This was posted 2 years 1 month 25 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[NSW] $500 Before & After School Care Vouchers @ Service NSW

280
[NSW] $500 Before & After School Care Vouchers @ Service NSW
Go to Deal
SmiTTy on 01/03/2022 - 23:11 service.nsw.gov.au (405 clicks)
Last edited 02/03/2022 - 19:23 by 1 other user
About the Voucher

Families with children aged 4 to 13 years that attend a primary school in NSW can receive a $500 voucher per child to reduce the out-of-pocket costs of before and after school care. This includes children who are starting kindergarten in 2022.

The before and after school care voucher program is one of more than 70 NSW Government rebates and savings that help with your cost of living.

Key dates
  • You can apply for a voucher from 28 February to 30 September 2022.
  • Eligible before and after school care providers can register for the program from 9 February to 30 September 2022.
  • Vouchers can be redeemed with a before and after school care provider from 28 February to 31 December 2022. Voucher credit can be used for services until 30 June 2023.

Other vouchers available to NSW residents:

Credit to @NGpriest for search site to check providers accepting vouchers:
https://nswdnd.ngpriest.com/index.php

Education Childcare Childcare Subsidy

Related Stores

NSW Government
NSW Government

closed Comments

  • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:35
    +1

    Before & After School Care Vouchers

    What about 'During' ?

  • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:36

    aged 4 to 13 years that attend a primary school in NSW

    13 at primary school ?????

    My 12yo is in year 8….

    jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:36 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
    • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:38
      -1

      Wow your child is so smart and other kids dumb.

      • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:38

        Where did I say that?

        I was discussing age…

        Do you know the difference ?

        • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:40

          Around the 5 question marks????? and 4 ….

  • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:37
    +3

    Can tell the Premier has a tonne of kids. How about removing the passenger levy on Uber. Subsidise public transport but tax passengers for using Ubers? How about reducing taxes and regulations on nightclubs so we can still have one or 2 in this state.

    • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:40
      -2

      How about removing the passenger levy on Uber.

      Why?

      • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:41
        +4

        Cost of living, lower car ownership and car park problems, lower drink driving, stimulate business, help those who have poor public transport. Isn’t a Liberal government supposed to lower taxes and regulations, not impose the, like crazy.

        • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:42
          -6

          So where will the money come from to pay for the taxi licences the government had cancelled?

          Are you going to pay for them all?

          • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:46

            @jv: Where does the money come from for buses, light rail, trains, etc. what about people who don’t live near stations or whose services suck…

            • CacheHunter on 02/03/2022 - 00:23
              -4

              @Emerald Owl: It doesn't need to. People that live away from public transport usually saved a lot on the price off their house/mortgage or rent.

              If someone is saving $100 a week on rent or paid $100,000 less to buy their home, then surely they can put some of those savings towards the odd Uber?

              • Emerald Owl on 02/03/2022 - 01:00
                +4

                @CacheHunter: Or maybe people are living in cheaper areas because they don’t make much money? There’s plenty of places in Sydney with medians over a million dollars that have crap/nonexistent public transport.

        • Ghosts on 01/03/2022 - 23:43
          -1

          🤦‍♂️

    • salmon123 on 01/03/2022 - 23:40
      +2

      Don't forget eScooters are still illegal in NSW.

      How about letting ubers in the bus lane or kicking taxis out of bus lanes? How about letting infants ride in ubers, the same way as taxis?

      • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:43

        How about letting ubers in the bus lane

        They are not buses.

        • Ghosts on 01/03/2022 - 23:44

          🤦‍♂️

      • jv on 01/03/2022 - 23:43
        -1

        How about letting infants ride in ubers

        I wouldn't trust an uber driver.

        • Ghosts on 01/03/2022 - 23:44

          🤦‍♂️

      • Emerald Owl on 01/03/2022 - 23:44
        +2

        Easily doable, even with the bus lane cameras, just record regos as rideshare.

        How about running only electric buses through George Street instead of the billion dollar years long fiasco. Public taxes pays for light rail yet ride share is taxed…

        • Ghosts on 01/03/2022 - 23:45
          -2

          🤦‍♂️

        • salmon123 on 01/03/2022 - 23:54
          +2

          How about running only electric buses through George Street instead of the billion dollar years long fiasco

          I'm surprised Andrew Constance has the balls to run for Federal Politics after this long list of failures.

  • [Deactivated] on 01/03/2022 - 23:48

    Is there bargains on kids? I need a couple I guess… aged 4 to 13 years

    • salmon123 on 02/03/2022 - 00:00
      -4

      Is there bargains on kids?

      The only time kids are a bargain is when you can sell them on the black market or harvest their organs … otherwise kids are generally a money pit.

      • m0usju1c3 on 02/03/2022 - 01:43
        +1

        Good thing your organs weren't harvested so you could enlighten us with your wisdom.

  • funnysht on 01/03/2022 - 23:51
    +9

    should be called "before and after election day" voucher

  • maverickseraph on 02/03/2022 - 11:04

    Lol, i smell desperation from a state goverment who lost a byelection and nearly lost 2 others. Why was this not offered last year?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join