This was posted 1 year 10 months 12 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Fabric Multi-Pocket Men’s Handbag $59.95 (Save $60) + $7.95 Delivery ($0 C&C/$75 Order) @ Zara AU

50

Also see, Monochrome slim briefcase for $69.95

https://www.zara.com/au/en/monochrome-slim-briefcase-p134008…

Light brown bowling bag. Soft design. The main pocket has double zip closure. The inside has a small zipped pocket. The front has two small pockets, both with zip closure. Two top handles and a detachable and adjustable shoulder strap. It can be used as a travel bag. Casual look.

Related Stores

ZARA
ZARA

closed Comments

  • +17

    Nice bag. Do they make any for men?

  • +15

    Mens…handbag? What next, mens tampons?

  • how did you find the on sale items on zara website

  • +8

    Why not get the men's dress and men's high heels to complete the collection?

    • +1

      Well… these days men are using men’s moistures etc..

      It’s like the cigarette companies.
      Used to be only men that smoked and they wanted to increase their sales performance.
      So they marketing smoking to women.
      Doubled their audience.

      • +2

        No men are not using mens only moisturizers. Idiots are.

      • +2

        Wristwatches were originally a woman’s accessory, only due to the war were they adopted by men, as you don’t really have time to go into your pocket and look for your watch while in the trenches

        • While it’s true wristwatches we’re e worn almost exclusively by women, it was much more for decoration than any sort of accurate timekeeping—with aristocratic ladies having very little need to be precisely on time for anything.

          The only reason wristwatches weren’t worn by men at the time was more to do with their vulnerability to dust, water, etc. Thus why watches were kept in pockets.

          Thus when the first man in the army modified a fob watch to go on his wrist and used for it’s true purpose this led to watches made more durable and thus used to tell the time.

  • +5
  • +15

    Everyone seems to be criticising this based on it not being masculine to carry a bag, but it deserves to be criticised based on it being ugly and badly designed and from a company that repeatedly does Facebook-level unethical sh!t

    • +3

      Agree with DanielBaird, this is ugly… The blind hatred towards a manbag is kinda funny as this used to be called a briefcase. Just marketing towards a different generation I guess.

      • Nah. Just marketing.
        Don’t be fooled.
        I just prefer not be be fooled tbh.

    • +1

      agreed .. it's fugly.

    • Nah. Why would a real man care what a handbag looked like.
      It’s not like real men use handbags.

  • +2

    It's not gay, it's European.

    • +2

      Its not a chair, its a chair

      • Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    • Yeah, right.
      Lol

  • Its a murse

  • +3

    You'll look as happy as the model in the photo

  • Looks kinda trash, but would it be decent for Carry on luggage ?

  • +2

    Zara Man is terrible here in Oz. Completely different to the one in Spain. There, and everything is great and here, everything looks so femenine

  • it doesn't have any dimension which is a shame

Login or Join to leave a comment