• expired

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 12GB Graphics Card $1061.65 ($999.20 with eBay Plus) Delivered @ Smarthomestoreau eBay

430
Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 12GB Graphics Card $1061.65 ($999.20 with eBay Plus) Delivered @ Smarthomestoreau eBay
Go to Deal
Cashback
Tachicuddles on 19/04/2025 - 22:23 ebay.com.au (1102 clicks)
Last edited 27/04/2025 - 23:53 by 1 other user
APL15APL20

Brand new RTX 5070 for a bit below MSRP.

Not a great card, but for those who want Nvidia, it's around 7-8% worse than a 9070 from a quick techpowerup relative perf check. 9070s also seem to hover around $1050 right now with ATL being around same price.

A few Gigabyte models for sale too albeit a bit higher price:

Windforce (1083.75 / 1020 w/ eBay Plus): https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/127026144618 sold out
Eagle ICE (1104.15 / 1039.2 w/ eBay Plus): https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/127018345358 sold out
Gaming OC (1104.15 / 1039.2 w/ eBay Plus): https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/127012610712

Computing Computer Component Nvidia Palit Video Card

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
Shopping Express
Shopping Express

Comments

    • xrailgun on 19/04/2025 - 22:38
      +54

      I'm not saying whether the 5070 is better or worse than the 9070/xt, but that website is notorious for being childishly anti-AMD for the past decade or so. Best to check other sources like Tom's, GN, HUB.

      • twig on 19/04/2025 - 23:10
        +16

        It's so blatently biased that even /r/Intel has banned links to that site

        Imagine the community you're simping for actively banning you.

        Great video summarising their slow demise

        • stephendt on 20/04/2025 - 08:49
          +13

          The description is hilarious:

          If you are considering an AMD 9000 series GPU because you have been influenced by Reddit, Twitter or a wealthy tech YouTuber, it’s worth understanding AMD’s track record. While their GPUs are often great at beating cherry-picked benchmarks, they normally fall short in real-world gaming performance. Every year, an army of influencers target first-time buyers declaring AMD a godsend for PC gamers. Every year a small percentage of users get duped. Since almost all PC gamers use Steam, the February 2025 Steam statistics are relevant: AMD’s combined market share for discrete 5000/6000/7000 series GPUs is 3%. Meanwhile, Nvidia’s 4060 alone has 9% market share. This reality starkly contrasts with influencer hype. The reason is simple: influencers rarely play games and gamers rarely buy AMD GPUs. Experienced gamers know all too well that high average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, black screens, excessive noise and a limited feature set. It’s notable that AMD’s GPUs have not historically had these problems in consoles because, unlike PCs, consoles operate in a closed environment which is less dependent on robust drivers. Using influencers for hardware performance data is less effective than using foxes to babysit chickens.

          • twig on 21/04/2025 - 09:11
            +1

            @stephendt:

            when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, black screens, excessive noise

            Sorry, are we talking about NVIDIA or AMD at the moment? It's a bit hard to tell today

        • MrChumps on 21/04/2025 - 10:30
          +1

          It's even worse. When Intel employees don't even want the Userbenchmark guy shilling and they know that they are getting beaten by AMD.

          • twig on 21/04/2025 - 16:00

            @MrChumps: HAHAHAHAHAHA I did not know about that

    • FuRyZ on 19/04/2025 - 22:45
      +15

      The 9070xt is significantly better than a 5070. It's slightly slower than a 5070ti on average. https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-9070-x…

      • Daffan on 20/04/2025 - 03:14
        +2

        You would hope it is better when the average one is 25-35% more expensive than this.

    • Jolakot on 19/04/2025 - 22:59
      +4

      Don't use userbenchmark, they've gone to crap. Real shame as they used to be the best free benchmark tool.

      • Toastywf on 19/04/2025 - 23:08
        +18

        they've never been the best benchmark tool lol

        • Jolakot on 20/04/2025 - 13:51

          Best free benchmark tool, plenty of better tools but they're either paid or annoying to setup. Nothing else you can really get someone non-technical to download and run for free without a million steps.

          • Toastywf on 21/04/2025 - 21:40

            @Jolakot: furmark, cinebench, geekbench, 3dmark, crystaldiskmark, antutu, unigine heaven, and many more, all very simple free downloads with 2 click setups and does a significantly better job than UBM ever will.

            • Jolakot on 21/04/2025 - 23:31
              -2

              @Toastywf: Now, absolutely.

              But in the 2010s, you had to download a separate tool for each component, and the benchmark scores were meaningless without comparison ranges for your model.

              Geekbench was notoriously biased back then as well, and 3dmark only had old versions for free.

              Up until around 2019 I'd say.

              • Lighter Fluid on 24/04/2025 - 12:05

                @Jolakot: Lttlabs is by far the best benchmark website atm. No essay expositions etc, just organised windows with nice graphic display for relevant benchmarks and data.

                Give those guys in Canada some time to build up their historic older cards and this will be the go to for everything and everyone.

                P.S. No Linus drama please, purely based on usability the website is free, free of ads and just plain helpful to use.

    • CrispyChrispy on 19/04/2025 - 23:09
      +9

      userbenchmark strikes again

    • DreadEmperor on 20/04/2025 - 00:00
      +7

      Rhodekill: cites userbenchmark

      Takes deep breath

      BAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

    • integriti on 20/04/2025 - 00:20
      +12

      Not only does Userbenchmark steal the first Google search results, it's also stealing OzB first comments too. Honestly I'm impressed at how insidious it is while sickened by its ability to prey upon regular laypeople.

    • WayneOZ on 20/04/2025 - 00:35

      Pfff… Userbenchmark, are you serious dude?

    • Franc-T on 20/04/2025 - 04:20
      +2

      Userbenchmarks are famous for being intel biased to a ridiculous degree.

      The site should be ignored in all circumstances.

      There are plenty of reviewers who you can rely on (Eg Gamers Nexus, Jay2C, Hardware unboxed on youtube) who actually provide testable evidence and explanations of card performance.

    • Huntakillaz on 20/04/2025 - 07:17
      +5

      FYI those who still use Userbenchmark or are new to tech and stumbled onto that site:

      Just read the blurb on AMD CPU's to see the bias against AMD
      https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/SpeedTest/2356328/AMD-Ryzen-7-…
      https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/SpeedTest/2081998/AMD-Ryzen-7-…

      The 9800X3D was the best gaming CPU until the 9950X3D came along
      There's a reason most Bigger Youtubers unanimously moved to using those for their GPU benchmark testing

      It's better to use a combination of the following (+others not mentioned here) to get you information about parts and performance:

      Websites:
      Toms Hardware
      Techspot

      Youtube:
      Gamers Nexus (CPU/GPU & Some Game performances/Investigations & Company/Consumer investigations )
      Hardware Unboxed (CPU /GPU & Some Game performances/Investigations)
      Monitors Unboxed (Monitors)
      Jarrod's Tech (for Laptops)

      Others:
      Linus Tech Tips (CPU /GPU & mostly "lets try this" with absurd tech stuff)
      JaysTwoCents (CPU /GPU & mostly watercooling, and "lets try this")
      Notebook Check (Laptop/Mobile chip compare)
      GSM Arena (Mobile/Tablet compare)
      EPosVox (Streaming related tech)

      Even small youtubers are more reliable and unbiased than Userbenchmark

    • gromit on 20/04/2025 - 12:41
      +3

      You would get a more unbiased comparison directly from Nvidia. userbenchmark has long been a no go zone for getting any sort of decent information.

    • MrMcHairyHead on 20/04/2025 - 13:04
      +3

      Userbenchmark isn't a legitimate site. It's worse than Fox News as far as bias. The owner is having a schizophrenic breakdown or something and only posts anti AMD content.

    • Dienk on 21/04/2025 - 21:10

      68 downvotes and counting lol 😂

  • buellersdayoff on 19/04/2025 - 22:38
    +3

    20% off gets it to msrp and it's considered a bargain? These 5060's should be a fair bit lower.

  • Meteor Anarcom on 19/04/2025 - 23:34
    +1

    HODL for $799. 4070 Super had been $799

  • Bruceflix on 20/04/2025 - 00:21
    +16

    12GB vram. No thanks

    • Hornpub on 20/04/2025 - 00:56
      +1

      anything 12 or below, should be max 1000$ period, more so , should be around 800$

  • flypig on 20/04/2025 - 01:04
    +4

    same performance with 4070 super but higher price, hodl for $700+

  • GenerallyClumsy on 20/04/2025 - 10:41

    Which card for Ai and photo editing? Adobe seems to be leaning more and more in gpu power.

    • MasterScythe on 20/04/2025 - 10:59
      +1

      Using topaz as a benchmark;

      2x 9070XT's outperforms a single 5080 for only a few hunded more total.

      • xrailgun on 20/04/2025 - 11:23

        From personal experience, please don't go AMD if you want to do any AI stuff besides LLMs. No matter how many times AMD announces some incredible AI/rocm milestone. They have never and maybe will never be a face-value "it just works" with real software that people use, rather than AMD's weird in-house tech demos. Maybe Topaz works with AMD, for now, but in 2 years when you want to add or switch to anything else, 99% chance it'll fall back to CPU.

        • Water Bearer on 20/04/2025 - 21:46
          +1

          As much as people dont like it. This is true. Nvidia have a monopoly on many software programs. Only allowing their GPUs to have the best rendering engine, AI development, etc. with other brands locked out. They also have cards of higher AI capabilities. It sucks as it means they can keep charging whatever they want if people want to work with certain software. We need others to improve and stop Nvidia from becoming the Disney of GPUs

      • Water Bearer on 20/04/2025 - 21:49

        Topaz needs both CPU and GPU to work together. Differences are not huge with higher end GPUs. Would rather get a decent GPU and good CPU.

    • xrailgun on 20/04/2025 - 11:25
      +1

      5070TI, but I'd wait for the price to come down a fair bit (like ~$1200)

    • Vaiels on 20/04/2025 - 13:05
      +1

      Have a look at this article from puget systems. GPU doesn't appear to have much of an effect. Just get loads of RAM and fast CPU cores. I noticed a decent subjective performance uplift in Lightroom by upgrading to 64gb RAM and 8 core CPU. For AI probably just something with loads of VRAM? 3090?

      • GenerallyClumsy on 20/04/2025 - 19:04

        Yeah, I'm currently rocking an outdated card (1070) and it really feels like a bottleneck. So anything will be an amazing upgrade!

  • bcYield on 20/04/2025 - 14:36
    -4

    Americans started to cry… Same as Chinese I guess
    https://www.reddit.com?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_a…

  • Deliotron on 20/04/2025 - 16:00

    Upgrade from a 4070 ventus 2x to the eagle ice at 1039$ or wait?

    • gromit on 20/04/2025 - 17:28
      +5

      That is such a minor upgrade for a huge cost. surely worth waiting for a 5070 ti at a decent price or skipping the gen entirely.

      • badonde on 20/04/2025 - 18:38
        +2

        Definitely wait for 6xxx

    • Deliotron on 20/04/2025 - 19:33

      Yea I will wait.. will bash the monkey in the head with a (ram) stick when the hitch escalates lol

  • stevelo on 20/04/2025 - 16:42
    +2

    Slighly faster than 4070 Super, but cost a lot more than 4070 Super.

  • Pacify on 20/04/2025 - 18:02
    +4

    1k for a 70 series card is still absolutely insane

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join