AUD$924.
The price is not the best but still in stock.
They also have 5950x for AUD$1,343.10: https://www.newegg.com/global/au-en/p/pl?d=5950x
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X CPU A$924 Delivered @ Newegg
121
LProfBon on 06/02/2021 - 09:47 newegg.com (468 clicks)
Last edited 06/02/2021 - 11:02 by 2 other users
Last edited 06/02/2021 - 11:02 by 2 other users
Related Stores
closed Comments
roger that
showing out of stock when I put it in my cart
Cannot add the 5900x to my cart as it says Out of Stock, and the 5950x just errors.
it seems they were all gone within 30min.
Getting a 10900 means giving money to Intel.
Show me on the doll where Intel touched you.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Everywhere
userbenchmark is heavily skewed towards Intel and actively tries to reduce AMD scores.
That's fine and all if true but every review ever concludes they have very similar performance so the AMD shouldn't be 40% more to buy. It's not exactly good value at the current market prices.
He is right about userbenchmark.
Getting the latest and greatest is never good value. Tables have juat turned between Intel and AMD. Just wait for the next latest and greatest thing and these will drop in price.
Errors out when adding into cart
so glad i gave up chasing amd cpus that dont exist, 10900k for $629 cheaper and better
Smart move. Not a fan of Intel but AMD at these prices is just the new Intel.
Yep. AMD profits per unit up but their market penetration tapering off. They want to be careful with that… If Intel comes out swinging with Rocket Lake decent supply and price point, it could win significant market share back.
AMD's CPU advances mean little if: 1) You can't obtain them, 2) They are too expensive for their target market, 3) People are not CPU bound and still running apps that where Intel typically performs.
And I hope they do, AMD just got too much head swell they need to be cooled down a bit.
You could grab a Z490 and 10900K for the price of a single AMD CPU, getting ridiculous.
@craving: They really chose a bad time to try and capitalise on the consumer too; an uncertain time for both home and business consumers when inflation is meant to be next to nil.
What their target market really wanted was a maturing of the Zen platform, a "5600/5700x" combo with modest price increases over the previous gen. Instead they release exorbitantly priced CPUs you can't even obtain and need a fridge to cool.
Cheaper but definitely not better.
Less single core and multi core performance with a lot higher power consumption.
Nothing about the 10900k is better except the priceNot from the research i done, this performs better on paper for my needs.
I think it wins in Red Dead Redemption at 1080p but that's about it
@Casomme: I should do the same favour you did me and pull you up on your potential misinformation i suppose. Plenty of games run better on the 10900k but so often there is only a couple fps difference between the CPU's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00VFSezCGAw&ab_channel=Bench…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDEGF7VMlJA&ab_channel=Testi…Not sure what setup this reviewer has but the 5900x runs hotter and draws more power than the Intel in all but the 1 benchmark the 5900x loses. Most other gaming benchmarks I've seen the CPU temps and power draw is very close as is the performance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyM-g4QZMjw&ab_channel=BENCH…@Cutsick: I was obviously being sarcastic and exaggerating.
As a tip stick to Hardware Unboxed and Gamers Nexus for the most accurate and scientifically controlled benchmarks. There are a couple games it does win just like any comparison really. Those power consumption numbers are very wrong.
at 250 Watts make sure you upgrade your air conditioner too.
I've seen you say this before. The Intel is 125w and the AMD is 105w. The review linked above estimates the yearly difference in power consumption cost to be $3. After 100 years of use you'll break even on money saved if you bought the AMD over the Intel now there is a $300 difference in price. I would not make your purchasing decision based on power consumption.
@Cutsick: That is TDP based on base clocks not boost and not real power consumption.
10900k uses ~250watts v 5900x ~180watts.
More if overclocked@Casomme: I have a 10900KA with a 1080ti and every LED known to man on every part of the system. My ASUS Thor PSU with real-time power consumption display hovers between total system consumption of 125w to 135w when I'm doing anything other than playing games due to Intels excellent load based CPU throttling. The real-world difference in power consumption cost is almost non-existant unless you're running your PC at 100% CPU load 24/7 and even then it would take a century to make $300 in difference i.e the difference in cost between the 2 CPU's right now.
@Casomme: No worries, I wouldn't call it misinformation though, I just quoted TDP. My point is still accurate, power consumption should not even come into consideration due to minute real-world cost of power difference.
@Cutsick: It comes into consideration with regards to power supply and thermals not so much cost per watt
@Cutsick: excess power, means excess heat and noise.
Intel started to really fake the TDP with the intel 9900k rated at 95watts, when it really ran at 150w or 200 overclocked. They've been dong the same ever since to fake the efficiency of their cpu's.
Exactly. Intel is already up to 10nth gen, AMD still on 5th gen. Intel ftw is a no brainer.
Thanks, got my 5950x just now.
How!?
still in stock: https://www.newegg.com/global/au-en/amd-ryzen-9-5950x/p/N82E16819113663?Description=5950x&cm_re=5950x--19-113-663--Product
I can't believe the prices for components now. This is the new covid.
Out of stock and above RRP
No bargain here.it wasn't out of stock at the time it was posted.
As for above RRP. Good luck finding it for RRP these days.
Thanks, but don't need it.
My sub RRP Ryzen wasn't too hard to find.that's nice, but do you neg every deal that you don't need?
How long ago was your sub RRP ryzen purchased?
Please put the price in the title