QCY G1 45ms Low Latency Gaming Earbuds US$37.37 (~A$51.76) Delivered @ QCY Official Store AliExpress

80

Go to Deal

Cashback

adr8 on 10/01/2022 - 17:38 aliexpress.com (359 clicks)
Last edited 12/01/2022 - 15:51 by 2 other users

Early Bird Sale on the QCY G1 Gaming Earbuds at a massive 66% discount. Sale starts at 7pm.

More info QCY G1: New Gaming Earbuds Cyperpunk Lights Action Latency

Check out Scabir QCY G1 review: Capable gaming earbuds on the cheap! & Head-Fi for reviews.

Note: Title prices include GST & Shipping. Approximated AUD price, based on today's MasterCard rates, paying in USD

Related Stores

AliExpress

Marketplace

QCY Official Store

• 

  Fergy1987 on 10/01/2022 - 18:03

  After the QCY T7 debacle where they all showed up DOA, I'm slightly hesitant with the brand.

  • 

    rhimes on 10/01/2022 - 18:31

    Yeah, I can understand. I had a dead T7 and a working T5. I messaged them for the T7 and they replaced with a Q13 (which thankfully worked on arrival).

    • 

      HandsomeMonkey on 10/01/2022 - 18:41

      How do you message them from Amazon application? There's no contact details.

• 

  hellolord on 10/01/2022 - 18:09

  -1

  Never QCY

• 

  MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 18:13

  45ms?! No thanks. Not getting rid of my cable just yet, if thats "low latency". Rhythm gaming impossible.

  • 

    jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 18:16

    Yeah, this needs LE Audio to get latency down to decent levels.

  • 

    Jaduqimon on 10/01/2022 - 18:27

    -1

    The human ear can't detect more than 60ms.

    • 

      jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 19:32

      +1

      It's at most 13ms.

      • 

        MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 20:08

        +3

        I think it was a bad joke at the cost of console gamers about how the human eye apparently cant see more than 60fps, lol.

        • 

          jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 20:24

          +1

          @MasterScythe: LOL you're right. I've genuinely seen people float numbers between 40-60 ms though, it's an irritating subject.

          • 

            MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 22:31

            +3

            @jasswolf: The reason numbers and reaction times and such are all useless, is because they're treated as binary events.

            They become WILDLY variable if its a predicted event.

            Just watch any rhythm gamer; "perfect" scores are within 5ms of a beat; and many can "Full Perfect" songs.

            You have a combination of queues, such as the previous beat, and a visual to help.

            Its one of the reasons why dubstep caught so many peoples ears; it was unpredictable and interesting to people who had been over exposed to 4:4 songs; now dub is overused, and the next thing will come along.

            Humans are weird.

            • 

              happykamper on 11/01/2022 - 07:21

              @MasterScythe: I think you mean "Combination of cues".

              Also, surely any decent rhythm game will let you calibrate to counter any delay anyway.

              • 

                MasterScythe on 11/01/2022 - 11:43

                @happykamper: I did, thank you.

                And yes, if this is a guaranteed exact 45ms, then it'd be usable.

                But often it varies, since BT is designed to adjust its packet size to the environment.

                I use some RF wireless headphones with my dance dance revolution machine, so I dont wake neighbours at 3am; and I was able to adjust the 24ms or so of those.

                But BT risks changing bitrate and such mid use… not sure I wanna risk that yet.