This was posted 2 years 10 months 17 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

LG 8K LED ThinQ AI TV 75" (190cm) 75NANO95 $3300 + Delivery @ Myer

270
LG 8K LED ThinQ AI TV 75" (190cm) 75NANO95 $3300 + Delivery @ Myer
Go to Deal
Cashback
Moostyle on 02/06/2021 - 05:39 myer.com.au (523 clicks)
Last edited 01/07/2021 - 20:14 by 1 other user

Not sure if this will be of use to anyone but saw this deal on Myers while searching for tv deals.

Real 8K NanoCell™: NANO Colour, NANO Black, NANO Bezel​
Alpha 9 Gen3 AI Processor 8K: AI Picture Pro, AI Sound Pro, AI 8K Upscaling
ThinQ AI, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, Apple Airplay 2, Apple HomeKit, Home Dashboard
Home Cinema Experience: Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, FILMMAKER MODE™
A World of Entertainment: Netflix, Apple TV, Disney+, Stan, Amazon Prime, Optus Sport, HGiG, Sports Alert​

For me, delivery came to $75 for inner Sydney.

EDITED:
- Possible price match with Harvey Norman as theirs includes delivery and wall mount installation
- $4670 https://www.harveynorman.com.au/lg-75-inch-nano95-8k-nanocel…

Electrical & Electronics 75inch 8k UHD TV LG UHD TV

Related Stores

MYER
MYER

closed Comments

  • chrism238 on 02/06/2021 - 05:51
    +29

    I know nothing about this model, but a 75inch 8K TV from a well-regarded manufacturer for $3300 (down from $5500) seems an absolute steal!
    (though beware it's on clearance, which reduces opportunities to return it)

    • chrism238 on 02/06/2021 - 06:48
      +6

      What, why would my comment be downvoted!?

      • summit on 02/06/2021 - 06:52
        +10

        was wondering the same thing, take a +!

      • smartazz104 on 02/06/2021 - 10:54
        -1

        People are stupid.

    • eggaz on 02/06/2021 - 08:23
      +1

      Wow strange that it was down voted by so many, have an up vote.

    • giventofly on 02/06/2021 - 09:19

      I actually came to the comments to see if it was a typo lol - pretty great deal

  • Bippz01 on 02/06/2021 - 06:10

    Would be a great deal if HN price match and include wall mount and delivery.

  • Watanabe1995 on 02/06/2021 - 07:42

    No local stock, can delivery or collect from store.

    https://www.t3.com/features/best-8k-tv
    REASONS TO BUY
    +Tons of 8K detail for less
    +All of LG's top-end processing
    +Great webOS software
    REASONS TO AVOID
    -Not as bright as higher-end 8K sets

    Also low contrast ratio I guess.

    Still a very good 8k tv at this price point.

    • zductiv on 03/06/2021 - 17:58

      +Great webOS software

      Eh. A cheap android box is better than anything I've ever used on a smart tv.

      We bought a 55" LG OLED when it just came out and it stopped receiving updates like a year after it was released.

  • nickm on 02/06/2021 - 08:01
    +1

    Can't find an rtings review but the NANO99 which I assume is a higher spec'd model comes off as a bit average

    • drycleanonly on 02/06/2021 - 08:46

      Seems like the NANO99 and NANO95 might be the same. Rtings are also confused though…

      "There's an LG NANO97 variant in North America and an LG NANO95 model in Europe that appear to be similar TVs, but aren't compatible with LG's Gallery Flush wall-mount, and they look more like the LG NANO90. However, we don't know for sure how they perform since we haven't tested them."

  • Xizor on 02/06/2021 - 08:16
    +3

    Glorified photo / personal video wall. 8K TV, really. We barely have decent amount of 4K content. Imagine how crap a lot of content upscaled on this would be. As a TV, it's an awful choice today. Quite fringe actual "good" use cases for it.

  • ifreddo on 02/06/2021 - 08:17
    -2

    These TVs receive a lot of flak, but I saw one in store recently and I gotta say apart from being not as bright as the other TVs, it looked stunning. For the average consumer who just wants to future proof with an 8k tv, this is a good deal.

    • Xizor on 02/06/2021 - 08:25
      -1

      The average consumer watches a lot of broadcast media…. so why would anyone want SD and HD to have to be upscaled to 8K so it looks even worse. The best AI algorithms struggle to make it look decent at 4K as is. This thing would probably be dead before there is any noteworthy 8K content.

      • ifreddo on 02/06/2021 - 08:29
        -2

        You make a lot of assumptions in your post. It's average consumers who are most likely going to buy into 8k for peace of mind about future proofing. That's all.

        • Xizor on 02/06/2021 - 08:44
          -1

          No more than you have by stating it's a good deal for an average consumer when there is a strong argument it actually degrades their viewing experience in broadcast media use cases.

          Someone being hoodwinked by sales/marketing propaganda, and it actually being a good choice (you know, of actual benefit), are very different things. Anywho, i'll leave it at that. Honestly the matter speaks for itself.

          • ifreddo on 02/06/2021 - 08:53

            @Xizor: Someone's knickers are in a knot early on a Wednesday morning!

            I'm not saying that consumers SHOULD buy an 8k television. I am simply stating that it's average consumers who are buying into 8k televisions. I can guarantee you that average consumers don't give a hoot about the issues you're listing.

            So if you're going to reply, please stay on topic. Might be time to take a break from the interwebs if you're struggling to follow along.

        • QuickdraW on 02/06/2021 - 09:08

          Any consumer would be better off focusing on making current content look as good as possible.

        • Trishool on 04/06/2021 - 16:43

          Not me, Im with Xizor.

          I still watch content that was created in SD,HD,FHD, so that content being upscaled to 4K wont be great, upscaling it further to 8K is going to be worse.

          This isnt a great investment at this time. I'd rather get a smashing new LG 65" C1 OLED for around a similar price point than this.

    • Boogerman on 02/06/2021 - 09:25

      This tv doesn’t future proof. It’s far too small for 8K

  • cdkane on 02/06/2021 - 08:47

    Have this TV and it’s a good deal for that price, but for dark room viewing it’s pretty average as the local dimming feature is poor. As far as 8k is concerned there are a handful of videos on YouTube currently and that’s about it.

    Also a warning to gamers whilst this is an HDMI 2.1 tv the panel itself if 60hz. It will accept 120hz signals however what is actually happening on screen is a 60hz refresh rate.

    • drinkin-beer on 02/06/2021 - 08:56
      +1

      how do you test what is actually happening on the screen vs what it is accepting? I thought if you could select 120hz on the PC end, it was supported?

  • cdkane on 02/06/2021 - 09:01
    +1

    https://testufo.com/ is a good place to start. It will show 120hz, but you will see that it is actually refreshing the same as the 60hz picture.

    I used that and also compared it to my oled that does have a 120hz panel and you are able to tell the difference when doing this test/playing games etc.

    LG Australia are a little dicey with the marketing too as the only indication that it gives is “trumotion100” which is the 50hz/60hz soap opera setting but if you look at LG UK for example they show this model as having a 50hz/60hz panel.

  • Boogerman on 02/06/2021 - 09:27

    8K is a gimmick, but ignorant people will buy it & there’s hundreds of millions of them.
    At such a small size, you wouldn’t be able to pick the difference from 4K

    • askbargain on 02/06/2021 - 11:18
      +2

      That’s what people said for 1080p and 4K.

      • Boogerman on 02/06/2021 - 12:31

        Because they don’t understand the technicalities

    • asa79 on 03/06/2021 - 06:37
      -1

      If you can't pick it up that might be your eyes that is the issue. I can see a huge difference in my Samsung 4k 43" over the old LG 1080p 43"

      • Boogerman on 03/06/2021 - 06:59

        False equivalence. 2K to 4K jump does not equal 4K to 8K jump

        • asa79 on 03/06/2021 - 07:00
          -1

          So your saying it does make a different now?

          • Boogerman on 03/06/2021 - 07:02

            @asa79: The objective testing using 20/20 vision confirms what I already knew - 8K is a gimmick.

            • asa79 on 03/06/2021 - 07:03
              -2

              @Boogerman: so your saying higher res and cleaner picture is a gimmick?

              • Boogerman on 03/06/2021 - 07:05

                @asa79: High res - Law of diminishing marginal returns
                Don’t conflate with display type

              • Trishool on 04/06/2021 - 16:45
                -1

                @asa79: Higher resolution it may have, if you have content to display at that resolution. At the moment, the lack of content is the key missing piece of the equation, thus making it a gimmick.

                • asa79 on 04/06/2021 - 22:36
                  -1

                  @Trishool: so no 4k content to upscale like they did with 1080p to 4k?

                  • Trishool on 05/06/2021 - 00:11
                    -1

                    @asa79: Sure, but whats the point? Isnt it better to buy an 8K TV when there is actual 8K content rather than having to pretend like you have 8K content through AI upscaling (which can be hit and miss anyway)?

                    • asa79 on 05/06/2021 - 00:12
                      -1

                      @Trishool: res, its like my 28" 4K monitor, everything just looks better on it

                      • Trishool on 05/06/2021 - 00:14
                        -1

                        @asa79: But thats a 28" 4K panel compared to the same amount of pixels spread out on a much larger panel. You could get away with upscaling content on a smaller screen compared to a larger screen where upscaling issues are much more visible.

                        • asa79 on 05/06/2021 - 00:15
                          +1

                          @Trishool: better res doesnt interest you, you already made that point, but others it would

                          • Trishool on 05/06/2021 - 12:44
                            -1

                            @asa79: Nice assumption there sunshine.

                • Boogerman on 05/06/2021 - 14:35

                  @Trishool: Higher resolution is pointless if the display is not big enough
                  If you sit just 2 metres away from the tv, you need at least a 110” tv to justify it
                  https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-r…

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join