Thinking betweenFujifilm X-s20 and Sony A6700 APC-s Camera. Which one is better ? Thanks
Fujifilm X-S20 or Sony A6700? Which One is Better?
fittymisty on 30/07/2023 - 19:09
Last edited 30/07/2023 - 19:55
Last edited 30/07/2023 - 19:55
Comments
I don't have any lens. First time to buy a mirrorless camera. But want something compact and easier to carry.
Neither of these are very compact once with lens imo
Fuji with the XF 27mm f/2.8 is pretty compact!
APC-s Camera
Umm. Ok. Might need to research further.
As full frame is too bulky for me, that's why I am thinking these 2 compact aps-c hybrid camera.
That makes more sense. Cheers
Better what? Sensor? MP? Video? Resolution? Framerate? Weight? Battery? ISO settings? Mount? Accessories?…
What's important to you?
Wants some compact mirrorless camera that easy to carry in backpack. Mainly use to take some building photo and everyday use. I am beginner and try to learn more photography.
I may upgrade to more advanced camera in the future…. Thanks
If you have no idea about cameras and just starting, get something second hand and spend the rest of the money on a workshop/training.
Worth looking into the Fuji XE-3 or XE-4. Super compact and still interchangeable lenses, can fit in a jacket pocket with the 27mm pancake lens and I love the sensors.
Also did you mean a6700?
Thanks ! My typo. I just correct my title to A6700.
Just like op meant APS-C
Those 2 cameras cost $2000+ new and are both very advanced cameras already. If you don't know what specs you want, what lens ecosystem you want to invest it (e.g. focal lengths or lens range you want, pricing) then it's better to do more research! Personally would go used for a first camera which will give you time to figure out what you want.
Anyway found this article which covers the basics between the two: https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/sony-vs-fujifilm/a6700-vs-x…
Key points I think would be both have internal stabilisation, both are flippy screens, x-s20 has a viewfinder hump, IQ prob the same (however Fuji uses an X-Trans sensor configuration, the only company that do so), same weight, AF prob similar (sony's af is the gold standard however) and a6700 is weather sealed vs x-s20 no weather sealing.
Between the 2 would personally go for the Fuji based on lens choice (this should be an important factor in your research). Has the much better selection of native primes in my opinion. Both have a decent selection of native zooms + 3rd party lens support. Sony apsc lenses Fuji lenses Dpreview lens search
I've shot with both the Fujifilm and Sony systems extensively (including professionally for a period of time, along with having shot Canon and Nikon DSLRs).
I have some overall thoughts.
On the A6700, I would avoid. Sony has historically underinvested in its APS-C system, meaning body updates have been few and far between, and lens selection is limited (yes, you can use full-frame lenses on APS-C bodies, but you end up buying bigger, more expensive lenses with less useful focal lengths). If you want to go with the Sony system, then I would steer you towards a full-frame body. The Sony A7C would be my pick. Basically the same price as the A6700, but with a full frame sensor, much better lenses, better image quality. Yes, the A6700 will have better AF performance, but if you're not shooting action, the A7C's AF system is still fantastic and is more than capable of what 99.99% of photographers will ever need.
On the X-S20, I also find this a bit of an odd camera to place. It's basically the same price as an X-T5 on sale, which is just a better camera. Overall, I really do like the Fujifilm system, they have a great collection of lenses (particularly if you want to shoot primes), they offer a really unique and well-rounded shooting experience, and they have improved a lot in the latest generation of cameras to catch up on areas where they were still lacking vs. the competition. However, overall, I do find that there are some quirks with the Fuji system that makes it difficult for me to recommend to a novice photographer. The AF performance of some of the lenses can be questionable, the technology in their latest cameras still sometimes feel a bit dated vs. Sony, and much of the appeal of the Fuji camera are the manual controls, shooting experience, and vintage-looking glass that beginners won't necessarily appreciate.
Long story short, between the two, I'd go with the X-S20, but neither are the best choices within their respective ecosystems.
Which camera is not important (unless you're shooting wildlife). A good photographer could take better pics with a 20-year-old Canon 10D than an artless person could with a Sony A1.
Think about what photos really impress you. (Or do you actually enjoy looking at photos? I know people who obsess over gear and their own photos, but are absolutely not interested in enjoying good photos taken by others.)
If you can identify what kind of photos you like, buy a cheap 2nd hand camera and lens that allows you to take the same kind of photos. The lens is most important. For example, if you like rocky beachscapes at sunrise, you'll need an ultra wide angle lens. If you like interior photos of old architecture (limited options in Australia) you would also need an ultra wide angle lens. If you like amazing bird photos, you'll need a long, heavy telephoto lens and a camera with decent autofocus (the Sony a6700 would actually be very good for this).
It you’ve never had a mirror less camera before, don’t get sucked into the hype of getting the newest one. I work with new full frame Sonys and the a6500 is still my go-to holiday camera because it’s portable and the 16-50 pancake lens is surprisingly excellent for its size and cost.
The a6700 is prob not worth the money if you haven’t got a camera before. Just get a second hand one for way cheaper. It’ll still be an excellent camera.
All are very logical answers. If you are thinking of 6700 that means you already have deep pockets.
At that point you are not buying a camera. You are buying into an eco system. Sony are killing it at the moment. So get the a6700 then you have a clear upgrade path of excellent bodies.
Specially if this is first camera, get the 6700 for the auto focus. Unless you are doing landscape, the ease AF will make a big difference.
I have both Sony and Fujifilm. My Sony is a FF (A7c) and my Fuji is an Xs10. I prefer Sony A7c AF speed and accuracy by far. However, Xs10 is much more fun to use due to Fuji film simulation capabilities. With Sony I have to post process a lot but with Fuji I'm mostly satisfied with jpeg output. U won't go wrong either way imho. I also use Sigma 18-55 2.8 which makes the xs10 very versatile n kinda compact in a sense. Hope that helps :)
People like you guys who have experience with multiple systems exactly who i wanted to ask questions :)
I'm using Canon M50 at the moment Sigma 30 1.4, pancake 22 2.0, been wanting to upgrade for awhile now as I want a nice street zoom for when I'm out and about with my wife and kids. I used to have Olympus Pro 12-40 2.8 I miss it so much nowadays.
Canon EOS-M is dead now, no new lens, no nice zoom
I've been reading about Canon R7, R8, Fuji s20, Sony A6700, or A7Cii or A7cR??
I'm in no hurry but hopefully will decide and buy before Christmas as we'll be travelling then.
Thank you :)
I'm gonna sell my Canon, few prime lenses and my flash collections so I don't think I'll be out of pocket too much.
I used Canon 5d mark iii + 135 f2 for 5 years and I thot I will stick with that combo for life. Then I tried Sony A72 for mirrorless, weight and better dynamic range but sold the camera within 2 weeks (can't unsee the green tint in skintone somehow). Might get a boo here but that's my experience. Switch to Fuji XT4 until A7c came along. I use A7c for landscape and low light photos, but Fuji Xs10 for family pics due to imho better skintone. If u like Ur Canon colour, may be stick with the brand.
Sony A7C is almost the same size as A6700, but is full frame and thus has better low light performance. No need to upgrade in the future, rather than spend now on an APSC camera and then later have to spend more to upgrade to FF.
wait for 2 more weeks for the a7cii :)
The FF lenses are larger and more expensive so it’s a drawback if OP wants portability.
Also, I think we should learn more about OPs photographic history before suggesting FF.
because if they’ve never used a pro/semipro camera system before, in my experience they are just as likely to give up using the a6700 and stick to their phone camera as they are to fall in love with it and upgrade to FF in the future.
Well for a start do you have glass from either camp?
And how did you end up at these two?