• expired

[eBay Plus] EVERAU UGG Slippers $29.95 Delivered @ UGG Express eBay

571
[eBay Plus] EVERAU UGG Slippers $29.95 Delivered @ UGG Express eBay
Go to Deal
Cashback
hamza23 on 24/04/2025 - 11:47 ebay.com.au (4329 clicks)
Last edited 24/04/2025 - 14:04
COMFY60

Similar price to the Black Friday Deal.

Various colours and sizes (Ladies 4-13 / Mens 2-11) : Chestnut, Grey, Pink, Brown, Caribou, Black

  • Brand: EVERAU
  • The fluffy sheepskin offers a warm embrace during the icy-cold winter.
  • The upper has a layer of nanotech coating that repels liquids and stains.
  • These sheepskin slippers are fully lined with sheepskin wool that is super comfy and soft and skin-friendly.
  • The sheepskin’s natural moisture-wicking property help keep your feet dry and comfortable.
  • This essential slippers are cast in soft suede and our signature sheepskin.
  • Finished with a lightweight EVA sole, the non-slip outsole offers you extra safety.
  • It is easy for you to slip on and off.
  • Suitable for both women and men wear.
  • These slippers are available for both indoor and outdoor during cozy winter.
  • Great gift idea for friends and family.
  • Upper: Cow Suede
  • Lining: Sheepskin Wool
  • Sole: EVA Rubber
  • Insole: Sheepskin Wool
  • Origin: Made In China
This is part of Mother's Day deals for 2025.
Fashion & Apparel Footwear Mother's Day Slippers

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
UGG Express
UGG Express

Comments

  • solidice on 24/04/2025 - 11:51
    +10

    I've found that my Made in Australia ones last way longer than the Ugg Express made in china variants.

  • Broden on 24/04/2025 - 12:24
    +2

    What makes these Ugg exactly? They look like Kmart slippers.

    • stephcurry on 24/04/2025 - 12:37

      UGG is just sheepskin boots

      • BartholemewH on 24/04/2025 - 18:47
        +8

        The American brand is not the original Ugg.

        • Big L on 25/04/2025 - 22:34
          -1

          The US brand is the original UGG, they bought the trademark from an Australian.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGG_(brand)

      • illusion99 on 24/04/2025 - 20:27

        The American UGGs are also made in China

  • Minimalism on 24/04/2025 - 12:47
    +3

    This style of uggboots suck tbh. You want uggboots for warmth, this is not the time for a slipon. Get zip up ones if you must.

    Also, i found on ozbargain a couple years ago proper ugg boot brand selling these slip ons for 10 or 20 bucks. Can't remember exactly, but the grip in the sole was attrocious :(

    I am a fan of quality over cheapness when it comes to long term objects but, any advice for a decent pair of ugg boots would be appreciated.

    Ps. this is not to rag on OP's deal, I just thought I should share my thoughts.

    • Russ on 24/04/2025 - 13:14

      Agree, and I think calling this type of footwear "slippers" is a stretch. I don't know if there's a proper word to describe them, around my home these are called scuffs, not slippers.

      • Daabido on 24/04/2025 - 13:20

        Scuffs. Perfect for Qld, because after a time regular ones might get too toasty, so taking your feet out or partially you can control the freezing 20 degree weather.

        • Russ on 24/04/2025 - 13:28

          Nah, thongs are better for 20 degrees. Change to slippers (not scuffs) when it gets to 16 degrees.

    • djkelly69 on 24/04/2025 - 16:27
      +3

      Personally I love this style because my feet get too hot in slippers or uggs.

  • Daabido on 24/04/2025 - 12:47
    -1

    No size 12 or over. Only for small people.

    • solidice on 25/04/2025 - 08:23

      You mean normal people.

  • FXx on 24/04/2025 - 12:54
    -1

    Only sizing for ladies and midget men..

    • maxpwr on 24/04/2025 - 13:43

      They've either added more or you misread.

      • sidesw1pe on 24/04/2025 - 22:29

        They only go up to men's 11

        • maxpwr on 25/04/2025 - 04:43
          +1

          definitely midget sizes.

  • Creator831 on 24/04/2025 - 14:32

    Why is there no size 13 for males, I've been looking for something like this

  • prince10 on 24/04/2025 - 14:35
    -5

    it uses animal skin so i am out

  • RADICALIST on 24/04/2025 - 15:29

    I got Made in Aus uggs, they are tattered up and sole is well worn but they are still going strong after 5 constant winter wears.

  • McMaferMur on 24/04/2025 - 17:13
    +1

    Hmm… no more monthly $5 off for plus member? Or it wont stack

    • hamza23 on 24/04/2025 - 17:15
      +2

      It wouldn't stack regardless, can't apply 2 discount codes.

  • Ilikecars on 24/04/2025 - 18:31
    +1

    UGG since 1974 is the only brand we should support

    • beach bum on 24/04/2025 - 19:28
      +1

      Because they have had their name and design ripped off by everyone?
      This design has been around awhile if you think Eskimo or Russian ,
      deep snow type places and the name is probably more the issue, and some American company suing to force the original company that first used the synonymous name “Ugg” to limit their marketing and sales to inside Australia,
      as well as all the other rip off artists using the name.

      • Big L on 25/04/2025 - 22:35

        The US brand is the original UGG, they bought the trademark from an Australian.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGG_(brand)

        • haemolysis on 26/04/2025 - 00:41

          “Bought the trademark” and created or own the original design are not quite the same thing.

          So yes, “UGG Australia™” is the original owner of the brand “UGG™”, in some jurisdictions. lol.

          But what they filed for/bought/own is just a brand name (a US trademark) - it’s not the design itself (a patent), or even the word itself. Nobody owns the design itself, and nobody owns the word.

          It’s well recognised that people have made sheepskin booties, and even called them uggs, as a generic, non-trademarked, simple word prior to that brand slapping a trademark on in the USA.

          And mind you - I say “in the USA” because it is not recognised here at all. Aussie courts recognised that the phrase is generic/pre-existing, so have not allowed it to be patented. It’s like trying to trademark “spoon” or “bicycle.” It’s just a generic word. It’s been used since the 50s.

          • Big L on 26/04/2025 - 14:08

            @haemolysis: You obviously didn't read the post or know the background.

            An Australian who had made UGG boots before 1974 trademarked it. "In 1971, Shane Steadman registered the trademark UGH-BOOT on the Australian Trade Mark Registry, and obtained an Australian registration for UGH in 1982. These registrations remained valid in Australia until they got removed for non-use in 2006". Your effort to make it sound like a US trademark that is hurting the 'little Aussie battler' is the same bullshit claims by Eddie Oygur or Todd Watts that it's a 'moral' or unfair practice. Watts wasn't even born by 1974, FFS.

  • beach bum on 26/04/2025 - 00:31

    Ahh ok , I knew there was more to it.
    So why is everyone wanting to support the 1974 Ugg ?
    I can see the appeal in these things if you lived in Melbourne 20years ago.
    But it’s peak bogan wearing them in public now .
    Unless I missed the everything old is new again cycle.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join