This was posted 1 year 9 months 16 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[PC] Indie Bundle for Abortion Funds - 792 DRM-Free Games/Projects - US$10.00 Minimum @ Itch.io

17827
[PC] Indie Bundle for Abortion Funds - 792 DRM-Free Games/Projects - US$10.00 Minimum @ Itch.io
Go to Deal
Bonding0909 on 04/07/2022 - 16:23 itch.io (2944 clicks)
Last edited 04/07/2022 - 16:42 by 1 other user

itch.io is running a jumbo bundle inspired by recent US events. $10 minimum purchase price for 790+ items, with more to be added until the 7th of July.

100% of the proceeds from this bundle will go to the National Network for Abortion Fund's Collective Power Fund, which moves money directly to abortion funds across 20+ U.S. states, with a particular focus on the South and Midwest (where it is often most difficult to get access to abortions). NNAF’s partnerships with these abortion funds provide direct resources and funds to many of the people most impacted by Roe v. Wade, towards immediate action.

All games are DRM-free, and can be downloaded and installed from the itch.io website. No Steam keys or similar are provided.

I haven't yet perused the list for good items (or sought out posts from people that have done so), but feel free to share in the comments.

Gaming PC Game Video Game

Related Stores

itch.io
itch.io

closed Comments

                    • m0usju1c3 on 06/07/2022 - 22:27

                      @ihfree:

                      Interesting that you'd assume I meant financial cost. Follower of supply side Jesus?

                      I have no idea what that is.

                      • ihfree on 07/07/2022 - 00:02

                        @m0usju1c3: Interesting news sources you follow - this addresses what deaths would look like if straya wasn't vaxxed. Seems you also have the bundle of typical views.

                        Definitely another believer in Capitalist Jesus - the guy who didn't hand out fish and bread because it would destroy the incentive of people to better themselves.

                        • m0usju1c3 on 07/07/2022 - 00:25

                          @ihfree:

                          Interesting news sources you follow - this(youtube.com) addresses what deaths would look like if straya wasn't vaxxed. Seems you also have the bundle of typical views.

                          How about we focus on the argument above and you actually answer some questions instead of searching through my comment history to "lump me in with the rest". It's very easy to flip that around.

                          • ihfree on 07/07/2022 - 00:46

                            @m0usju1c3: Lol, you all talk about how you're different and came to the same conclusion independently.

                            You're kind are as bad as so called SJWs and arguably a prime example of horseshoe politics.

                            • m0usju1c3 on 07/07/2022 - 10:10

                              @ihfree:

                              Lol, you all talk about how you're different and came to the same conclusion independently.

                              And the constant mantra from the naturalist/materialist is that you are all enlightened, neutral and just, critiquing anyone who ascribes to a faith/framework of beliefs, when you can't even provide a meaningful definition of absolute truth/wisdom, reason, logic or morality, while at the same time making absolute truth claims to all those categories.

                              • ihfree on 07/07/2022 - 11:25

                                @m0usju1c3: That's your expectation from this with your "mysterious ways" of asking.

                                I just gave an opinion as to why firearms control is more important than abortion. I'm sorry, I didn't realise there was such an expectation to back that opinion.

                                framework of beliefs

                                If you are interested in frameworks of belief when faith is not involved, I suggest you read about it in your own time.

                                • m0usju1c3 on 07/07/2022 - 17:10

                                  @ihfree:

                                  That's your expectation from this with your "mysterious ways" of asking.

                                  How is it anyway mysterious to expect there to be consistency and substance to a person's ideas and decision, especially when that person's views affect the public domain/policy?

                                  If you are interested in frameworks of belief when faith is not involved, I suggest you read about it in your own time.

                                  It was more specifically directed to you.

    • GandalfTheCheap on 04/07/2022 - 21:06
      +2

      I found one game I've heard of before:

      The Floor Is Jelly

      (Maybe worth $1 if you're really interested?)

      Anyone find any other games someone might actually want?

    • Playboi Carti on 05/07/2022 - 12:59
      +1

      Garfield ± You is probably the most exciting

    • AEKaBeer on 05/07/2022 - 16:23
      +1

      Are you saying those projects should have been aborted?

  • veetor on 04/07/2022 - 16:34
    +14

    I'll wait for Humble Bundle to do their own abortion bundle.

    • Valowick on 04/07/2022 - 22:25
      +10

      They already did. It's called Humble Choice. Absolute abortion

    • payton on 04/07/2022 - 16:37
      +91

      Protip: you don't get to decide what other people talk about

        • payton on 04/07/2022 - 16:40
          +46

          Right back at you

        • Jasonio on 04/07/2022 - 17:02
          +3

          Ngl looks like you're the one triggered

    • Aequitas on 04/07/2022 - 17:17
      +37

      Protip: most of the people here are here for the comments and not the deal

      • GandalfTheCheap on 05/07/2022 - 08:46
        +1

        What deal?

        Out of the 700+ games in the bundle, we've only found one decent game (i.e: a game somebody might actually play if it was free), so far.

        I keep checking this post to see if some helpful unemployed ozBargainer bothered to go through the whole list and find some more, no luck yet…

      • acoma on 05/07/2022 - 09:18

        Agreed. This masterpiece has brightened up my day as I have my (2nd) morning coffee.

    • buckster on 04/07/2022 - 17:10
      +5

      Gonna bite -

      Because it's so much better to let them grow to school age and then get murdered in a gun massacre?

      Clap clap America

      • Caped Baldy on 04/07/2022 - 17:21
        +14

        As soon as they're out of the wombs they should be able to fend for themselves.

      • Almost Banned on 04/07/2022 - 17:31
        -1

        Those aren't the only two options - and there are multiple laws against school shootings too. So you don't need to worry that they aren't dealing with one issue legislatively and ignoring the other.

        • buckster on 04/07/2022 - 17:43
          +12

          Oh they're definitely ignoring school shootings and gun deaths

      • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 19:39
        +8

        Your reasoning is that we should allow people to freely murder innocent and defenceless human beings in the womb at will, because hey, they will get their heads blown off later in life anyway? You've preferred one method of death over another, could you please give me a reason why? While you are there could you provide a reason why me or anyone else should follow your morality?

        • buckster on 04/07/2022 - 21:17
          +2

          Comprehension is bad.

          Pointing out the hypocrisy that some US states ban any form of abortion including in rape because "life is sacred", but encourage people who aren't even of legal drinking age to buy shotguns and rifles (14 year olds can own shotguns in a lot of states), enough of which go on to cause mass murders more or less continuously through the year.

          Think of how many more unwanted children will be brought into the world without purpose, likely to be bullied due to either being adopted or hated by their biological parent till they get old enough to get their hands on a gun.

          GREAT TIMES AHEAD USA

          • Binchicken22 on 04/07/2022 - 21:37
            +3

            @buckster: Yep, better to kill em' off early hey. Stop those damn school shooters before they even learn to load a rifle!

          • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 21:47
            +2

            @buckster: Ok, I want to know how you've reasoned to your current position, do you believe that murder is universally, morally wrong? Is that why we shouldn't allow younger kids or even the general populace to own firearms?

        • FabMan on 04/07/2022 - 22:53
          +1

          Have you seen the states that have banned abortion also have the death penalty. So murder is okay, as long as it is government sanctioned.

          • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 22:59
            +1

            @FabMan: Well I would contend with your definition of murder there with equating murder on par with the example raised of the death penalty. The death penalty is there to serve a discipline and punishment of those who would break (very serious) laws. The government's role predominantly is to punish law breakers. Murder on the other hand is one individual taking another's life.

            Are you trying to draw a distinction between murder/death from an individual/government, or are you trying to establish that ultimately, the state determines universal morality?

            • FabMan on 05/07/2022 - 01:32

              @m0usju1c3: "The government's role predominantly is to punish law breakers."
              What a (profanity) up view of what a government is or should be.

              It seems some people think it is fine for a government to kill people as punishment, it is fine for them to invade other nations and kill entire families, bomb kids or pregnant women, for any made up reasons but they are unhappy to kill a clump of cells that are not a person, that aren't a living human being yet. Why does the fertilization of an egg make it a person? Why is the rational of killing so inconsistent?

              • m0usju1c3 on 05/07/2022 - 12:21
                +1

                @FabMan:

                What a (profanity) up view of what a government is or should be.

                Mate, you've not addressed any of my response to your original comment but just dodged it and are cherry picking my definition of what a government should be. Then in your opinion, governments shouldn't punish wrong doers? Should we do away with law?

                Tell me than FabMan, what is the correct, universal and ultimate standard of what a government should be?? Many criticisms but you haven't even established or substantiated, in an objective manner, why anyone should take your view of a government? Don't keep attacking my worldview just to prop up your own, I've already given you my beliefs and how they can stand as ultimate standards.

                It seems some people think it is fine for a government to kill people as punishment, it is fine for them to invade other nations and kill entire families, bomb kids or pregnant women, for any made up reasons

                I've already addressed this point in our other discussion, the Bible is clear on murder especially murder of the innocent.

                but they are unhappy to kill a clump of cells that are not a person, that aren't a living human being yet. Why does the fertilization of an egg make it a person? Why is the rational of killing so inconsistent?

                A lot of complaining and moaning about the framework of beliefs that Western Civilisation has been built upon to this day, but very little substance to what exactly you are promoting or encouraging? What is the ultimate standard of reason and logic that you are drawing from to make these arguments so we can likewise understand?

          • Almost Banned on 04/07/2022 - 23:54

            @FabMan: If it is government sanctioned it is not, by definition, murder.

            • FabMan on 05/07/2022 - 01:22
              +1

              @Almost Banned: So if abortions become legal, they aren't bad. So can we agree it is fine to kill certain things, as long as it is legal, like cells in the body such as cancer cells, zygotes, morulas, and blastocyst?

            • gizmomelb on 05/07/2022 - 10:43
              +2

              @Almost Banned: yet anti-abortionists protested and harassed people outside abortion clinics for decades before the repeal.

      • oshkoshjosh4 on 05/07/2022 - 09:50
        +1

        Apparently abortion and gun control is part of the same issue. Your brain on MSM I guess.

    • havabeer on 04/07/2022 - 21:06

      If banning guns will stop school shootings, then maybe they should try banning school shootings first.

    • FabMan on 04/07/2022 - 22:54
      +1

      If you get a skin cancer, are you going to kill by having it removed? I hope not, since you don't want others to have a collection of cells killed.

      • alcadive on 05/07/2022 - 06:43
        +6

        I love that you're comparing an embryo to cancer. It seemed shocking at first, but a pregnancy can be just as life-changing as a cancer diagnosis, if not more.

        • gizmomelb on 05/07/2022 - 10:45
          +1

          dating in my 50s has opened my eyes a lot - of the 3 women around my age I've dated in the past 8 years, 2 out of 3 said they didn't want kids but they felt pressured into it. "it was expected".

  • AussieDeals on 04/07/2022 - 16:47
    +88

    I love these kinds of deals! Allows me to identify the various nut job accounts on OzB

    • matris on 04/07/2022 - 16:51
      +22

      Hehe - so which is the nut job? Pro-abortion or Pro-life?

      • [Deactivated] on 04/07/2022 - 16:54
        +41

        I've got bad news for you buddy, if you've got to ask…

        • CheetoJesus on 04/07/2022 - 17:47
          +23

          A nut job is anyone that doesn't agree with your point of view?

          • [Deactivated] on 04/07/2022 - 17:55
            +43

            @CheetoJesus: Nope, but it's fair to say I'd consider an antivaxx, anti woman's rights, racist nutter to be a deeply unpleasant individual and yes, also a nutcase. Funnily enough such people also tend to put forward the best argument for abortion being legalised, just by being themselves :)

            • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 19:43
              -2

              @[Deactivated]: Where's the ultimate standard you refer to that says we ought to be non-racist etc.? The only nut case is the person who's worldview is founded on the presupposition that we evolved from a slimy, primordial soup, into the highly sophisticated human beings we currently are, and then some how determines universal morality and logic, whilst at the same time demanding that others follow this morality and logic? Tell me, what is the source of your reasoning?

              • Exorcist on 04/07/2022 - 21:10
                +3

                @m0usju1c3: No reason and too bad you just have to deal with it

                • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 23:00
                  +2

                  @Exorcist: Excellent, thanks for that. Now shall I do the same? Too bad just deal with it, what next? To what end?

              • FabMan on 04/07/2022 - 22:55

                @m0usju1c3: A question, are you pro the bombing of nations of people with brown skin, like Iraq?

                • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 23:02
                  +1

                  @FabMan: I believe the shedding of innocent blood is evil.

                  • FabMan on 04/07/2022 - 23:08
                    +2

                    @m0usju1c3: You decide who and what is an innocent life?

                    A collection of cells, no more a human than the semen in your nut sack has more of a right to life than people with a different skin colour minding their own business being bombed to shit because of made up reasons? Cells in the womb is life, just not a human life, and the Christian bible agrees with that, if that is your thing.

                    • m0usju1c3 on 04/07/2022 - 23:31

                      @FabMan: No I don't decide, my worldview is that of a Christian worldview, that God the creator only has the authority to determine "who" or "what" even is.

                      A collection of cells, no more a human than the semen in your nut

                      Modern day science and medicine have allowed us to learn that without a doubt, after conception, those cells are indeed a human life. The only difference between a baby in the womb and a grown adult is time of development. Semen, prior to conception, are not human life, just like eggs within the ovaries by themselves are not human life.

                      more of a right to life than people with a different skin colour minding their own business being bombed to shit because of made up reasons?

                      Again I agree with your sentiment of shedding innocent blood, this is why I'm against taking away a baby's life within the womb. But let's flip that statement you just made; do people of colour have more right for life then people within the womb being decapitated, have their limbs torn to pieces and their brains literally sucked out of their skull because a bunch of made up reasons to do so?

                      Cells in the womb is life, just not a human life, and the Christian bible agrees with that, if that is your thing.

                      How exactly are you differentiating "human life" and "life"? While you're at it, since I've already explained my position, what exactly is your worldview of moral absolutes and logic?

                      • FabMan on 05/07/2022 - 02:54
                        +12

                        @m0usju1c3: “my worldview is that of a Christian worldview”
                        Which particular Christian worldview is that? There is so many of them it is hard to keep up, which is strange as you’d think if God’s decrees were so clear there wouldn’t be so many fragmentations of it and Christians wouldn't have killed each other in large numbers to decide what interpretation is the correct one.

                        "Modern day science and medicine have allowed us to learn that without a doubt, after conception, those cells are indeed a human life."
                        That isn't true. The fertilized egg is part of the human development, just like semen and eggs are, but they aren’t yet a human. Why exclude semen and eggs as being human but include a fertilized egg, maybe you want to masturbate or have protective sex without guilt but also want to control the body of women? You cannot have a human without semen or egg, so why is that the stage of a fertilized egg you decree it to be a human being, is that when the soul forms? At least Islam gives a date of the soul formation, 120 days after conception.

                        "do people of colour have more right for life then people within the womb being decapitated, have their limbs torn to pieces and their brains literally sucked out of their skull because a bunch of made up reasons to do so?"
                        Yes, as one is a person, and one isn’t, depending on the stage of development.

                        "How exactly are you differentiating "human life" and "life"?"
                        Sure, this is an important distinction. Well of course life exists without humans, plants and animals as two obvious examples, but we, as an entity, aren’t just a single living being with one type of DNA. As you know we are a collection of cells, many trillions of them, some have our DNA, some don’t, and our cells are all individually alive, but by itself not a human. If you cut off a bit of skin, we wouldn’t call that a human, we’d call that a piece of skin, yet it a collection of our cells with our DNA, dying. Now I’m sure you wouldn’t think a piece of our soul died with it, but rather it is just a bit of skin too. All our cells die and get replaced constantly, we break down foods to build those cells, we poo out dead cells, some of our cells will kill other cells if they detect they are damaged, the cells themselves aren’t a person.
                        Thinking on this, is it Christian doctrine that the fertilized egg is when the soul enters the body? If it does, I can imagine why you might think it is a human, but considering I don’t believe in a soul, to me it is a fertilized egg, then a clump of cells, and then during many processes and changes it becomes a human. Before the stage it becomes a human, an abortion is no more than killing off unwanted and potentially damaging cells.

                        • namgib on 05/07/2022 - 04:07
                          +5

                          @FabMan: Despite some many great replies @FabMan I dont think they will ever understand, either willfully or through lack of capability.
                          I have always found the most entertaining thing in person is whenever they refer to the fetus as a baby you immediately say "fetus". More often than not I found shifting the argument to that small difference in language at least causes them to give up after a while.

                          • gizmomelb on 05/07/2022 - 10:49
                            +3

                            @namgib: agreed.. the 'wilfully ignorant' will never accept any world / scientific view other than their own incorrect one. Even when they profess to caring for everyone they demonstrate they only look out for themselves.

                            • m0usju1c3 on 05/07/2022 - 16:49

                              @gizmomelb: Tell me what worldview is it exactly that you speak of? Could you please provide a definition of it and how you've established universal, inerrant laws of logic, reason and morality?

                              • gizmomelb on 05/07/2022 - 17:14
                                +1

                                @m0usju1c3: You can discuss morality with any other religion on the planet. They will all tell you 'you' (as in Christianity) is wrong. Going back in time Christianity burned amateur scientists alive for spreading heresy that the Earth was not the centre of the universe. Flat earthers still wilfully ignore the overwhelming proof that the Earth is not flat. Though nothing I can say or present to you would sway your undying belief to something different to what matches your belief.

                                • m0usju1c3 on 09/07/2022 - 05:05
                                  -1

                                  @gizmomelb: I could point to many of the atrocities only in the last century thanks to humanistic/atheistic philosophy such as communism, fascism etc.

                                  Obviously faiths would contend with each other regarding which is correct, but I'm asking you the question.

                                  Though nothing I can say or present to you would sway your undying belief to something different to what matches your belief.

                                  It's a rational question I asked in my previous comment to you, wasn't about convincing or swaying me of anything.

                          • m0usju1c3 on 05/07/2022 - 16:48
                            +1

                            @namgib: As I've mentioned to FabMan, modern medicine and science have proven now without a doubt that the embryo/fetus is indeed a human organism, the only difference between a born baby and it is level of development, and you are kidding yourself if you think otherwise.

                            I dont think they will ever understand, either willfully or through lack of capability.

                            No on the contrary I think there is some serious delusion and confusion on the other side, especially if, more than likely, majority of pro-abortionists are atheists or naturalist/materialists. It doesn't take long to expose the belief systems of such individuals as absurd and hypocritical.

                        • m0usju1c3 on 05/07/2022 - 16:44
                          +1

                          @FabMan:

                          Which particular Christian worldview is that? There is so many of them it is hard to keep up, which is strange as you’d think if God’s decrees were so clear there wouldn’t be so many fragmentations of it and Christians wouldn't have killed each other in large numbers to decide what interpretation is the correct one.

                          Before getting into the multiple denominations and convictions amongst Christians, we first have to establish on what basis your worldview/beliefs rests on to substantiate reason and logic? I'm happy to go into depth as to why my particular denomination, which follows the Bible alone as the sole authority of the faith instead of men's traditions, but I think I've granted enough to you now of where I stand on the whole. However it's now on you to provide substance and foundation to your particular beliefs of universal morality, reasoning etc.

                          That isn't true. The fertilized egg is part of the human development, just like semen and eggs are, but they aren’t yet a human. Why exclude semen and eggs as being human but include a fertilized egg, maybe you want to masturbate or have protective sex without guilt but also want to control the body of women? You cannot have a human without semen or egg, so why is that the stage of a fertilized egg you decree it to be a human being, is that when the soul forms? At least Islam gives a date of the soul formation, 120 days after conception.

                          Not going to spend much time on this, you've mashed categories together to support your narrative that the embryo is somehow on par with semen or eggs, it is absolutely false. Here is a simple search for you to browse: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=what+is+an+embryo&atb=v232-…

                          Regarding Islam and the date of the formation of the soul, how exactly is that scientifically proven?

                          Yes, as one is a person, and one isn’t, depending on the stage of development.

                          Refer to my points above about this, I'll say it again modern medicine and science have without a doubt proven that the embryo is indeed a human organism and from then on simply develops.

                          Your last point is kind of covered by this and my comments above as well, but I would really appreciate an answer on my question above please.

            • scud70 on 04/07/2022 - 20:51

              @[Deactivated]: Thanks for the laugh mate have a + 🙂( seriously end bit of Ur comment made me laugh)..

            • Abraxsas on 07/07/2022 - 08:47

              @[Deactivated]: Racists always bring up racism to create a strawman for themselves to 1 up their illogical argument. But i would like to know seeing as you are Pro woman's rights are you for or against transgender men in women's sport? The circles you progressives have to tangle yourselves in to remain relevant is quite amusing. Your pro choice but ah not when it comes to Vaccines, Your Pro choice when it comes to womens rights but not unborn child's life. I could go on but you've already dug a hole to big to get out of…Enjoy.

            • rumchaser on 08/07/2022 - 04:12
              -1

              @[Deactivated]: But isn’t it my body my choice ? Why can you force a people to vaccinate yet not say no to killing a baby ?

              • ihfree on 08/07/2022 - 08:55

                @rumchaser: Who was forced to vaccinate?

                • rumchaser on 10/07/2022 - 07:54

                  @ihfree: You really need to ask that ?
                  And who is forced not to use contraception?

          • GrueHunter on 04/07/2022 - 17:58

            @CheetoJesus: No, just pro-lifers

            Any other cool questions?

      • namgib on 04/07/2022 - 16:55
        +15

        Either can be a nut job. The extreme edges of any issue can be a scary place. But I think the edge of one is much further away than the other here but that could be just from where I am standing.

      • Yummy on 04/07/2022 - 16:57
        -1

        Pro-SEX-y-time.

    • Caped Baldy on 04/07/2022 - 17:22
      +5

      Should post another gun deal or bible sale to see them really come out.

    • HereYeeHereYee on 05/07/2022 - 10:06

      Shockingly disgusting as well!

  • rumchaser on 04/07/2022 - 16:50

    No thanks I won’t support that no matter how good the games offered are .

    • Gladioli on 04/07/2022 - 18:08
      -5

      I agree

  • 1Kenobi on 04/07/2022 - 16:54
    +23

    Does pro choice have to be pro abortion ? This one seems badly aimed ?

    • maverickjohn on 04/07/2022 - 17:08
      +5

      Perfect response.

      • GrueHunter on 04/07/2022 - 17:59
        +2

        So are you for abortion or against it?

        Because a perfect response would make that really clear.

        • maverickjohn on 04/07/2022 - 18:52
          +14

          It's pro choice to have an abortion.
          Like I said i would never have an abortion but there are situations when it may be appropriate. And my feelings should not interfere in that process. The option needs to be there for the woman

        • Ugly on 04/07/2022 - 22:31
          +10

          Bill Clinton is quoted as saying - “abortion should be safe, legal and rare”
          I would consider that viewpoint as pro-choice but not pro-abortion.

          • GandalfTheCheap on 05/07/2022 - 08:55
            +6

            @Ugly: Yep. It's the viewpoint of 98% of humans:

            Abortions should be available when needed, but with sensible limits, so they can't be casually used as contraceptive by people too lazy to use birth control, or done when the baby is old enough to be born safely, etc.

            This satisfies both religious people and women's rights people, unless they are belligerent idiots.

            It's also how it's done in every first world country except the USA, where it's debated only to distract from actual debatable issues, and trick people into voting republican against their own interests.

  • chul00p4 on 04/07/2022 - 16:54
    +58

    Damn, turns out there's a lot of a-holes on ozbargain…

    • Misha Bakunin on 04/07/2022 - 16:57
      +2

      There are a lot everywhere

    • Aureus on 04/07/2022 - 16:57
      +17

      Member Since: 09/08/2012

      Slow learner… :P

      • chul00p4 on 04/07/2022 - 16:58
        +10

        I am the human tortoise.

    • jakeh87 on 04/07/2022 - 17:07
      +13

      Middle aged white balding gamers what do you expect mate 🤣

      • scud70 on 04/07/2022 - 20:52
        +2

        Hell yeh… Minus the white bit!

  • ChillBro on 04/07/2022 - 17:03
    +111

    ✅ Anti vax
    ✅ Pro guns
    ✅ Thinks climate change is a hoax
    ✅ Anti abortion

    Don't need to go to a zoo with these animals on this site lmao

    • buckster on 04/07/2022 - 17:08
      +30

      Hey man you left the flat earthers out.

      HOW RUDE

      • Spendmore on 04/07/2022 - 17:37
        +6

        Don't forget the great reset or reptiles running the world 😂

      • DesiredUsername on 04/07/2022 - 20:23
        +3

        There are dozens of us all around the globe!!!

    • [Deactivated] on 04/07/2022 - 17:09
      +12

      Hahaha was just thinking the same, one of SlavOnion's alts is already busy doing his best snowflake impression above. I'll give it a few hours before grabbing some popcorn and perusing the comments section.

      • TEER3X on 05/07/2022 - 10:22

        SlavOnion. Lmfao.

      • GrueHunter on 04/07/2022 - 18:00
        +36

        Aww, look at you making a desperate bid for relevance

        /head pat

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join