This was posted 2 years 3 months 17 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

SanDisk 256GB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB Type-C $46.45 Delivered @ The Around Australia via Amazon AU

240
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

I've had the black one on my keychain for a year with no signs of wear/tear, significantly better option over the push-click models that break straight away.

These have both USB-A & USB-C for nearly all devices.

SanDisk 64GB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB - A$18.99 + Prime Delivery

SanDisk 128GB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB - A$26.50 + Prime Delivery

SanDisk 256GB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB - A$46.45 + Free Delivery

SanDisk 512GB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB - A$86.86 + Free Delivery (Update: sold out on Amazon, now sold by third party seller for $88)

SanDisk 1TB Ultra Dual Drive Luxe USB - A$189.99 + Free Delivery (Update: Sold out on Amazon, now sold by third party seller for $179.50)

The 1TB, 512GB & 256GB models shouldn't require Prime for the free delivery.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
The Around Australia
The Around Australia

closed Comments

  • At 150mb/s, the higher volume you go the diminishing use it is, as it's bottlenecked to 7200rpm HDD speeds.
    If you get 1tb, depending on the type of files, its going to take a very long time to read/write that much data.

    • +2

      It would still perform the same for the same sized files though right?
      For example, if I had a 128GB drive with 80GB on it and I'm loading a 400MB file onto it, it should be the same write speed as a 1TB drive with 750GB on it and I'm loading a 400MB file?

      • The performance depends on whether those files are many small files or fewer large files making up the total amount. CrystalDiskMark can give you an indication of how different speeds are for these situations and they can be a lot.

      • +1

        Yep precisely.

        If you're using it like most do, to save to, bit by bit; the larger ones will give you a higher resilience.

  • +1

    Get extra 5% off at OW with their price beat!

  • I'm used to SSD speed of at least 400MB/s so no buy from me.

    • +2

      Unfortunately some people want a flash drive small enough to hook onto their keyring. Most portable SSD drives are too big for that.

      • +1

        Yup, that is definitely the main appeal for me. You just hook it into a keyring, and it has the added convenience of a usb A head and a usb C head

        Write speed isn't great as with all compact usb's, they will always throttle in some way after a while.

        From my experience, write goes from about ~45MB/s to ~30MB/s

        • I use mine as an external Drive that resides on my keys, handy as its own storage, just not fast enough for large transfers once you write & then read together.

      • yep, for me it’s the key ring portability, don’t expect SSD performance in that form factor.
        my desktop has USB A and my laptop is 2 ports of USB-C, no A so i’m slowly moving to these dual port devices.

  • +1

    25MB/s sequential write speed on the 128GB model according to a review.

    • +1

      I just attempted a 70gb transfer of a ton of files and had to give up, then 10GB of larger files was fairly fast.

      I wouldn't get more than 128GB because of the speeds, I have the 256GB and will be unlikely to use that much. This USB is more useful as an external storage than something to transfer with.

  • +2
  • +1

    Bought one of these 256gb ones for $39 during amazon black friday and doesn't work with USB 2.0. Can't quickly playback a video on a lot of tvs and media players, transfer a file to like a printer/3d printer, playback music in a car or transferring dashcam files. Wouldnt even work on a old win 7 work pc on the front 2.0 ports, had to use one 3.0 at the back.

  • +2

    not device of choice if are people expecting these to perform like an SSD drive ? ……they use different flash cells, have different controller, and some don’t have any SLC cache, just some DRAM as SLC is more expensive than DRAM…..

    they are slow to write to as it takes more processing to write a cell and validate it, and have faster read than write speeds …… people get more frustrated reading data as they need it “now” but writing data you can be doing other things while it happens in the background ….they are made to a price.

    they aren’t SSD replacements, for that you can buy samsung T series which run as fast as SSD SATA (faster if you have 3.2).

    they are portable storage devices for either back up (back up while doing other stuff) and taking data with you in which case the read speed is faster than write speed ……

    i like these samsung thumb drives because they fit onto a key ring, i can back up my work data and take it it with me to other locations …. it won’t replace my boot device or working drive if in want speed.

  • +1

    Got a much lower capacity one a while ago, I love it. Very well built and convenient.

Login or Join to leave a comment