - 17:18

      Should be there soon I just got mine yesterday.

      I was very happy with the quality of construction and overall capacity/features for the price, you'd be hard pressed to find something similar in Australia for under 100 bucks!

      • reaching on 10/01/2018 - 09:26

        Hopefully mine's here soon then!

  • Marty131 on 09/01/2018 - 10:01

    Would a 20Ah battery be acceptable on a Qantas flight?

    https://www.qantas.com/travel/airlines/dangerous-goods/globa…

    Apparently up to 100Wh is OK for carry-on? (5v x 20Ah= 100Wh?)

    • bbtlovebbt on 09/01/2018 - 10:03

      3.6V X 20Ah

      • Marty131 on 09/01/2018 - 11:10

        bbtlovebbt - Where did you get 3.6V from? I would have thought it would be 9V or 5V? If you use the 9V, would that make it 9V x 20Ah = 180Wh?

        • anzacpaul on 09/01/2018 - 11:16

          Power banks are rated at their highest Ah at the lowest volts.

          So at 5V its only about 14Ah

        • bbtlovebbt on 09/01/2018 - 11:20

          20000 mAh @ 3.7V 74 Wh - you really think the out put is 20000 mAh @ 5V?

        • Marty131 on 09/01/2018 - 14:27

          @bbtlovebbt:

          20000 mAh @ 3.7V 74 Wh - you really think the out put is 20000 mAh @ 5V?

          Thanks. Where did you find this info? Is it 3.6V or 3.7V for the rated 20000mAh? Web page only shows:
          "Output: 5.1V 2.4A / 9V 2A / 12V 1.5A"
          I couldn't find any reference to 3.6 or 3.7V?

        • waade395 on 09/01/2018 - 22:41
          +1

          @Marty131: the internal battery is lithium 3.7V, 20000mah. It then converts this to a higher voltage to charge phones.

      • virtual81 on 10/01/2018 - 10:28
        +1

        At no fault of anyone here this just proves that selling power banks in mAh capacity is a shoddy marketing tactic.
        Aside from the fact that this could readily be called 20aH instead of 20,000 mAh, there are other issues.

        The users that are using 3.7v are correct, as that is the nominal voltage of the cells in any lithium ion based power bank.

        An old comment of mine describes why it would be better to measure powerbanks in watt hours, i'll reproduce it here, figures for a different capacity but the math is still good…

        I'd rather see mAh ratings disappear all together.
        Watt Hours would be more appropriate, and is meaningful regardless of volts/amps.

        For those unclear of what is being discussed or how this works i'll provide a BASIC explanation…
        The power is stored in a bank of batteries with a nominal voltage of about 3.7V, and likely a capacity as stated of 16,000 mAh (16Ah)
        This can be roughly worked out in watt hours by a simple formula, volt x amps (3.7 x 16 = 59.2 Wh)
        The internal battery feeds a boost regulator that increase output voltage to 5.1v, and can deliver up to 3.6A
        By working the formula backwards 59.2Wh divided by 5.1 volts we would only see about 11,608 mAh of charge current available for devices to be charged
        Before anyone jumps to conclusions, there is NO power lost in these calculations; "power" is measured in Watts / Watt hours, no amps alone.
        So the debate is should a power bank capacity be measured in 'Amp Hours' (Ah) of the banks total internal battery, OR total Ah of output.

        I say neither, they should use Watt hours instead.

        (Math above for simplicity, no battery or regulator is 100% efficient)

        Taking the argument to another level, why measuring the output Ah is as bad as internal battery Ah…
        Once that 5.1v ?ma comes into the phone is is via a constant current / constant voltage controller reduced down from 5.1v to not more than about 4.2v, to charge a battery in a pone or similar that likely has a nominal battery voltage of 3.7v again, same as the batteries in the power bank that the bank manufacture provides the rating on!

        So in short, source power bank battery is typically a 3.7v Lithium Ion or similar, destination battery also likely to be a 3.7v LithiumIon or similar.
        Forgetting losses the regulation processes between power bank battery and device being charged, maybe after all the manufacturer is correct to measure the Ah @ 3.7v ?
        The only variables are the efficiency of the regulator in the power bank which the manufacture could account for the regulator in you device, which the manufacturer will not know.

        What a ramble.

        TL;DR
        Electronics theory says manufacturer is possibly right to use Ah of bank internal battery, but Wh would be better all round.
        The conversion efficiency of the charging process both in power bank and device being charged/powered is of more concern.

    • xoom on 09/01/2018 - 12:05
      +1

      Have travelled with 2 rommoss 20k and 2 xiaomi 20k. No problems woth either.

      Carry on through US, parts of Asia and Greece. No issues.

  • garage sale on 09/01/2018 - 10:09

    price is showing $46 so flash sale must be finished ?

    • acehoangtt on 09/01/2018 - 10:28

      agreed… :(

    • shaiguy on 09/01/2018 - 10:31

      same?

    • tarken on 09/01/2018 - 11:36

      Showing as $23.99 for me?

  • crunch on 09/01/2018 - 10:44
    -6

    Not cheap or 'cheaper' than any previous deals.

    • IceCreamBandit on 09/01/2018 - 11:27
      +3

      From the Voting Guidelines

      Appropriate uses of negative vote
      Cheaper price elsewhere
      Mention store or URL and price making sure to include shipping.

      Care to share where you have found it cheaper that is available right now, or are you letting us borrow your time machine?

  • lakers1222 on 09/01/2018 - 11:23

    That sold out Quick 3.0

    • bbtlovebbt on 09/01/2018 - 11:38

      before Christmas when it was really on special - i paid $32 delivered.

  • Ratzie on 09/01/2018 - 15:15

    mine just arrived today fro. The last GB deal, took around 7-10 days for delivery. not too big but it's heavy.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join