It's nearing the end of 2023, how many vaccines are you up to? Are you planning on getting more?
How Many COVID Vaccines Did You Get?
deme on 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Last edited 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Last edited 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Poll Options
- 222Zero
- 221
- 3782
- 7263
- 2974
- 2105
- 306
- 67
- 78
- 789+
Comments
@PappaLuigi: Your rant really does not have much relevance to my comment.
you even look into how many deaths due to influenza etc Australia experiences during normal flu years prior COVID? It was 3000-4000 per year… magically those disappeared replaced with COVID deaths…
Influenza is spread by droplet transmission via coughing, sneezing, etc or contact with items where the droplets landed. It is not a magical that these dropped when we adopted masks, distance requirements, better and regular cleaning, etc. all of which prevent transmission.
heart related issues…
One of the complications from covid. Not unique to vaccines.
do your research plenty of evidence now out there..
Present some then, instead of first hand accounts and speculation of the rates jumping.
1st hand of vaccine related injuries, rush to emergency rooms.. the doctors are not allowed to report it in the national database
If they can't report it, why do we have reports on the number of adverse vaccine reactions from the health department, ABS, TGA, and even a claims scheme for those that experienced one.
any GP that had been writing medical excemptions for needing the vaccine were forced out of their jobs.. CCCP levels of control
Any GP writing false medical excemptions you mean. Plenty of GPs wrote exemptions and continued work.
Influenza is spread by droplet transmission via coughing, sneezing, etc or contact with items where the droplets landed. It is not a magical that these dropped when we adopted masks, distance requirements, better and regular cleaning, etc. all of which prevent transmission.
Could you remind everyone how covid spreads? Wait…
I will do it for you…
"Covid is spread by droplet transmission via coughing, sneezing, etc or contact with items where the droplets landed"Same mechanism, but strangely works on influenza, but not covid. Apparently the influenza cases in 2021 dropped to zero. https://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/79016/96354/flu_vs_cov…
Those darn masks are so effective???I gotta say, these pro-vaxxers certainly lack any form of objective logic.
@bigticket: Here's your lack of logic comparing covid that has a longer contagious period and a higher rate of transmission to influenza, and wondering why things arent as effective simply because theyre spread the same and have the similar preventions.
Your blurry graph with an invalid source link? Here's a real source saying influenza didnt drop to zero.
https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/aisr-2021-n…Here's your lack of logic comparing covid that has a longer contagious period and a higher rate of transmission to influenza.
If you look at your own source, page 2, at the peak of the flu season there is a drop of flu cases from 11% to 1% (against a 5 year average), that is, more than a 10 fold decrease. If you research the reported transmissibility of the flu and covid, they very similar, for example 310,000 (2019 - flu) and 380,000 (2021 - covid) cases per year respectively. Your argument is flawed.
Also, reference the study showing a dramatic drop in flu cases with masks, social distancing and hand washing instead of making things up.
Shall we also conclude that my "blurry graph" is less credible to your nice and crispy reference?
@bigticket: You said there was a drop to 0 zero cases. And now you write 1% or 1 per 1,000 as the graph states. I guess that still won't change your opinion of some sort of conspiracy at play to reduce the numbers, and there being covid cases so masks must not work.
My argument is flawed? You chose two years with similar numbers in one country and derived that transmission is equal based on that. "If you research" those two years in America the covid amount is over double. Canada, England, and more, multiple times higher.
I like how you tell me to reference my claims, yet you provide stats and just leave it with "if you research" as their source. Here's some for you though.
A longer contagious period.
The incubation period of COVID-19 ranges up to 24 d (Wang YX et al., 2020), but is generally between 4 and 6 d. One recent study conducted by Guan et al. (2020) showed that the median incubation period for COVID-19 is 4 d, while Zhang et al. (2020) estimated the average incubation period to be 5.2 d. The incubation period of influenza ranges between 1 and 7 d (Sihler and Park, 2011), but is generally 2 d (Kalarikkal and Jaishankar, 2020).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885750/
Covid measures reduced other viral diseases.
We compared indicators of influenza activity in 2020 before and after public health measures were taken to reduce coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with the corresponding indicators from 3 preceding years. Influenza activity declined substantially, suggesting that the measures taken for COVID-19 were effective in reducing spread of other viral respiratory diseases.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392467/
A similar study.
This study analyzed the epidemiologic data of the influenza seasons 2017/2018, 2018/2019, 2019/2020, and 2020/2021 and the changes in personal awareness of protection during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results suggest that the diagnosis rate of influenza decreased after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932933/
A coincidence of timing?
In the United States, influenza virus circulation declined sharply within 2 weeks of the COVID-19 emergency declaration and widespread implementation of community mitigation measures, including school closures, social distancing, and mask wearing, although the exact timing varied by location (2).
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm
Your blurry graph saved here lists a homepage and a broken wikipedia page as source. My reference from our health department shows your claim of zero cases was wrong.
A longer contagious period.
There is a difference between "contagious period" and "incubation period".
Covid measures reduced other viral diseases.
These 2 studies are retrospective studies and generally constitute a very low level of confidence, as evidenced by the use of words like "suggests" in phrases such as "The results suggest that… " in the papers conclusion. In other words, these studies do not show causality and are nothing more than opinionated pieces.
If you have not figured it out yet, the reason flu cases dropped suddenly during covid is simply due to the vast majority of the population testing for covid rather the flu (ie. the actual number of tests) because of the fear espoused by the media and the political/medical system.
My reference from our health department shows your claim of zero cases was wrong.
You got me there. It was not zero, but a marked reduction. I was wrong.
suggests
Is this the first time you've seen a scientific paper? Many scientific papers/reports use the word 'suggest'…. Lawyers have their own language and way of writing, same with scientific literatures.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474301/
You can prove 1+1=2, as that will never ever change. But outside of maths, things can change.
@Ughhh: Thankyou Ughhh. I was about to write a similar comment on the language of research papers. Similarly with their remark on causality, and why correlation is used.
There is a difference between "contagious period" and "incubation period".
With covid you are contagious throughout the incubation period as that and other studies say.
These 2 studies are retrospective studies…
Yes most studies are retrospective, instead of predictions of future events.
And you can refer to Ughhh's comment on your research paper criticism.
because of the fear espoused by the media and the political/medical system.
Going to need your causality study on that one.
@Gehirn: @Gehirn
@UghhhThe point is these researchers are basically conducting a epidemiological studies that are in this case associative methods that do not lend to any form or causation. Hence their conclusions are just opinions. Don't get me wrong, some thorough epidemiological studies using temporal and other advanced methods can show causation with a higher level of confidence. Just not in this case.
@Gehirn: One of the two studies you cite, the Chinese one notes a "sharp decrease in influenza tests & positivity was observed" during 2020.
The Singaporean one claims to have used data of "influenza like illnesses" to estimate influenza cases.
One of the two studies you cite, the Chinese one notes a "sharp decrease in influenza tests & positivity was observed" during 2020.
Yes but it also notes the rate of positivity dropped as well, and in other countries too.
The Singaporean one claims to have used data of "influenza like illnesses" to estimate influenza cases.
That's not a genuine representation of what they did.
"We estimated number of influenza cases per day by multiplying influenza like illnesses (ILI) visits per day by the proportion of ILI patients who tested positive for influenza, which better reflects influenza infection rates than either indicator alone".
@PappaLuigi: Very true what you state, it doesn't matter how much evidence emerges against the experimental vax, the blind sheep of Australia will still take it.
and say I am boosted, I am boosted I am boosted
its a very sad story for the blinded boosted people
Australia has around 10,000 more excess deaths over the three years than Sweden
so ABS stats show deaths from respiratory illnesses go up and down by thousands every year and you're trying to rationalize state-wide house arrests by saying Aus had 10k "excess deaths" (with qualifiers) over 3 years. absolutely laughable.
you're trying to rationalize state-wide house arrests by saying Aus had 10k "excess deaths" (with qualifiers) over 3 years. absolutely laughable
That wasn't what i was saying. If you read the whole comment and what i was replying to and not just quote a sentence out of context.
The Wololo Wombat said to look at excess deaths compared to Sweden as it would show them favourably. However that number of our 10,000 more deaths adjusted to Swedens deaths and population show it was around equal to Australia. Thus nothing can really be inferred from it.
Great post. Happy to see people like you who are able to think critically and independently.
Happily vaccine-free
Just covid vaccine or all?
Unfortunately just the covid one. But I'm definitely never taking a vaccine again.
Why?
Having worked in ICU and COVID wards since it all started - and seeing how it destroyed peoples bodies and lives, I think we are lucky that we had a vaccine at all
Our luck is immeasurable honestly.
Not only having a successful and highly effective vaccine so quickly, but also having such extreme luck that the virus so quickly mutated into a weaker, less deadly form.
Lots of pundits predicted it would, and they were right… but historically speaking, many viruses live on for hundreds of years and never get any less virulent.
If we still had delta variant going around these antivaxxers wouldn’t feel so bold to be laughing and carrying on with conspiracies. Many of them would be living with permanent lung damage.
But fortunately the whole pandemic blew over and now they’re all rewriting history and pretending it was “never that serious.”
“Antivaxxers” seriously? Or do you mean people that don’t like injecting experimental liquids in their body? Surely you know this was a global trial confirmed by Gregory Hunt himself! Thousands had the doses and guess what? They still got it and some died. Some are even disabled from the injections or is that a conspiracy also?! Wake up!
Antivaxxers” seriously?
From the "definition" of vaccine from another user
Vaccines are a weaponised version of the safe & effective preventative treatment known as homeopathic prophylaxis.
If that's not anti Vax, what is it? (note the quote is on vaccines in general, not just covid).
It's also coming from the same user who thinks viruses can be seen as a response by the cell in order to facilitate well being. Also, the viewpoint of viruses "attacking cells" is incorrect.
The user has become a 'genious' after watching of some YouTube videos and has decided to redefine words. Bravo.
@Ughhh: "Antivax" is a label that "sheep" use to shame. Hope you get it.
In reality, its an opinion different to yours.
͏͏͏͏͏͏It's also coming from the same user who thinks viruses can be seen as a response by the cell in order to facilitate well being. Also, the viewpoint of viruses "attacking cells" is incorrect.
Who are you to shame this user expressing their viewpoint with your unqualified opinion.
As far as I can see, this user has researched and understands the topic to a deeper level than you and is not part of an echo chamber parroting superficial ideologies.And to be clear, this user is on point with their assertions.
@bigticket: The text that I quoted, would you say that is for or against vaccine?
What is your understanding of the word "anti" and "vax"? Do those words, when put together and separately, mean something different in your universe? Those words have definitions, those definitions are not my opinion.Who are you to shame this user expressing their viewpoint with your unqualified opinion.
Their viewpoint on the scientific definition of a word decided decades and decades ago? Whats your viewpoint on the word "jump", you wanna redefine that word? Perhaps your viewpoint is that it actually means "eat"?.
My conclusion is not based on my opinion, but rather the scientific consensus of what the term means.As far as I can see, this user has researched and understands the topic to a deeper level than you and is not part of an echo chamber parroting superficial ideologies.
So you agree with his definition of 'virus', despite not knowing his credentials. You just swallowed it in one gulp, no spitting. Agreeing with whoever you feel is on your side, regardless right or wrong. If this is not an example of a sheep, what is.
May I suggest you visit specsavers and enrol yourself in (legitimate) critical thinking classes.
@Ughhh: It is clear that you are using the word antivaxxer as a derogatory term. The term has been used to shame a marginalized community that refused to take an experimental drug. There is no dispute of what it means.
My conclusion is not based on my opinion, but rather the scientific consensus of what the term means.
Fair enough, you are just reiterating the scientific consensus. It does not necessarily mean that the current scientific consensus is correct though. Have you researched the history of a virus from the time its been hypothesized to a theory and to a consensus? I don't think so. The user you refer to appears to have done just that.
So you agree with his definition of 'virus', despite not knowing his credentials.
I do not know his exact definition of a virus, but it seems to align with my perspective. I have not suddenly "jumped on board" and "swallowed it in one gulp". Its been my view for several years now. Been superficial and just agreeing with the scientific consensus is not enough for me. That is what is usually termed as following the crowd.
Have I hit a nerve with the term "sheep".@bigticket: So I’m getting the sense some people are anti-vaccine but “choose not to identify” as antivax… hrrrm, I wonder how much crossover to some other segments of the population.
@haemolysis: What are you taking about. Im clearly against vaccines and am antivaxx as you put it.
That includes ALL vaccines; measles, polio, flu etc etc.
Choosing not to identify is not in my vocab.
It is clear that you are using the word antivaxxer as a derogatory term.
Have I hit your nerves? If you don't like the word 'antivaxer', feel free to redefine the word in the dictionary. In my viewpoint, "antivaxer" means "lovely people". Do you have an issue with viewpoints diff to yours?
Also, "Sheep" isn't a derogatory term? Pot kettle much?If you think you know more than hundreds of scientist, and decades and decades of research, then no one help someone with god complex.
I do not know his exact definition of a virus
But you agree with it anyway. Good sheep!! Well behaved!
I have not suddenly "jumped on board" and "swallowed it in one gulp".
I'm pretty sure he could say something like viruses and bacteria are the same, and you would just agree, simply because he's on your side and it's against scientific consensus.
Have I hit your nerves?
Actually an emphatic no.
Im proud to be and antivaxxer and its actually honourable designation within a group antivaxxers. You may have a hard time getting your head around that concept.
In essence, the point was that the cohort of provaxxers have redefined the term to marginalise a group in a derogatory way and associate it with tin foil conspiracy theorists.Also, "Sheep" isn't a derogatory term? Pot kettle much?
Yes it is. Sheep aptly refers to provaxxers. Can't come up with your own word as rebuttal? How shallow and embarrassing can it be shouting back like a parrot.
If you think you know more than hundreds of scientist, and decades and decades of research, then no one help someone with god complex.
I assume you know some history?
You would have to agree that there has been numerous times when the scientific consensus has been outright wrong. Its the few like us who don't follow the crowd, who do not outsource our thinking skills to others who only parrot the narrative in echo chambers, that leads to positive change.But you agree with it anyway. Good sheep!! Well behaved!
Strawman. Strawman. Strawman.
Re: sheep. See above.
Care to reveal how may shots you have taken?
I would hazard a guess at 4+.
Successful, Honestly.
How come the people around me that have been vaccinated 2-5 times have had Covid 2-5 times.
Because ive had GBS/CIDP my immune system isn't the greatest, was told by two doctors i would probably die if i caught Covid.I refused the experimental vaccine.
It's highly possible my first flu vaccine caused it but can't prove it…
I Caught Covid and was mildly sick with flu like symptons. The headaches were the worst.Now i can't catch Covid again, I've been around a few people (including the girlfriend who's had it twice and been vaccinated twice) and nothing 🤷♂️🤷♂️. Her neighbour been vaccinated twice and has caught it 4 times.
Remember get vaccinated to protect the family , grandkids etc .The vaccine is far from safe and effective they didn't even test for transmission…
It has recently been confirmed that what people got during the trials vs the mass vaccination was in fact two different formulas. To date I haven’t had the virus either plus I refused the experimental injections! Pity I’ve had every other because the last three years has put me off ever get another injection. Everyone I know that got “vaccinated” caught the virus after the second injection. In my family my sister can no longer work and my baby niece died.
@AussieDolphin: Sorry to hear that mate, The cover up and corruption going on regarding adverse reactions is downright DISGRACEFUL, people woke up that's why most ive spoken to stopped at the two vaccinations as a lot of people didn't feel well from it.
I also spoke to a lady that works with my daughter after my daughter told her about me, The couple thought they were doing there right thing, Both healthy beforehand,well her partner came down with GBS and died a couple of months after his last vaccination…
To think Facebook etc were Censoring this info as misinformation just shows how far the corruption goes..
All the best.
It's highly possible my first flu vaccine caused it but can't prove it…
I wish more people would listen to stories like this: https://rumble.com/v3olcvk-vaccines-caused-my-son-great-inju…
Sara, young mother pressured into getting flu shot while 7 months pregnant, gets sick with flu like symptoms within 2 days, goes on to have a boy who receives the recommended shots as a baby, notices at 2 months of age a difference, child is diagnosed autistic by 2 years of age. Today, he is 5, has sensory processing issues & is non verbal. Sara has another child soon after, this time she refuses shots during pregnancy & for her baby. This boy is neurotypical.
It's a clear case of common sense dictating the shot was harmful to her during pregnancy. And the shots to the firstborn.
It was blown out of context. Most where very sick people to begin with with a resume of major health problems . We have destroyed more lived with lockdowns!
Cheers OP for the reminder. I'll plan #6
Did you book yet?
Literally typing this on the plane. I'll book tomorrow
All sorted mate. Got myself a Pfizer 4.5 again
to be honest i wish i didnt get the third booster shot. after the third one i became incredibly sick, then developed an intolerance to dairy, gluten and oats, bundled with now suffer from ibs. obviously this has meant i had to change my lifestyle immensely, and it has affected it so much too.
i think the timing of it was too coincidental, i could either blame it on me getting older or that. doctors swear that getting the shot couldn’t do anything like that, but im inclined to believe otherwise.
i only got the vaccine shots to protect my grandfather, and also because my job and uni had requested me to. otherwise i probably would have only gotten the first and maybe one booster.
anyway, if i knew then how i would react at the time i dont think i would have done it at all, regardless of the risk of sounding antivax and so on. hopefully one day these issues resolve themselves, but i doubt it.
regardless of the risk of sounding antivax
I sincerely sympathize with what has happened and hope you fully recover in time.
Weighing in on what others think is a form of bias and coercion in your decision making process and is detrimental to you and your family. Kudos to you for seeing the jab for what it really is.i am sorry to hear the struggles and suffering you encountered, the results you had a are a common problem with the experimental vaccines,and may other health issues affecting heart, bloods, organs etc
I know some direct family and some friends, suffering like you, and worse than you, directly after been vaxxed.
There is a big cover up over the covid vax, BUT you cant hide the truth forever, it will come out when due cause
No reasonable healthy person of any age needs them, people over 100 got covid and lived
If you care about anyone close to you, family friends, its better they dont take any of the new covid vaxes
You yourself know now what its done to your body, and your 100% correct
There have been some studies showing how the spike protein smashes your gut microbiome, especially the biffo bacteria. Look into rebuilding it, home made yoghurt/kefir etc and prebiotics. Probiotic capsules are getting better as well.
Pfizer used a completely differently process in making the vaccination for the mass produced version compered to the one used in the trials. In effect a whole new set of trials should have occurred with this new process as a different formulations can process different results and side effects.
Yet, we still have people who absolutely froff over it.
froff
😅
In effect a whole new set of trials should have occurred
It's a good point, but really, what difference would it have made? The "regulatory" agencies do essentially no verification and Pfizer has a history of scientific malpractice. Pfizer and others can basically publish whatever the hell they want for any drug and the FDA (and the rest of the regulators globally) will rubber stamp it.
Covid was the biggest scam of our lives!
Why?
If your asking that question then you are late for your booster!
So I just need to blindly trust what someone says and not question it?
So many are still calling it a vaccine 🤯.
What do you call it?
An injection that instructs cells to create a synthetic protein.
What if this injection provided the person with some amount of immunity to a virus?
@deme: mRNA does not belong inside the body at all anywhere! Have you looked at the ingredients of the injections? Did you know that what was administered in the “trials” is not what people actually got? When you create enough fear you can instill what you want on the population. My sister can no longer work. She has no quality of life! My baby niece died also! I will not forgive or forget what the injections NOT vaccines did! If you really believe this where did the flu go for two years?
mRNA does not belong inside the body at all anywhere
mRNA naturally occurs in the body.
mRNA naturally occurs in the body.
The injections are modified rna, not messenger rna, despite "science" telling you they are one & the same.
The injections are modified rna, not messenger rna, despite "science" telling you they are one & the same.
mRNA is a subset of RNA
modified mRNA is a subset of mRNA
modified RNA is a subset of RNAmodified x is just taking x and modifying it.
Though if you really did mean modified (m)RNA then you are correct but only because the definition of modified means it won't occur naturally, I mean if it did then you wouldn't need the vaccine would you?
mRNA does not belong inside the body at all anywhere!
I cbf, so I googled:
mRNA stands for messenger RNA, which helps translate DNA code to create the building blocks of life. It does this by carrying messages containing sections of DNA code from the nucleus of cells to the cell machinery.If you really believe this where did the flu go for two years?
That one is easy, less people interacting physical = less spread.
@AussieDolphin: The mRNA used in the jabs is not 'natural' as they use pseudouridine as one of the nucleotides, not uridine found in true mRNA.
Pseudouridine is more stable than uridine (hence its use) but is known to have issues… including turning your body into a spike protein factory for a long (and still unknown I believe at time of writing?) time.
@sn00ze: The vaccine does not cause prolonged production of spike protein. The fact that we need boosters after 6 months really should have been a hint that you clearly misread something there.
Not a vaccine of any sort.
What's a vaccine in your eyes?
@deme: Vaccines are a weaponised version of the safe & effective preventative treatment known as homeopathic prophylaxis.
Vaccines directly introduce a range of proteins into the blood. Researchers make lab animals sick in order to study them, by injecting them with compounds that mimic bacterial or viral infections.
Charles Richet won the Nobel for anaphylaxis (severe allergic reactions). He wrote that introducing proteins directly into the blood (bypassing the gut) sensitizes the individual to future exposures.
homeopathic
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-homeopathy…
@deme: But Homeopathy Plus! isn't Big Pharma, small fish aren't interested in making money off gullible people!!!!!111!! 🙃
@deme: You haven't figured out yet that homeopathy & other natural healing modalities are targeted, because….they're over the target?
People haven't yet figured out it's an upside down world. Lol.
@deme: Let’s see. Well for a start these three years have taught me that that this particular vaccine is not safe, effective or good for you. What other injection in the history of mankind caused people to get the illness they were vaccinated against? Even put them in hospital and they still died?! What other vaccine is responsible for some of the worst side effects and disabilities ever seen on a global scale? What other vaccine is built on mRNA formula? I can’t think of another vaccine that people were coerced to have and where I live incentivised to get it. Call these injections. A vaccine if there was ever a good one and I now highly doubt is supposed to “protect” you from particular diseases without destroying your immunity. Funny how the latest injections forced on the population don’t even give you immunity! I bet you don’t know that all the animals died in the trial either.
@AussieDolphin: "What other injection in the history of mankind caused people to get the illness they were vaccinated against?"
The polio one and measles too. Pretty sure a few others too.
@EightImmortals: How many cases in comparison? None of them come combined come close to the covid statistics.
What other vaccine is built on mRNA formula?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRNA_vaccine#Development
I can’t think of another vaccine that people were coerced to have and where I live incentivised to get it.
Rubella vaccine.
I'm not saying it's right, just saying you are wrong.
Funny how the latest injections forced on the population don’t even give you immunity!
Which one?
I bet you don’t know that all the animals died in the trial either.
Source
Got 1 vaccine for job requirements and never got it again. Also haven't had covid yet or caught the cold in over 10 years. Not sure why.
I held out until October 2021 then got 2 against my instincts at the time. The obnoxious coercion by my State Government Dictator and his human rights abusing Nuremberg Code violating Chief Health Officer was only reason. In hindsight I regret getting them and I realise now that I was gaslit, lied to and could not have possibly given informed consent because I was never "informed" of the risk of a severe outcome I subjected myself to, which was most likely higher than the risk of a severe outcome from contracting C19 in my agegroup. The continual parroting of the lie about it protecting others when the product was never even tested for that endpoint and it was already known this was false by mid 2021 was unforgiveable. The attempt to create a two tier society and the ostracising + demonisation of rational people like Novak Djovovic who decided they wanted to retain control over what was injected into them was the most socially repugnant outrage of my lifetime. i will never forget I will never forgive and I will never comply against my gut instincts again.
Sorry you had to go through all that. In a rational & compassionate society, it would of been unthinkable.
What has been your observation of adverse effects of the jabs (if any) to yourself & those around you?
Both myself and my partner experienced adverse reactions. The fact that these novel products were mandated onto under 50s who had approximately zero risk from C19 itself with undisclosed potentially fatal VIT & myocarditis risks is beyond criminal, it was psychopathic.The fact that this was done under the guise of two outright lies - that "vaccines" would prevent contracting and transmitting C19 is mind boggling. And the fact that all the rat faced shit weasels in suits and North Face jackets who were responsible for these vile policies are scurrying off into the shadows to avoid any accountability for what they did is unsurprising.
I'm glad most people have seen the light now, 2-3 years ago, you guys were negging me to death and wishing I died and not take a hospital bed.
Now, you mostly give me +, and I got 0 jabs, and didn't need a hospital bed. Never needed a hospital bed. My extended family did, they succumbed to the pressure, they kept on getting sick and issues after the jab. No one in my family did.
I called this natural selection. At the time, those thought that meant not getting the jab, nature will deal with them, oh how wrong they were.
This is a forum post on a bargain website and your highest comment here has 15 upvotes. To think you have majority support of the people when the poll shows the 4-6 dose at near 500 people, a dosage past what employers, travel etc, required, is not reality.
Simply put no-one cares.
when the poll shows the 4-6 dose at near 500 people,
The way I read the poll so far is that most people stopped at 3, which would most likely have been sometime in 2022. It would appear RocketSwitch is correct.
That doesn't show their stance on covid, vaccines, etc. You can't infer an opinion one way or the other from that.
Using your logic anyone that hasn't had a flu vaccine or one regularly must believe the flu vaccine is dangerous or the flu is not harmful.
You can't infer an opinion one way or the other from that.
More people stopped at 3, than have had 4-9 shots, although I assumed the 9+ category was a humorous addition. Respect to those who have really had 9+.
I would infer from that, that most of the 3 group didn't want them in the first place but were probably mandated them in order to keep their jobs, or most were believers at the time but have since changed their views.
I would infer from that…
Yes you can say whatever you like. However it is disingenuous to insist what peoples opinions are based on a poll of a different question.
However it is disingenuous to insist what peoples opinions are based on a poll.
I'm not insisting anything. It's called inferring, or speculating, based on what the poll numbers are.
A dishonest speculation to reinforce your own opinion. No consideration to an alternative.
Lol. Who's the one insisting now?
@mrdean: You have made it known what your opinion is with your currently 147 comments in this post. I dont need to speculate.
I dont need to speculate.
To think you have majority support of the people when the poll shows the 4-6 dose at near 500 people
Well, the 4-6 dose category is currently at around 490.
The 0-2 category is currently at around 560.
Which one has the majority?
@Gehirn: you even look into how many deaths due to influenza etc Australia experiences during normal flu years prior COVID? It was 3000-4000 per year… magically those disappeared replaced with COVID deaths…
would you drive a car that was just produced with next to no safety testing? course not, but thats what happened here.. forced to take it.. government BS that its our choice, you have no choice when you are told you will lose your job if you are not vaccinated.. "keep everyone safe get vaccinated".. that slogan quickly disappeared once it was proven it does 0 to stop the spread..
watch cancer rates jump… heart related issues… know of several friends around same age and always been fit suddenly experience heart issues along with 1 given 6 months to live, highly aggressive cancer.. sad what was done to us
do your research plenty of evidence now out there..
any know of many cases 1st hand of vaccine related injuries, rush to emergency rooms.. the doctors are not allowed to report it in the national database and dismiss it as stress etc.. its horrific what happened..
any GP that had been writing medical excemptions for needing the vaccine were forced out of their jobs.. CCCP levels of control