This was posted 2 years 6 months 12 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

[NSW] Double Vaccinated Customers Receive A Free $20 Table 2164 Voucher @ Smithfield RSL

1700

How to get it: *must show ID, Medicare Card and Vaccination certificate to receive a Free Meal Voucher
Table 2164 is also ready to accept your dine and discover vouchers – 7DAYS a week Lunch and Dinner!

DOUBLE JABBED?
Smithfield RSL is giving away
$30,000 worth of vouchers

SIMPLE WALK IN
Receive A Free $20
TABLE 2164 VOUCHER

Related Stores

Smithfield RSL
Smithfield RSL

closed Comments

    • +7

      …. He was only nineteen…

    • +5

      Nobody wants to see that

      • +2

        Lol but it’s contagious mate, are you are you sure you want to know about anything other than COVID?

    • +2

      Can I also show the rash around my groin region for diagnosis?

      that just proves you've been locked at home by yourself for too long…

    • No, you need to go to a doctor about your STI.

      • -2

        For those who took my comment literally….shame lol

        • Just looking out for a fellow OzBargainer, syphilis can be quite serious if left untreated. I'm glad you know that the RSL can't help. I hope you get it sorted quickly.

          • -3

            @Miss B: I just won Powerball last night. I'm good

            • +3

              @Danstar: Powerball win, and still surfing OzBargain? 🤣🤣

              • -3

                @Iwantthatbargain: My point exactly 🙄

                Do you just believe everything you read or
                Hear as fact instantly ?

              • +2

                @Iwantthatbargain: I’d still surf ozbargain if I won the lotto fyi. I’m addicted to no longer paying rrp

    • -5

      Agree

    • +26

      but short dated biscuits were worthy of your bargain approval?
      https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/655732

      If you live in this area, its essentially a free meal for the first 1500 people.

    • -1

      $20 off for being a reasonable, responsible citizen is pretty good!

    • +3

      Just another typical invalid negs

    • Sorry to burst your little bubble but ALL deals are pretty much advertisements.

      • +11

        Loved watching the PrOtEsTeRs getting herded through the streets

        • Loved watching the normies herding into the clinics

    • +4

      show us a peer reviewed study on heart problem.

      • -8

        do some homework, you will get it.

        • +12

          you don't come across as someone proficient in homework…

        • +2

          I don’t have a research centre at home for “homework”, do you?

        • there is none that shows significant adverse reaction.

          I am not talking about interviews and videos. A lot of the interviews I have seen talk about studies that do not exist, are exagerrated or not peer reviewed.

          I have also read all the journal articles on ivermectin. they are done in countries like Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan, Peru etc.

          if this was not a covid vaccine but a cancer treatment drug, most people will not 100% believe those studies.

          And the worst thing is that they combine all the data of those studies and make the population a larger number.

      • +6

        Majority of people are fine, but to deny the side affects is just as bad.

        • +4

          So true.

          Incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism post-vaccination is approx 1 in 400,000.

          Incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism post-COVID19 infection is approx 1 in 12,000.

          Science>facebook…

          • @UncleRico: I think myocarditis risk is similar to what you said as well

    • +5

      you don't have to get a deep fried meal choice..
      im sure they would let you pick a salad with your $20 voucher…

      as thats the only thing in this deal that would relate to your comment.

    • +8

      Walk into the The Alfred ICU and see how many people are dying on a ventilator and aren't vaccinated - it's about 90% of them. I can assure you their hearts are failing and they have over a hundred-fold risk of DVTs and PEs, which increases every day they're immobilised on a breathing machine with an absolute storm of inflammatory molecules floating around.

      Please get vaccinated.

      • +1

        You kind of have to thank the anti vax movement for informing the community of vaccination benefits (strange but true). The anti vax created so much hesitancy and the vax rate was so low that when the wave hit (VIC then NSW then back to VIC) it gave everyone a massive kick in the arse and most people woke up.

        Taking the morals out of the argument, the covid wave created a huge demand and got NSW into the 80% range in record time, probably better than any advertising campagine the gov could create.

        The martyers of anti vax saved so many old people I know, who were hesitant.

        Most people can see the Cause and Effect when they see the number of deaths in vax and unvaxed reported on TV each night.

        And hey… 5G coverage is so much better now.

      • +2

        In Victoria, there is 21,324 active cases, 157 in ICU. That is less than 1% of people in ICU who actively have the virus……….

        • +2

          good luck to them, hope the 157 pull through

          • @tonsta: If the TGA didn't block the available treatments they probably would.

        • +3

          That is not even close to my point - of those 157, approximately 90% aren't fully vaccinated (80% totally unvaccinated). Also 'just' 1% - the mortality once you are admitted to ICU and ventilated (increases with age of course) is staggering.

        • So the effect is only severe if they're in ICU? Lol…it's not a binary thing.

          • +2

            @raptormesh: By definition severe COVID is if you're admitted to ICU …

            • @Griefbringer: It's severe if you're admitted to hospital, not exclusively ICU

              • @buckster: I'd probably disagree. The NIH stratifies it quite nicely, and most journals stratify outcomes as either preventing hospitalisations, or preventing serious disease (organ failure +/- respiratory support which of course would require ICU).
                People with moderate illness are still typically admitted to hospital, given they have evidence of hypoxaemia, chest findings indicative of infection/infiltrates, that can rapidly progress to severe life-threatening respiratory failure.

    • +1

      $20 not to be one of the daily statistics in hospital or dead.

    • +1

      C'mon, the food isn't that greasy.

    • +3

      Blood clotting is significantly more likely if you are infected with COVID-19.

    • -2

      People love to be lab rat and injecting so call vaccine that doesn't work properly. Liberal party should get investigated by ICAC to see how much kickbacks they are getting per these vaccine.

      • +4

        There's been over 2.5 billion vaccine doses administered globally - how is it untested?

        • +4

          Damn that Australian Liberal Party!

          Because, because, some guy on Facebook said so, dammit!

        • -1

          2.5 billion people are the tests…

          Analysis: TBD

    • @CoreJava "$20 for blood clot and heart problem, no thanks."

      In defense of the deal, it's also a pretty good initiative in support of the concept of Darwinism.

      Whatever you do, do not take the vaccine…

  • +30

    love how anti vaxxers swarm posts like these

    • +4

      The discrimination against troglodyte's never ends :(

      • I am more worried about the deal getting expired or ozbargained by the time I get there.

    • It's their evangelical zeal.

    • -6

      Or how sheep swarm to neg vote them?

      • oh i am confused, i thought sheep was the source of credible evidence (as that is usually the reply when asked for it).. i can not confirm or deny that sheep are indeed the source until NZ and AU opens their borders,

    • +10

      Vocal minority that like to feel smart (because they ain't).

  • +2

    The lovely receptionist let my mum and i grab another voucher.

  • This reminds me of when I was anti AMEX deals and the admin/mods suspended me for a few days except the anti-vaxxers will be allowed to run wild over this thread while we watch the daily covid death count creep up.

    • +3

      Simple solution, comments should be turned off on such deals. Stop the spread of misinformation by tin hatters in its roots.

      • What if we allowed comments only to vaccinated users by checking their passport. That way the pages won't be cluttered with nonsense.

    • -7

      LOL. Death count creep up…Mate, we've have years where Australia has had hundreds if not thousands of death caused by the flu. We never got told to not leave our homes after 9pm or go beyond 5kms of your home for shopping or exercise

      • +8

        What exactly is your point?

        You're trying to correlate public health measures for a highly infectious, high mortality virus, to a pre-existing illness that is … relatively controlled with yearly vaccination, hand hygiene and staying home when sick? The death rate for influenza would diminish if people followed these measures pre-COVID anyway - we've had less than 20% of influenza cases this year because of the above measures.

        So if you're trying to say that a pre-existing virus causes death and severe illness, you're right. If you're trying to correlate public health measures as not working, to a pre-existing virus that does in fact get controlled with those measures, you have no idea what you're talking about.

        • If you're trying to correlate public health measures as not working

          Lockdowns?
          Curfew?
          School closures?
          Business closures?

          All were enforced when Victoria had < 10 cases. How’d those measures help?

          I’ll assume your next comment would be because people didnt follow the rules or if we didn’t ha e those measures, infections would be even higher

          • +4

            @Danstar: I mean your initial comment was regarding how we shouldn't take COVID-19 seriously because we already had a yearly Influenza problem. Clearly my discussion on that was sufficient for you to shift your goalposts to the (apparent) lack of efficacy of strict public health law.

            I absolutely will say that further spread was due to people's movement, and without strict public health measures infections would have rocketed. Look at our colleagues in America, the UK, Germany, at the peak of their pandemics. Presumably you follow sources of news that continue to feed your narrative, rather than publications from internationally-based State-wide adult and paediatric ICU services where daily bed allocations are exhausted, ECMO/life support is turned off at day 14 regardless of pre-existing health, due to the overwhelming number of cases and requirement for limited resources, equipment, and staffing.

      • Thanks for putting it in perspective; I can't be bothered looking - can you tell me a year when Australia has had thousands of death caused by the flu? It seems to be common knowledge and I feel so uninformed.

        Genuinely keen to feel where you are coming from.

        • Interestingly the National report this year identifies how skewed Influenza data is because of such significant (and effective) public health measures. Worth a read.

          https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/979E8B6641AD7D10CA2586E20024F83B/$File/flu-04-2021.pdf

          From the 2010 report a 'typical' moderate year:
          Australian Bureau of Statistics death data
          Influenza and pneumonia (ICD-10 codes J09–J18)[5]were noted as the underlying cause of death for 2,364 persons in 2010 (1.6% of all deaths), of which 56% (n=1,324) were female.[3]The rate of influenza and pneumonia deaths was 8.8 per 100,000 deaths. The standardised death rate was higher in males, with 10.4 per 100,000 deaths, compared to females at 7.8 per 100,000 deaths

        • 1919 - over 15,000. Must be something about the number 19 - 2019 was the second worst year on record, with 800 deaths. 800 < 1000

    • +5

      If I am not able to cope with virus in this world, I am not worthy for living.

      So you are saying people should never take medication for any disease? If they can’t cope they should die?

      • -2

        No he is saying that the risk of catching covid and having any serious side affects is of less concern then putting a vaccine in his body….

        • -1

          Read their quote in my comment and try again.

          • -2

            @Pricebeat: Not wanting a newly developed vaccine injected into you doesn't make someone an anti-vaxxer or anti-medicine….

            • @Danstar: I never mentioned anything about antivaxxer in my above comment

          • -6

            @Pricebeat: Look up Dr Kary B. Mullis' view of the PCR-RT test.
            Look up Humetrix
            Look up Nick Karl and other Pfizer scientists admit natural immunity provides more protection than their vaccine
            Look up immunologist J.Bart Classen
            Look up the Great Barrington Declaration
            Look up the Rome Declaration
            Look up Dr. Rochagné Kilian
            Look up Dr. Mike Yeadon

            Why is it after two years you never see on the MSM any debates or interviews with professional medicos who don't want the vaccine discussing the reasons why not; nobody interviews demonstrators; the press questions to the politicians and medical spokespeople at the daily press meetings consist of pushing the vaccine and never talk about the deaths and injuries it is causing; any other treatments are poo-hoo'd and dismissed as crank remedies (when they are proven to be beneficial and have been in use for decades) because these vaccines would then loose their emergency use authority.

            The vaccine is experimental regardless of what we are told about it being safe.
            NOBODY knows their long term effects whether good or bad.

            • @alidli: Come on jabsbara, only one downvote in 3 minutes

            • +1

              @alidli: what I have learned during this debate is that all the information provided are all videos. None of them come with clinical scientific peer review studies.

              and the same people reject any clinical scientific peer review studies that does not support their belief.

    • +1

      Maybe because you rely on the rest of us to protect you, why so weak? That said, there's a certain subreddit awaiting for you to grace its pages. I'd look forward to similar deals in my area eventually.

    • +2

      I am just believe in myself and my immune system

      I was unaware a lack of belief was why people suffered from diseases.
      You should put out a self help book

      If I am not able to cope with virus in this world, I am not worthy for living

      Until you actually need any form of medical assistance and then you (like most covid deniers) will be front of line asking doctors for medicine and assistance.
      You're telling me if you got diagnosed with cancer tomorrow you'd just say "oh well, guess i wasnt worthy"

    • +4

      I feel like I've read this exact message from one of the pictures on /r/hermancainaward. They trusted their immune system right to the grave.

    • +2

      Happy as long as you don't spread the infection more than the vaxed people and don't rely on our health system so these can be used for people who actually need them.

      But interesting you believe so much of your immune system, you don't think your immune system can handle the vaccine which is obviously weaker than the actual covid.

    • Wow look everyone we have another hero who thinks his immune system is strong.

      You are obviously not educated enough to understand how immune systems work, finish school first before you make another stupid comment like that.

      Think you're a hero, but you ALL fold like cowards flee to the hospital when you get Covid.

  • +3

    What is table 2164?

    • +1

      Name of Smithfield RSL Restuarant

      OUR STORY
      This fresh eating establishment will tantalize your tastebuds with all your bistro favorites and more. The menu is full and varied and offers everything from sumptuous steaks and succulent schnitzels to perfect pizzas and brilliant burgers. Don’t miss our weekly club specials that start at just $15 for members. Menu items include our classic roasts of the day, Crispy Fish & Chips, Pizzas, Steak and much more. Weekly club meals are available Monday to Friday lunch and dinner.

      Our breakfast menu is equally delicious and features the ever popular smashed avo, poached eggs and bacon. Or why not try a slice of toasted banana bread with a hot cup of coffee.

      There’s something for all the family and kids are looked after with an exciting menu as well as our Krazy Kids Playland that is right next door.

      Table is the perfect restaurant for family and friend’s gatherings. Table 2164 is open for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner seven days a week.
      https://smithfieldrsl.com.au/dining/table-2164/

    • +8

      I assume 2164 is the postcode.
      Either that or the year they hope to have perfected the food.

      • +2

        Yes good pickup it is the postcode

      • +2

        Thought it was a dig at the number of covid cases in Vic ;)

  • +2

    I'm sure the voucher is to bring people back for pokies. I hate RSL clubs

    • +2

      The pokies subsidise the cheap food and entertainment and sports programs

      • Sport programs at clubs?

        • +3

          Yes they sponsor the local soccer, footy, chess, hockey sports teams etc The richer clubs even have fields and sportsgrounds

          • +2

            @[Deactivated]: Yeah, 100%.

            I used to work in a club doing some bookkeeping and banking (uni job) and frankly the pokies made plenty..but it was all money in and money out. The money out was to wages, invoices for local suppliers, footy expenses etc.

          • @[Deactivated]: Ah, so generous to take from gamblers and give it all to community. Did I say all? I'm sure it's like 1% of the poke revenue.

            • @orangetrain: You do know that all licensed club are not for profit, right?

              Where do you think the other supposed 99% of "poke revenue" goes?

              • @UncleRico: Consultancy fees of directors? https://www.emilford.com.au/charity-notforprofits/charity-no…

                https://theconversation.com/new-research-shows-pokie-operato…

                Are you saying they spend all their donations on charitable activities? They obviously need to maintain the club. I wonder how much the salaries are. Is this public?

                • @orangetrain: You think one case of fraud worth $200k is equal to - and evidence of the recipients of - 99% of gaming revenue? The average honorarium for directors of clubs is less than $50 a week. I can assure you that the average gaming clearance yields a little more than that…

                  And not withstanding the "new research" from 2012, every single cent of profit earned by licensed clubs is returned to members and communities - including the mandatory 2% of revenue which goes to funding the ClubGrants program.

Login or Join to leave a comment