bigticket » user profile

Its hilarious that most have incorrectly voted. Most point out to the lane markings, indicating straight or a right turn for the mustang…

Im not a hypocrite like others on here claiming the moral high ground of driving for decades and not having lost a single demerit point.…

There are loopholes in the labeling laws, for example, where the additive amount per serving size is below a set threshold it does not have…

Specifically what?

"INGREDIENTS: Orange Juice (100%)." "No artificial colours or flavours." Ahhh you believe the label. I believe you should research the…

>Misleading. Your milk is already pasteurised (for good reason). Try boiling that and see if it tastes the same! Yes and No. In my example,…

>The real difference if any is the oranges used. Whether its reconstituted from a concentrate or made from real oranges makes no…

Correct me if I'm wrong, but $4400 is what can be claimed as a deduction, the actual dollar savings on tax would max out at $1980 ($4400 x…

>But taken with the extreme drying, the increased bushfires, the flooding these incidents are all expected byproducts of the expected…

> LMAO! You do realise that you are making dumb comments about modellling on a forum topic that is based on modelling? What is a joke is…

>Wrong. What was 'predicted' over 50 years ago based on pure data(pre modelling) is happening now. That does not even make sense. Saying…

>Climate change is not based entirely on 'modelling'. Wrong. Its entirely based on modelling. Its the current and historical data thats…

In reality you are the one **parroting** the climate change scientists.

What? Mr science hasn't a rebuttal. How about you crunch on that cracker and think about it.

Climate change science is based on modelling. Simple modelling is predicative and is not equal or even equates to the real world that is…

> I've heard your version of denial a million times over 30 years. I'm still not reading any science. btw. I didn't neg you

>I get it. You get your science from X. Hardly, and presumptuously incorrect. I get my science from science itself. Its ridiculous to say…

Thumbnail does not checkout.

Screenshot should work though.

That is a well written and detailed response. >This is not a single, exploratory study by a couple of postgraduate students seeking to…

Its quite discerning that your citation starts the first line that reads "Scientific Opinion" This document appears to be an application…

>...bovaer, which is well-within the safe limits in cow feed (and does not end up within the beef and milk that we consume.) Cite the…

>Bovaer doesn't end up in the beef, nor in the milk. >It doesn't matter how many scientific studies tell you that the bovaer doesn't end up…

>Practically everything in the universe is toxic to humans at certain doses. Even water can kill you if you drink too much at once. Salt is…

>A toxin is produced by biological organisms and can be man made. According to the FDA the product is not for human use and states.…

> First of all, billions of herbivores have roamed this planet for hundreds of millions of year. So somehow saying "carbohydrate were…

>Eating meat is why humans were able to as quickly evolve to have the intelligence they do. Meat is easy to digest and get the energy out…

>Recent research found that ancient humans and neanderthals were eating a carbohydrate-rich diet (starch-rich foods such as tubers) 100,000…

Bovaer is a toxin to any biological system. The immediate bodily reaction is to expel it. Some of it will end up in the meat and the effect…

>recent research identified carbohydrates as critical for the expansion of the human brain and the evolution of human intelligence. It is…