• expired

New Shredder - Fellowes B-141C Shredder $459.00 Pembroke Business

04

Fellowes Cross Cut Shredder B-141C
Features:
3x20mm cross cut
14 sheet capacity
230mm (A4) entry throat
24L bin capacity
Other Specifications:
15 on / 30 off duty cycle
Auto start & reverse
Castors
Convenient pull out bin
Ultra quiet operation
Accepts: staples, paper clips & credit cards
Warranty: 2 year machine warranty/ 5 years on cutters

Mod: Added rep tag

Related Stores

pembrokebusiness.com.au
pembrokebusiness.com.au

closed Comments

  • no saving = no bargain = SPAM

    • also, the poster is from the same place as the store ???

  • $459 for a 24L bin capacity shredder??

    • maybe it's for shredding gold foil…

  • What a joke!

  • this is not an advertising site its a site for bargains, you will get negative publicity attempting to use this site for SPAM….
    please provide bargains in future.

    also if you would have read the posting guidlines you would have known this and the rules, your supposed to search before posting to confim what your posting is in fact a bargain!

  • Not a bargain given officeworks price, but even then, $400 for a shredder??

    • It's not something you'd use at home. It's a cross shredder which can take stacks of paper at a time. For people who deal in confidential records they're pretty much essential for an office, hence they can charge a premium.

      • Yeah, I know it's not for use at home, but even still, pretty ridiculous for what it is…

  • -3

    Commenting so I can neg.

    • your supposed to provide a reason why you negged, even if "it can be found cheaper as listed above"

      not a vailid reason to neg.

    • negging so i can neg!

      • If you are refering to Wisc they explained the neg earlier - you have to look at all the posts they make

        • +1

          nope pete
          i am replying to our wisE friend who commented so he could neg
          i think its a poor contribution to our community - i completely agree with wisC
          (if you look at who i replied to you will see it was to phobaphobic) - and i negged his comment

          sorry if it wasnt clear - i just thought being brief would create a little irony

        • thanks , thought so, but just wanted clarification. Not that it would have come to anything if was the other way.. just curious.

  • +2

    as above. better luck next time

    • +1

      As above… No idea which above you are refering to. Voting negative carries a responsibility to let people know why you do this.

      Not saying we have to agree with your vote, (and you know I do after my vote) but it carries a responsibility so people can understand and evaluate the reason as per our guidelines.

      That helps the community with sharing

Login or Join to leave a comment