This was posted 3 months 1 day ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

Motorola Moto G54 128GB $219 + Delivery ($0 C&C) @ Bing Lee

170
Motorola Moto G54 128GB $219 + Delivery ($0 C&C) @ Bing LeeAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
mvbc85 on 01/02/2024 - 12:05 binglee.com.au (871 clicks)
Last edited 01/02/2024 - 12:16 by 1 other user
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Was sad that Big W's price on the Moto G54 went back to full price but then I noticed that Bing Lee has them even cheaper at $219.

Was able to price beat with Officeworks over the phone.

  • MediaTek Dimensity 7020
  • 6.5" FHD+ 120Hz IPS screen
  • 50 MP main (OIS) + 2 MP macro + 16 MP selfie
  • 5000mAh battery with 15W charging
  • Ships with Android 13, released October 2023, budget Motorolas usually get one Android update (14) and 3 years security
  • microSD card up to 1TB
  • Stereo speakers and 3.5mm headphone jack
  • NFC
  • Dual SIM: nano + eSIM
  • 20W charger included

Thanks to @shxhshzhz for the spec list
Referenced from this post: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/828927

Mobile Mobile Phone Motorola Android

Related Stores

Bing Lee
Bing Lee

closed Comments

  • skido on 01/02/2024 - 12:10
    +8

    use code: WELCOME20 for a further $20 off

    brings it down to $199

  • shxhshzhz on 01/02/2024 - 12:11
    -2

    Note: Available to order, 18-20 days delivery time

    • mvbc85 on 01/02/2024 - 12:16

      Sorry, first time I've posted in many years
      Added your post for reference. Used it as a template. Thanks for the good work

  • [Deactivated] on 01/02/2024 - 13:56
    -3

    Great price but just FYI, MediaTek SoC is garbage. Laggy AF. I would never touch one again. You're far better off paying a bit more for the G84 with the SD 695 in it.

    • hexapling on 01/02/2024 - 14:16
      +1

      Lack of esim on G84 is a deal breaker for me.

    • gimme on 01/02/2024 - 15:40
      +1

      another blanket statement. I have one of these and it works just fine. Overall even better than my previous galaxy s21

      • [Deactivated] on 01/02/2024 - 15:43
        -1

        I don’t doubt that. Exynos is equally as shit.

        • gimme on 01/02/2024 - 15:46
          +2

          Another person who doesn't understand the concept of 'fit for purpose'. Not everyone needs the fastest processors. Then again internet.

          PS: Not laggy at all for everyday apps.

          • [Deactivated] on 01/02/2024 - 15:47
            -1

            @gimme: Maybe for browsing the web, sure. Just try doing something labour intensive and watch it soil itself. I'm speaking from experience and have used both chipsets.

            • gimme on 01/02/2024 - 15:52
              +1

              @[Deactivated]: Let me list
              browsing
              banking
              youtube
              messaging
              airlines/booking
              etc etc

              all work just fine. you may need it for labour intensive stuff (most people don't) hence my comment about fit for purpose. Saying a $200 phone (of this calibre) is shit is not understanding relative value

              • [Deactivated] on 01/02/2024 - 15:53

                @gimme: Oh I understand relative value, that's why I said you're better off spending a little more for the G84 and not just simply "this is a shit phone". If you're happy with it, then I'm happy for you 🙂

                • Tiggrrrrr on 01/02/2024 - 16:56

                  @[Deactivated]: So in your opinion paying 50% more equates to at least a 50% improvement? (Based on chipset?)

                  Any opinion on the Snapdragon 480+ ? For roughly same price.

                • jackspratt on 02/02/2024 - 00:25
                  -1

                  @[Deactivated]:

                  Oh I understand relative value,…….

                  It's pretty clear you don't - in this case at least.

                  • [Deactivated] on 02/02/2024 - 18:05

                    @jackspratt: What's clear is that I don't waste money on inferior chipsets.

    • [Deactivated] on 04/02/2024 - 00:05

      3 negs and not a single person can explain why I'm wrong lol. Pathetic.

      • xoom on 04/02/2024 - 00:27

        Didn't neg you but lets see if i can explain the possible reason they negged you.

        Some things are built to a price point. Which this is. Sure it don't have a great soc. But it works to its price point. Oh sure the G82 was $200 but that was a price error. But the dimensity 7020 beats the sd 695 in benchmarks.

      • jackspratt on 04/02/2024 - 00:32

        Why don't you start, and explain why you are right.

        Yes.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join