Featuring a stylish timber base these chairs are idea for reception and waiting areas but also great around the fire place at home. Available in 2 colours.
We currently have over 30 in stock in brown also have over 70 in burnt orange colour, we delivery upto 30km from our warehouse for costing email store.
Material: Faux Leather
Store Location:
52 North View Drive, Sunshine West Vic 3020 - Mon-Fri: 7:30am - 4pm, Sat: 10am - 3pm
Define a bargain.
That’s it comrades, simp away for the second hand furniture dealer!
If you can't define it, how can you expect others to?
@magic8ballgag: I’m not asking anyone to define anything. I am (in fact) suggesting that this does not fit my definition of a bargain (if we all needed to preface every statement with ‘in my opinion’ the internet’d become even more tedious than it currently can be).
Further to that, any definition of bargain that does not stipulate the personal nature of what constitutes a bargain isn’t worth af, therefore it is enough for me to state this is no bargain without needing to preface it with ‘in my opinion’ given that is implicit in the definition of the term.
@0jay: No one called you any names when you shared your opinion, so why respond with that?
You're entitled to share your definiition of a bargain, but you should also be prepared to be questioned if it's baseless.
@magic8ballgag: Did I call you names?
I must be absolutely tripping balls, I can’t see evidence of that anywhere.
@magic8ballgag: This is demonstration of a word in its verb form.
A person can simp without being a simp as such (certainly without being described as such).
Admittedly I should've responded to my own root-post, wasn't actually meant to address you personally either.
@The Judge: I'm not, but since we're observing and pointing out each other's behaviour..
We've gone full circle!
@0jay: Your "reason" doesn't fit the rules for a deal neg. The item is a big discount on similar new chairs, the OP has stated the condition and age. Like every deal on this website the item/deal isn't for everyone.
@0jay: I didn't say so, the rules speak for themselves. Not that you'd know of course. Unfortunately, opinionated ignorance is a scourge of the 21st century
I didn’t say so
Actually, you just did.
Unmitigated assholery is the scourge (something you’re admirably demonstrating).
Your idea of ignorance is, I think it’s fair to bet, unlikely to be a gold standard.
Can you provide an example of a similar used chair for a cheaper price?
New price looks to be about $300. If they're in good nick $50 is a bargain. Lol at the photos. Chair just wiped over and couldn't wait until it dried.
Since when does OzB regard RRP as primary ref point?
Did I say it was RRP? Do your own research, preferably before commenting about something you obviously know fa about.
@Igaf: Sorry, did I make a technical error?
RRP against new price is admittedly a potential gulf. I guess I’m of the view that $300 for one of these new is a stupid price, might be different if it were an original design or remarkable quality (something, you’re correct, I know nothing about).
If you’ve tested these units and you’re saying they’re a great buy then good for you for defending the seller, it’s one of the reasons OzB’s a useful resource – there’re often people who can vouch for a product that might otherwise seem more of a risk than it’s worth.
@0jay: You've made lots of errors, including assuming that your idea of a bargain is gold standard, as is your notion -by association - that everyone who thinks $300 for a similar new chair is "stupid". I don't need to test every item that is posted as a deal. Some things are obvious, if not to you.
@Igaf: Assuming my assessment is ‘gold standard’ Oh my.
You certainly appear to be asserting your judgment as ‘gold standard’ in this instance.
As to your needing (or not) to test an item, I don’t hold the view that you do, but if you’re going to assert that I know nothing about the product I’m passing judgment on (as though you know something about it I do not) then I will reasonably assume you have experience with said product.
Apparently you were commenting on ‘something you know fa about’.
As for my belief in the stupidity of buyers, I described it as a stupid price. If you choose to conclude that extends to a judgement on buyers at that price that’s on you.
@0jay: Nothing reasonable about your assumptions at all. You assumed that this wasn't a bargain based on nothing more than your whim and ignorance, you assumed you understood the rules of voting, and you've assumed that the OP was telling lies when he described the age and condition. Your "stupid" implication was obvious. It couldn't have been about the chair's quality or "value", or its cost to produce and supply, or its longevity, because you've already shown you know nothing about it or similar products. Old adage needs some amendment in your case. Some people know the cost(price) of everything, and the value of nothing. Others know neither.
Nothing reasonable about your assumptions
"if you’re going to assert that I know nothing about the product I’m passing judgment on (as though you know something about it I do not) then I will reasonably assume you have experience with said product"
You assumed that this wasn't a bargain
I stated a view that it didn't constitute a bargain. That is not an assumption, it is an expression of opinion. Opinions and assumptions are not even vaguely synonymous.
you've assumed that the OP was telling lies
I'm sorry, what? You need to brush up on your comprehension skills
Your "stupid" implication was obvious
I often describe prices as stupid, it's primarily a judgment on the practice of setting an RRP that is well outside of what is reasonable charge for the item in question. If you choose to conclude that integrates a judgement on the buyer then you're demonstrating a remarkably childish engagement with the world.
As to the chair's value (or indeed its longevity), you are in no position to speak on these matters as it appears that you're pontificating on something you know fa about.
You're getting very personal here, chum. Mebbe you should logoff.
@0jay: I could parse your comments until the cows come home but as a "wise" /s person once observed "you're demonstrating a remarkably childish engagement with the world."
Ahh what the heck, it's the way of the world on this site.
if you’re going to assert that I know nothing about the product I’m passing judgment on (as though you know something about it I do not) then I will reasonably assume you have experience with said product"
I've already dealt with that non-sequitur. What went over your head?
I stated a view that it didn't constitute a bargain. That is not an assumption, it is an expression of opinion. Those two things are not even vaguely synonymous.
Au contraire, you assumed that you knew the value of the item, and you assumed your view was valid that it didn't constitute a bargain despite not knowing the price of similar new chairs, or the condition and age of these chairs, or knowing what the rules say about negative votes.
I'm sorry, what? You need to brush up on your comprehension skills
By means of elimination that was a fair assumption on my part. But it went over your head so I'll elaborate. Reasons for a NEG.
The deal is not the cheapest available - can't be that because you didn't have even the vaguest idea of prices.
Issue with product - can't have been that because you know nothing about the chair
Issue with retailer - unlikely unless you think he lied about the condition
I often describe prices as stupid, it's primarily a judgment on the practice of RRP that is well outside of what is reasonable charge for the item in question. If you choose to conclude that integrates a judgement on the buyer then you're demonstrating a remarkably childish engagement with the world.
I have no doubt you do, because as we can deduce your judgement and knowledge is infallible. Certainty is almost invariably childish, and I say that with utter certainty.
As to the chair's value (or indeed its longevity), you are in no position to speak on these matters as it appears that you're speaking about something you know fa about.
Is that so? And how would you know what I know exactly?
You're getting very personal here, chum. Mebbe you should logoff.
Or maybe you should revoke your neg, learn the rules, and contemplate the effects of arrogance and ignorance.
@Igaf: What an utter fckin (profanity).
I've spilt tea all over my keyboard from laughing so I'ma leave it there jfc
@0jay: Aw, poor fella. Not used to someone pointing out your deficiencies? Ask the OP, maybe he can source a near new second hand keyboard.
@0jay: No doubt you do. I'll take it as I have with most of your comments here. I don't think I'd be using yours because whatever he/she is doing obviously ain't working.
Is Ozbargain Gumtree now?
Hi Rep, fake leather is notorious for cracking & flaking over time so do you know how old they are & the condition please?
These chairs are in great condition your welcome to view them anytime during our trading hours- extremely comfy to sit in, there are roughly 6 months old.
*you're
thanks this is OZ bargains last time i looked not English Class-
All items are second hand/pre-owned and may show signs of wear (i.e. scruff marks and scratches)
*
These chairs are in great condition
Pick one?
around the fire place at home.
is this a joke im too poor to understand?
Those were the days my friend…..altho I doubt PU leather and direct heat are a good combo.
This should go to forum isnt it
And this https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/761906 ?
Why are 2nd hand pc/laptop/phones ok but not a bulk lot of chairs?
This 1993 Mercedes
is going for $7450 https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/1993-mercedes-benz-…
does that mean they can post it on here cos in some people’s opinion it’s a bargain? If so let’s just turn this site into carsales.com.au or the trading post
Not sure why ojay is being negged for questioning why used furniture deals are being posted here.
So other members that are potentially interested should just miss out because you don't think used items should be allowed here?
The 7 people that upvoted this deal? What about the others that don’t want this site turned into gumtree?
What about them?
There's a lot of dribble that is detrimental to this website (cough jv cough), deals that offer used/refirbished items certainly don't come to my mind.
No because it's against the rules of insufficent quantity. It's amazing how many members of this site either don't know, or understand, the rules and the use of a neg vote.
Member since 2022…
Have to get this one a uniform.
That your best shot or your infallible opinion? Not surprising because you clearly "know" your opinion is right eh? Perhaps you're wrong - again?
@0jay: I think I'm repeating what I said about your opinion on what constitutes a deal, but it's worth repeating - don't judge others by your own pathetic standards
You must be a hoot at parties
That's a new one. You should copyright it. Read the rules yet?
lol..make the poor guy work for his neg vote 😂
![[VIC, Used] Cuba Tub Chair, Brown $50 Pickup (Delivery Cost Quote thru Email) @ Sustainable Office Furniture](https://files.ozbargain.com.au/n/69/763069.jpg?h=ce6cfca4)
Ads allowed on OzB now?
I’m pretty comfortable saying $50 for one of these used does not constitute a bargain.