bigticket » user profile

The uneven heating on most if not all cooktops is due the induction coil below the glass being smaller than the indicated circle on the…

$40.99 for a placebo is expensive.

>I'm not a fan of Kamala Harris Thats what I thought. A biased leftie failing to be objective, even after that proclaimation... right?

@ForkSnorter I would love to hear your character assassination if Kamala Harris was pushing a smartphone to pay for the shortfall in the…

>phrases like “nanny state” you’ve already **lost** the argument. Did you hear that @Protractor, you lost too. New ozbargain rule:…

ditto.

The nanny state is failing us. If brought into perspective there are situations where objects under someones control causes many many more…

Its apparent that if you're after a positive and sympathetic response(especially if you are at fault) from the ozb community and not the…

Its hilarious that most have incorrectly voted. Most point out to the lane markings, indicating straight or a right turn for the mustang…

Im not a hypocrite like others on here claiming the moral high ground of driving for decades and not having lost a single demerit point.…

There are loopholes in the labeling laws, for example, where the additive amount per serving size is below a set threshold it does not have…

Specifically what?

"INGREDIENTS: Orange Juice (100%)." "No artificial colours or flavours." Ahhh you believe the label. I believe you should research the…

>Misleading. Your milk is already pasteurised (for good reason). Try boiling that and see if it tastes the same! Yes and No. In my example,…

>The real difference if any is the oranges used. Whether its reconstituted from a concentrate or made from real oranges makes no…

Correct me if I'm wrong, but $4400 is what can be claimed as a deduction, the actual dollar savings on tax would max out at $1980 ($4400 x…

>But taken with the extreme drying, the increased bushfires, the flooding these incidents are all expected byproducts of the expected…

> LMAO! You do realise that you are making dumb comments about modellling on a forum topic that is based on modelling? What is a joke is…

>Wrong. What was 'predicted' over 50 years ago based on pure data(pre modelling) is happening now. That does not even make sense. Saying…

>Climate change is not based entirely on 'modelling'. Wrong. Its entirely based on modelling. Its the current and historical data thats…

In reality you are the one **parroting** the climate change scientists.

What? Mr science hasn't a rebuttal. How about you crunch on that cracker and think about it.

Climate change science is based on modelling. Simple modelling is predicative and is not equal or even equates to the real world that is…

> I've heard your version of denial a million times over 30 years. I'm still not reading any science. btw. I didn't neg you

>I get it. You get your science from X. Hardly, and presumptuously incorrect. I get my science from science itself. Its ridiculous to say…

Thumbnail does not checkout.

Screenshot should work though.

That is a well written and detailed response. >This is not a single, exploratory study by a couple of postgraduate students seeking to…

Its quite discerning that your citation starts the first line that reads "Scientific Opinion" This document appears to be an application…

>...bovaer, which is well-within the safe limits in cow feed (and does not end up within the beef and milk that we consume.) Cite the…