• expired

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2GB/16GB - USD $154.99 (~AUD $214.76) Delivered @ AliExpress

170

Assume you buy in USD ($154.99).

Under $200 delivered if you factor 7% cash back at aliexpress via Top Cashback.

Related Stores

AliExpress
AliExpress
Marketplace
AliExpress 1986585
AliExpress 1986585

closed Comments

  • 7% cashback is from Top Cashback not cashrewards it's only 2.4%

      • +6

        There's all the reason in the world to neg you. All of it.

      • +10

        Sure, fanboys no need to neg him. Let us non fanboys do the neg job!

      • And he goes and buy a $500 iPoo..

    • -2

      Did I miss something? What's with the ton of negs, and no explanation?
      It's a valid concern - But I'm not sure if it applies to this phone…
      So I get nailed?! Really helping the community there, people.

      I have a OnePlusX, myself. I looked at a ton of Chinese-aimed phones, but the comments were FULL of confusion over what OS, flashing, supported bands etc. And it all came-down to EXACT models - Which were generally not known (which one the deal was for).

      • While i didn't neg you the model is in the title. There are plenty of deals and threads on redmi note 3 Pro phones on here and whirlpool. There also is a full list of specs and bands in the link.

        • -1

          Thanks for that. Do you know what I'm referring to, though? May

          Deals that show the brand, the model… and even the RAM (sometimes)… but-still all other specs can vary between EXACT model codes.

          I thought I'd bring it up, in case it was a concern. If it doesn't happen with this phone, a simply reply wasn't hard.

        • -1

          @Utopian:
          I know what you mean. If you don't know just ask if this is the best version to buy.
          If you didn't add the "I wouldn't spend $1 without knowing the exact model & bands" you probably wouldn't have been negged so much.

          Also i am sure the guy saying he wouldn't buy any xaiomi phone unless it is under $50 probably led to some of the negs.

        • -1

          @Duff5000: Maybe/Probably. I'm not looking to buy. Maybe I needed to make my advice sugary sweet (or just not post), who knows.

          Either-way, I'm promotion this deal, and the other similar one to a forum member.

  • -1

    Might want to unpublish this. The actual pro version is 3gb memory and is 220 USD. The ones for 154.99 USD are the 2gb version and not the "pro" version.

    • +8

      I think you are wrong - Pro version now refers to the model with Snapdragon processor.

      • "I think you are wrong"

        You sure?

        In the link the $154 deal is for a MTK processor. The pro is $159

        • -2

          Eating popcorn, while you guys argue amongst yourselves here.

          The truth, it burrrrns.

        • @Utopian:

          Seriously you are still going?

          "Oh no there is a $5 difference between 2 versions of the same phone i got negged making a comment on. I better post yet another comment on it days later……"

        • -1

          @Duff5000: Irony, much?

          Most don't sit on ozb waiting to reply instantly. Right to reply has a window of a few hours, huh.

          Quick, Reply to me!!

    • -2

      How dare you suggest this deal isn't flawless (while without any specs/details).

      (joke)
      Have a +

  • Good price - but again 16GB is not enough for me :(

    • +2

      Comes with an SD Slot.

  • -1

    Is the price in the title correct? $154 looks to be the non pro mediatek one. $159 for the pro.

    • -2

      Is this the kinda thing we've just been discussing??

      • -1

        That's a yes.

        • -1

          No we were discussing you saying you wouldnt pay $1 for a pretty high end phone.

          that's a yes

          I didn't neg you before but with a reply like that i will.

        • -1

          @Duff5000: Sorry, but you are wayyy off the mark.

          My confirmed by concern… different specs, phone, model can happen easily.

          I won't gamble money, even a dollar, until its clear what the offer is.

        • @Utopian:

          Me: "we were discussing you saying you wouldnt pay $1 for a pretty high end phone"
          You: "Sorry, but you are wayyy off the mark. I won't gamble money, even a dollar, until its clear what the offer is."

          So i am off the mark but exactly correct at the same time? Nice.

        • -1

          @Duff5000: You still make no sense.
          Quoting what i never said. Confirming what never happened.

          Ps. Sorry, 10hrs to reply. I slept.

        • @Utopian:
          Er, i quoted you word for word from the post immediately above my reply. Not sure how you could forget your own words or fail to understand my post.

          In case you still think i quoted what you "never said": http://i.imgur.com/uYlZUqE.png

          BTW i make no sense? have you tried to read your own posts?
          "My confirmed by concern…" ect.

        • @Duff5000: First time you've seen an autocorrect typo? Oh no.

          You're claimed i said, and we're discussing, "wouldnt pay $1 for a pretty high end phone". Bs. and selectively dodging the problem.

          You're dragging this away from the topic, and my original point that you helped concrete… The models, specs, inclusions are often not what everyone thinks… And people shouldn't buy until its clear/confirmed.

Login or Join to leave a comment