This was posted 2 years 8 months 18 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Australian Made AMD P2 Respirator Masks (Box of 50) $111.60 Delivered (Was $149) @ Australian P2 Mask

1481
Australian Made AMD P2 Respirator Masks (Box of 50) $111.60 Delivered (Was $149) @ Australian P2 Mask
Go to Deal
AssociatedLAustralianP2Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:25 australianp2mask.com.au (5317 clicks)
Last edited 22/08/2021 - 19:47 by 1 other user
OZZYB10

An OzBargain community member shared one of our deals here a little while ago that was meant to be on a local Facebook page that’s expired now. We’re glad to let you know that we’ve set up a new code just for OzBargain.

OZZYB10 at checkout will get you 10% off your total order and we have free shipping Australia wide.

AMD P2 Respirators are the first Australian made P2 Respirator with a 99.66% PFE and 99.92% BFE. AMD are the official sponsor of the Australian Olympics team that kicked ass in Tokyo, you may have seen these P2 masks around the last few weeks.

If you want to learn more about us our our masks feel free to read more here: https://www.australianp2mask.com.au/learn-more

If you have any queries or concerns please fire away in the comments and we’ll get back to you. Thanks for your support.

EDIT: Thanks everyone for the positive feedback and support so far! We've just noticed someone has reported this deal as expired - it isn't, it's still going strong til the end of the month. With more and more cases being reported everyday we hope you're all staying safe out there.

Health & Beauty Advanced Medical Devices Mask N95 Mask P2 Mask Respirator

Related Stores

Australian P2 Mask
Australian P2 Mask

closed Comments

            • wwwsam on 08/08/2021 - 13:55
              +4

              @Deeseeee: So you'd rather not wear a mask because it states it does not FULLY protect you from any virus, and chance yourself with breathing in unfiltered quantities of COVID-19 virus particles that have ability to self replicate in your bloodstream. If you're scared of the spike proteins, well you'll have plenty more of them in your brain if you manage to catch the virus.

              By not putting up ANY resistance against the virus particles entering your body, YOU are the one playing "Russian Roulette" with your health.

              In a similar manner for vaccines, the vaccines are supposed to prime your body against COVID-19 by promoting the generation of relevent antibodies in your body. Would you rather have a controlled start to your body's fight against COVID-19 particles? Or would you prefer to start from square one and chance the virus particles causing bloodclots in your brain?

              • KangaDrew on 08/08/2021 - 14:00
                +4

                @wwwsam: 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

                Ridiculous logic, huh? As the saying goes: you can't fix stupid.

                • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:07
                  -3

                  @KangaDrew: Dude what are you trying to prove lol? You're like the annoying kid from school who just repeats what other kids say and chimes in without having anything of substance to say. This is about surgical masks providing no proof against viruses as it states as a warning on the box, and about vaccines causing blood clots and killing people and being more harmful than the supposed virus itself hence the links I provided giving evidence to this. What do you have to say to refute it? Nothing, reply with a 2 year old come back like everyone knows you will

                  • KangaDrew on 08/08/2021 - 14:09
                    +3

                    @Deeseeee: Well if you actually had something of substance to reply to, I'd bother. But, you don't, so… 🤷🏻‍♂️

                  • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 14:09
                    +4

                    @Deeseeee:

                    You're like the annoying kid from school who just repeats what other kids say and chimes in without having anything of substance to say

                    oh the irony when you're literally regurgitating absolute garbage links and selective half facts..

                    • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:11
                      -2

                      @SBOB: Ah yes because a picture of of the warning they put on masks saying they provide no protection against viruses and linking to articles of people dying from blood clots causes by the covid vaccine is such garbage I must work for the mask manufacturers and edited that photo or I must work for channel 7 and faked that article!

                      • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 14:15
                        +4

                        @Deeseeee: Its not my fault if you don't have the capacity to do any further investigation on things like box label (on a single box image thats been circulating on the internet for over 12mths now) and how/why masks work for reducing covid spread.

                        As i said, the irony of regurgitating garbage.

                        https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/may/21/facebook-p…

                        • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:21
                          -1

                          @SBOB: Did you literally just link that as a form of proof lmao? even on that website it states the image is legitimate… you know you're really desperate and grasping at straws when you link to a fact checking website like POLITIfact jesus christ lol

                          • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 14:28
                            +4

                            @Deeseeee: I repeat, its not my fault if you don't have the capacity to do any further investigation on things like box label (on a single box image thats been circulating on the internet for over 12mths now) and how/why masks work for reducing covid spread.

                            The irony of something like politifacts (or any other random result from google) being a terrible fact source compared to what you've posted…
                            This stand up routine of yours just keeps getting better

                      • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 16:15
                        +2

                        @Deeseeee:

                        a picture of of the warning they put on masks saying they provide no protection against viruses

                        That you insist that a warning on one box of overseas "surgical" masks trumps the whole of the combined scientific knowledge on mask efficacy* is stupidity personified. You'd wear it as a badge of honour amongst your cohorts no doubt.

                  • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 15:59
                    +4

                    @Deeseeee:

                    vaccines causing blood clots and killing people and being more harmful than the supposed virus

                    You haven't provided the numbers I asked for yet Mr Cherry Picker, so here's another chance. How many dead from C19 (or as you know it - "the supposed virus") V thrombosis or any other vaccine complication?

                    Is it more harmful to be hospitalised from C19 or to have mild side effects from a vaccine, which is the experience of the vast majority of those vaccinated?

                    What do the statistics say about the outcomes for vaccinated V unvaccinated C19 sufferers (try that PHE link above maybe)?

                    Does C19 hospitalisation have harmful effects (physical and mental) on health workers AND their families?

                    Does C19 hospitalisation have harmful downstream effects for people needing different treatments - eg delayed surgeries?

              • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:04
                -2

                @wwwsam: Ha its like talking to children, even though I just explained it before and referenced the health minister who also said it just answer this. Why would you take an experimental vaccine that has a high risk of killing you than the supposed virus? The virus resembles the flu which people get every year..

                • KangaDrew on 08/08/2021 - 14:10
                  +4

                  @Deeseeee: Oh you poor, poor little thing. As I said before. Dunning. Kruger. 🙄

                • pln on 08/08/2021 - 16:14
                  +2

                  @Deeseeee: Not really like the common flu, besides causing respiratory diseases & presenting like the flu in some. My mother's brother in law is mid-50s & coughs up blood, I wouldn't suggest just Lemsip & some rest. Also, I wouldn't take packaging wording as gospel, especially over professional advice, but you've repetitively referred to the warning which states 'Will not provide any protection against covid-19…', probably just to protect themselves from a legal standpoint, nothing about preventing spread to others.

              • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 18:55
                +2

                @wwwsam:

                chance the virus particles causing bloodclots in your brain

                Not to mention long term effects on the lungs, heart and multi-system inflammation: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/i…

                The full effects of covid19 on those who survive a serious infection won't be known for years but we already have some idea based on the much more limited SARS and MERS outbreaks.

        • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 16:34
          +3

          would you seriously consider wearing anything that didn't provide 100% protection against a legitimate deadly virus?

          Enlighten us.

          What should we wear which DOES provide 100% protection against a legitimate deadly virus?

          • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 16:47
            +6

            @Zackeroo: They could try a plastic bag over their head?

    • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 12:52
      +16

      Most masks, worn properly, provide protection against virus transmission. The level of protection depends on the mask quality (and the behaviour of the wearer). Masks work two ways - by limiting the outgoing aerosol from an infected person, and providing a filter between the air and the wearer. They're just a part pf the mitigation environment.

      These are quality masks, esp suitable in areas where the virus is active in the community.

      • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 12:56
        -5

        It literally says that surgical masks (the ones most people wear and what the government tells people to wear) don't provide ANY protection against viruses on the box

        • May4th on 08/08/2021 - 13:10
          +10

          surgical masks aren't rated P2, and primarily are for reducing transmission in the community. A properly fit tested P2/N95 mask will protect you against viruses. you'll never get 100% protection unless you are in a Level 4 biohazard suit but if it's good enough for doctors and nurses in ICU treating covid patients it sure is good enough for you.

          • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 13:56

            @May4th: So why aren't they telling people to wear those special masks then? What's the point of enforcing laws and fining or arresting people for not wearing a surgical mask or a cloth one when they don't do anything at all lol?

            • Creamsoda on 08/08/2021 - 15:45
              +4

              @Deeseeee: err this is so 1 year ago when research has been done. those masks even not rated p2 or n95 helps with reducing the viral spread when you cough. the virus particles will be expelled 2-3m with out a mask when you cough, with masks it will only be less then a meter. the point of wearing masks is to protect OTHERS from your virus.

              • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 15:47

                @Creamsoda: This is assuming everyone walks around coughing without covering their mouth

                • Creamsoda on 08/08/2021 - 15:54
                  +1

                  @Deeseeee: ok lets deal with your absolute thought process and logic. how do you guaranty people covering their mouth when they cough? what's your solution with stopping them from spewing their virus laden mucus across the room?

                • Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 16:01
                  +6

                  @Deeseeee: They don't have to be coughing. Wearing a mask significantly reduces the distance particles are transmitted from just regular breathing.

                • dangerdong on 08/08/2021 - 16:35
                  +4

                  @Deeseeee: Wearing a mask also limits the amount of aersolised particles you expel when normally breathing. By wearing even a normal surgical mask you limit the spread of your own potentially infectious material to others. Wearing an N95/P2 mask would be ideal but they're not as readily available as normal surgical masks.

                  Even if the masks only provide some protection, it's still better than no protection at all. We don't need people to do things perfectly with perfectly engineered masks, we need people to do as much as they can to help limit the spread of a novel virus and if that means wearing a non-perfect mask (that still provides protection) then so be it.

                  You don't discount safety precautions because they don't protect you in 100% in the case of an accident. If you applied this to everything, you wouldn't wear a seat belt as you may still die from a car crash (or die from a car crash that you may have survived with a seat belt on).

                  • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 16:57
                    -2

                    @dangerdong: EUA for PCR testing is being withdrawn by the CDC because the PCR test can't differentiate between SARS and the Flu. Direct link to the CDC website.
                    https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert…

                    If they can't distinguish what it is how could you determine how deadly it is or any new "strains" for that matter. As the health minister said why risk dying from an unknown vaccine when the actual virus isn't that deadly and is basically the flu. Comparing it to a seat belt in a car is stupid as cars actually are dangerous for various different reasons especially when you don't wear a seat belt so you're obviously an idiot if you don't wear one, but this virus/flu has a survival rate of over 99 percent among younger people so why would you enforce such drastic and dystopian measures over something we deal with every year, old people die all the time from the flu, as you get older your immune system becomes weaker especially if they already have existing health problems and are taking whatever medications. Especially when one of those dystopian measures is enforcing people wear masks that the manufacturers state won't provide protection against a supposed virus they admit they can't test for

                    • Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 17:14
                      +5

                      @Deeseeee: That link only says the EUA was being withdrawn, doesn't say anything about why.

                      Possumbly has already given a link to refute the claim you're making earlier. I'll repost here to keep it close to the context.
                      https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210730/Claims-that-CDCe2…

                      TL;DR
                      The CDC withdrew the EUA because the PCR test that specific EUA authorised only tested for covid. At the time of withdrawal flu season was coming up so the CDC encouraged the switch to tests that could detect both influenza and covid (if not more viruses) as to save time and resources.

                      You still don't understand the point of mandating masks if you think it's to protect you. It's not. It's to protect other people in the event you have covid and didn't know. That way it stops and slows the spread. Surgical masks by design are not meant to protect the wearer, they're to protect the person the wearer is breathing onto, it just so happens that in certain circumstances surgical masks can protect the wearer if the air being inhaled is directly drawn predominantly through the filter or from an area that isn't being breathed into by someone else who is facing directly towards you (the openings of the masks facing sideways or backwards). The disclaimer is there for legal reasons, ever since covid became a thing people mistakenly believe that surgical masks can directly protect them, it doesn't by primary design; hence the legal disclaimer. It just so happens that surgical masks without intention does protect the wearer in certain circumstances but because it's not the primary use of the mask nor the significant use of the mask, they can't claim it protects the wearer because there will be situations where the mask will not protect the wearer because of the lack of a seal.

                    • toasty on 08/08/2021 - 19:32
                      +7

                      @Deeseeee: Mate, you really need to take a break from watching Sky News and listening to people like Craig Kelly!

                      Also, I’m going to make a wild guess that you might be involved a small business which has been impacted by the epidemic and the difficult choices which were taken to get these outbreaks under control before they completely overwhelmed our healthcare system. If that is the case then my heart goes out to you, but please revisit your thinking on masks.

                      Masks are by no means perfect, but they certainly do help, and you don’t want to be the person who brings this nasty virus home to your loved ones, especially if they are unvaccinated.

            • jcon on 09/08/2021 - 20:04

              @Deeseeee: This isn't difficult.
              Wearing a mask - cloth or surgical - helps stop you from spreading your germs when you exhale.

              That's all there is to it. It works. The science is proven. If you want some anecdotal proof, here it is: surgery staff wear surgical masks to protect the patients from their germs.

              Let it go. Find another cause.

      • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:56
        +11

        Couldn't have said it better myself. We buy car insurance every year and that doesn't guarantee 100% we'll never be involved in a crash. We do it because it's the best extra protection we've got.

        • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 13:01
          -8

          The best protection you have against a crash is being a good driver, insurance won't save you when you're dead.

          • Yummy on 08/08/2021 - 13:26
            +13

            @Deeseeee: You dont drive, do you?

            Being a "good" driver aint good enough. You still have plenty idiots on the road to dodge.

          • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 16:27
            +1

            @Deeseeee:

            The best protection you have against a crash is being a good driver, insurance won't save you when you're dead.

            You can't just snap your fingers and became a better driver…

            You can however buy a mask and be safer than you would be without one

          • Remy Kim on 08/08/2021 - 19:33
            +5

            @Deeseeee: did you attend the protest?

    • Amaris on 08/08/2021 - 13:43
      +2

      What's your alternative if these or other masks don't help reduce the chance of you catching covid-19?

      • Spets on 08/08/2021 - 15:31
        -2

        Boost your immune system: sleep, exercise, go outside for vitamin D, eat healthy, wash your hands.

        • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 18:05
          +3

          Your immune system needs antibodies to be effective. That's the point of vaccines. No empathy for people whose immune systems are compromised?

        • Amaris on 08/08/2021 - 21:11

          So you think boosting your immune system with things other than vaccines would be more effective than a mask?

    • KangaDrew on 08/08/2021 - 13:44
      +4

      Oh, how strong your Dunning-Kruger is… 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • 51ngh on 08/08/2021 - 14:03

      Hey, did you check with OzBargain.com.au if the mask they put on your DP complies with your tough regulations ?

    • Chchnu on 08/08/2021 - 14:23
      +4

      Does it trigger you that why you buy a pair of shoes theres no warning that says you can cook and eat it?

      • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:25
        -2

        No? It should trigger you that that's all you have to say back though

        • Chchnu on 08/08/2021 - 14:29
          +2

          Why do you expect warnings on everything in life?

      • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 20:15
        +3

        Personally I always go to product disclaimers for my scientific information and advice Chcnu. Here are a few classics to help the ignorant survive: "never iron clothes while they're being worn", "don't allow your kids to play in the dishwasher/washing machine/oven", and rotary drill advice that "this product not intended for use as a dental drill."

        I particularly like this one from an American company during Trump's presidency: https://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/warning_…

    • cwongtech on 08/08/2021 - 14:33
      +1

      For your info, even if it's a crappy mask that can't physically filter out the particulate size, there's no denying it definitely slows down the velocity of someone's spit/breath significantly, just think about it logically.

      It's like trying to stop a jet of water coming from a hose with a sock attached over the end.

      A sock wasn't made to be waterproof, but it sure as hell will slow the water velocity down from leaving the hose nozzle fat full speed.

      Your photo is for a surgical mask which normally doesn't have the filtration level high enough to filter out COVID particles directly.

      • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:36
        -6

        Who do you hang around that spits when they talk, sneezes and coughs without covering their mouth? Bunch of grubs, either way you look at it the mask won't save you, if your that close to someone that your feeling their breath, you don't think their breath can go around the mask or a tiny opening it may have?

        • cwongtech on 08/08/2021 - 14:59
          +7

          Who do you hang around that spits when they talk, sneezes and coughs without covering their mouth?

          So you think the people who unknowingly have COVID are deliberately spitting on other citizens.. to spread COVID and COVID only spreads through physical spit?

          you don't think their breath can go around the mask or a tiny opening it may have?

          As per above, their breath's/puff of air that may have COVID particles would significantly lose energy because of some random crap in front of their face and have a higher chance of falling faster if their mouth was covered.

          Did you ever do projectile motion in high school?

          • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 15:05
            -8

            @cwongtech: The derogatory high school comments only make you look like the pretentious wannabe as I have shown I have a better understanding of the vaccine, how it works and science in general. What I'm saying is that neither mask will protect you as the manufacturer's state as warnings and that you're an idiot if you believe they will

            • deva5610 on 08/08/2021 - 15:09
              +7

              @Deeseeee: You use the word "understanding" like you know what it means, but it's clear your only source of information are the pretty pictures on Facebook anti-vax, anti-mask, covid is fake pages.

              Masks work. N95 masks work. Yes, they don't ELIMINATE the risk (just like it says on the N95 box you pointed out. Gold star you can read, shame you can't comprehend!), but they do severely reduce the risk. Especially if everyone was to wear them.

              Sort of like condoms. They don't ELIMINATE the chance of pregnancy, but they're damn near good enough.

              • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 15:13
                -5

                @deva5610: Ah yes because providing a picture of the warning on a mask box and linking a channel 7 article is only getting my info from Facebook anti Vax pages lol I don't even have Facebook. Every comment you make you manage to sound more and more silly

            • cwongtech on 08/08/2021 - 15:30
              +2

              @Deeseeee:

              The derogatory high school comments only make you look like the pretentious wannabe as I have shown I have a better understanding of the vaccine, how it works and science in general

              Ah, the one claiming Pfizer vaccine has side effects

              FYI it's not TGA, it's ATAGI for Australia that gives vaccine recommendations.

          • Spets on 08/08/2021 - 15:34

            @cwongtech: except not all masks help. Some make it worse.

            https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72798-7

            "Surprisingly, wearing an unwashed single layer t-shirt (U-SL-T) mask while breathing yielded a significant increase in measured particle emission rates compared to no mask, increasing to a median of 0.61 particles/s. The rates for some participants (F1 and F4) exceeded 1 particle/s, representing a 384% increase from the median no-mask value. Wearing a double-layer cotton t-shirt (U-DL-T) mask had no statistically significant effect on the particle emission rate, with comparable median and range to that observed with no mask."

            • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 15:39
              +3

              @Spets: You keep posting that link like it's a definitive answer, instead of just using one line from it to try and make some rather poor point.

              The main summary should be to wear a crappy home made mask made out of t shirt material
              simple

              And (as I posted earlier) that report didnt cover the distance or velocity of particles travelled of mask v no mask, just the number of particles.
              It follows logic that forcing juicy spit particles through porous material would cause the break up of those particles and therefore increase their count/second, but it also reduced the median size of those particles, which was covered later in that report.

              There needs to be a follow up for you to go and google that includes velocity and carry distance of no mask v crappy home made t shirt mask.

            • buckster on 08/08/2021 - 19:20

              @Spets: A piece of t shirt is not a mask

        • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 16:30
          +2

          Who do you hang around that spits when they talk, sneezes and coughs without covering their mouth?

          This literally shows how little you know…

          • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 18:10
            +2

            @Zackeroo: Yep, the ignorance is astonishing, moreso given the barrage of easily understood information on television, radio, in newspapers, on the internet.

            • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 18:30
              +1

              @[Deactivated]: Exactly. I thought everyone knew that spit will ALWAYS be transferred when talking or EVEN whispering!! It's nothing to do with the people they "hang around" with. As microscopic as these spit droplets may be, masks prove to be worthy as this could be a COVID/No-COVID decision

      • SBOB on 08/08/2021 - 14:45
        +6

        , just think about it logically.

        nup, you've already lost him ;)

        • emptypocket on 08/08/2021 - 16:09
          -1

          No, you think about it logically. You cognitive dissonance.

    • Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 14:48
      +5

      I made popcorn in anticipation of you turning up. I'm glad you didn't disappoint.

      Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 14:48 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
      • Deeseeee on 08/08/2021 - 14:52

        I never do but everyone else does, including yourself

        • Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 14:59
          +8

          Nah, I have popcorn; definitely didn't disappoint myself.

        • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 16:31
          +8

          Sheesh, you're really going to attack some dude eating popcorn as well

      • sanmigueelbeer on 08/08/2021 - 17:29
        +6

        At least JV knows when to quit.

        • Trance N Dance on 08/08/2021 - 17:36
          +1

          Do they though? I guess JV leans into it though.

        • Zackeroo on 08/08/2021 - 18:28
          +1

          JV knows what he/she is doing when they send the comment :)

          • KangaDrew on 08/08/2021 - 19:25
            +1

            @Zackeroo: As indicated by JV's excessive and overly used bold text for words that more often than not do not need it.

            *waits for JV's neg 😂

            • Zackeroo on 09/08/2021 - 10:49
              +1

              @KangaDrew: Hahahaha, nah jv's gonna be happy that they've influenced you into using BOLD text

              • KangaDrew on 09/08/2021 - 13:18

                @Zackeroo: Sheesh, I hope not! It annoys the sh.t outta me and many others lol Completely unnecessary.

    • the discombobulated… on 09/08/2021 - 21:49
      +1

      There aren't enough negs left in the day for this thread.

  • harrylives on 08/08/2021 - 12:36
    +4

    Does anyone have experience wearing these with glasses?

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:40
      +11

      Some of our team (myself included) are blind as a bat and can't live without glasses. We have no issues with fogging if the masks is worn properly but everyone's experience may differ. Our recommendation is that during fitment of the mask instead of pinching the nose bridge with one hand, use both index fingers to push together from both sides to get the best fit.

      • harrylives on 08/08/2021 - 12:49

        I'll give it a shot, thanks for the prompt response!

        • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:50
          +2

          No worries at all! We appreciate the question as we're aiming to produce more content to address community queries and concerns so stay tuned for that.

    • avtek on 08/08/2021 - 13:27
      +2

      these fog up my glasses - also they are too small - very disappointed after all the hype around these

      • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 13:55
        +1

        Hey there, sorry to hear about your bad experience. They are one size fits all solution. We'd love to hear more feedback so we can address any outlying issues with the manufacturer. Care to drop us a line at [email protected]?

        • the discombobulated… on 09/08/2021 - 22:03

          So given that these are rather expensive, if they don't fit can we get our money back?

          I'm having trouble with the fit of the current set but at least they were $20 for 50…

      • mrctan on 08/08/2021 - 18:01
        +6

        Use this for fogging glasses. Seriously changed my mask wearing life.

        ZEISS Anti Fog Spray, 15 milliliters https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B08PK4V67Y/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_g…

  • MrsJones on 08/08/2021 - 12:37
    +1

    The fit is really important. What’s in the nose piece? (The 3M ones have the bendy wire thing and some foam for a tight fit).

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:43

      Yep these masks do have that bendy wire thing too! AMD P2 Respirators utilise a different technology compared to standard meltblown masks, which result in a better fit. You can learn more about them here: https://www.australianp2mask.com.au/learn-more

      • MrsJones on 08/08/2021 - 12:44

        Thanks I’ve read that - I couldn’t find any information about the nosepiece hence my question. Appreciate the prompt reply.

  • May4th on 08/08/2021 - 12:42
    +1

    this is a good fit and I use this on a daily basis. also I think what that overly enthuasiastic swimming coach was wearing at the olympics?

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 12:45
      +2

      Glad to hear that you're a daily user! All of the Australian Olympic team were using AMD P2 Respirators as AMD are an official sponsor of our team, so yes the meme-worthy swimming coach was probably wearing the very same mask.

      • fatgypo on 08/08/2021 - 12:54

        You should make one's with the Australian team logo/colours. I'd love to see that.

        • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 13:38
          +4

          We've definitely raised that with AMD, personally I'd love that! Also can we take a moment to acknowledge Patty Mills and his 42 points last night?

          • [Deactivated] on 08/08/2021 - 18:19
            +1

            @AustralianP2Mask: Patty Mills and Peter Bol. Great, articulate ambassadors for this country.

  • Villainous on 08/08/2021 - 12:52
    +5

    +1 for being Australian made

    • sanmigueelbeer on 08/08/2021 - 13:58
      +1

      Not sure where the Australian government is sourcing their facemasks from but Med-Con is struggling.

  • PhatChedda on 08/08/2021 - 12:57
    +1

    FK me I'm in the wrong business

  • psyphon11 on 08/08/2021 - 12:59

    hey op, your Australian made certificate on your website is showing as expired

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 13:03
      +1

      Hey, good catch! We'll look into it and get that sorted. If anyone is wondering these are made in Baulkham Hills, NSW.

      • Snoop on 08/08/2021 - 21:03
        +1

        Being from Melbourne, if I order some now, could you get them down on a removalist truck for me tomorrow?
        (funny / not funny)

  • demiurge on 08/08/2021 - 13:00
    +16

    Got any Intel masks?

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 13:04
      +28

      Still waiting on their 7nm chips…

  • dangerdanger on 08/08/2021 - 13:07
    +2

    Thanks OP

    • AssociatedAustralianP2Mask @ Australian P2 Mask on 08/08/2021 - 13:11
      +1

      You're very welcome!

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join