DDR3 1GB Notebook Memory $7.5 + Shipping @BudgetPC [Out of Stock]

Related Stores

BPC Technology

• 

  schwinn on 13/01/2011 - 13:28

  Is this 1066 or 1333?

  • 

    Trance N Dance on 13/01/2011 - 13:38

    +2

    Says
    DDR3-1066 in the description.

    • 

      schwinn on 13/01/2011 - 14:19

      +1

      It said 1333 in the description earlier.

      • 

        Trance N Dance on 13/01/2011 - 16:25

        +1

        Ahh I see, well all fixed up now all good.

• 

  CVonC on 13/01/2011 - 14:33

  any deals on 2GB?

  • 

    mini2 on 13/01/2011 - 16:20

    4/8Gb kits will be nice..

• 

  [Deactivated] on 13/01/2011 - 22:24

  are these imac compatible?

  • 

    furythree on 13/01/2011 - 22:36

    -2

    /facepalm
    is an imac a notebook?

    oh wait sorry, its written in pc language

    i meant, is an imac a macbook? this is "macbook" ram

    • 

      [Deactivated] on 13/01/2011 - 23:57

      New generation imacs, use laptop ram. You probably think imacs are still using PowerPC architectures.
      Your attempt backfired, horrendously.

      http://tinyurl.com/48zdekj

      • 

        StewBalls on 14/01/2011 - 01:50

        +2

        Lulz!

        Ah, I miss the PowerPC…now that was solid real 'Apple' hardware! Intel macs are just bland IMHO. You might as well just save some money & buy outdated PC hardware upfront & run Hackintosh on it; again, IMHO! :p

        I miss my old Power Mac 6100/66 with the Intel 486dx66 daughtercard…hot switchable by keyboard, running simultaneously…damn, Apple was on a roll then! :)

        What do we have now, Steve Jobs the flim-flam man! :(

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 14/01/2011 - 20:46

        Yeah, I remember using an iMac G5. The funny thing is that the G5 felt faster than the i3s they currently sell. Apple did a fat marketing stunt saying the core 2 duo was faster, but I very much doubt it actually was.

      • 

        StewBalls on 14/01/2011 - 23:22

        Agreed, IMHO when they switched architecture they of course picked up the bloated x86 code to go along with it…PPC RISC code was speedy, lean & svelte; and apps were tiny compared to x86/64 equivalents…now the two fat cops are neck & neck waddling outside the donut shop! ;)

        I'm sure Jobs occasionally forgets his lines and breaks into "monorail, monorail, monorail!" :p

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 15/01/2011 - 20:32

        +1

        'DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS!!!'

        • Steve Ballmer
• 

  andyken on 14/01/2011 - 08:45

  OUT OF STOCK..please change the title thanks

  • 

    Store RepBPC Technology @ BPC Technology on 14/01/2011 - 09:50

    Done!! Thx