This was posted 5 years 9 months 10 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[Amazon Prime] Julius Marlow Hunter Tan & Black $59.98 (Was $149.95) @ Amazon AU

620
[Amazon Prime] Julius Marlow Hunter Tan & Black $59.98 (Was $149.95) @ Amazon AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
neilpatrickharris on 16/07/2018 - 18:28 amazon.com.au (7639 clicks)
Last edited 16/07/2018 - 19:41 by 1 other user
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

The heritage Julius Marlow Crystal Sole collection is a must have wardrobe essentials. A pure rubber sole provides superior underfoot grip and traction while a padded removable footbed ensures underfoot comfort, and allows for orthotics. Better yet, these shoes are metal free which means you don't need to remove your them at the Airport!

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
This is part of Amazon Prime Day sale for 2018
Fashion & Apparel Amazon Prime Day Dress Shoes Footwear Julius Marlow

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • batrarobin on 16/07/2018 - 18:29

    Showing $149.95 to me.

    • stockastics on 16/07/2018 - 18:30

      sign up to prime

    • urbancartel on 16/07/2018 - 18:35
      +2

      Select a size and price adjusts accordingly

      Black also same price

    • supersabroso on 16/07/2018 - 23:04

      Select a size, it'll drop when you do. I was about to buy this until I read the reviews. Forget about it.

  • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 18:36

    Available in black as well. Keep in mind it's showing the wrong EU size in cart (at least for AU 12, it's showing EU 45), and I'm getting mixed results from Amazon Global Support.

    • Lysander on 16/07/2018 - 18:46

      Well, the Air Jordan I got a long time ago were a 12 US and a 45 EU so in my experience this is actually correct.

      • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 19:53
        +2

        You're right: a US 12 is an EU 45… for women.

        • Lysander on 16/07/2018 - 21:25

          Sorry, my original Air Jordan say differently.

          Have a look:

          https://www.candefashions.com/about/shoe-size-conversion-cha…

          Man or woman enough to admit you are wrong and apologise? ;-)

        • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 21:33

          @Lysander: I take your point regarding the reference chart supplied, but we've all just read 3 other charts with 3 different answers.

          I'm an EU 46.5-47.5, and I'm an AU 12 (approximately 30 cm foot). If I put on a pair of EU 45s, I'm going to start binding my toes.

        • Lysander on 16/07/2018 - 21:57
          +3

          @jasswolf:

          I consult with a medical grade footwear business and am well aware that there is no uniform sizing. Best to go by actual centimetre measurements and disregard the sizing number.
          However, the majority of the shoes in that business do conform to the sizing chart I referenced.

          Keep in mind that older shoes and older brands liken AU sizing to UK sizing which is incorrect these days.
          Other brands have different number for US sizing, AUS sizing, and UK sizing. Also incorrect.

          These days AU sizing is US sizing. UK sizing is typically 1 - 1.5 sizes less.

    • Sharp on 16/07/2018 - 18:52

      Amazon size chart seems wrong. I wear EU44 or AU9.5 or US10.5.

      https://www.finder.com.au/shoe-size-conversion-guide

      • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 19:51
        +1

        The size chart's right, it just defaults to the women's tab on the page that comes up. ;)

    • Yrav on 16/07/2018 - 19:22

      I noticed the same thing. Will the deliver the EU size or selected AU size?

      • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 19:52
        +1

        Customer support were zero help with this. It's free returns though, so just organise an exchange.

        One of them suggested I get both and return one…

        • Yrav on 16/07/2018 - 20:01

          Cool thanks for that.

      • smoothymcmellow on 24/07/2018 - 10:01

        They sent the EU size, I ordered a 9.5AU, got sent an 8.5, can't exchange only refund

  • PJC on 16/07/2018 - 19:14
    +1

    If I didn't already have a pair of shoes …

  • JohJoh on 16/07/2018 - 19:18
    +4

    Julius Marlow shoe size chart: https://juliusmarlow.com.au/sizechart

    It seems Amazon is mistakenly selecting items 2 sizes down. E.g. Select 9.5AU -> EU42/43 in cart (should be 43/44 per above chart)

    • drongodave on 19/07/2018 - 23:36

      I just noticed your comment. Looks like I was impacted by this. The shoes I received were not the size I selected. Looks like I'll be sending them back…

    • smoothymcmellow on 24/07/2018 - 09:56

      I got hit with this too, 8.5 arrived after ordering 9.5AU, customer service won't replace only refund and now the right size is unavailable.

      Stupid system

  • nomekop on 16/07/2018 - 19:22
    +1

    no more size 7

  • CharityCase on 16/07/2018 - 19:25

    How does this compare to Hush puppies?

    • ujwols on 16/07/2018 - 19:34
      +1

      inferior

    • jasswolf on 16/07/2018 - 20:03
      +2

      For style? Typically better.
      Construction? Marginal.
      Sole? Sameish.
      Comfort? Worse, but not awful.

  • Tregetour on 16/07/2018 - 19:34

    Thanks! I was wondering whether i'd get any value out of an Aussie Prime membership right up until I jumped on my computer at work today. Parcels incoming (inc these shoes just as my current ones gave out).

  • BargainKen on 16/07/2018 - 20:07

    Cost co has these for $70 if I recall

    • xuqi on 16/07/2018 - 21:33
      +4

      Given their quality even $70 is too much to pay for this brand.

  • DEvok on 16/07/2018 - 20:29

    How are these compared to hush puppies as I need new pair for work after two years of usage?

    • xuqi on 16/07/2018 - 21:31
      +4

      JM make shite products that wear out far too easily.

      I'm the same with Hush Puppies and can easily wear them for ~2 years.

      The Two times I tried JM shoes, both needed replacing within 6 months, looking far worse than my worn out HP's.

      • montorola on 16/07/2018 - 21:45

        How's the heels on your hush puppies? Do you wear them everyday?

        • xuqi on 16/07/2018 - 22:10
          +2

          I wear them 5-6 days a week. The hush puppies soles last for the duration I use them. They normally wear out within 22-24 months of use for me.

          With JM's not only does the sole/heel wear away, the upper leather portion looked far worse for wear. Weird crinks/cracks were quite visible within 6 months of use.

        • montorola on 16/07/2018 - 22:23

          @xuqi:

          Great thanks for your input, I'll look at hush puppies instead

        • butwhy on 17/07/2018 - 07:12

          @xuqi:
          Totally agree. "Leather" is hopeless. Cracks very easily with minimal use

  • docians on 16/07/2018 - 21:26

    not a lot of love on product review
    https://www.productreview.com.au/p/julius-marlow.html

    honestly I would spend a bit more to get a better pair if these are expected to last 6 months or less

    • Dave1988 on 17/07/2018 - 10:17

      Hush puppies upheld in comments above also don't have good ratings on ProductReview.com
      https://www.productreview.com.au/p/hush-puppies.html
      I am confused here, I have ordered one anyway, If I don't like will return them.

      • docians on 17/07/2018 - 14:11
        +1

        there is a reason why people have moved on from Hush Puppies/ Clarks/ Florsheims etc

        You could get a pair of decent Asian made Good Year welted pair of leather shoes, for around the $150 mark, or Portugese made Blake constructed shoes for a bit less

        Took me many years (and many pairs) to spend a bit more :)

        I thought I was being extravagant when I bought my first pair of Herrings shoes costing $300, only to find out they are 'entry level shoes', similar to the Loakes

  • Tgb on 16/07/2018 - 21:27

    Also the 'Honest' are available in black for the same price: https://www.amazon.com.au/Julius-Marlow-Honest-Fashion-Shoes…

  • Jared17 on 16/07/2018 - 21:45

    Could you get them cheaper during their Christmas sales?

  • frostman on 16/07/2018 - 21:49

    pig leather

    • Sharp on 16/07/2018 - 22:17

      How do you know?

  • Kranbone on 17/07/2018 - 00:19

    Always says unavailable for me regardless of size. I wonder how they compare to florsheim.

    • Chthonic on 17/07/2018 - 07:03

      Florsheim are way, way better.

      Style, build quality, comfort are superior to JM. I own about 4 different pairs as well as a pair of imperials and CT shoes / Aquila’s. Just don’t opt for florsheims cheaper child brand “Stacy Adams’.

      Hope this helps.

      • docians on 17/07/2018 - 14:12

        which CT shoes did you try
        the Asian made lower priced ones
        or the British made higher priced ones?

  • Gracey on 17/07/2018 - 08:14

    The black is still available in 10 and 10.5 if anyone wants them
    EDIT: Also the tan in 12

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join