[SUBS, Prime] Warfare (2025) Movie Streaming @ Prime Video

360
[SUBS, Prime] Warfare (2025) Movie Streaming @ Prime Video
Go to Deal
Cashback
n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 21:55 primevideo.com (273 clicks)
Last edited 16/06/2025 - 23:02 by 1 other user

this was a bit of a random find. couldn't see it anywhere in Primevideo app but found it showing as available on Prime in the Apple TV app.

think this is the first time I have seen one of these major new cinema releases go straight to Watch on Prime (movies are released on stream don't count).
usually you have to pay on top of Prime to watch.
but it's showing as $24.99 to Rent, $29.99 to Buy (like with most major new release) and also Watch on Prime.

if you like war movies apparently this is the one to watch. not old war like "All quiet on the western front" or "1917" or "Dunkirk" but this movie is modern war.

I'm not on Prime right now but will definitely be catching this new release on the next month I subscribe. I would watch with bass heavy headphones for this movie.

Director Alex Garland and Ray Mendoza team up for an Iraq War movie based on the veteran’s memories

The harrowing true story of a US Navy Seal platoon surveillance mission gone dangerously wrong. Warfare captures the intensity of combat like never before, and delivers an unflinching portrayal of brotherhood, sacrifice, and survival.

Users who wish to Block "Additions to Streaming Services" can do so by clicking on the Streaming Service Addition tag, then clicking the 3 dot menu, then clicking hide on new deals and/or front page. Ensure that on the home page, the new front page is selected for customisation to show. Video Instructions here or More info here.

Entertainment Movie Streaming Service Addition Video on Demand

Related Stores

Prime Video
Prime Video

Comments

  • OfTheOverflow on 16/06/2025 - 22:03
    +4

    "Not only will America go to your country and kill all your people, they'll come back twenty years later and make a movie about how killing your people made their soldiers feel sad"

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 22:05

      yeah I know military propaganda triggers some people. which ruins the movie for them/they refuse to watch.

      I can enjoy the movie because I don't look too deep into it. some had the same opinion about Top Gun: Maverick. but I thought it was great 10/10 for me I don't care about the propaganda.

      • besttechadvisor on 16/06/2025 - 22:24
        +1

        I enjoy these movies, and I have sympathy for the soldiers sent there to fight, but the quote is pretty apt.

        America only made things worse in the Middle East and Vietnam. Far worse.

      • besttechadvisor on 16/06/2025 - 22:22
        +10

        When did Iraq attack the US?

        • Maloo on 16/06/2025 - 22:37
          -8

          Their leader was supporting, funding and harbouring Al-Qeada terrorists.

          • sangohan on 16/06/2025 - 23:14
            +6

            @Maloo: iraq wasn't really alqaeda afflilated nor have operatives. It was after the fall of sadam, and the instability of the new iraq govt, that lead to alqaeda recruiting the now displaced soldiers of the former iraq army.

            Iraq was attacked because they refused to capitulate to american interests. It was to finish the job after their attack on Kuwait failed. But the US royally stuffed the post-reconstruction, but they just didnt want to invest in the country, and there are still elements which uses the US as a rallying cry to gather power.

            • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 23:37

              @sangohan:

              Iraq was attacked because they refused to capitulate to american interests.

              I'm probably the less knowledgable about this kind of thing here (politics, globalist agenda, war).

              but from what i know 80% of global energy reserves are in Eurasia. one of the biggest places with many buried oil was Iran.
              Iraq is next to Iran, US is a global superpower but is not in Eurasia, so Eurasian superpowers can have the advantage and weaken US military superpower because they can control 80% of the energy reserves.
              US has military bases all over the world, but not many in middle eastern countries.
              US tries to control some of the energy reserve and occupy Iraq (or install their own president) to have first dibs on Iran oil. it was not as easy as they planned. oil runs the world I think it's no real secret. no oil or expensive oil can weaken even the biggest and most high tech military in the world.

              also I don't know if this is why, but it would explain why Iran has nukes.

            • 2ndeffort on 17/06/2025 - 00:41

              @sangohan: Iraq was attacked because their leader Saddam Hussein was a ruthless butcher that usurped power for his Baath party and ruled with an Iron Fist. he use nerve gas on his own citizens and in the 1st Gulf War invaded Kuwait and had to be removed by a US led coalition. Despite having his Arse kicked in Desert Storm and being then left alone with sanctions he continued to sponsor terrorism, commit atrocities and the west thought he was trying to build Weapons of Mass Destruction (later not found). Give his track record of using nerve gas on his own people and of invading neighboring countries, the west didn't wait for him to act again and they took a pre-emptive approach the second time around.

              It was very successful and Saddam's regime was overthrown quickly. He was later found (once met one of the guys that found him) and handed over to the new Iraqi regime who promptly hung him.

              Don't try to make the Iraqi regime the victim here, Saddam was a tyrant and deserved everything he got. Plenty of Iraqis were supportive of the overthrow and the new regime.

              • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 17/06/2025 - 00:47
                +1

                @2ndeffort: ok thanks for explaining.

                this reminds me why I usually don't talk in these discussions. people often misunderstand that I am against or "sympathizing" with one side, or as you say making one side feel like the victim. I honestly just shared what I know and I'm sorry I couldn't really provide or go into detail like you did.

                I never mentioned Saddam or that he did or did not deserve what happened to him. or whether iraqi's were supporting him or not. because honestly I don't know about the details.

                I just know Iran borders with Iraq, so makes sense to control iraq doesn't it? to get direct access to the oil (Iraq also probably has many oil the government just doesn't want you to know about it). Iran doesn't want this obv.
                just tried to give a perspective of one big powerful country, exploiting and using another country to maintain power and make sure there are no weaknesses.. 💁‍♀️

                • 2ndeffort on 17/06/2025 - 00:55
                  -1

                  @n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm: Sorry, didn't mean to be forceful, I had many friends that served in Iraq, literally work with Iraq war vets every day. the whole anti-America thing is a tired trope. Sure they've made mistakes and sure they haven't always been successful and sure they often act in their own interests but most of the time the people they are fighting against are anything but victims. People like Saddam and Bin Laden would massacre thousands without blinking and they use our empathy, pacifism and reluctance to fight as a weapon against us. They know the west's soft underbelly is using the media to promote anti-war sentiment at home, Iran/Hamas is currently giving the world a masterclass in media manipulation. Nobody should cry any tears for Hussein, he was a butcher, the same is true of the Hamas leadership and of the Ayatollah's in Iran.

                  • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 17/06/2025 - 00:58
                    +1

                    @2ndeffort: ok well just fyi I wasn't being supportive of either really. just my understanding of how globalism is working. need to maintain power, need to have access to oil, need to keep selling trading stuff and keep money moving.

                    just in simple terms I think stuff like, ok the oil is in eurasia, so big countries outside of that continent need to work in their own self interest and secure their future? I dunno. a bit out of my depth to be honest.

              • sangohan on 17/06/2025 - 18:42

                @2ndeffort:

                Saddam was a tyrant and deserved everything he got.

                nobody disputes that. But there are plenty of tyrants in the world, and few (or none!) of them have been invaded by america. I'm not saying america is "wrong" for doing it - but the fact is that your belief that they did it for altruistic reasons is blatantly a lie they concocted up to garner public support for the invasion.

                • 2ndeffort on 17/06/2025 - 20:17

                  @sangohan: Please show me where I mentioned Altruism. He was bad for stability, bad for business and a really bad person to boot so he got what he deserved. Military operational decisions are never based on altruism.

      • poisongodmachine on 16/06/2025 - 23:29
        +3

        Actually they were there because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they were saving the world from a potential world war.

        HAHA just kidding, I don't fall for US bullsh*t

      • smartazz104 on 17/06/2025 - 19:24

        They should have invaded Saudi Arabia then.

    • poisongodmachine on 16/06/2025 - 23:30
      +2

      I don't get the downvotes. Classic quote by Frankie Boyle, and it's true too.

  • mr fox on 16/06/2025 - 22:04
    +5

    A navy SEAL, an army ranger and a delta operator walk into a bar.. the Delta operator orders a shot of whisky, the army ranger has a beer, and the navy SEAL writes a book about it.

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 22:07
      +1

      I don't understand the joke. maybe because I don't know that the full difference is between Seal, Army ranger, Delta operator.

      is the seal meant to be the smart one or something??

      • besttechadvisor on 16/06/2025 - 22:18

        There's just a lot of books written by seals. Think David Goggins, Seal team 6, etc.

      • OfTheOverflow on 16/06/2025 - 22:53

        Your final obstacle to joining the SAS (or SASR) is to establish a book deal. Only those who succeed can be recruited.

        • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 23:28
          +1

          ok now you throwing so many acronyms at me. I looked it up and TIL the SEAL in Navy Seal actually stands for Sea Air and Land. never knew that.

          I noticed the comment by fox above used all caps SEAL. but I thought it was hinting at the joke. 😭

      • 2ndeffort on 17/06/2025 - 00:45
        -1

        Its a joke about how Seals cant keep their mouths shut and have to write a book when they get back.

        • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 17/06/2025 - 00:53
          +1

          Its a joke about how Seals cant keep their mouths shut and have to write a book when they get back.

          oh ok. funny. 😂 I thought military are meant to be all secret and that.

    • smigglejiggle on 17/06/2025 - 17:11

      Army Rangers and Delta are from the same group. Probably go with Delta Ranger, Green Barret and Navy Seal

  • Ozjoey on 16/06/2025 - 22:30
    -1

    Movie Review
    https://youtu.be/jwmhg8tN6jQ?feature=shared

    • elarion on 16/06/2025 - 22:34

      mate your profile pic is my all time favourite movie

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 16/06/2025 - 23:24
      +1

      thanks for the link but do you really watch these before you watch the movie? doesn't it contain spoilers?

      a bit worse in my opinion than using a rating between 1 and 10 to decide whether you will enjoy a movie or not.

      other than the trailer which I usually watch months before, I liked to try to soak in the movie so I'm raw dogging it without any opinions or bias.

  • SS625 on 16/06/2025 - 23:10
    +1

    this movie is pretty boring imo

  • SavingUpForAnXbox on 16/06/2025 - 23:15

    Fantastic movie, saw it twice in the cinema's

    • XCOM v2 on 17/06/2025 - 08:20
      -1

      me too, very good

  • yvesmindreader on 17/06/2025 - 00:25
    +1

    It's a good movie but man you don't need "I would watch with bass heavy headphones for this movie." It doesn't have any sound for half of the movie.

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 17/06/2025 - 01:05
      +2

      okay maybe I am wrong. I thought the trailer had a lot of gun shots and explosions I did watch it awhile ago though.

      also just realised it's an A24 movie. so maybe I am going into something completely unexpected.

      • yvesmindreader on 17/06/2025 - 02:13

        Enjoy mate. Thanks for your recommendation again.

    • SBOB on 17/06/2025 - 06:48
      +1

      It doesn't have any sound for half of the movie.

      It does have an annoyingly loud screaming section though:)

  • XCOM v2 on 17/06/2025 - 08:19
    -2

    such a good film

  • TommyGun on 17/06/2025 - 18:43
    -1

    Amazing movie, I was absorbed the whole time. Great to watch on a big screen

  • AmazingJas on 17/06/2025 - 22:02
    +1

    Found this movie interesting and enjoyable but the enemies couldnt hit the broad side of a barn, every ak47 rifle barrel must have been banana shaped.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join