[Vic] Toilet Replacement Program - $100 Rebate - up to 48% off (Incl Installation)

Related Stores

dualflush.com.au

• 

  LolwutMikka on 17/12/2013 - 15:04

  Make way for all the shitty comments

  • 

    Vortex99 on 17/12/2013 - 15:07

    +1

    Don't pooh-pooh the deal

    • 

      nafe on 17/12/2013 - 15:20

      +1

      Stop taking the piss…

      • 

        cuteseal on 17/12/2013 - 15:42

        Otherwise it'll all go down the drain…

      • 

        Vortex99 on 17/12/2013 - 15:44

        +8

        Why is Star Trek like Toilet paper? They both orbit Uranus searching for Klingons

      • 

        giggles on 17/12/2013 - 17:55

        +1

        that joke was crap

• 

  strangeloops66 on 17/12/2013 - 15:12

  -1

  You guys are driving me around the bend. Bet you're flushed with success.

• 

  [Deactivated] on 17/12/2013 - 15:13

  +5

  This program started 18ths ago. You don't have to use this company.
  http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/water/saving-water/water-rebate-p…

  Lots of other rebates here too
  http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/water/saving-water/water-rebate-p…

  • 

    Hunter80 on 17/12/2013 - 15:22

    +1

    Any other cheaper company?

  • 

    peeweekathi on 17/12/2013 - 16:18

    Thanks! Never knew about this and now I can get dear, old mum some rebates :)

• 

  John Dough on 17/12/2013 - 15:15

  +6

  So, you pay money to use less water, and your bill doesn't drop by more than a few dollars as the water companies charge super high 'Service Fees'.
  Actual water usage savings doesn't mean crap for customers except to feel good about doing something for the environment.

  By using less water, you are saving the water company money.

  If they were serious about trying to get people to cut back on water usage, they would apply a sliding scale of usage fees. i.e use 50% less water than a set amount (i.e Average usage for household), pay 25% less for your 'Service Fee'.

  • 

    wisc on 17/12/2013 - 19:33

    +1

    doesn't that favour singles or DINKS?

    • 

      4wd on 17/12/2013 - 21:26

      +1

      It favours all those that wish to save water.

• 

  xfiledavid on 17/12/2013 - 15:21

  +3

  i hold on until im at work,
  so basically i get paid to shit..

  • 

    PlagueistheCheap on 17/12/2013 - 15:30

    +3

    You work in HR?

    • 

      subtorrent on 17/12/2013 - 15:47

      Works for a bank

    • 

      cozmo on 17/12/2013 - 15:47

      +2

      They only talk it… that's about all they do actually.

  • 

    marcusv on 17/12/2013 - 15:59

    +1

    by the kg?

  • 

    daydream on 17/12/2013 - 16:50

    Senior management ;-)

• 

  troyww on 17/12/2013 - 15:54

  +3

  These toilets don't always save any water due to the fact you have to often flush twice . The problem is worse in older homes with clay pipes as you need more water to flush the pipes out .

  • 

    thushan on 17/12/2013 - 16:51

    sounds like they're taking the piss out of us with a shitty deal! I'd flush this down the toilet!

  • 

    llama on 17/12/2013 - 22:36

    What a load of bullshit.

    The problem is worse in older homes with clay pipes as you need more water to flush the pipes out

    You only flush to remove your "stuff" from the bowl. Gravity takes care of moving along the pipes.

    You certainly never need to worry about "flushing the pipes out".

• 

  shmahoo on 17/12/2013 - 16:55

  This is a crap deal.

  I wipe my hands of the lot of you.

  OK, that's first and second bad pun, so I'll finish with a turd one as well.

• 

  daydream on 17/12/2013 - 17:08

  Rather than throw out perfectly good toilets (and spend the associated with replacing them) the government should just encourage this: http://www.wikihow.com/Convert-Any-Toilet-to-a-Low-Flush-Toi…

  Or if they feel the need to spend more of our money just subsidise a local product like these being fitted: http://aquaclicwatersaving.com.au/toilet-stop

  The $500+ on each replacement would cover a lot of water flushed with the old toilet!

  You can check your toilet water efficiency here: https://apps5a.ris.environment.gov.au/wels-public/search-pro…

  • 

    outlander on 17/12/2013 - 18:41

    +1

    Mmmm not quite. Theres a fair bit of design that goes on with toilets to make them water efficient. Not just reducing flush volume, the ball is also smaller, and the way the water is directed is better. A normal toilet using less water means the poo just comes back up when you're not looking.

    Course if they were serious, they would be promoting squat toilets. More hygenic, more effective for the user, doesn't put as much stress on the body, and is very efficient water wise. Try selling that to joe public, and they'll close the door as soon as they hear the word squat. 'bout as easy as promoting vegetables to nobility in the medieval period.

    • 

      troyww on 20/12/2013 - 08:39

      Thats because the only experience Aussies have had with squat toilets are the filthy public toilets throughout asia . Certainly enough to put me off .

• 

  dissin on 17/12/2013 - 19:22

  Shit hot deal!!!!

• 

  Wallyt99 on 17/12/2013 - 19:23

  This is for the forums - particularly as single flush toilets would need to be about 30 years old - and most 30 year old toilets would have packed it in by now.

  • 

    nafe on 18/12/2013 - 09:47

    Not true, still have the original toilet in our place built in the 50s and works fine. Unfortunately we missed out on the NSW toilet replacement deal.