Nissan X-Trail ST $39,990, ST L $44,990 Driveaway + More (Save up to $4,000) @ Nissan Australia

1220
Nissan X-Trail ST $39,990, ST L $44,990 Driveaway + More (Save up to $4,000) @ Nissan Australia
Go to Deal
Associatedthebeep @ The Beep on 06/07/2025 - 11:54 nissan.com.au (5600 clicks)
Last edited 07/07/2025 - 11:52 by 1 other user

Nissan has reduced the price of the X-TRAIL mid-size SUV across every variant and introduced driveaway pricing across the range.

  • ST $39,990 (save $2,255)
  • ST 4x4 $44,990 (save $430)
  • ST L $44,990 (save $3,972)
  • ST L 4x4 $47,990 (save $4,198)
  • N-TREK $49,990 (save $3,761)
  • ST L-HYBRID 4x4 $51,990 (save $3,533)
  • N-TREK 4x4 $52,990 (save $3,987)
  • TI 4x4 $53,990 (save $2,058)
  • TI HYBRID 4x4 $56,990 (save $3,434)
  • TI L 4x4 $56,990 (save $2,184)
  • TI L HYBRID 4x4 $59,990 (save $3,560)

It also features a 10 year warranty, longer than most competitors.

Search full price history, spec and compare models at The Beep.

Automotive Nissan SUV

Related Stores

Nissan Australia
Nissan Australia
The Beep
The Beep
Third-Party

Comments

  • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 11:57

    2026 model?

    • Associatedthebeep @ The Beep on 06/07/2025 - 11:58

      Yes it's for the latest model year.

      • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 11:58
        +10

        2025

        • Slo20 on 06/07/2025 - 12:03

          Not sure why someone downvoted you. The link shows MY25 model which have been built since June 2024.

          • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 12:04
            +6

            @Slo20: Thats fine, could be wrong tapped. I stay positive

            • eddyah on 06/07/2025 - 12:46
              +5

              @Zeee: It's ok bro I upvoted you. Us above average people gotta help each other out!

  • ttkc on 06/07/2025 - 12:00

    this or mazda cx-5?

    • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 12:00
      -7

      Mazda are smaller and no good pick

      • raperozbargain on 06/07/2025 - 13:09
        +5

        Agree that Mazda Cx5 is smaller but still solid pick in this price range. Look at the sale and you'll see :)

        • Bisky1 on 06/07/2025 - 23:57

          Could probably knick one for 35k, maybe with some extras thrown in.

          They called me plenty of times saying they could knock some more off than indicated if I came in, prior to EOFY.

          Think it was 1200 off without negotiating from 37990, with more wiggle room indicated every time without me asking for it (my car wasn't written off so ended that thought).

    • Muscles on 06/07/2025 - 12:06
      +4

      I think the new gen cx5 is due shortly

    • Edsanwong on 06/07/2025 - 12:48
      +12

      They are both in the sam category Medium SUV, but cx 5 space inside is way smaller than xtrail.
      Xtrail previous gen (T31, 32) are famous for CVT failure.
      CX-5 is popular for reliability, plenty of parts and not a CVT

    • Headless on 06/07/2025 - 12:59

      Or toyota 2026 model?

      • PVA on 06/07/2025 - 14:27

        Need to wait until next year and no exact date.

    • Drakesy on 06/07/2025 - 15:30
      +7

      Cx5 if you want the company to be around long enough to see out the warranty

    • ozmau5 on 06/07/2025 - 17:46

      CX-5 is better in terms of quality, especially the cabin. It's better than X-trail in the city IMO.
      X-trail is better in off-road (a light 4x4!), and off course has more space

    • profane01 on 06/07/2025 - 21:45
      +2

      This. The new gen X-Trails are much better than the older ones and feel so much better to drive than the CX5

    • MavrickIsBack on 06/07/2025 - 23:38
      +2

      Nissan ePower all the way.

  • PerthectDeal on 06/07/2025 - 12:02
    +25

    Far to expensive with the recent Chineese compitition.

    • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 12:03
      -3

      Chinese also way expensive

    • SupeNintendoChalmers on 06/07/2025 - 12:34
      +13

      Partially true, but from experience, Xtrails are cheap to repair as parts are plentiful.

      Need a new front bumper= 1-2 weeks wait.

      New bumper for a lot of Chinese cars= lucky of you hey it within a month.

      This will change, of course and is slowly changing.

    • perfectlydark on 06/07/2025 - 15:37
      +1

      i know car prices inflated over the past few years but this is too much for this

  • whichwhatwho on 06/07/2025 - 12:04
    +11

    Thats about 48 too many SKU's for the same dated looking car we've seen on the roads for the last 30 years.

    • Zeee on 06/07/2025 - 12:05

      Nothing much has changed

    • navman on 06/07/2025 - 13:44
      +3

      Which care does this look like from the last 30 years?

      • rel on 06/07/2025 - 17:03

        30 years does seem like a hyperbola (there were some awesome cars around in 1995). But certainly for the last ~10 years it's been much of the same slop.

        • japes on 06/07/2025 - 19:02
          +1

          Na, Nissan's current line all look excellent IMO, they've up'd their game.

      • whichwhatwho on 06/07/2025 - 19:06

        It looks just like the last xtrail, which looks like the last xtrail. Styling is like Subaru now. Just a completely lacking aesthetic that doesn't look like anything.

  • Wiadro on 06/07/2025 - 12:09
    +35

    id rather not buy from a bankrupt car company

  • Whatisthatvelvet on 06/07/2025 - 12:15
    +18

    Will Nissan be around in 10 years?

    • SupeNintendoChalmers on 06/07/2025 - 12:35
      +3

      I reckon they will be, though not in the same state as now.

      I reckon the Japanese government will force Nissan, Mitsubishi and Suzuki to merge if push comes to shove.

      • Secret ID on 06/07/2025 - 12:58
        +5

        Maybe add Honda in the mix.

        • SupeNintendoChalmers on 06/07/2025 - 13:09
          +14

          Honda is a dark horse. Their sales number in Australia is laughable, but their numbers in America are healthy and they are massive in the motorcycle space.

          • Beezum on 06/07/2025 - 17:23
            +1

            @SupeNintendoChalmers: going to call it and say all Japanese brands will go under in the next 10 years (Nissan, Toyota, Mazda, Subaru, Mitsubishi Suzuki). I don't particularly think merging Nissan, Mitsubishi and Suzuki are going to do anything (if anything, it'll just cause more issues as merging = downsizing staff = skills lost). Japanese brands have continuously done the same thing over and over again and vouch for their 'we are the creators of lean..'. That mentality has basically 'driven' them to the point they are now (on the verge of going under) as every company worldwide are not only way more efficient but a hell way more innovative. In terms of Honda MPE, they are big in the motorcycle scene. However, they've slashed prices as they've relised they're not able to move them. Theyve also removed their top Repsol branding from MotoGP. I believe Ducati are the main cats now for that sport. Suzuki is already out of the picture with the motocycle presence in MotoGP. Once the Chinese markets cars enters with more and more competitive price & parts supply start ramping up, I just cant see Japanese cars being able to compete.

            At this point, they've all relied on their 1990's reputation and thats what got them to this point. Nothing more, nothing less.

          • guidedlight on 07/07/2025 - 08:09
            +1

            @SupeNintendoChalmers: Massive in Thailand too where Honda has 47% market share in passenger cars.

      • rodericb on 06/07/2025 - 13:41
        +23

        Behold the 2035 Nimitsubizuki X-Troutlitara!

        • jwh on 06/07/2025 - 13:52
          +1

          I’d buy that. Sounds futuristic and historic at the same time.

      • omblygombly on 06/07/2025 - 17:02

        Honda, Mitsubishi, and Nissan were in talks about merging, but I haven't heard how these have progressed.

        • Ryk on 06/07/2025 - 17:22
          +3

          called off,
          Honda didn't think much of Nissan, thought Nissan could, at best, may be form a new division of Honda.
          Nissan thought they should be equal partners.

          Nissan have, may be, 12 months to work it out.

    • eddyah on 06/07/2025 - 12:48

      Yes they might not sell new vehicles, but there's plenty of money to be made in the servicing / spare parts of sold cars (which make a large portion of revenue for car companies as opposed to pure sales of vehicles).

      • dukeGR4 on 06/07/2025 - 14:11
        +10

        name one former car company that decided to close shop and only make a profit thru servicing and selling spare parts lol. that is some real crazy work.

        • z28 on 06/07/2025 - 15:29
          +7

          Holden

          • dukeGR4 on 23/07/2025 - 19:00

            @z28: good will from GM rather than a business pivot + dealers were only offered 5 years of service contract.

            they shut down because the cars weren't selling, not because they wanted to "focus" on selling spares and servicing.

        • eddyah on 06/07/2025 - 17:09

          no you don't understand, they have parts supplies and connections still.

          just because there are no shopfronts doesn't mean they can't make money on parts.

          servicing indirectly gives the revenue (again via parts).

          Christ your post has 5 upvotes from people that don't know how car companies make money.

          People need to read more books. It's how Tesla's business model really shake up the entire auto industry.

          • dukeGR4 on 23/07/2025 - 18:59

            @eddyah:

            Christ your post has 5 upvotes from people that don't know how car companies make money.

            People need to read more books. It's how Tesla's business model really shake up the entire auto industry.

            ironic. says the one that thinks Tesla do not sell cars? if you've read the fins automative sales is literally their core revenue (80%), aftermarket support is only about 10% FYI. what is your point lol…

            so i ask you this:

            name one former car company that decided to close shop and only make a profit thru servicing and selling spare parts

    • etan on 06/07/2025 - 13:08

      I don't think so. only toyota maybe

    • Stealtho on 06/07/2025 - 14:07

      Will Holden lol

    • Nem0 on 06/07/2025 - 19:38

      Let me consult my crystal ball … will Tesla be around in 10 years?

  • buy swap sell on 06/07/2025 - 12:18
    +22

    Nissan CVT transmission has a terribly unreliable reputation, plenty of informationon that availableon the internet. These are not cars that hold value well. Keep that in mind when selecting your next vehicle.

    • Yepseh on 06/07/2025 - 12:40
      +6

      Great point. So buy a used one that's lost the value already?

      • JIMB0 on 06/07/2025 - 12:54
        +1

        Then you'll be spending money on repairs instead.

      • Bisky1 on 07/07/2025 - 00:03

        Sellers don't actually want to sell at the 'market' price, potentially.

        So very little overlap btw supply and demand.

        The brands everyone gravitates towards on the used market keep a decent resale - plenty of happy sellers getting most of their money back and buyers willing to pay a premium for the perceived (+ actual) benefits and peace of mind.

        If I bought a 40k X-trail, I'd rather keep it than sell it for 22k in 7 years.

    • Supercool on 06/07/2025 - 12:42

      10 year warranty?

      • NoHorny on 06/07/2025 - 12:55

        Yes if you've a lot of spare time to keep complaining and then when they ignore(known problems), class-action. All these would take around 10 years so may be still within a reach for some.

    • Headless on 06/07/2025 - 13:00
      +1

      Their partnership with Renault killed the quality, has been downhill ever since

      • JIMB0 on 07/07/2025 - 17:22
        +1

        They started going downhill in the mid 80's.

    • japes on 06/07/2025 - 13:43
      +8

      Skip the transmission, get the ePower hybrid.

      • Captain Yobbo on 06/07/2025 - 22:03
        -3

        Why would you pay $50k for a lowly Nissan hybrid when you could get a Rav 4 for about the same money and retain a lot more resale value.

        • japes on 07/07/2025 - 06:18
          +4

          Because the Nissan drives far better.

          • Captain Yobbo on 07/07/2025 - 11:07
            +1

            @japes: Meh, if you say so, I'd get a BYD Sealion 6 standard for roughly the same $$$. GQ Patrols were about the last good car Nissan made.

    • nick90 on 06/07/2025 - 14:00
      +2

      Agree that the CVTs are crap. If you service it with Nissan and it fails within the 10 year warranty, Nissan has to replace it. Otherwise, if you service the CVT every 50,000 km, it should last. Nissan states the CVT are sealed for life, which is nonsense.

    • Albert10 on 06/07/2025 - 14:49
      +4

      The CVT on my 2014 Altima still runs smooth. I think CVT is pretty good as long as you service it regularly and you don't do aggressive driving.

    • thomalfa on 07/07/2025 - 00:50
      +1

      I still drive first gen dualis from 2008 currently over 330Mms. I don’t see any issue with cvt, own it from brand new. No timing belt issue either

    • topherboi on 07/07/2025 - 09:01

      Nissan CVT transmission has a terribly unreliable reputation

      FTFY.

      Regardless of the manufacturer, CVTs in general have a bad reputation because they generally aren't serviced.

    • JIMB0 on 06/07/2025 - 12:55

      Nissan is about on par with German cars for reliability.

    • Poor Ass on 07/07/2025 - 06:57

      Statement would only be correct if it was truly full jap

  • freedomofspeech on 06/07/2025 - 12:22
    +4

    rather get the new Subaru Forester my26

    • Duram on 06/07/2025 - 12:42

      Share why please sir ?

      • Rimas on 06/07/2025 - 14:55
        -1

        Because the Nissan is a crappy underpowered engine for such a big mass and the CVT is awful and sounds like a cold press juicer. Oh wait…

        • japes on 06/07/2025 - 19:04
          +3

          So grab a 190kw hybrid with no CVT? They zip.

        • dlovep on 06/07/2025 - 21:54
          +2

          Subaru are not far from CVT issues as well, each to their own…

  • snajper on 06/07/2025 - 12:24
    +9

    Bought demo TIL last year for 43k. Someone smashed into me and got written off. Just bought another one for 49k…. Really Great car….

    • chrisharry53 on 07/07/2025 - 08:34

      That was cheap. I thought I did well getting a 2024 MY24 TiL demo with 3000km for $49k.

  • NoHorny on 06/07/2025 - 12:24
    +5

    I've so much love for X-Trails, but when I think about the Jatco cvt issues and the bad support from dealer/Nissan Australia, ugh I would stay away and won't even touch them with the 10ft pole again. A lot of fun to drive otherwise. If only they ditched the cvt but wishful thinking.

    • FTTNope on 06/07/2025 - 13:18
      +3

      A lot of fun? Basically everything in this segment is as fun as watching paint dry

      • NoHorny on 06/07/2025 - 14:13
        +2

        Well I had a red one, so it went faster (while it lasted).

        ;)

  • shxhshzhz on 06/07/2025 - 12:25
    +1

    Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid PHEV is the same price

    • CocaKoala on 06/07/2025 - 13:11
      +10

      Suddenly the Nissan looks attractive in that case.

    • thomalfa on 07/07/2025 - 00:53

      I would rather get a tank 300

  • Eyetie on 06/07/2025 - 12:26
    +2

    NIssan is almost gone as a company, i wouldnt even look at this as a deal unless you're happy to risk there being no aftermarket service in the near future.

    • nick90 on 06/07/2025 - 14:02

      Same goes for Holden, but the one eyed bogans think they were the greatest cars ever made and truly Australian

      • Poor Ass on 07/07/2025 - 06:58

        Either that or Ford Falcon

  • SahitDagani on 06/07/2025 - 12:26

    This or the mid size EV?

    • LSGH on 06/07/2025 - 15:43
      +2

      EV

  • mokai on 06/07/2025 - 12:27
    +2

    Want manual or not CVT 😉

    • greenlantern on 06/07/2025 - 15:46

      I’m currently driving my Corolla Sportivo and thinking on getting a mid size SUV but not many (second hand) with manual transmission unless it’s the smaller Vitara…

      • GangGang on 06/07/2025 - 19:42

        Ahhh sportivo. I had one around 2008. Loved it but had issues with the gearbox.

        • greenlantern on 06/07/2025 - 21:15

          I bought it new 2004 and the gearbox has finally decided to give up, hence why I’m looking for a bigger vehicle as my kids are growing and just want them to be comfortable plus the paint is peeling away as it was in the sun 😬

    • PVA on 06/07/2025 - 15:47
      +6

      Get the epower model then. No cvt.

  • freeradical on 06/07/2025 - 12:30

    Their eforce hybrid has amongst the worst fuel efficiency of the SUV hybrids. Average 7l/100km urban, 8.5l/100km on highway.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join